Department of the Navy XML Naming and Design Rules (NDR) Overview. 22 September 2004 Federal CIO Council XML WG Mark Crawford LMI

Similar documents
UBL Naming and Design Rules Checklist

Department of the Navy XML Naming and Design Rules. Office of the DON Chief Information Officer

UBL NDR 2.0 Checklist

UN/CEFACT/UBL XML Naming and Design Rules Analysis Page 1

XML Naming and Design Rules. Draft 1.1, 14 January 2005

The Future of XML Vocabularies. Creating UBL Conformant Schema Tutorial

XML Naming and Design Rules Draft 1.2, 8 September 2005

Universal Business Language (UBL) Naming and Design Rules 2.0

Federal XML Naming and Design Rules and Guidelines. Mark Crawford

XML Naming and Design Rules

GJXDM Information Exchange Package Methodology Naming & Design Rules (MNDR) Presented by

FEDERAL XML NAMING AND DESIGN RULES

Universal Business Language (UBL) Naming and Design Rules

UBL Library Content Methodology

Universal Business Language (UBL) Naming and Design Rules

Technical Framework Supporting ebusiness Standards. Christian Huemer TMG Chair

Dictionary Driven Exchange Content Assembly Blueprints

Information Model Architecture. Version 1.0

UBL v2 Data Model Architecture Discussion Paper

UN/CEFACT XML Naming and Design Rules Version st Public Review 7 August 2008

DON XML Achieving Enterprise Interoperability

Universal Business Language (UBL) Naming and Design Rules

Universal Business Language (UBL) Naming and Design Rules

Fourth Cycle Validation Report

UN/CEFACT Core Components Technical Specification Version 3.0

A registry model for UN/CEFACT s Core Components

Quick Guide to CAM Dictionaries

Schema Rules for UBL and Maybe for You. Eve Maler XML 2002 Conference 12 December 2002

NIEM. National. Information. Exchange Model. NIEM and Information Exchanges. <Insert Picture Here> Deploy. Requirements. Model Data.

The Future of XML at the IRS and Building Partnerships for Collaboration. Agenda

Business Document Naming and Design Rules Version 1.0

ST.96 - ANNEX I XML DESIGN RULES AND CONVENTIONS. Version 2.0

DTD MIGRATION TO W3C SCHEMA

UN/CEFACT ebxml Core Components Technical Specification. 30 September 2002 Version 1.85

Business Document Naming and Design Rules Version 1.1

XML Design Rules and Conventions (DRC) for the Exchange Network

Step-by-Step Approach to Data Harmonization and Modeling

STANDARD ST.66 DECEMBER 2007 CHANGES

Warfare and business applications

Vocabulary-Driven Enterprise Architecture Development Guidelines for DoDAF AV-2: Design and Development of the Integrated Dictionary

UN/CEFACT Core Components Data Type Catalogue Version September 2009

SDMX self-learning package No. 3 Student book. SDMX-ML Messages

Office of the Government Chief Information Officer XML SCHEMA DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT GUIDE PART I: OVERVIEW [G55-1]

Electronic Business Extensible Markup Language (ebxml) Part 5: Core Components Specification (CCS)

STAR Naming and Design Rules. Version 1.0

UN/CEFACT ebxml Core Components Technical Specification. 11 August 2003 Version 2.0

ebxml CC Dictionary Entry Naming Conventions ebxml Core Components

A Core Component-based Modelling Approach for Achieving e-business Semantics Interoperability

Software Requirements Specification. <Project> for. Version 1.0 approved. Prepared by <author(s)> <Organization> <Date created>

Proposed Revisions to ebxml Technical Architecture Specification v ebxml Business Process Project Team

DATA Act Information Model Schema (DAIMS) Architecture. U.S. Department of the Treasury

- MXV (Model-driven XML Vocabulary) Design and Productivity Tools

ebxml Core Components

Comments on this guide should be sent to Steve Vineski, of the Office of Information Collection.

