Network of Judicial Registers PL BG NL SK SI UK IT PT November, 28
BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Activities and results of the project (February November 28) New partners: BG, NL partners with operative data exchange:,,,,, partners preparing the data exchange: BG, IT, NL, PL, PT, SI, SK, UK Coaching: : NL : BG, SI, UK [ ] : PT : PL, IT, SK [ ] observers: AT, RO, SE
BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Activities and results of the project (February November 28) Improvement of common documentation considering especially experiences of new partners Preparation of implementing the table of sanctions and parameters of sanctions developed by the Judicial Workgroup of the project Brainstorming about rules of a common Change Management suitable and practicable for 14 or more project partners Support to the EU Commission with respect to the development of the reference implementation to be connected to Contributing experience to the ECRIS discussion
BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Statistics: Requests sent by partners in 28 16 1476 Σ: 1944 147 14 11 1231 11 1339 49 91 1326 12 198 14 166 number of requests sent 1 8 6 549 48 62 1 538 6 557 7 494 73 476 111 64 586 1 348 99 28 4 597 11 4 2 423 1 77 668 95 52 63 629 14 438 7 54 452 19 1-8 2-8 3-8 4-8 5-8 6-8 7-8 8-8 9-8 1-8 11-8 12-8 month-year 598 96 9 567 43 549 78
BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Statistics: - Requests (January 28 - September 28),3% 43,4% 44,3% 5,7% 6,2%,1%
BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Statistics: Notifications sent by partners in 28 45 38 4376 Σ: 2214 4 248 35 575 number of notifications sent 3 25 2 15 1 5 583 936 53 2564 191 37 17 2337 896 12 218 266 452 84 536 2288 12 294 291 829 568 24 45 13 63 24 499 749 646 2774 1 353 284 745 1594 131 16 65 425 252 267 81 86 265 334 699 451 176 165 111 332 733 645 293 213 1 1-8 2-8 3-8 4-8 5-8 6-8 7-8 8-8 9-8 1-8 11-8 12-8 month-year
BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Statistics: - Notifications (January 28 - September 28) 15,4% 1,8% 38,7% 12,9% 21,9%,4%
BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Special topic: meets ECRIS Compatibility between and existing common reference table of categories and subcategories of offences new ECRIS table of offences Compatibility between and existing new common reference table of categories, subcategories and parameters of decisions (sanctions) new ECRIS tables of sanctions and parameters of sanctions Brainstorming about inclusion of new ECRIS table of parameters of offences in data exchang
BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Special topic: Reference Implementation What can/should the reference implementation be used as? (Or not)? Stand-alone application (?) (Manual input and output ) Interface between own register application and data exchange (?) (Automatic input and output ) (?) How can the reference implementation be integrated in the existing data exchange and its further development? Test procedures (?) Responsibilities for decisions touching further development (?) Change management rules and their consequences (?)
BG IT NL PL PT SI SK UK Special topic: Reference Implementation Who will be responsible for the maintenance and the further development of the reference implementation? Decisions about new releases of the reference implementation (?) Financing of normal maintenance of the reference implementation (?) Regular technical support for users of the reference implementation (?) Roll-out of new releases of the reference implementation (?) Maintenance of user-specific features (interfaces, etc.) (?) Financing of agreed changes of the reference implementation (?) Responsibilities and financing in cases of agreed changes of the data structure definitions and the common reference tables (?) Dependency on a special software development company (?) Dependency on special systems archtictures, hardware plattforms etc. (?) (?)
Network of Judicial Registers PL BG NL SK SI UK IT PT November, 28