Rajashree Deka Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Similar documents
Mapping Relational data to RDF

RDF and RDB 2 D2RQ. Mapping Relational data to RDF D2RQ. D2RQ Features. Suppose we have data in a relational database that we want to export as RDF

The Implementation of Semantic Web Technology in Traditional Plant Medicine

W3C Workshop on RDF Access to Relational Databases October, 2007 Boston, MA, USA D2RQ. Lessons Learned

An overview of RDB2RDF techniques and tools

The D2RQ mapping language. Richard Cyganiak Presentation to W3C RDB2RDF XG, 23 May 2008

Practical experience: FP7 DebugIT project

Semi-Automatic Discovery of Meaningful Ontology from a Relational Database

RDF Workshop. Building an RDF representation of the the ChEMBL Database. Mark Davies. ChEMBL Group, Technical Lead 30/04/2014

Turning the Web into a Database

Comparative Study of RDB to RDF Mapping using D2RQ and R2RML Mapping Languages

An R2RML Mapping Management API in Java. Making an API Independent of its Dependencies

FrameWeb. Vítor E. Silva Souza ~ vitorsouza

D2RCrime: A Tool for Helping to Publish Crime Reports on the Web from Relational Data

A General Approach to Query the Web of Data

Semantic Web Technologies Linked Open Data & Semantic Web Programming. Heiko Paulheim

Tools for Mapping Ontologies to Relational Databases: A Comparative Evaluation

Benchmarking RDF Production Tools

Enhanced Search and Vocabulary Access for the Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) using the Semantic Web Stack

A Framework for Performance Study of Semantic Databases

UPDATE-ENABLED TRIPLIFICATION OF RELATIONAL DATA INTO VIRTUAL RDF STORES

Incremental Export of Relational Database Contents into RDF Graphs

Semantic Web Fundamentals

COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCE JENA DB. Group Abhishek Kumar Harshvardhan Singh Abhisek Mohanty Suhas Tumkur Chandrashekhara

Semantiska webben DFS/Gbg

R2RML by Assertion: A Semi-Automatic Tool for Generating Customised R2RML Mappings

Package rrdf. R topics documented: February 15, Type Package

Semantic Web and Natural Language Processing

Semantic Web Fundamentals

Triple Stores in a Nutshell

Semantic Queries and Mediation in a RESTful Architecture

Language Specification

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

The Semantic Web Revisited. Nigel Shadbolt Tim Berners-Lee Wendy Hall

Dartgrid: a Semantic Web Toolkit for Integrating Heterogeneous Relational Databases

The Semantic Institution: An Agenda for Publishing Authoritative Scholarly Facts. Leslie Carr

Orchestrating Music Queries via the Semantic Web

Semantic Web. {:Philly ETE} What It Is and Why You Should Care. {:Speakers} {:Ted Coyle} {:Brian Mackay} {:4/9/2010} twitter:brianmackay}

Introduction to RDF and the Semantic Web for the life sciences

Publishing the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate s FactPages as Semantic Web Data

Translating Relational Databases into Linked Open Data

Connecting SMW to RDF Databases: Why, What, and How?

RDF Mapper easy conversion of relational databases to RDF

Vijetha Shivarudraiah Sai Phalgun Tatavarthy. CSc 8711 Georgia State University

Semantics. Matthew J. Graham CACR. Methods of Computational Science Caltech, 2011 May 10. matthew graham

Linked data from your pocket

QuickTime and a Tools API Breakout. TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture.

From Online Community Data to RDF

From Raw Sensor Data to Semantic Web Triples Information Flow in Semantic Sensor Networks

PECULIARITIES OF LINKED DATA PROCESSING IN SEMANTIC APPLICATIONS. Sergey Shcherbak, Ilona Galushka, Sergey Soloshich, Valeriy Zavgorodniy

Semantic Web and Linked Data

Enterprise Information Integration using Semantic Web Technologies:

Lecture Telecooperation. D. Fensel Leopold-Franzens- Universität Innsbruck

Enrichment of Sensor Descriptions and Measurements Using Semantic Technologies. Student: Alexandra Moraru Mentor: Prof. Dr.