XML TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

Release 2.5. Part No. E

S-100 schemas and other files

Global Justice XML Data Model.

UN/CEFACT Core Components Data Type Catalogue Version December 2007

Teiid Designer User Guide 7.5.0

Fourth Cycle Validation Report

Proposed Revisions to ebxml Technical. Architecture Specification v1.04

Introduction to Global Data Types in SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1 (preview)

21 February 2009 AUDIT REPORT Page: 1/32 AUDIT REPORT OF THE. D08A ACC and BIE CCL Directories and All associated RSMs and schemas

Software Requirements Specification. <Project> for. Version 1.0 approved. Prepared by <author> <organization> <date created>

HTML vs. XML In the case of HTML, browsers have been taught how to ignore invalid HTML such as the <mymadeuptag> element and generally do their best

Management of Metadata and XML Schemas for e-justice. Pim Keizer Pim van der Eijk

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Obsoletes: 7302 September 2016 Category: Informational ISSN:

Naming & Design Requirements (NDR)

technical memo Physical Mark-Up Language Update abstract Christian Floerkemeier & Robin Koh

Exchange Network Shared Schema Components: Technical Reference

A Standards-Based Registry/Repository Using UK MOD Requirements as a Basis. Version 0.3 (draft) Paul Spencer and others

Teiid Designer User Guide 7.7.0

The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set

XML Design Rules and Conventions for the Environmental Information Exchange Network Version 1.0, September Prologue

UBL Guidelines for Customization Version 1.0

27 September 2009 AUDIT REPORT Page: 1/23 AUDIT REPORT OF THE. D08B ACC and BIE CCL Directories and All associated RSMs and schemas

Economic and Social Council

GUIDELINE NUMBER E-NAVIGATION TECHNICAL SERVICES DOCUMENTATION GUIDELINE

ebix Rules for the use of UN/CEFACT Modelling Methodology (UMM) version 2 Version: 1.1 Revision: -

Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 1: Introduction and Overview

Webinar May 13, 2010

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MARITIME AFFAIRS AND FISHERIES. FLUX Master Data Management Implementation Document v2.1.

lnteroperability of Standards to Support Application Integration

Glossary of Exchange Network Related Groups

Xml Schema Attribute Definition Language (xsd) 1.0

Core Components Technical Specification, Part October 2001 Version 1.7

Specification for Information Exchange (SIX) Language

Step: 9 Conduct Data Standardization

Exchange Network Schema Conformance Report Preparation and Review Process

XML FOR FLEXIBILITY AND EXTENSIBILITY OF DESIGN INFORMATION MODELS

ebxml Business Process & Core Components

HR-XML Schema Extension Recommendation, 2003 February 26

DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.0

Working Group Charter: Web Services Basic Profile

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Implementing the Army Net Centric Data Strategy in a Service Oriented Environment

Feedback from OASIS UBL TC to Draft Core Components Specification 1.8

Search Page Basic Search Advanced Search Exploring search results Showing Properties Showing Details...

Guide to the Core Components Dictionary. ebxml Core Components

Transcription:

Department of the Navy XML Naming and Design Rules (NDR) Overview 22 September 2004 Federal CIO Council XML WG Mark Crawford LMI

Why do you need XML rules? To achieve interoperability! Department (e.g. The DON) Organization A Organization A Dept - X Dept - Y ORACLE Data Dictionary: DeptX.Address.ZipCode DB2 Data Dictionary: LocationX_PostalCode Due to differences in both syntax and business context Dept. A can not exchange ZipCode data with Dept. B without integration costs

The Problem Summarized Conflicting Overlaps DLA XML X2-CICA XML HR-XML Other XML Standards Legacy Data Though semantically equal, the following are 4 different XML tag names <QUANTITYORDERED>2</QUANTITYORDERED> <QuantityOrdered>2</QuantityOrdered> <quantityordered>2</quantityordered> <E_Quantity_Ordered >2</E_Quantity_Ordered> Today, there are hundreds of standard XML syntax and semantics

