SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Similar documents
EXHIBIT 2. [Revisions to Division II of the San Francisco Transportation Code.] Resolution amending San Francisco Transportation Code, Division II, by

[Planning Code - Transportation Demand Management Program Requirement]

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

CONNECT TRANSIT CARD Pilot Program - Privacy Policy Effective Date: April 18, 2014

ORDINANCE NO. _ CITY OF LEOTI, KANSAS

{(. }.) Ordinance Fact Sheet 'P..o... ~~

UNIFORM GUIDELINES RED LIGHT CAMERA ENFORCEMENT

STREET EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM LOW & HIGH IMPACT EVENTS

An ordinance adding Section to CHAPTER 28, MOTOR VEHICLES AND

Revisions to the Right-of-Way Management Ordinance for Wireless Providers Implementing SB1004

Ordinance No. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS:

RESOLUTION DIGEST

You Could Kill Someone and Go to Jail for Talking or Texting While Driving California Vehicle Code Sections 23123, 23124

Unified Development Code. Public Workshop No. 3 November 7, 2017

Municipal Ticket Information Bylaw

CITY COUNCIL CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU HONOLULU, HAWAII

CITY OF DUBUQUE ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY REVISED OCTOBER 24, 2011 RETROACTIVE TO JANUARY 1, 2011

ORDINANCE NO APPROVING A MAILBOX ORDINANCE FOR SHAWANO COUNTY

CELLULAR TELEPHONE USE POLICY

Food Safety Certification

Requirements for Individuals and Businesses Offering to Work or

DATE: September 2014 Project Sponsors Rachel Schuett and Transportation Team Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Data Collection

CITY OF NEWARK REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS BUSINESS RULES

SPRING-FORD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

June 17, SR-NASD Policy to Conduct Fingerprint-based Background Checks of NASD Employees and Independent Contractors

ORDINANCE NO Section 1. Section of the Rochester Code of Ordinances is hereby amended and reenacted so as to read as follows:

Municipal Ticket Information Bylaw

2009 MUTCD CONTENT Introduction Part 1 General Part 2 Signs Part 3 Markings Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals Part 5 Traffic Control Devices for Low

Electric Sample Form No Agreement for Unmetered Low Wattage Equipment Connected to Customer-Owned Street Light Facilities

July 1, 1999 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

California Code of Regulations TITLE 21. PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION 1. DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES CHAPTER 1. OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT

the City of Palm Bay Brevard County Florida held on November

IC Chapter Assessor-Appraiser Examination and Certification

Regulatory Notice 18-27

Executive Summary Adoption of Amendments to the TDM Program Standards HEARING DATE: JANUARY 19, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DRAFT. Amendment to Chapter 102 Taxation Article I In General, by adding a new Section titled Omitted Real Property Assessments.

PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

Automated Photo Enforcement Annual Report 2017

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

City of Seattle. IT Policy. Internal Controls Over Voice Communications. Gregory J. Nickels, Mayor Bill Schrier, Chief Technology Officer

CELLULAR TELEPHONE USE POLICY

I MINA'TRENT AI UNU NA LIHESLATURAN GUAHAN 2011 (FIRST) Regular Session

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 1, 1999

'ie BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS REPORT TO THE. aili.,2 T, Q,,,Q (2

CAN-SPAM ACT RULEMAKING

Regulations for Compulsory Product Certification

Ch. 5 UPC SCANNING SYSTEMS CHAPTER 5. UPC SCANNING SYSTEMS AND PLU DEVICES GENERAL

DATE: JANUARY 24,2008 REAL ESTATE DIVISION

Figure 1: Summary Status of Actions Recommended in June 2016 Committee Report. Status of Actions Recommended # of Actions Recommended

Cell and PDAs Policy

The City of Mississauga may install Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Traffic Monitoring System cameras within the Municipal Road Allowance.

Guidelines for the use of the IT infrastructure at the University of Bayreuth 10 February 2005

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 12, 2016

ISSUE BRIEF SC DMV ELECTRONIC TICKET TRANSMISSION MANDATE (November, 2017)

CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED ORDINANCE NO

STATE OF MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL FUNDRAISER SOLICITATION NOTICE INSTRUCTIONS

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

THANK YOU. O ehalf of Philadelphia s a i als, tha k you for volunteering! ACCTPHILLY.ORG TRANSPORT DRIVER MANUAL

Application and Instructions for Firms

Postal Inspection Service Mail Covers Program

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON

CELL PHONE POLICY Page 1 of 5 City of Manteca Administrative Policy and Procedure

Barksdale Alternative Water Supply Project Proposal

Requirements for NCOWCICB certification with Business Succession Exemption Please read and follow carefully.

