High-Precision Positioning Unit 2.2 Student Exercise: Calculating Topographic Change

Similar documents
COORDINATE TRANSFORMATION. Lecture 6

Surveying. Session GPS Surveying 1. GPS Surveying. Carrier-Phase (RTK) Pseudo-Range (DGPS) Slide 1

Updating Autonomous Start to an RTK Field Survey (Part II)

Unit 3.5: Geodetic Data for Hillslope Diffusion in MATLAB Student Exercise

Navigation coordinate systems

Central Coast LIDAR Project, 2011 Delivery 1 QC Analysis LIDAR QC Report February 17 th, 2012

LOCAL GEODETIC HORIZON COORDINATES

TOPOGRAPHY - a LIDAR Simulation

Horizontal Positional Accuracy (HPA) How is it calculated? Gord Gamble and Peter Goodier, Practice Advisory Department

Preview. Two-Dimensional Motion and Vectors Section 1. Section 1 Introduction to Vectors. Section 2 Vector Operations. Section 3 Projectile Motion

TLS Parameters, Workflows and Field Methods

Lab 7: Bedrock rivers and the relief structure of mountain ranges

Sandy River, OR Bathymetric Lidar Project, 2012 Delivery QC Analysis Lidar QC Report March 26 th, 2013

Fundamentals of Surveying MSS 220 Prof. Gamal El-Fiky

TLS Parameters, Workflows and Field Methods

Geometry of Aerial photogrammetry. Panu Srestasathiern, PhD. Researcher Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (Public Organization)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATABASES FOR PROPAGATION STUDIES. (Question ITU-R 202/3)

Vector Addition and Subtraction: Analytical Methods

TLS Parameters, Workflows and Field Methods

BLM Fire Project, 2013 QC Analysis Lidar and Orthophoto QC Report November 25th, 2013

Rogue River LIDAR Project, 2012 Delivery 1 QC Analysis LIDAR QC Report September 6 th, 2012

Burns, OR LIDAR Project, 2011 Delivery QC Analysis LIDAR QC Report February 13th, 2012

Chapter 5. Transforming Shapes

Terrain correction. Backward geocoding. Terrain correction and ortho-rectification. Why geometric terrain correction? Rüdiger Gens

Contents of Lecture. Surface (Terrain) Data Models. Terrain Surface Representation. Sampling in Surface Model DEM

GPS/GIS Activities Summary

Geocoding and Georeferencing. Scott Bell GIS Institute

Kinematics Review. Physics 2012

Curves, Tangent Planes, and Differentials ( ) Feb. 26, 2012 (Sun) Lecture 9. Partial Derivatives: Signs on Level Curves, Tangent

THE FUTURE OF STATE PLANE COORDINATES AT ODOT

The Differential df, the Gradient f, & the Directional Derivative Dû f sec 14.4 (cont), Goals. Warm-up: Differentiability. Notes. Notes.

UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE AERIAL TARGET GROUND CONTROL SURVEY REPORT JOB # DATE: MARCH 2011

Third Rock from the Sun

Use of n-vector for Radar Applications

1. Introduction Surveying Method chosen depends on:

ENGI Parametric & Polar Curves Page 2-01

Fall 2016 Semester METR 3113 Atmospheric Dynamics I: Introduction to Atmospheric Kinematics and Dynamics

Airborne Laser Scanning: Remote Sensing with LiDAR

L7 Raster Algorithms

Novel Real-Time Coordinate Transformations based on N-Dimensional Geo-Registration Parameters' Matrices

Base Configurations Carlson SurvCE

5 Applications of Definite Integrals

A SYSTEM OF COORDINATES FOR 3D

ACTIVITY TWO CONSTANT VELOCITY IN TWO DIRECTIONS

Chapters 1 9: Overview

How to Use GOCE Level 2 Products

Edge and local feature detection - 2. Importance of edge detection in computer vision

Real Geodetic Map (Map without Projection) Abstract Keywords: 1. Introduction

Ground Subsidence Monitored by L-band Satellite Radar. Interferometry

Terrestrial GPS setup Fundamentals of Airborne LiDAR Systems, Collection and Calibration. JAMIE YOUNG Senior Manager LiDAR Solutions

Lecture 21 - Chapter 8 (Raster Analysis, part2)

Question: What are the origins of the forces of magnetism (how are they produced/ generated)?

Objectives for Terrain Week

Research in Computational Differential Geomet

TxDOT Survey Manual. Manual Notice Archive. by Texas Department of Transportation (512) - all rights reserved

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 1, January ISSN

Unit #19 : Functions of Many Variables, and Vectors in R 2 and R 3

Finite Elements Method and its Space Application in the Study of Movements of GNSS BULiPOS Reference Stations in Bulgaria

Purpose : Understanding Projections, 12D, and the System 1200.