The DON NDR is the answer NDR compliance results in: Semantic interoperability Unambiguous Syntax Neutral Model (SNM) Standards compliance A foundation for enterprise harmonization

Purpose of this brief Purpose of this brief is to provide a: background of the NDR, An overview of the final guidance, and a path forward

Background DON XML Developer s Guide V. Released May 2002 (Main focus NDR) V2.0 - DON XML WG Team 2 began drafting in 2002 Naming and Design Rules (NDR) Sub-set Significant portion of V2.0 Completed 5/2004 Evolution of the guidance provided in DG. NDR products to be delivered NDR Guidance (eventually to be incorporated into DG 2.0) Complete Schema Examples

Current NDR Status NDR Final Draft Released to DON BSC and XML work group 6/7/2004 Final NDR DRAFT includes: Comprehensive set of NDR s Information analysis method - UMM Working Schema example package Specifications TBD by BSC Awaiting DON CIO sign out anticipate by end of September

The DON XML NDR Strategy Provide clear guidance Information analysis (Data modeling) Schema design Align with FEA DRM ISO 79 Reuse existing Voluntary Consensus Standards OASIS Universal Business Language NDR Introduce principles and concepts ISO 5000-5 Core Components Business Information Entity (BIE) ebxml

Intended audience DON XML Developers DON FNC s DON XML Technical Assistance Team (TAT)

Overview of NDR contents NDR topic narratives: Information analysis Data management Namespace and Schema modularity Versioning XML rules: General XML Naming, Definition and Declaration Code List Instance Security Schema example package Appendix E: Enterprise example Strike Plan Development example Battle Damage Report Rules Table Appendix A

Information analysis This section provides an overview of the: CCTS Object Model What are ABIE s, ASBIE s and BBIE s? Uniform Modeling Methodology (UMM) Recommended approach for information analysis CCTS and UBL standard for data modeling

Architecture Layers Model Driven Architecture using BP and Data Analysis bridges the gap between EA and Applications Business defines your core business functions and their uses. Process identifies your value chain and supporting processes Information identifies data types and flows and aids standardization Business Process Information Application identifies systems and software used to manage data and support processes Application Infrastructure Infrastructure documents and assesses technology required to secure, prepare, transport, process, store, and retrieve data across agency

ISO 5000-5 BIE Basic Definition Model Business Context +co nt ex t..* 0..* Business Information Entity (BIE) Business Term 0..* Aggregate Business Information Entity (ABIE) Qualif ier Term 0.. Cardinality.. 0..* Registry Class Unique Identif ier.. Dictionary EntryName.. Definition.. 0..* +basis +basis Core Component Aggregate Core Component (ACC) Object Class Term....* BIE Property Qualif ier Term 0.. 0..* +basis..* CC Property Property Term.. Cardin ality.. 0..* Association BIE Property 0..* Association CC Property Association Business Information Entity (ASBIE) 0..* +basis Association Core Component (ASCC) Basic Business Information Entity (BBIE) Basic BIE Property Basic CC Property 0..* 0..* Data Type Qualif ier Term 0.. +ba sis Basic Core Component (BCC) 0..*

From ISO 5000-5 to Schema Core Component Type (CCT) Data Type (DT) Specifies restrictions on Further restricts Data Type (DT) Xsd:complexType or xsd:simpletype xsd:complextype Defines a set of values of Defines a set of values of xsd:complextype (as BBIE Property) xsd:element (Declared as BBIE Property) Basic Core Component (BCC) Is based on Basic Business Information Entity (BBIE) xsd:element Association Core Component (ASCC) Is based on Association Business Information Entity (ASBIE) As Property Aggregated in As Property aggregated in xsd:complextype xsd:element Aggregate Core Component (ACC) Qualifies the Object Class of Aggregate Business Information Entity (ABIE) Assembly Component Adds extra information Aggregated in Aggregated in Message Assembly Core Component Library

