Motion stabilization plug-in for LW? Posted by Danas_Anis - 04 Sep 2013 12:29 Hello! Is there any plug-in to work with Lightworks that would do motion stabilization in LW? Posted by ianconry - 05 Sep 2013 12:00 Hi Danas_Anis, You just might have missed the Deshaking Assistant for VirtualDub app that Khaver wrote; I Use it constantly to clean up hand-held shots and it works a treat. If not I apologise for misunderstanding what you want! Link to the topic www.lwks.com/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=7&id=18664&ite mid=81#49073 Cheers Posted by Danas_Anis - 06 Sep 2013 09:56 Hello! Thank you! somehow I missed this one, definitely checking out this one! ianconry wrote: 1 / 6
Hi Danas_Anis, You just might have missed the Deshaking Assistant for VirtualDub app that Khaver wrote; I Use it constantly to clean up hand-held shots and it works a treat. If not I apologise for misunderstanding what you want! Link to the topic www.lwks.com/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=7&id=18664&ite mid=81#49073 Cheers Posted by ianconry - 06 Sep 2013 10:18 Hi again, I'm pleased then that I mentioned it. Some people have had difficulty in getting Khaver's Assistant apps to work (Particularly in LW 64bit). I now have no trouble whatever and consequently in case it helps I add this link to a post I made some time ago when I recommended a member to first try the Australian Techlife's magazine deshaker. This allows one to view the before and after results which is neat but I use this installation of VirtualDub and the deshaking tool as a basis to install Khavers app which integrates into LightWorks as an assistant app. Good luck www.lwks.com/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=7&id=18664&limi t=15&limitstart=15&itemid=81#46324 Posted by computerflummi - 14 Sep 2013 17:39 Dear s, 2 / 6
first of all: Thanks for this great forum which is a big help for new-comers like me Regarding this stabilization tool I am facing some problemes even if I dit it in the way described here. Can some put the latest data s as download links together and write a short how-to install? (for example where to place plug-in s...) One big point for me is that virtualdub is always crashing (different versions tested). I can jump with arrow keys within the movie but if I like to add a filter oder play the movie it crashes. Does someone know if there is probleme with Intel HD graphic cards or whatever. OS is Win 8 64 bit / i5 processor / 8GB RAM... Tested with different video codecs... For me the stabilization if the key feature and I really need your help. Thanks a lot in advance! Best Regards Holger Posted by ianconry - 15 Sep 2013 08:40 @computerflummi, Holger, welcome to the forum! What I'd do first (if you haven't already tried this) is to download the Australian Techlife Deshaker which runs as a standalone in Win 7 (as a 32bit program) and should do the same in Win 8. If this runs without problems then go from there getting khaver's VDAdssistant app installed in LightWorks, but try this first! 3 / 6
Posted by computerflummi - 15 Sep 2013 15:33 Thanks a lot! You made my day! Works fine for me!!! Thank you! Best Regards, Holger Posted by conualfy - 10 Dec 2013 05:36 Does anyone know how can one stabilize a movie in Ubuntu/Linux version of Lightworks? Thanks a lot! Posted by ianconry - 10 Dec 2013 06:53 @conualfy: Hi there - Welcome to the forum and a very good question! Unfortunately, all the systems that work well that I've come across use VirtualDub which is, of course, a Windows utility. If fact, now that LW for Linux 11.5.d is working so well for me, this is the only stumbling block for me in changing over from Windows LightWorks to Linux. Much of the video I capture is in local National Parks with a 36X optical zoom and even with very stable mounting support for the camera, the result is immeasurably improved by using the VD Assistant app of Khaver's. I did once try to get VDub to work using Wine but got nowhere at all! Posted by conualfy - 10 Dec 2013 10:25 Thanks for the answer! Maybe there's some solution on the way... BTW: I don't think running some video processing software in Wine is a solution as this is a very intensive opperation. Wine will make it slow. Posted by ianconry - 10 Dec 2013 10:57 4 / 6
Of course you are right. I really did not expect Wine to provide a solution. We've successfully used Wine to run Tin2tin's Eyeframe converter however to provide a interim solution to allow the conversion of video into a format suitable for importing into LightWorks for those of us unfamiliar with terminal processing in Linux! Posted by conualfy - 10 Dec 2013 12:06 @ - for converting you can use the other tools (Avidemux, Openshot, PiTiVi, etc.). I will try stabilizing in Cinelerra (also a great software), although it is not nice to use multiple software for one thing. Posted by Danas_Anis - 05 Jan 2014 14:56 Linux users may also try KDenlive, it also has video stabilization solution there. Pitivi or Openshot should also have something like that. But I Know KDenlive has one. It would be really nice if someone could write an extension for Lightworks that would use the video stabilization solution, the one that is used in Kdenlive is open source and is(was?) a standard in the libraries that KDenlive is built on and should be publicly available. Posted by brdloush - 05 Jan 2014 17:43 Once again the Blender seems to provide. But in this case you obviously need to stabilize your clips before using them in LWKS. Currently the problem is that LWKS's (pixel shader based) effects don't allow any external data to be fed 5 / 6
into the effect. Effects only accept values from effect settings and the actual video feeds as inputs. Theoretically under current limitations one could create: 1) assistant app for LWKS, which would open the clip in Blender. 2) a script to Blender which would output the stabilization data (X shift, Y shift, zoom level,?rotation?) in a form of image sequence 3) a FX file for LWKS which would expect actual video clip in one video input and stabilization data in form of images (created in step 2). I think it might be doable, and such workflow might actually be even relatively effective. But it's questionable how would the final result look. For example, LWKS doesn't work with pixels, but with 0..1 interval.. 6 / 6