Patterning Math Lab 4a

Computation of Slope

Lateral Ground Movement Estimation from Space borne Radar by Differential Interferometry.

Geometric Rectification of Remote Sensing Images

SPH3U1 Lesson 09 Kinematics

Free Fall. Objective. Materials. Part 1: Determining Gravitational Acceleration, g

Local Linearity (Tangent Plane) Unit #19 : Functions of Many Variables, and Vectors in R 2 and R 3

The Rectangular Coordinate System and Equations of Lines. College Algebra

WHERE THEORY MEETS PRACTICE

Correcting INS Drift in Terrain Surface Measurements. Heather Chemistruck Ph.D. Student Mechanical Engineering Vehicle Terrain Performance Lab

Navigational Aids 1 st Semester/2007/TF 7:30 PM -9:00 PM

Section 1.2: Points and Lines

Where s the Boss? : Monte Carlo Localization for an Autonomous Ground Vehicle using an Aerial Lidar Map

Kinematics of Machines Prof. A. K. Mallik Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Module - 2 Lecture - 1

Exercise 4: Extracting Information from DEMs in ArcMap

The 2017 InSAR package also provides support for the generation of interferograms for: PALSAR-2, TanDEM-X

Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE SCOPE DEFINITIONS PROCEDURE... 5

LECTURE TWO Representations, Projections and Coordinates

GPS SP1. Students will analyze the relationships between force, mass, gravity, and the motion of objects.

Quantifying Three-Dimensional Deformations of Migrating Fibroblasts

The Determination of Telescope and Antenna Invariant Point (IVP)

State Plane Coordinates and Computations using them GISC Spring 2013

Determination of Geoid and Transformation Parameters By Using GPS On The Region of Kadinhani in Konya

APPLICATIONS FOR COORDINATED MOTION IN RADOME TESTING

National GNSS/BDS CORS Services in China

An Introduction to Lidar & Forestry May 2013

2. POINT CLOUD DATA PROCESSING

Big Mathematical Ideas and Understandings

Thoughts on Representing Spatial Objects. William A. Huber Quantitative Decisions Rosemont, PA

4.5 Conservative Forces

RT-2 L1TE NovAtel s Single Frequency RTK Solution

FAULT SLIP. GG303 Lab 13 11/29/16 1

2.1 Motion in Two Dimensions A Scale Diagram Approach

3GSM GmbH. Plüddemanngasse 77 A-8010 Graz, Austria Tel Fax:

Data Representation in Visualisation

Lecturer 2: Spatial Concepts and Data Models

Relating Local Vision Measurements to Global Navigation Satellite Systems Using Waypoint Based Maps

EMIGMA V9.x Premium Series April 8, 2015

Projectile Motion SECTION 3. Two-Dimensional Motion. Objectives. Use of components avoids vector multiplication.

Measurement of Direction: Bearing vs. Azimuth

SurvNET Lesson One - Processing an Assumed Coordinate System 2D Total Station Network

Transcription:

High-Precision Positioning Unit 2.2 Student Exercise: Calculating Topographic Change Ian Lauer and Ben Crosby (Idaho State University) Change is an inevitable part of our natural world and varies as a function of space and time. Geomorphic change is a diverse process manifesting as both diffuse and concentrated actions varying from channel migration to incision or hillslope creep to mass movement. Additionally, we can quantify many other objects including boulder or log migration down hillslopes or riverbeds. To assess and make informed decisions about the impact and variation of change within our environment, we must develop skills to categorize and quantify these processes. GPS/GNSS surveys that have the advantage of temporal and spatial data distribution allow us to quantify these changes with relative ease. Continuous monitoring or reoccupation of a site over time series allows us to analyze changes in position, which indicate direction and speed of landscape elements. Introduction In this unit, you will apply knowledge learned from working with GNSS surveys and point data to analyze and quantify changes in point data. Additionally, you will be challenged to think about how GNSS errors arise and how they might propagate through change detection equations. Change detection is the act of identifying and quantifying how an object has moved from one location to another. GNSS systems are excellent tools for detecting change due to their ability to produce time series data of an object s motion and to compare them in a georeferenced coordinate system. Quantifying Change: GNSS data describes the three-dimensional positioning of an object to some reference frame. Cartesian coordinate systems (X,Y,Z) and geographic coordinate systems (Latitude, Longitude, and Height) are two contrasting ways to approach establishing a reference frame and displaying data. The system that is used as a reference can have a great impact on the way data is visualized. However, both systems can be georeferenced for precision positioning, and they can be projected back and forth with relative ease. Cartesian GPS/GNSS point data is three-dimensional and can be described simply in a Cartesian system of X,Y,Z measurement. These measures are referenced around some origin, which can either be local or georeferenced. Local origins are arbitrary starting points that describe movements relative to each other and the origin with arbitrarily selected orientations for X,Y,Z. Usually Z is vertical distance, with X and Y describing perpendicular directions on a horizontal plane, often with one oriented north south and the other east west. Georeferenced origins are often geocentric, with the fixed origin of the X,Y,Z system at the approximated center of the Earth. However, geocentric coordinates and Cartesian systems can complicate the interpretation of positions, because the axis orientation is not relative to the ground s surface. By using a Cartesian system with a local origin, one that can arbitrarily be assigned, we can quickly compute the difference between any two points without need for complicated geometries Questions or comments please contact education_at_unavco.org, Version January 19, 2018 Page 1

