ATTACHMENT 2, EXHIBIT 3 Deliverable Expectation Document Template For [Deliverable Title]

Similar documents
Standards and Guidelines Notebook

Standards and Guidelines Notebook September 1, 2017

<PROJECT NAME> IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

<PROJECT> WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

System Requirements Specification

Purpose and Structure of Requirements Specifications (following IEEE 830 Standard)

The Project Charter. Date of Issue Author Description. Revision Number. Version 0.9 October 27 th, 2014 Moe Yousof Initial Draft

Requirements Specifications & Standards

<Name of the project> Software Requirement Specification

Saving the Project Brief document under its own name

Service Description: Identity Services Engine Implementation-Subscription Service


D50: Advances in Software Engineering. Case Study: Defining an Object-Oriented Development Process. Why Define Process?

Communications Management Plan Template

Request for Comments (RFC) Process Guide

REPORT 2015/149 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

Title: Construction Hazard Analysis and Job Safety Analysis

OG0-091 Q&As TOGAF 9 Part 1

Exchange Network Schema Conformance Report Preparation and Review Process

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

User Documentation Development Life Cycle (UDDLC)

IT Governance ISO/IEC 27001:2013 ISMS Implementation. Service description. Protect Comply Thrive

Software Requirements Specification. <Project> for. Version 1.0 approved. Prepared by <author(s)> <Organization> <Date created>

Service Description: Advanced Services Fixed Price Cisco WebEx Advise and Implement Service (0-5,000 Users) (ASF- WBXS-UC-PDIBSE)

CRITERIA FOR CERTIFICATION BODY ACCREDITATION IN THE FIELD OF RISK BASED INSPECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES. HANDBOOK for

Service Description: CNS Federal High Touch Technical Support

Appendix 5 Operational Support Systems Verification Test Plan

Standards for Versioned Documents

Chapter 8: SDLC Reviews and Audit Learning objectives Introduction Role of IS Auditor in SDLC

Password Standard. Suzanne Baker Version Effective Date 7/12/2013 Last Updated 7/12/2013

CONTRACTOR EVALUATION FOR SERVICE CONTRACTS. Name & Title of Dept. Evaluator: Evaluator s Signature: Name & Title of Supervisor Approving Evaluation:

Appendix 6 Operational Support Systems Change Management Plan

Internal Audit Report. Electronic Bidding and Contract Letting TxDOT Office of Internal Audit

Requirement Analysis

Engineering Document Control

<Project Name> Vision

Appendix 6 Operational Support Systems Change Management Plan

HPE Data Center Operations Consulting Service

Clinical Information Security Pre-Purchase Security Assessment Vendor Packet Instructions

Architecture and Standards Development Lifecycle

Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence

Service Description: Advanced Services- Fixed Price: Cisco UCCE Branch Advise and Implement Services (ASF-CX-G-REBPB-CE)

CHESS Release 10.0 Business and Technical Specification

SECTION 10 CONTRACTING FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTANT COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION ACT (CCNA)

Appendix 5 Operational Support Systems Verification Test Plan

[Product] MTM Program Product Software Requirements Specification

Requirements Specification with the IEEE 830 Standard

Government of Ontario IT Standard (GO ITS) GO-ITS Number 56.3 Information Modeling Standard

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION RESOURCES. Test Scenario. Instructions. Version DEC 2006

System Name Software Architecture Description

7/21/2017. Privacy Impact Assessments. Privacy Impact Assessments. What is a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)? What is a PIA?

<Company Name> <Project Name> Software Requirements Specification For <Subsystem or Feature> Version <1.0>

Timber Products Inspection, Inc.

Registration & Certification Update

Annex C. Developing New Engine Oil Performance Standards for API Certification Mark. C.1 General. C.2 Auto/Oil Advisory Panel

OE-PM Project Charter Document

Cisco Data Center Accelerated Deployment Service for Nexus 9000 (ASF-DCV1-NEX-ADS)

Government of Ontario IT Standard (GO ITS)

Smart Meters Programme Schedule 6.3. (Development Process) (CSP North version)

Policy Document. PomSec-AllSitesBinder\Policy Docs, CompanyWide\Policy

REPORT 2015/186 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

AsureQuality Limited. CodeMark Programme. Certificate Holder Responsibilities and Requirements

Service Description: Cisco Security Implementation Services. This document describes the Cisco Security Implementation Services.