3. Queries Applied Artificial Intelligence Prof. Dr. Bernhard Humm Faculty of Computer Science Hochschule Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences

The P2 Registry

COMP9321 Web Application Engineering

OSDBQ: Ontology Supported RDBMS Querying

COMP9321 Web Application Engineering

Ontology Servers and Metadata Vocabulary Repositories

Building Blocks of Linked Data

Open And Linked Data Oracle proposition Subtitle

Proposal for Implementing Linked Open Data on Libraries Catalogue

Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilot. NOTSL Fall Meeting October 30, 2015

Digital Public Space: Publishing Datasets

Preface. Introduction. The Prototype. by Ragnhild Holgersen, Michael Preminger, and David Massey

Semantic Integration with Apache Jena and Apache Stanbol

Gnowsis Adapter Framework: Treating Structured Data Sources as Virtual RDF Graphs

7 Analysis of experiments

SPARQL Protocol And RDF Query Language

A REVIEW ON RDB TO RDF MAPPING FOR SEMANTIC WEB

Prof. Dr. Christian Bizer

Semantic web. Tapas Kumar Mishra 11CS60R32

A tutorial report for SENG Agent Based Software Engineering. Course Instructor: Dr. Behrouz H. Far. XML Tutorial.

Semantic Web Technologies: Assignment 1. Axel Polleres Siemens AG Österreich

State of Bio2RDF. Marc-Alexandre Nolin François Belleau Peter Ansell Other Bio2RDF collaborators

Today: RDF syntax. + conjunctive queries for OWL. KR4SW Winter 2010 Pascal Hitzler 3

Chapter 13: Advanced topic 3 Web 3.0

Mapping Relational Data to RDF with Virtuoso's RDF Views

Linked Data: What Now? Maine Library Association 2017

Profiles Research Networking Software API Guide

Using RDF to Model the Structure and Process of Systems

Serving Ireland s Geospatial as Linked Data on the Web

SEPA SPARQL Event Processing Architecture

THE GETTY VOCABULARIES TECHNICAL UPDATE

Readme file for Oracle Spatial and Graph and OBIEE Sample Application (V305) VirtualBox

Semantic Web Technologies

Implementing and extending SPARQL queries over DLVHEX

Multi-agent Semantic Web Systems: RDF Models

Automapper: Relational Database Semantic Translation using OWL and SWRL

Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation. Beijing (China), July 14 16, 2004

Using Linked Data Concepts to Blend and Analyze Geospatial and Statistical Data Creating a Semantic Data Platform

Extracting knowledge from Ontology using Jena for Semantic Web

The Semantic Planetary Data System

Data integration perspectives from the LTB project

Accessing Relational Data with RDF Queries and Assertions

CC LA WEB DE DATOS PRIMAVERA Lecture 10: RDB2RDF. Aidan Hogan

Multi-agent and Semantic Web Systems: RDF Data Structures

Apache Marmotta. Multimedia Management

The Semantic Event Broker. Francesco Morandi

Transcription:

Rajashree Deka Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Ø The majority of data underpinning the Web are stored in Relational Databases (RDB). Ø Advantages: Secure and scalable architecture. Efficient storage. Reliability. Ø Disadvantages: Difficult to share data across large organizations where different database schemata are used. Most importantly, there is no check on semantics.

Ø Semantic web getting more mature, growing need for RDF applications to access content of legacy databases. Ø Compared to RDB, RDF is: More expressive. More easily processed and interpreted. Easily reasoned over by software agents. Ø Need a way to make data in RDBMS available as RDF.

In order to generate Semantic Web content from a RDB, Tim Berners-Lee proposed a very direct mapping: Each table in the RDB is a RDF class. Each field (column) name is a RDF property. Each record is a RDF node - an instance of the RDF class and so can play the role of a subject or an object in a RDF statement.

Ø Semi-automatic generation of ontology from RDB Read all records, export as RDF triples. Mappings are direct, complex mappings do not usually appear. Need to convert to RDF regularly. Does not allow the population of an existing ontology a BIG limitation! Ø Map existing RDB to an existing ontology Customize mapping according to existing ontology. Complex mappings can be implemented.

Ø Provides an integrated environment for accessing the content of non-rdf, relational databases as virtual, read-only RDF graphs. Ø Using D2RQ we can: Query a non-rdf database using SPARQL queries. Access information in a non-rdf database using the Jena API or the Sesame API. Access the content of the database as Linked Data over the Web.

D2RQ mapping language describes the relation between ontology and RDB D2RQ engine uses mappings to rewrite Jena and Sesame API calls to SQL queries. D2R server - provides a Linked Data view, a HTML view for debugging and a SPARQL Protocol endpoint over the database.

Ø D2RQ mapping language formally defined by http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/d2rq/0.1/ Ø D2RQ namespace is defined by http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/d2rq/0.1# Ø Database compatibility: Oracle MySQL PostgreSQL Microsoft SQL Server ODBC data sources (e.g. Microsoft Access) - mapping generator and automatic detection of column types do not work.