such as ellipsoidal transformations in a geographic system. The distance between any two points on one axis of a three-dimensional position can be expressed as the difference between its initial and final position, example dx. dx = Xfinal Xinitial Any two dimensions in a Cartesian system can be differenced using Pythagoreans theorem. dxy = dx 2 + dy 2 Similarly, we can calculate a three-dimensional displacement in X,Y,Z. This is sometimes called slope distance, ds, and is the total distance from point A to B, where A and B describe the initial and final position of some object. ds = dx 2 + dy 2 + dz 2 Figure 1: An illustration of the geometry of three-dimensional distances between two points. In change detection, A and B would represent the same object with its locations taken at two different times, i.e. Time A and Time B. dx, dy, and dz represent the change in distance for a single axis. The slope distance, ds, is the total distance, or change in position, between A and B. A Cartesian coordinate plane has a local origin of (0,0,0). An object has moved from its original position at the origin, A (1,1,0) to a new position, B (2,4,3). 1. Calculate the total distance, ds, the object has moved. 2. How would the way location or orientation of the origin (0,0,0) affect the way you interpret results. (ie., as negative numbers). Which way is up? 3. What is the advantage of setting a local reference point e.g. a base station set to (0,0,0)? Geographic Geographic reference frames describe positions relative to the earth s surface often in latitude, longitude, and height. Latitude and longitude measure degrees of offset along the earth s surface Questions or comments please contact education_at_unavco.org, Version January 19, 2018 Page 2

oriented based on cardinal directions, north, south, east, and west. Because the Earth is neither perfectly circular nor elliptical, a significant amount of work is dedicated to producing the best fit model of the Earth s shape. The fundamentals of geodesy, which allow for these models and transformation between Cartesian and geographic systems, are beyond the scope of this assignment. In general these transformations can be done quickly in software such as ArcMap. Look at Figure 2, then discuss as a small group and individually answer the following: 4. How does projecting a planar measurement (e.g. line) onto a curved surface affect its distance? 5. How does height or elevation change with the reference point you choose? Figure 2: An angular slice of the globe, illustrating the measurement of various geodetic distances using grid, normal, and slope lengths. Note how the length of these lines would change with varying topography and with differences in how mapping planes are selected. Slope distance is measured from the topographic surface. Grid distance is measured along the flat mapping plane or projection. Normal Distance is measured along the Ellipsoid. The three distances shown all have the same angular separation. Surface Change and Visualization A common way to analyze geomorphic change is through differencing data sets, employing similar equations as described previously. Often GNSS data is used to create or reference digital elevation map (DEM) data derived from other sources as is described in Unit 2.1 Measuring Topography. Digital elevation maps contain data about surface elevations, which are interpolated from multiple point measurements such as GNSS or LiDAR. A DEM only describes a surface at a singular time. Landscape evolution often occurs at a rapid pace, and it is possible to record changes through time with multiple GNSS surveys. By differencing the time series from each other, you can extract the distance and direction of change over time. One way of visualizing GNSS and DEM changes is in map view through vectors and color gradients. GNSS velocities from a survey are shown as arrow vectors, with the length of the arrow symbolizing the magnitude of the velocity and the direction indicating the net direction of motion. The DEM underneath shows only movement in the Z-axis, changes in elevation. Changes in elevation on the DEM are shown using a bicolor color ramp. Questions or comments please contact education_at_unavco.org, Version January 19, 2018 Page 3