Paper for Consideration by CHRIS. Cooperation Agreement Between IHO and DGIWG

Number: DI-SESS Approval Date:

9 March Assessment Policy for Qualifications and Part Qualifications on the Occupational Qualifications Sub-Framework (OQSF)

Nick Rozanski Andy Longshaw Eoin Woods. Sold! How to Describe, Explain and Justify your Architecture

Policy on the Standardisation of Documentation

TAP RETAIL CHANGE REQUESTS

Progress Report Negotiations on the Registrar Accreditation Agreement Status as of 1 March 2012

Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Performance Criteria Transmission Maintenance Procedure No. 6

Annex C. Developing New Engine Oil Performance Standards for API Certification Mark

DoD Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Contractual Language

Cisco QuickStart Implementation Service for Tetration Analytics Medium

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTS DEPT. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

Vendor: The Open Group. Exam Code: OG Exam Name: TOGAF 9 Part 1. Version: Demo

Purchasing Activities Creating a Fixed Cost Service Requisition

26 February Office of the Secretary Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 1666 K Street, NW Washington, DC

Module 7 TOGAF Content Metamodel

FedRAMP General Document Acceptance Criteria. Version 1.0

RFQ OIT-1 Q&A. Questions and Answers, in the order received.

FORMAT & TYPING GUIDE

VMware vcloud Air Accelerator Service

19 March Assessment Policy for Qualifications and Part Qualifications on the Occupational Qualifications Sub-Framework (OQSF)

CompTIA Project+ (2009 Edition) Certification Examination Objectives

SCI QUAL INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD ENQUIRY & APPLICATION/RENEWAL FORM FOR CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATE SCHEME THE MATERIAL HEALTH CERTIFICATE PROGRAM. Version 1.1. April 2015

Accreditation Process. Trusted Digital Identity Framework February 2018, version 1.0

Notes for authors preparing technical guidelines for the IPCC Task Group on Data and Scenario Support for Impact and Climate Analysis (TGICA)

Mathematical and Statistical Sciences

CMSC 447: Software Engineering I

CIS 890: Safety Critical Systems

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Loughborough University (LU) Research Office SOP 1027 LU

EXHIBIT 3-D Core System Integration Plan Template

MAASTO TPIMS Systems Engineering Analysis. Documentation

E2.0 WRITING GUIDELINES for SPECIAL PROVISIONS (SPs)

Amazon Aurora AWS Service Delivery Program Consulting Partner Validation Checklist

Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standard Self-Assessment Questionnaire A and Attestation of Compliance

UK EPR GDA PROJECT. Name/Initials Date 30/06/2011 Name/Initials Date 30/06/2011. Resolution Plan Revision History

Transcription:

ATTACHMENT 2, EXHIBIT 3 Expectation Document Template For [ Title] [This template provides a sample of the required contents of a Expectation Document (DED). Work plans that support the activity summary can be attached, and may be referenced to support the methodology and schedule summary. Each DED will contain the following: a. An introduction of the ; b. Table of contents; c. objectives, methodology, standards, requirements, resources required, format and sample pages; d. Schedule for activities related to the, including without limitation, dates for the consistent with the Secretary of Stateapproved Project Schedule and Project Management Plan and with this Statement of Work and proposed Secretary of State review timeframes for the consistent with the Secretary of State-approved Project Schedule and Project Management Plan and with this Statement of Work; e. Acceptance Criteria which are consistent with the Specifications and other requirements of this Contract and prior s and communications between the parties; f. Contractor correction time frames for the ; g. Payment; and h. Expectation Document Approval.] 1. Introduction [A brief overview defining the purpose of the deliverable and how it fits within the overall completion of the project should be here. Indicate if there are pre-requisite tasks and subsequent tasks.] 2. Table of Contents [List the table of contents or outline of the document. Discuss the content of each major section. Where appropriate or as requested by the project, provide a sample of this document from other engagements/projects or sample content, level of detail and format of key sections.] (1) Section 1 Introduction [This section will provide a high-level overview of the deliverable, its scope and purpose.] (2) Section 2 (3) Section 3 (4) Section 4 Page 1 of 5

(5) Section 5 (6) Appendix A Glossary (definitions must align with Project Glossary of Terms) (7) Appendix B (8) Appendix C 3. Objectives [Describe the deliverable s objectives and scope. Discuss the level of detail to be provided such as will describe the rationale for design decisions, will provide a textual summary of the design with detailed design pseudocode in the appendices, will include database schema diagrams and database table relationships, field sizes and descriptions, and indices and keys. Discuss dependencies, and if subsequent deliverables are dependent upon this deliverable. If such dependency exists, include acknowledgement that if Contractor proceeds with subsequent deliverables dependent upon this deliverable, Contractor proceeds at Contractor s risk. Discuss the intended audience. If the document assumes a specific knowledge level, list the key concepts that must be understood (e.g., understanding of backup rotation schedules, understanding of registry editing, etc.). Do not use vague terms such as basic knowledge of system administration.] (a) (b) (c) Methodology for Creating the [Provide a brief explanation of tasks, activities, and methods to be used to develop the deliverable. If appropriate, include a process flow diagram. Do not duplicate methodologies described elsewhere (e.g., if the design methodology was described in detail in the proposal and project management plan, reference the appropriate document section). Indicate if there are any assumptions or constraints on the development of the deliverable. In cases where the Contractor s methodologies differ significantly from the State s, it may be appropriate to require the Contractor to provide a mapping of its methodology to the State s methodology (as an appendix to the DED and/or the deliverable).] Applicable Standards [List the specific industry and/or government standards that must be observed. Standards and methodologies include, but are not limited to: IEEE, PMBOK, CMMI, SEI, ISO, CA-PMM and other industry best practices. Do not simply list industry standards or IEEE. Indicate the format/order of the standards that are applicable or will be observed or if the contractor will provide a mapping of their format to the standard to show compliance.] Requirements [List the specific requirements for this deliverable from the Request for Proposal, Statement of Work, and/or contract. List the specific source of the requirement, including document name, document date/version, paragraph or page number, Page 2 of 5

