EMF Compare Ganymede Simultaneous Release

Similar documents
EMF Compare Galileo Simultaneous Release

EMFT Mint (Incubation) 0.7 Ganymede Simultaneous Release Review

EMF Ganymede Simultaneous Release

Unified Modeling Language (MDT UML2) 3.0 Galileo Simultaneous Release Review. 4 June, 2009

Acceleo Galileo Simultaneous Release

Object Constraint Language (MDT OCL) 1.3 Galileo Simultaneous Release Review

EMF Europa Simultaneous Release

Tools for mobile Linux Release Review Dec 2009

Planned Review Date: June 10, 2009 Communication Channel: eclipse.tools.emf Dave Steinberg and Ed Merks

EMFT 1.0 Release Review (OCL, Query, Transaction, and Validation)

GMF 2.0 Europa Simultaneous Release

Eclipse Data Tools Platform (DTP) 1.8 Release Review. Eclipse DTP PMC May 28, 2010

Towards A Common Build Infrastructure: Designing For Reusability

Equinox Project 3.6 Release Review

Dali JPA Tools Project Graduation Review

Eclipse Technology Project: g-eclipse

Graphiti Release Review

Embedded Rich Client Platform (ercp) 1.2 Release Review

Eclipse Memory Analyzer Release Review

Eclipse Packaging Project

Eclipse Foundation, Inc. Copyright 2005 by Intel, IBM, Scapa Technologies and others and made available under the EPL v1.0 1

TPTP 4.7 Release Review -- One Quick Foil What s new

Eclipse Data Tools Platform (DTP) 0.7 Release Review. Eclipse DTP PMC March 8, 2006

e4 Project 0.9 Release Review

API Tooling in the Eclipse SDK

ECF 3.0 Release Review

The Galilean Moons of Eclipse

Eclipse Memory Analyzer Release Review 0.8

BPMN modeler project Creation review. Wednesday, Oct. 29 8am PT. Feedback and communication: eclipse.bpmn-modeler newsgroup

Embedded Rich Client Platform (ercp) 1.0 Release Review

Eclipse Process Framework Project

Eclipse Memory Analyzer Graduation, Move and 1.0 Release Review

SCA Tools: new & noteworthy

Planned Review Date: Communication Channel: news://eclipse.technology.linuxtools Andrew Overholt

Eclipse Project 3.6 Release Review

Linux Tools 0.6 Release Review

WSDM = Web Services Distributed Management, an open standard/specified ratified by OASIS

Eclipse Packaging Project

Eclipse Foundation. Provenance and Licensing Considerations. Eclipse IP Team November 2008

The Eclipse Development Process for Committers

Eclipse Technology Project: g-eclipse

Object Teams Release Review. Planned Review Date: July 7, 2010 Communcation Channel: Submitted by: Stephan Herrmann

WindowBuilder Graduation & Release Review

SCA Tools project Creation Review. July

Web Tools Platform (WTP) 3.1

Eclipse project update by the Eclipse project PMC March 11 th 2008

ECLIPSE FOUNDATION, INC. INDIVIDUAL COMMITTER AGREEMENT

Model Driven Development with EMF and EclipseLink (experiences in MDD and generating user interfaces)

Web Tools Platform (WTP) 3.2

DTP Help-Helper for Dynamic Context-Sensitive Help

IP for Eclipse Committers. Janet Campbell Director, Intellectual Property Legal Counsel and Secretary Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

Papyrus: Advent of an Open Source IME at Eclipse (Redux)

Eclipse Collaborative Development

ECLIPSE JAVA DOCUMENTATION

Web Tools Platform (WTP) 3.3

From the RCP Book To Reality. Jean-Michel Lemieux IBM Rational, Ottawa, Canada

Eclipse Packaging Project

John Graham Eclipse Data Tools Platform (DTP) Project PMC Chair

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

CDT 7.0 Helios Release Review. Planned Review Date: June 11, 2010 Communication Channel: cdt-dev Doug Schaefer

Building XML-based content for Eclipse Help: a real experience. Christian Kurzke Gustavo de Paula Daniel Moura