Precision of Movements and Error As discussed in Unit 1, GNSS positioning is the result of trilateration of the antenna by 3 or more satellites. The most favorable configuration is a wide spread of satellites across the available sky. This creates the greatest difference between individual signals and refines precision. However, even the greatest distribution of satellites across the horizon produces twice as much error in the vertical direction than the horizontal. This is because, unlike horizontal distances, vertical distances are poorly constrained due to geometry. You can think of it as physical lines connected to an object. If three people held cords attached to an object and they spread themselves evenly around said object, they could very well constrain its ability to move side to side. Figure 3: An elevation change map from the Salmon Falls landslide. The map was produced using two DEM maps derived from terrestrial LiDAR surveys. Additionally, GNSS surveys of 5 landmarks established on various features of the slide give a sense of velocity and direction for slide. Elevation change detected from the DEM is symbolized using a bicolor color ramp with red showing subsidence and blue uplift in cm. Notice the potential coregistration issue along the canyon rim. The canyon rim should be stationary, but seems to show uniform uplift along the whole rim. This is potentially a misalignment of images, a problem that can be corrected with proper GNSS survey of ground control points on the canyon rim. See Figure 3.1 A cross-section illustration of the landslide slump. Figure 3.1: A cartoon transect of an earth movement indicating surface color as they would be visualized on a DEM map. Red indicates the removal of the upper slump block resulting in decreased elevation. Blue indicates areas where the slump deposited and therefore surface elevation increased. Questions or comments please contact education_at_unavco.org, Version January 19, 2018 Page 4

Many sources of error contribute to the final position. However, the object would still be able to bounce up and down with significant freedom. Likewise, the vertical position of a GPS signal can only be constrained from above and not below, which significantly reduces its precision. Many sources of error contribute to the accuracy of the final position including clock timing, satellite position (ephemeris), multi-pathing, and atmospheric attenuation. These errors are summed in the product of dilution of precision (PDOP) and precision estimates provided by the receiver for any single data point. However, with change detection you are differencing two data points from each other and must therefore consider the error that is contributed by both. If the difference between two points is greater than the sum of their errors (1), then we can consider the change to be detectable. In the other case, if the total error is greater than the difference between the two points (2), then change is not detectable. Note that in (2) the error bars for A and B overlap, indicating their error is too great to detect change. Figure 4: Examples of detectable and no detectable change. Figure 5: A cartoon representation of satellite network geometry, Cartesian coordinates, GNSS positioning, and error. Clock, atmospheric, and multi-path error is significantly reduced by processing baseline between two stations. This is resolved by processing a base station through OPUS or another online solution and then correcting baselines with the rover or second station such as in the Kinematic GPS/GNSS Survey Methods manual, Section 5.3. Questions or comments please contact education_at_unavco.org, Version January 19, 2018 Page 5

Questions Think back to the Accuracy and Precision assignment and the Introductory lectures, and answer the following questions about how accuracy and precision relate to making measurements for change detection. 6. How does accuracy and precision relate to error? 7. How does accuracy and precision relate to our ability to measure change? Error? 8. How could you design a research problem so that the measurements you take are sufficient for the change you are trying to detect? 9. Think of one research problem that could be solved for a kinematic GNSS survey. Justify why the kinematic survey is the right technique for the given application and explicitly state the estimated amount of change you want to detect, the accuracy you need in order to detect this change, and the potential error that you can accommodate in your survey and still be able to detect change. Questions or comments please contact education_at_unavco.org, Version January 19, 2018 Page 6

Rubric Component Exemplary Basic Nonperformance General Considerations Part 1: Questions 1 8 Question 9: Exemplary work will not just answer all components of the given question but also answer correctly, completely, and thoughtfully. Attention to detail, as well as answers that are logical and make sense, is an important piece of this. 9 10 points: Answered all questions correctly. Students should illustrate: They know how local vs fixed-reference frames affect how you interpret positional measurement Depending on reference frames, distances measured can be significantly different on large scales (over 10+ km) Accuracy, Precision, and Error must all be accounted for in measurements. Errors from multiple sources add up and must be accounted for, along with estimated accuracy of the tools used. Error must be less than the amount of change detected in order for change to be considered significant. 5 points: Student provides the amount of change they need to detect and makes a reasonable estimate of the accuracy and error measurement. The accuracy doesn t exceed the capability of RTK, which is 2 3cm. Basic work may answer all components of the given question, but some answers are incorrect, illconsidered, or difficult to interpret given the context of the question. Basic work may also be missing components of a given question. 5 8 points: Answered all the questions, missing 1 2 critical points 3 4 point: Student demonstrates they understand the system and comes up with a survey that could be accomplished with GPS, but may make some unreasonable assumption in accuracy or error. Nonperformance occurs when students are missing large portions of the assignment, or when the answers simply do not make sense and are incorrect. 0 4 points: Missed more than 2 of the questions or did not complete them. 1 2 points: The student makes unreasonable assumptions on the accuracy of equipment or completely fails to justify how an RTK survey could solve the problem. Questions or comments please contact education_at_unavco.org, Version January 19, 2018 Page 7

Questions or comments please contact education_at_unavco.org, Version January 19, 2018 Page 8