Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Similar documents
Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case: 5:10-cv SL Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/30/10 1 of 8. PageID #: 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2017 Page 1 of 21

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-cv-662

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 6:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 86 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 771

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/01/18 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:99-mc Document 316 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:99-mc Document 298 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 10 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 142

Case 1:99-mc Document 341 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

Case 1:17-cv PBS Document 12 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/08/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 6:07-cv LED Document 87 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 3

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 20 Filed 08/15/17 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 138

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NEWARK VICINAGE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:13-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/17/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 8:17-cv JSM-TBM Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case: 3:18-cv JJH Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/18/18 1 of 12. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TOLEDO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 8:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:1

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. O. Gregoire, Attorney General; and Paula Selis, Senior Counsel, and brings this action against

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv G Document 1 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:18-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 03/08/18 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION PATENT CASE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

AIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 128 PageID: 1. Of Counsel:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 45 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00362

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:08-cv G Document 74 Filed 04/20/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 5:18-cv LHK Document 55 Filed 12/06/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/10/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1

Case3:15-cv EDL Document1 Filed04/07/14 Page1 of 10

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/05/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 22 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:15-cv JAG Document 28 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 57 PageID# 379

18 Civ. 269 COMPLAINT. Complaint for patent infringement against Defendants FanDuel, Inc. and FanDuel Limited

Case 3:18-cv B Document 1 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 81 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 3 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 6

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 06/20/18 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/03/14 Page 1 of 49 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:15-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 34 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO.

Case: 1:11-cv TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/27/11 Page: 1 of 20 PAGEID #: 1

GOOGLE S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH PATENT RULE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case CSS Doc 9 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv LPS Document 1 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NEWARK DIVISION

1 PLAINTIFF S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Case No.: 15-cv-0974

Case 1:07-cv MGC Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2008 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:08-cv GW-AGR Document 34 Filed 11/14/2008 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 32 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF TRADEMARK NON-INFRINGEMENT, TRADEMARK NON-DILUTION, FOR NO UNFAIR COMPETITION AND FOR NO BREACH OF CONTRACT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:16-cv KNM Document 199 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 3711

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 2:14-cv-00182-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JOHN B. ADRAIN, Plaintiff, vs. HIKVISION DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and HIKVISION USA INC. Defendants. Case No. ----- JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff John B. Adrain ("Adrain") brings this action against defendants Hikvision Digital Technology Co., Ltd. and Hikvision USA Inc. (collectively "Hikvision" or "Defendants") and alleges: THE PARTIES 1. Adrain is the inventor of and owns the entire right, title, and interest in the patent at issue in this case. 2. On information and belief, Hikvision Digital Technology Co., Ltd. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of China, with its principal place of business located at No.700, Dongliu Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou 310052, China. Service of process can be made on Hikvision Digital Technology Co., Ltd. by way of The Hague Service Convention. 3. On information and belief, Hikvision USA Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of California, with its principal place of business located at 908 Canada Court, City of Industry, California 91748. Hikvision USA Inc. can be served with process through its registered

Case 2:14-cv-00182-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 2 agent located within the Eastern District of Texas, Fei-Fei Catherine Fang, 6300 Stonewood Drive, Suite 308, Plano, Texas 75024. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the provisions of the Patent Laws of the United States of America, Title 35, United States Code. 5. Subject-matter jurisdiction over Adrain's claim is conferred upon this Court by 28 US.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 6. On information and belief, Defendants have operated, conducted, engaged in, and/or carried on business in the state of Texas and this District. 7. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) (c) and (d), and/or 1400(b). GENERAL ALLEGATIONS REGARDING PATENT INFRINGEMENT 8. On November 3, 1998, US. Patent No. 5,831,669, entitled "Facility Monitoring System with Image Memory and Correlation" was duly and legally issued to the inventor, John B. Adrain. A Reexamination Certificate for US. Patent 5,831,669 issued on August 21,2012. A true and correct copy of US. Patent 5,831,669 with the Reexamination Certificate is attached hereto as Exhibit A. (US. Patent 5,831,669 and the Reexamination Certificate are collectively referred to as "the '669 patent.") Adrain owns all right, title and interest in the '669 patent, including the right to sue for and recover all past, present and future damages for infringement of the '669 patent. 9. The '669 patent is presumed valid. COUNT I PATENT INFRINGEMENT 10. Adrain repeats and realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-9 above, as though fully set forth herein. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Page -2-