CUMBRE VISTA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. RECORDS INSPECTION AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURE. 1-Pl) ~ \ 1

Security Surveillance Camera and Video Policy

Current prohibitions:

ITSMR RESEARCH NOTE EFFECTS OF CELL PHONE USE AND OTHER DRIVER DISTRACTIONS ON HIGHWAY SAFETY: 2006 UPDATE. Introduction SUMMARY

Guelph Police Service

TransLink Video Surveillance & Audio Recording Privacy Statement

Cell Phone Policy. 1. Purpose: Establish a policy for cell phone use and compensation allowance.

Joseph Cevetello, Chief Information Officer, Information Systems Department Subject: Bid Award for the Purchase of 345 Mobile Phone Tablets

Certification Requirements and Application Procedures for Persons and Firms.

Los Anseles W Department of 5* Water & Power

TITLE 595. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CHAPTER 10. CLASS D DRIVER LICENSES AND IDENTIFICATION CARDS AND MOTOR LICENSE AGENT PROCEDURES

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1699

Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Secretary. Word Processor. Streets and Facilities Supervisor. Traffic Signal Technician.

Section I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Testimony of Bethanne Cooley Director, State Legislative Affairs CTIA The Wireless Association December 2 nd, 2015 Support for H3747

H. R To reduce unsolicited commercial electronic mail and to protect children from sexually oriented advertisements.

A RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, recent organizational changes require the appointment of an

M E M O R A N D U M. Issue

Known Errors in the 2012 OMUTCD 7/21/17 Update

City of Azusa Light & Water Department. Interconnection and Net Metering Agreement For Generating Facility 10kW or Less

Access Field Entrance Other Constructed Yes (Type)

STUDENT TRANSIT PASS PILOT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS UNION CITY

Model Legislation As approved by the NCSL Executive Committee Task Force on State & Local Taxation of Communications and Electronic Commerce

-P~~. November 24, The Honorable Thomas V. Mike Miller, JI. Senate President State House, H-107 Annapolis, MD 21401

R Delegation of Powers and Duties to the Executive Secretary. R Application for Certification.

Adopted by La Mesa City Council July 9, 2013 Resolution

AGENCY APPLICATION AND PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT MISSOURI POLICE CHIEFS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

City of Palo Alto (ID # 9075) City Council Staff Report

5.9 PUBLIC SERVICES POLICE PROTECTION

UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION. The Telecommunication Regulatory Authority s Board of Directors. Resolution No. 2 of 2010

Update : CalFresh Elimination of Change Reporting in CalFresh

Downtown Boise Multimodal Center

Telephone - Pa. P.U.C. No. 1. Contel of Pennsylvania, Inc. Section 15 d/b/a GTE Pennsylvania Original Sheet 1

AT&T MOBILITY PUERTO RICO INC.

ITEM 43. Simpson dba Basecamp Environmental

Transcription:

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION No. 16-021 WHEREAS, In Fiscal Year 2015, the San Francisco Juvenile Court adjudicated approximately 819 transit violation citations issued to youth; and WHEREAS, In 2008, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), in conjunction with the City of Los Angeles, successfully changed state law to allow the agency to issue an administrative citation, as an alternative to a criminal citation, for adults receiving transit related violations; and WHEREAS, This change shifted the processing of transit violation citations from the Superior Court to the SFMTA and its contractor, similar to parking tickets, but at the request of the San Francisco Juvenile Court, did not apply to citations issued to youth under the age of 18; and WHEREAS, By retaining jurisdiction for administering transit violations committed by youth in the court system, an undue burden is placed on children and families by requiring them to appear in court during school and/or work hours while adults are able to pay or protest their violation by mail, online or by phone; and WHEREAS, Currently adults charged with fare evasion pay a $112 administrative fine, while juveniles may be subject to criminal penalties and administrative fees up to $380; and WHEREAS, On January 1, 2016, Senate Bill 413 became effective, authorizing local jurisdictions to establish by ordinance administrative penalties for transit violations committed by youth, and for citations issued to any passenger or other person who fails to yield a seat reserved for the elderly or people with disabilities; and WHEREAS, The proposed amendment to Division II of Transportation authorizes the SFMTA to set the penalties for violations committed by youth at $56, or fifty percent of the penalty for adults, and failure to yield a seat committed by adults at $112; and WHEREAS, In conjunction with these changes, a number of non-substantive amendments are being proposed to Division I and Division II to delete outdated references, consolidate and clarify definitions of transit violations, and add language to comply with existing state law; and WHEREAS, The proposed Division II amendment to the San Francisco Transportation is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); the CEQA Guidelines provide an exemption from environmental review for the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring or approval of rates, tolls, and other charges, if these rates, tolls, and other charges will be used to meet operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits, or purchase or lease of supplies, equipment, or materials. (Cal. Regs., Tit. 14, 15273.); and,