Information analysis method Analyzing information exchange requirements Expressing units of metadata in reusable core components and Business Information Entities (BIEs) Documenting BIEs Using syntax neutral model In the form of a spreadsheet or other medium Ultimately BIE s will be registered objects in the DON XML Registry/Repository CCs and BIE s are the core building blocks of semantically interoperable Schemas

Data management This section provides an overview of the: Use of global elements All enterprise level standards will be global Key exceptions are identifier, code, and measures which may be local only at functional or BSC or equivalent discretion [Ref-ELD] All element declarations MUST be global with the exception of Identifiers, Measures, and Codes, which MAY be declared as local elements if, and only if, approved by the FNC and BSC.

Elements and Types Example: Global Element Schema with Complex Type (Example shown does not include all required documentation for the purposes of this illustration.) <! Global Element > <xsd:element name= Target type= TargetType /> <! Global ComplexType > <xsd:complextype name= TargetType > <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name= TargetID type= TargetIDType /> <xsd:element ref= Description /> <xsd:annotation> <xsd:documentation> <cdp:dictionaryentryname>target. Description. Text</cdp:DictionaryEntryName> <cdp:objectclass>target</cdp:objectclass> <cdp:propertyterm>description</cdp:propertyterm> <cdp:representationterm>text</cdp:representationterm> </xsd:documentation> </xsd:annotation> <xsd:element ref= AssignedOrdnanceREF /> <xsd:element ref= CountryCode /> <xsd:element ref= SurfaceTemperatureMeasure minoccurs= 0 /> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complextype>

Namespace and modularity This section provides an overview of the: DON enterprise and development namespace modularity standard including: Base URN URN naming conventions Minimum required Schema modules

Declaring Schema namespace Namespaces allow Schema to be grouped together Namespaces can include multiple Schema Namespaces allow more flexibility for businesses to exchange data For example, a business can share the same semantics Namespace Rule [NMS] All DON enterprise and development namespaces MUST use the base URN urn:us:gov:dod:don.

DON namespace hierarchy ENTERPRISE NAMESPACE Base URN: urn:us:gov:dod:don DEVELOPMENT NAMESPACE enterprise usn usmc UDT:X:X bie:x:x After importing the BIE Reusable.xsd, all other Enterprise modules are imported by default. <FAM> <Command> QDT:X:X <Command Component> CodeList:X:X Identifier: X:X UCodeIdentifier:X:X...:usn:log:navsup:StrikePlan::0 StrikePlanRoot.xsd..log:navsup:StrikePlan::0 IMPORT EXAMPLE: Developmental XSD Imports shown in dotted lines. The resulting URN is: urn:us:gov:dod:don:usn:log:navsup:strikeplan:.0

Generic Schema Modularity Architecture Message Assembly Document Schema Module Included Internal Schema Module(s) I m p o r t e d I m p o r t e d I m p o r t e d I m p o r t e d I m p o r t e d I m p o r t e d External Schema Modules Common Basic Components (CBC) Schema Module Imported Common Aggregate Components (CAC) Schema Module Imported Imported Imported Imported Unspecialized DataTypes (UDT) Schema Module I m p o r t e d 0..* Imported Code List (CL) Schema Module(s) Specialized DataTypes (SDT) Schema Module Imported 0..* 0..* I m p o r t e d Core Component Type (CCT) Schema Module Imported Imported Core Component Parameters (CCTS) Schema Module Imported

DON enterprise Schema modularity model Root Schema Optional import of external BIE's & Codes BIE:X:X QDT:X:X Identifier: X:X CodeList:X:X UDT:X:X OPTIONAL UCodeIdentifier:X:X

This UML Class diagram expresses the relationship between the Core Component Type Measure, the Unqualified Data Type Measure. Type, and a Qualified Data Type Temperature_ Measure. Type. Data Type Class Diagram

Versioning This section provides an overview of the: Versioning requirements for all DON Schema components including: Namespace (URN) versioning Schema versioning