Case 2:14-cv-00182-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 3 11. Upon information and belief, Hikvision, either alone or in conjunction with others, has in the past and continues to infringe and/or induce infringement of the '669 patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing, and/or causing others to make, use, sell, or offer to sell, and/or import, in this judicial district and/or elsewhere in the United States, security monitoring systems that alone or in use are covered by one or more of the claims of the '669 patent. 12. For example, Hikvision makes, uses, sells, offers to sell and/or imports video surveillance cameras, software and network video recorders. By way of further example, one such camera is the DS-2DF5276-AEL that can be used with the DS-7600NI-SE Series HikVisionNetwork Video Recorder and ivms-4200 software. 13. Consumers purchase and use Hikvision's systems and devices and are instructed by Hikvision to use such systems and devices in manners that infringe one or more claims of the '669 patent. 14. Hikvision provides instructions, such as user manuals, that instruct consumers on how to set up and use such devices and systems, specifically intending such consumers will operate these devices and systems in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims of the '669 patent, and knowing of such actions, which constitutes infringement of one or more claims of the '669 patent. 15. Hikvision has been and/or is now indirectly infringing one or more claims of the '669 patent in violation of35 U.S.C. 271(b) by inducing users ofhikvision's security monitoring systems to directly infringe one or more claims of the '669 patent through their use of such systems. 16. For example, Hikvision induces direct infringement of the '669 patent by providing user manuals and instructions with the ivms-4200 operate the motion detection features ofhikvision's software that show users how to setup and security monitoring system. Hikvision engages COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Page -3-

Case 2:14-cv-00182-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 4 in such inducement knowingly and, at least from the time of receipt of the present Complaint, has done so with knowledge that such activity encourages consumers of its security monitoring systems to directly infringe the '669 patent. 17. Hikvision is liable for infringement of the '669 patent pursuant to 35 US.C. 271. 18. Hikvision's acts of infringement have caused damage to Adrain, and Adrain is entitled to recover from Hikvision the damages sustained by Adrain as a result ofhikvision's wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. 19. As a consequence of the infringement complained of herein, Adrain has been irreparably damaged to an extent not yet determined and will continue to be irreparably damaged by such acts in the future unless Hikvision is enjoined by this Court from committing further acts of infringement. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Adrain prays for entry of judgment that: A. Defendants have directly infringed and/or induced infringement of the '669 patent; B. Defendants account for and pay to Adrain all damages caused by their infringement of the '669 patent; C. Adrain be granted permanent injunctive relief pursuant to 35 US.C. 283 enjoining Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees and those persons in active concert or participation with it from further acts of patent infringement; D. Adrain be granted pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the damages caused to him by reason of Defendants' patent infringement; E. Adrain be granted his reasonable attorneys' fees in accordance with 35 US.C. 285; F. Costs be awarded to Adrain; and, COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Page -4-

Case 2:14-cv-00182-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 5 G. Adrain be granted such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Adrain demands trial by jury on all claims and issues so triable. Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 4,2014 By: lsi Elizabeth L. DeRieux John T. Polasek Texas Bar No. 16088590 tpolasek@pqelaw.com C. Dale Quisenberry Texas Bar No. 24005040 dquisenberry@pqelaw.com Jeffrey S. David Texas Bar No. 24053171 jdavid@pqelaw.com POLASEK, QUISENBERRY & ERRINGTON, L.L.P. 6750 West Loop South, Suite 920 Bellaire, Texas 77401 Telephone: (832) 778-6000 Facsimile: (832) 778-6010 Otis W. Carroll State Bar No. 03895700 nancy@icklaw.com Deborah Race State Bar No. 16448700 drace@icklaw.com IRELAND, CARROLL & KELLEY, P. C 6101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 P.O. Box 7879 Tyler, Texas 75711 Telephone: (903) 561-1600 Facsimile: (903) 581-1071 S. Calvin Capshaw State Bar No. 03783900 ccapshaw@capshawlaw.com Elizabeth L. DeRieux State Bar No. 05770585 ederieux@capshawlaw.com COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Page -5-

Case 2:14-cv-00182-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 6 D. Jeffrey Rambin State Bar No. 00791478 jrambin@capshawlaw.com CAPSHAWDERIEUX, LLP 114 East Commerce Avenue Gladewater, Texas 75647 Telephone: (903) 236-9800 Facsimile: (903) 236-8787 Russell R. Smith State Bar No. 18682310 rsmith@fairchildlawfirm.com Fairchild, Price, Haley, & Smith, L.L.P. 1801 North Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75963-1668 Telephone: (936) 569-2327 Facsimile: (936) 569-7932 Attorneys for Plaintiff COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Page -6-