WHEREAS, On November 23, 2015, the SFMTA, under authority delegated by the Planning Department, determined that the proposed Division II amendment is statutorily exempt from environmental review under Title 14 of the California of Regulations 15273; the proposed action is the Approval Action as defined by the S. F. Administrative Chapter 31; now, therefore be it RESOLVED, That the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors amends San Francisco Transportation Division II 302; to add a penalty for fare evasion and passenger conduct violations committed by youth subject to passage by the Board of Supervisors of an ordinance to create a separate violation and making other nonsubstantive revisions and be it further RESOLVED, That the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors recommends that the San Francisco Board of Supervisors amend San Francisco Transportation Division I to implement the provisions of California Senate Bill 413 authorizing local jurisdictions to establish administrative penalties for fare evasion and other transit violations committed by youth under 18, and any passenger or other person who fails to yield a seat reserved for an elderly person or person with disabilities on any public transit vehicle; and various non-substantive amendments to delete outdated references, consolidate and clarify definitions of transit violations, and adding language to comply with existing state law. I certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors at their meeting of February 16, 2016. Secretary to the Board of Directors San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

RESOLUTION NO. 16-021 [Transportation Penalty for Fare Evasion and Passenger Conduct Violations Committed by Youth] Resolution amending the Transportation to add a penalty upon passage by the Board of Supervisors of an ordinance to create a separate violation for fare evasion and passenger conduct violations committed by youth, and deleting the existing penalties for conversing with an operator and Clipper card violations. NOTE: Additions are single-underline Times New Roman; deletions are strike-through Times New Roman. The Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors of the City and County of San Francisco enacts the following regulations: 1. Article 300 of Division II of the Transportation is hereby amended by amending 302, to read as follows: SEC. 302. TRANSPORTATION CODE PENALTY SCHEDULE. Violation of any of the following subsections of the San Francisco Transportation shall be punishable by the fines set forth below: FORMER CODE SECTION 77, 78 104 96 TRANSPORTATION CODE SECTION Div I 7.2.10 Div I 7.2.11 Div I 7.2.12 DESCRIPTION PEDESTRIANS AND SIDEWALKS Pedestrian Crossings Electric Assistive Personal Mobility Devices Bicycle Riding Restricted FINE AMOUNT Effective July 1, 2014** FINE AMOUNT Effective July 1, 2015** $60.00 $62.00 $60.00 $62.00

100 315(a) 37(c) 202.1 202 38A 38B, 38B.1 38C 38D 37(a) Div I 7.2.13 NUV Violation $60.00 $62.00 ON-STREET PARKING Div I 7.2.20 Residential Parking $76.00 $78.00 Div I 7.2.22 Street Cleaning Div I 7.2.23(a) Div I 7.2.23(b) Parking Meter- Downtown Core Parking Meter- Outside Downtown Core $76.00 $78.00 Div I 7.2.25 Red Zone $103.00 $106.00 Div I 7.2.26 Yellow Zone $88.00 $91.00 Div I 7.2.27 White Zone $103.00 $106.00 Div I 7.2.28 Green Zone $76.00 $78.00 Div I 7.2.29 Parking for Three Days $103.00 $106.00

32(c)(1) 32(c)(2) applicable applicable 32.13, 55 32.21 56 58(a) 61 27, 219 33.5, 39(b), 66 Div I 7.2.30(a) Div I 7.2.30(b) Div I 7.2.30(c) Div I 7.2.30(d) Overtime Parking Downtown Core Overtime Parking Outside Downtown Core Overtime Meter Parking Downtown Core Overtime Meter Parking Outside Downtown Core $76.00 $78.00 $76.00 $78.00 Div I 7.2.32 Angled Parking $60.00 $62.00 Div I 7.2.33 Div I 7.2.34 Blocking Residential Door Median Dividers and Islands $47.00 $48.00 $76.00 $78.00 Div I 7.2.35 Parking on Grades $60.00 $62.00 Div I 7.2.36 100 Feet Oversize Div I 7.2.37 Motorcycle Parking $103.00 $106.00 Div I 7.2.38 Parking in Stand $103.00 $106.00 Div I 7.2.39 Parking Transit-

53(a) 32(a)(1) 32(a)(2) 32(b), 32.6.2, 32.6.3, 32.6.7, 32.6.8, 32.1.10, 32.6.13, 32.6.16, 32.6.18, 32.6.19, 32.6.20, 32.6.21, 32.6.22, 32.6.23, 32.6.24, 32.6.25, 32.6.26, 32.6.27, 32.6.29, 32.6.30, 32.6.31, 32.6.32, 32.6.34, 32.6.35 32, 32.1, 32.1.1, Div I 7.2.40 Div I 7.2.41 Div I 7.2.42 Div I 7.2.43 Only Tow-Away Zone- Downtown Core Tow-Away Zone- Outside Downtown Core Parking Restrictions Parking-Public Property $98.00 $101.00 $88.00 $91.00 $88.00 $91.00