USER GUIDE. MADCAP FLARE 2018 r2. Eclipse Help

BPS79- Sample Reports View

Roundtable: Sell Your First Revit Plug-in on the Revit Exchange Store Saikat Bhattacharya Autodesk Stephen Preston - Autodesk

EclipseCon France 2017 Squaring the Capella circle: Open Source, Agile, Traditional

Mylyn Reviews Project Creation Review

... SysML version SNAPSHOT Developer Guide.... Eclipse

Target Management New and Noteworthy. Martin Oberhuber, Wind River

The Eclipse Modeling Framework and MDA Status and Opportunities

m2e 1.2 Release Review

Eclipse 4.0. Jochen Krause EclipseSource

Buckminster. Helios Review. May, Cloudsmith Inc - Made available under the Eclipse Public License.

DOC2MODEL. This document is a docuware for creation review and describes the doc2model project.

Embarcadero Change Manager 5.1 Installation Guide. Published: July 22, 2009

verapdf Industry supported PDF/A validation

Modellierung operationaler Aspekte von Systemarchitekturen. Master Thesis presentation. October 2005 March Mirko Bleyh - Medieninformatik

Using CVS Repositories with SAS

HCI-4/631 Software Architectures for User Interfaces, Fall 2006

Silk Central Release Notes

Introduction to Eclipse

ADT: Eclipse development tools for ATL

Web Tools Platform (WTP) 3.4

Buckminster. Ganymede Review. May, Cloudsmith Inc - Made available under the Eclipse Public License.

Lyo OSLC4J and OSLC Test Suite 1.0 Release and Graduation Review

Introduction and Purpose 2 History 2 Previous Releases 3 Project Organization 3 PMC Organization 4. WTP 3.11 Goals and Plans 4

Module Road Map. 7. Version Control with Subversion Introduction Terminology

Zest: Move Review. Transition from Mylyn to GEF. Component Lead: R. Ian Bull. University of Victoria & IBM Centre for Advanced Studies

Oracle Identity Manager

Europe on a Disk Geodata Processing with Eclipse and OSGi. Harald Wellmann 10 Nov 2008

Training Course Accreditation

Streaming with Project Capuchin for Adobe Flash Lite developers

ONAP Release Planning

CPSC 491. Lecture 19 & 20: Source Code Version Control. VCS = Version Control Software SCM = Source Code Management

Checklist: Requirements GUI Test tool for Java and/or Web

EAXML Demonstration Platform on Artop/Sphinx.

About the Tutorial. Audience. Prerequisites. Copyright & Disclaimer

MDA. SOA = Model Driven SOA

CISC836: Models in Software Development: Methods, Techniques and Tools

Tutorial Methodologies for Test-Driven Development of OSGi enabled Embedded Devices

USER GUIDE. MADCAP FLARE 2018 r2. What's New

Transcription:

EMF Compare 0.8.0 Ganymede Simultaneous Release June 16 th, 2008

Ganymede Release Talking Point Noteworthy New Features 2 way / 3 way comparison detecting conflics differencing, merging and extensibility diff export Quality of APIs The component lead certifies that the requirements for Eclipse Quality APIs have been met for this release A few classes were marked as provisional ( presentation (this is further detailed in this End of Life Issues: No significant deprecations, deletions, or other end-of-life changes IP Issues: No significant contributions and has been integrated and the component do not use third-party libraries. Committer Changes

( Incubation ) EMF Compare model : differencing merging team API CVS/SVN diff export extensibility

0.8.0 features and non code aspects Features ( conflicts 3 way Comparison (detecting Merge support Differencing Export Extensibility on match/diff/merge Performance enhancements Unit tests 161 unit tests launched on every build Code coverage is about 30% of the diff and 50% of the match core. Non-regression tests Comparison with results and expected results on 15 different models Code quality Checkstyle activated on each distinct plug-in Javadoc represents more than 50% of the source code lines

APIs Metamodels definition and corresponding implementations are considered APIs. Every plugin provides its API through an «api» prefixed package. Core services DiffService / MergeService MatchService ( GenericDiffEngine Generic implementations (GenericMatchEngine, Export diff model Utility classes in org.eclipse.emf.compare ModelUtils Commitment to provide stand-alone diff and match features (JAR ( Eclipse used without Non-API classes and extension points are marked as «internal» through the id or package name.