DON versioning Schema must be versioned like any other code subject to revision Namespaces are also versioned to support polymorphic processing Example: urn:us:gov:dod:don:usn:log:navsup::0 Repositories and other version control technologies can help (e.g. Canon) You must follow the versioning recommendations contained in the Federal Best Practices for Schema Development guidance Examples of DON NDR Versioning Rules [VER] XML schema version information MUST be defined in a schema and match the version of the namespace in which it resides. [VER2] The major-version field MUST equal for the first release of a namespace. [VER3] The major-version field of a namespace or schema MUST be incremented when the proposed Schema changes impact the compatibility of any previous XML instance based on the related Schema.

General XML rules This section provides an overview of the: Standards adherence (e.g. W3C) Overall Schema structure including: General Schema structure Root element Namespace Documentation All BIE s XML instance rules Namespace, encoding and root element

Standards Adherence Rules [STA] All DON XSD schema design MUST be based on the W3C XML Schema Recommendations: XML Schema Part : Structures and XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes. [STA2] All DON schema and messages MUST be based on the W3C suite of technical specifications holding recommendation status. [RED] Each DON Root-Level Schema module MUST identify at least one global element declaration that defines the content in the schema expression. That global element MUST include an xsd:annotation child element, which MUST further contain an xsd:documentation child element that declares the following: This element MUST be conveyed as the root element in any instance document based on this schema expression.

XML Schema rules This section provides an overview of the: Naming, Definition and Declaration rules for all BIE s ABIE, ASBIE, and BBIE Complex types Root element Data types Code lists

General Naming Rules [GNR] [GNR2] [GNR3] [GNR4] [GNR5] [GNR6] DON XML element, attribute, and type names MUST be in the English language, using the Oxford English Dictionary for Writers and Editors (Latest Ed.). Where both American and English spellings of the same word are provided, the American spelling MUST be used. DON XML element, attribute, and type names MUST conform to CCTS dictionary entry names with all separators and spaces removed. DON enterprise XML element, attribute, and type names MUST NOT use abbreviations or other word truncations (e.g. acronyms), except those in the approved list published by the cognizant FNC. Abbreviations and acronyms MUST be submitted to an FNC for approval. The abbreviations and acronyms list approved by the BSC and FNC MUST be used. DON XML element, attribute, and type names MUST be in singular form unless the concept itself is plural (example: goods).

Metadata [DOC] Every data type definition MUST contain a structured set of annotations in the following sequence and pattern: UniqueIdentifier (mandatory): The identifier that references a data type instance in a unique and unambiguous way. CategoryCode (mandatory): The category to which the object belongs. For example, BBIE, ABIE, ASBIE. DictionaryEntryName (mandatory): The official name of a data type. Definition (mandatory): The semantic meaning of a data type. Version (mandatory): An indication of the evolution over time of a data type instance. QualifierObjectClass (optional): The qualifier for the object class. ObjectClass: The object class represented by the data type. Qualifier Term (mandatory): A semantically meaningful name that differentiates the data type from its underlying UDT. Usage Rule (optional, repetitive): A constraint that describes specific conditions that are applicable to the data type.

Security Rules This section provides an overview of the: Standards adherence to W3C and OASIS recommendations W3C XMLDIGSIG W3C XMLENC

NDR Schema examples This section provides a detailed Schema example package Main document (Appendix E) includes a subset of the overall package Electronic file (.zip) contains the complete example package

SAP Application Integration - NetWeaver Approach NetWeaver Master Data Model will be based on ISO 79 and ISO 5000-5 NetWeaver XML will be based on ISO XML naming and design rules

Summary. The DON XML NDR provides a comprehensive set of XML design rules, applicable guidance and working Schema examples 2. The DON XML NDR supports the DON XML Vision for global DON interoperability 3. The DON XML NDR is suitable as a baseline for federal XML guidelines 4. The NDR is supported by a robust governance structure