Two command line tools (only on Windows and Unix systems ): Mapping generator: Analyzes database schema. Generates a default mapping file. Resultant D2RQ map is an RDF document in N3 format. Mapping can be used as-is or can be customized. Dump script: Writes the content of the RDB into a single RDF file. Supported syntaxes are "RDF/XML" (the default), "RDF/ XML-ABBREV", "N3", "N-TRIPLE".

Ontology is mapped to a database schema using: d2rq:classmaps Represents a class or a group of similar classes in the ontology. Specifies how instances of the class are identified. d2rq:propertybridges A ClassMap has a set of PropertyBridges which specify how the properties of an instance are created.

# Table dataset (default mapping) map:dataset a d2rq:classmap; d2rq:datastorage map:database; d2rq:uripattern "dataset/@@dataset.dataset_id@@"; d2rq:class vocab:dataset; d2rq:classdefinitionlabel "dataset";. map:dataset label a d2rq:propertybridge; d2rq:belongstoclassmap map:dataset; d2rq:property rdfs:label; d2rq:pattern "dataset #@@dataset.dataset_id@@";. map:dataset_dataset_id a d2rq:propertybridge; d2rq:belongstoclassmap map:dataset; d2rq:property vocab:dataset_dataset_id; d2rq:propertydefinitionlabel "dataset dataset_id"; d2rq:column "dataset.dataset_id"; d2rq:datatype xsd:int; # Table dataset (customized mapping) map:dataset a d2rq:classmap; d2rq:datastorage map:database; d2rq:uripattern "http://escience.rpi.edu/ontology/bco-dmo/ bcodmo/2/0/ DeploymentDatasetCollection_@@dataset.dataset_id@@"; d2rq:class bcodmo:deploymentdatasetcollection; d2rq:classdefinitionlabel "DeploymentDatasetCollection";. map:seealsostatement a d2rq:propertybridge; d2rq:belongstoclassmap map:dataset; d2rq:property rdfs:seealso; d2rq:uripattern "http://osprey.bcodmo.org/dataset.cfm? id=@@dataset.dataset_id@@&flag=view";. map:hasidentifier a d2rq:propertybridge; d2rq:property bcodmo:hasidentifier; d2rq:belongstoclassmap map:dataset; d2rq:column "dataset.dataset_id"; d2rq:datatype xsd:int;. map:dataset_dataset_id a d2rq:propertybridge; d2rq:belongstoclassmap map:dataset; d2rq:property bcodmo:hasparameter; d2rq:referstoclassmap map:parameters; d2rq:propertydefinitionlabel "dataset dataset_id"; d2rq:join "dataset.dataset_id = dataset_parameters.dataset_id"; d2rq:join "dataset_parameters.parameters_id = parameters.parameters_id";.

Ø Customization is very direct in the case where a class in the ontology is represented by a table in the database. Ø Mapping is complicated or sometimes not possible when a class in the ontology is not a table in the database, but a record in a database table.

Ø Define primary keys wherever possible and create indexes. Ø Indicate directions in d2rq:joins. Ø Set d2rq:autoreloadmapping to false whenever not needed. Ø Use hint properties: d2rq:valuemaxlength d2rq:valueregex d2rq:valuecontains

Ø Performs reasonably well with basic triple patterns, performance deteriorates when SPARQL features such as OPTIONAL, FILTER and LIMIT are used. Ø Does not have reasoning capability. Reasoning can be added by using the D2RQ engine within Jena. Ø Integration of multiple databases or other data sources using D2RQ alone is not possible. Ø Read-only, cannot perform INSERT, DELETE or UPDATE operations. Ø Cannot handle complicated database structures like VIEWS.

Ø Virtuoso RDF View: Uses table to class and column to predicate approach. RDB data are represented as virtual RDF graphs. Customization of mapping possible. Ø Triplify: Maps HTTP-URI requests to relational database queries expressed in SQL. No SPARQL support.

Ø R2O: XML based declarative mapping language. Ø DartGrid Semantic Web toolkit: Provides a visual tool to define mapping. Ø RDBToOnto User oriented tool that creates static mapping (RDF dump). Ø Asio Semantic Bridge for Relational Databases (SBDR) and Automapper: Uses table to class approach.

Ø Prof. Peter Fox Ø Patrick West Ø Eric Rozell Ø Ankesh Khandelwal Ø Evan Patton