( provisionning ) APIs UI classes extensibility is not finalized. Clients are not expected to extends the UI classes yet. diff_extension in org.eclipse.emf.compare.diff org.eclipse.emf.compare.internal.team.handler extension point Used to fix issues with the Subversive Team implementation, not considered as finalized yet.

Architectural Issues Since its begining the EMF Compare component has been designed so that every part of the process is extensible ( below (represented with red boxes

Documentation User tutorials Setting up and using the EMF compare component Comparing and merging XML Files Developer tutorials Adding new actions to the export menu Customizing the diff process Domain model Synchronization with EMF Compare Examples Library diff to HTML export Domain model synchronization with EMF Compare Creating differences representations dedicated to UML FAQ on the Eclipse Wiki http://wiki.eclipse.org/emf_compare

Bugzilla Note : these figures are subjects to change as the whole team is in the process of fixing ( 2008 bug until the final release (this snapshot has been taken on May 14,

Tool usability EMF Compare is tightly integrated with org.eclipse.compare support and as such provides the same user interface. Localization Standards End of Life French, Dutch and German translations integrated into Babel No standard exists concerning the model comparison though EMF Compare works nicely with any standard-based metamodel (... UML ) As this is the first release there are no specific end of life concerns.

Communities Talks have been given on the following events: EclipseCon 2007 Model Comparison Panel Eclipse Summit Europe 2007 EMF Compare One Year Later EclipseCon 2008 An Update on EMF Compare Activity on the EMFT newsgroup 55 threads from June 2007 to May 2008 Planet Eclipse about 1 update a month Articles «EMF Compare : vie d'un projet Eclipse» in «Programmez!» Feb 2008 «Comparing XML files» in «Programmez!» June 2008

Schedule Since the feature freeze our commitment was to follow the EMF builds as closely as possible. IP Issues 0.8 Release Plan M4: 2007-01-10 M5: 2008-02-13 M6: 2008-04-02 M7: 2008-05-06 RC1: 2008-05-16 RC2: 2008-05-23 RC3: 2008-05-30 RC4: 2008-06-06 0.8: 2008-06-13 M6 slipped from 2 April to 4 April as EMF slipped from 31 March to 2 April About files and licenses in place and sent to EMO No dependency on external JAR's or libs. IP log has been submitted with the EMFT project The contributions to this release has been recorded in bugzilla : 196438 226565

IP Issues The EMF compare component leadership verifies that The about files and use licenses are in place as per the Guidelines to Legal Documentation. All contributions (code, documentation, images, etc) have been committed by individuals who are either Members of the Foundation, or have signed the appropriate Committer Agreement. In either case, these are individuals who have signed, and are abiding by, the Eclipse IP Policy. All significant contributions have been reviewed by the Foundation's legal staff. All non-committer code contributions, including third-party libraries, have been documented in the release and reviewed by the Foundation's legal staff.

IP Issues (. cont ) The EMF compare component leadership verifies that All Contribution Questionnaires have been completed. The "provider" field of each plug-in is set to "Eclipse.org. The "copyright" field of each feature is set to the copyright owner (the Eclipse Foundation is rarely the copyright owner). Any third-party logos or trademarks included in the distribution (icons, help file logos, etc) have been licensed under the EPL. Any fonts or similar third-party images included in the distribution (e.g. in PDF or EPS files) have been licensed under the EPL. IP Log is available at http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emft/projectinfo/ipquery.php

Project plan Graduating from Incubation status Patch/Changeset for model differences UI Extensibility and reuse Graphical modeler integration proof of concept Remote proxy resolving DiffExtension API stabilization This plan is an initial list, the up to date plan is on the wiki : http://wiki.eclipse.org/emf_compare

Legal Notices Java and all Java-based trademarks are trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States, other countries, or both OMG, EMOF, and XMI are trademarks of the Object Management Group Other company, product, or service names may be trademarks or service marks of others