and requirement number (from the Requirements Traceability Matrix/Database). Comments may include, but are not limited to: frequency of the requirements, timeframe, dependencies, constraints, etc.] Table 1 - Requirements REQMT # REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION SOURCE OF THE REQUIREMENT COMMENT (d) Lead Approver Reviewers Resources Required [List the specific resources involved in the deliverable preparation and review. Estimate the amount of time required from each key resource, particularly for any sponsor, user, or stakeholder staff involved. If appropriate, list the specific skill or knowledge required, such as knowledge of case management policy or experience with current system s financial reports. It is not necessary to list all contractor staff involved in the preparation, only the key staff or required skills. This list is not intended to replace the work plan resources, but to identify specific individuals/skills needed to ensure successful completion of the deliverable.] Table 2 - Required Resources ROLE NAME(S) RESPONSIBILITIES ESTIMATED NEED (example) Subject Matter Experts Policy Representative IV&V 2 months 5 days 7 days 10 days 10 days 5 days (e) (f) Format [List any required templates, diagrams, tables or specific content required for this deliverable. For instance in design and test deliverables, an updated requirements traceability matrix should be included in the final deliverable. Indicate the format of the document and any associated diagrams, spreadsheets (e.g., MS Word, MS Visio, MS Project, etc.). Estimate the length/size of the document, and number of copies to be delivered.] Sample or sample pages Page 3 of 5

4. Schedule (a) DED Approval Key Dates [List the key activities and due dates in the preparation and review of this deliverable. If appropriate, list key meetings, walkthroughs, inspections, and reviews. These tasks should be consistent with the activities and dates in the work plan and contractual timeframes regarding deliverable delivery, review, and approval/rejection. Include time for state review of the deliverable and contractor incorporation of comments. Indicate if any activities/dates are on the critical path or have significant dependencies. The following is a sample.] Draft Submitted State Review Table 3 - Key Dates KEY ACTIVITY DUE DATE COMMENT Contractor Correction of Deficiencies Final Submitted State Review of Final Approval Contractor Incorporation of Final Corrections (if necessary) *Critical Date (b) Schedule for Updates xx/xx/20xx* Minimum of 10 State Business Days 5 State Business Days Minimum of 10 State Business Days 5 State Business Days [If the deliverable is expected to be updated on a periodic basis, list the proposed schedule of updates and tentative time frames. Dates may be either hard dates (e.g., May 5, 2014) or soft dates (30 days prior to System Test). If appropriate, reference the appropriate RFP/SOW requirement for the update.] REASON FOR DELIVERABLE UPDATE Code/Unit Test phase the Integration and System Test phase the Acceptance Test phase Table 4 - s Update Schedule SOW REFERENCE DATE DUE COMMENT [Reference, as used in SOW; i.e. paragraph #, or unique reference] SOW paragraph 3.2 Page 4 of 5

REASON FOR DELIVERABLE UPDATE the Implementation phase Incorporate updates related to the Warranty Period and First Year Maintenance system release SOW REFERENCE DATE DUE COMMENT 5. Acceptance Criteria [List the specific acceptance criteria for the deliverable. The first criteria should always be Were the requirements met? The criteria should be specific to the deliverable and indicate key needs of the project (e.g., must include detailed description of database sizing, growth considerations, performance considerations, and de-/normalization considerations). Other general review criteria (which are primarily the same for all deliverables) may be referenced or attached. The following are the minimum acceptance criteria.] Did the deliverable comply with the applicable standards from Section 3 (above)? Were all requirements from Section 3 (above) met? Did the deliverable comply with the stated format requirements from Section 3 (above)? Does the deliverable comply with stated industry standards and/or best practices from Section 3 (above)? Is the deliverable consistent within itself (all acronyms, terms, roles, etc. are consistent) and consistent with other deliverables already approved? Did the deliverable meet the general review criteria (e.g., pages numbered, free of formatting and spelling errors, clearly written, no incomplete sections, etc.)? Does the deliverable serve the purpose and objectives stated? 6. Contractor correction time frames for the [Define minor and substantial corrections, and the time frames necessary to complete each type of correction.] 7. Payment [If applicable, indicate if this is a payment deliverable.] 8. Expectation Document Approval [The Contractor may recommend changes to the DED as warranted to improve a particular deliverable, subject to approval by SOS. SOS may also propose changes to the DED to improve its content relative to a particular deliverable, subject to the agreement by the Contractor.] Page 5 of 5