32.1.2, 32.1.3, 32.1.11, 32.1.4, 32.1.7, 32.1.9, 32.2, 32.2.1, 32.2.2, 32.2.3, 32.3, 32.3.1, 32.5, 32.6, 32.6.5, 32.6.6, 32.6.11 33(c) 33.1 21 65 315(c), 412(c), 712(c) 315(d), Div I 7.2.44 Div I 7.2.45 Div I 7.2.46 Misuse Disabled Parking Placard/License Temporary Parking Restriction Temporary Construction Zone $880.00* $875.00* Div I 7.2.47 Remove Chalk Div I 7.2.48 Repairing Vehicle $81.00 $83.00 Div I 7.2.49 Permit on Wrong Car Div I 7.2.50 Invalid Permit

412(d), 712(d) 32.4.2(b), 32.14, 58(c) 32.10, 32.11 32.15 32.14 32.16 32.21A Div I 7.2.51 Div I 7.2.52 Parking Marked Space On-Street Car Share Parking $60.00 $62.00 Div I 7.2.54 Large Vehicle Div I 7.2.60 Div I 7.2.61 Div I 7.2.62 Div I 7.2.63 Div I 7.2.64 Div I 7.2.65 Div I 7.2.66 OFF-STREET PARKING Parking Facility Charges Entrance/Exit Parking Facility Blocking Space Parking Facility Speeding within Parking Facility Block Charging Bay Overtime Parking - Off-Street Parking Meter Misuse Disabled Parking Placard/ License Plate $60.00 $62.00 $60.00 $62.00 $880.00* $875.00* Div II 1009 SFMTA Property

70 194.3 194.3 31, 31.2 103 121 122 25 28.1 63.2 Div I 7.2.70 Div I 7.2.71 Div I 7.3.3 Div I 7.2.72 Div I 7.2.73 Div I 7.2.74 Div I 7.2.75 Div I 7.2.76 Div I 7.2.77 Div I 7.2.80 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS Obstruction of -Vehicle Obstruction of Without Permit Obstruction of Without Permit Driving in Transit- Only Area Driving Through Parades Streetcar Right-of- Way Passing Safety Zones Removal of Vehicles-Collision Weight Restricted Streets COMMERCIAL VEHICLES Vehicles for Hire Parking $1,000, or six months in jail, or both (4th or more offenses within one year) $546.00 $563.00 $1,000, or six months in jail, or both (4th or more offenses within one year) $71.00 $73.00 Div I 7.2.81 Advertising Sign

63.3 68 33.3, 33.3.2 63, 63(A), 63.1 60.5 Police 1183-1183.40 Police 710.2 127 128 128.5 Div I 7.2.82 Div I 7.2.83 Div I 7.2.84 Div I 7.2.86 Div I 7.2.87 Selling from Vehicle Truck Loading Zone Commercial Vehicle Parking Restrictions Idling Engine While Parked Commercial Passenger Vehicle Street Restrictions $88.00 $91.00 $103.00 $106.00 Div. I 7.2.88 For Sale Sign $60.00 $62.00 TRANSIT VIOLATIONS Div I 7.2.101 Fare Evasion $109.00 $112.00 Div I 7.2.102 Div I 7.2.103 Passenger Misconduct Fare Evasion/Passenger Misconduct - Youth Violation $109.00 $112.00 $55.00 $576.00

Div I 7.2.104 Conversing with Operator Fare Evasion - Clipper Card $109.00 $112.00 * This fine includes a 10% additional penalty assessment as mandated by California Vehicle 40203.6. ** e: The California State Legislature has imposed additional fees applicable to all parking citations. As a result, the total fine amount for parking citations includes the following fees: $4.50 for the state courthouse construction fee, $2.50 for the local courthouse construction fee, and $3.00 for the Trial Court Trust Fund fee. 2. Effective and Operative Dates. This ordinance shall become effective 31 days after enactment. Enactment occurs when the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors approves this ordinance. 1 shall become operative upon the effective date of an ordinance enacted by the City to create a violation for fare evasion and passenger conduct violations committed by youth. 3. Scope of Ordinance. In enacting this ordinance, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors intends to amend only those words, phrases, paragraphs, subsections, sections, articles, numbers, letters, punctuation marks, charts, diagrams, or any other constituent parts of the Transportation that are explicitly shown in this ordinance as additions or deletions in accordance with the "e" that appears under the official title of the ordinance.

APPROVED AS TO FORM: DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney By: JOHN I. KENNEDY Deputy City Attorney I certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors at its meeting of February 16, 2016. Secretary to the Board of Directors San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency