Snyder leads by 5%, Peters leads by 14% Snyder 48% - Schauer 43% Peters 52% - Land 38%

Similar documents
Clinton Leads Trump in Michigan by 10% (Clinton 49% - Trump 39%)

Colorado Results. For 10/3/ /4/2012. Contact: Doug Kaplan,

Spring FREQUENCIES

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

The Growing Gap between Landline and Dual Frame Election Polls

Spring (percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding)

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

Voters and Mail. 5 Insights to Boost Campaign Impact. A United States Postal Service and American Association of Political Consultants (AAPC) study


New Jersey economic issues poll April 5-14, 2018 Stockton Polling Institute Weighted frequencies

Marquette Law School Poll September 25-28, 2014 Results for Likely Voters

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

Survey Questions and Methodology

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

User Manual. Last updated 1/19/2012

x_ APPROVED BY CLIENT

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

Des Moines Area Regional Transit Non Rider Survey

Mobile-only web survey respondents

Marquette Law School Poll May 15-18, 2014

Poll Results: American Voters Views on Police Body Cameras. August 2015

August Tracking Survey 2011 Final Topline 8/30/2011

Telephone Survey Response: Effects of Cell Phones in Landline Households

Vision Services Application Overview

Topline Questionnaire

2013 Local Arts Agency Salary & Benefits Summary EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO

Survey Questions and Methodology

Sample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

Smartphone Ownership 2013 Update

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS

Practical Issues in Conducting Cell Phone Polling

THE AP/AOL POLL CONDUCTED BY IPSOS PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROJECT # ONLINE VIDEO STUDY

Informed Delivery. June 2018

IT Web and Software Developer Occupation Overview

The Rise of the Connected Viewer

PETER D. HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. Study #7006--page 1 May 2003 OMB No

BOARD APPROVES STATE FUNDING MATCH FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CAREER TECHNOLOGY CENTER

L2 VoterMapping - Display Options

Annual Gadgets Survey Final Topline 4/21/06

Students Preferences for Receiving Communication from the University: A Report from the Student Life Survey

2017 PIT Summary: Boulder County

Sample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

N.J. drivers continue to roll the dice with safety

STAT10010 Introductory Statistics Lab 2

Purpose. Symptom. Cause. March 4, 2008

Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Occupation Overview

What Clicks? A Technology Study for The Minneapolis Institute of Arts Baseline Research. August-September, 2002

2017 PIT Summary: Jefferson County

TYPES OF VARIABLES, STRUCTURE OF DATASETS, AND BASIC STATA LAYOUT

Occupation Overview. Western Technical College. Emsi Q Data Set. March Seventh Street La Crosse, Wisconsin

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Adults 11/9/16-11/10/16 MOE +/- 2.8 Percentage Points

Distracted Driving Education for High School Students. Despina Stavrinos, PhD & Benjamin McManus

SAMPLE Treatment Perceptions Survey (TPS) Report. XXXXXX County, N=239. (Not Real Data) All Substance Use Treatment Programs Surveyed.

TAFDC, EAEDC and SNAP Voter Registration Mailing

Almost half of all internet users now use search engines on a typical day

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATION

AMERICANS USE OF THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: AN AARP BULLETIN SURVEY

To start, please type the ID number from your invitation letter here, then click Log in.

Parents Names Mom Cell/Work # Dad Cell/Work # Parent List the Math Courses you have taken and the grade you received 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4th

Spring Change Assessment Survey 2010 Final Topline 6/4/10 Data for April 29 May 30, 2010

Election Night Reporting Quick Start Guide

November 2016 G. Oscar Anderson, Senior Research Advisor AARP Research

ƒ % ƒ % ƒ %

Full download all chapters instantly please go to Solutions Manual, Test Bank site: testbanklive.com

Election Night Reporting. DuPage County Election Commission

APPENDIX G: Biennial Exhibition Device Survey Questions

Implementing Optional Gmail Service

Election Night Reporting Guidebook. County of Santa Clara Barry Garner Registrar of Voters

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Young Drivers Report the Highest Level of Phone Involvement in Crash or Near-Crash Incidences. Research Note

OEMC 2016 Budget Statement of Executive Director Gary W. Schenkel to the Committee on Budget and Operations September 30, 2015

Contents. 1. Survey Background and Methodology. 2. Summary of Key Findings. 3. Survey Results. 4. Appendix

SPRING 2014 PENN STATE POLL

2014 AARP Connecticut Telecommunications Survey

HOW CANADIANS BANK. Annual tracking study on Canadian attitudes and behaviours towards banking. Prepared for:

ITSMR Research Note KEY FINDINGS. Crash Analyses: Ticket Analyses:

Dynamic Documents. David Allen University of Kentucky. July 30, Presented at TUG 2014

The XYZ of ABC 2007 Citizen Survey

Internet, Science & Tech RESEARCH AREAS. Mobile Fact Sheet MORE FACT SHEETS: INTERNET/BROADBAND SOCIAL MEDIA

THE MISSING AGENDA THE IMPORTANCE OF CYBER SECURITY TO U.S. VOTERS

ITHAKA S+R ASERL: DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION

Survey questions. Winter Tracking Survey 2012 Final Topline 02/22/2012 Data for January 20 February 19, p e w i n t e r n e t.

APPLICATION FORMS. For. Certified Prevention Specialist (IC&RC reciprocal) CPS

Sample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

Mail Ballot Management Undeliverable Mail Ballots

Election Night Reporting User Guide. Don Gray Sangamon County Clerk

Nassau County Voter Data Request Packet. Vicki P. Cannon Supervisor of Elections

Things you ll know (or know better to watch out for!) when you leave in December: 1. What you can and cannot infer from graphs.

GVU s WWW User Surveys

Cumulative Report - Unofficial MARTIN COUNTY, TEXAS - GENERAL ELECTION - November 06, 2018

Mobile Messaging Apps Study : India. August 2014

2013 ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer Mexico Consumer Results. October

T he Inbox Report 2017

Station Community Engagement Survey Results

Mobile Access July 7, 2010 Aaron Smith, Research Specialist.

How to Save the Smart Home from Cyber Invasion. IoT DevCon 2017 Art Swift, President, prpl Foundation

Eligibility Application for ENP Certification

2013 ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer India Consumer Results. October

2013 ISACA IT Risk/Reward Barometer US Consumer Results. October

Transcription:

P R E S S R E L E A S E FOR RELEASE AFTER 6:30 PM October 28, 2014: Contact: Steve Mitchell 248-891-2414 Snyder leads by 5%, Peters leads by 14% Snyder 48% - Schauer 43% Peters 52% - Land 38% EAST LANSING, Mich. Governor Rick Snyder has extended his lead from two percent out to five percent over Democratic challenger Mark Schauer, while Congressman Gary Peters increased his lead from thirteen percent to fourteen percent over former Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land in the U.S. Senate race according to a new Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell Poll of Michigan. In the poll, Snyder has 48%, Schauer 43%, Libertarian Mary Buzuma 2%, U.S. Tax Payers Mark McFarlin 1%, and Green Party Paul Homeniuk 0.4%. Five percent are undecided. In the U.S. Senate Race Peters has 52%, Land 38%, Libertarian Jim Fulner 3%, U.S. Tax Payers Richard Matkin 1%, and Green Party Chris Wahmhoff 1%. Five percent are undecided. The automated survey of 1,159 likely voters in November s General Election was conducted on Oct. 27, 2014 by Mitchell Research & Communications, Inc. for Fox 2 News (WJBK-TV) in Detroit and has a Margin of Error + or 2.88% at the 95% level of confidence. Governor Snyder s support has stayed the same at 48% since our poll last week while Mark Schauer has dropped three percent down to 43%. The Governor seems to be moving away from Schauer and it looks as though Republicans are more engaged. However, Schauer leads by 10% among those who have already voted by absentee ballot (17% of all voters) and he leads by 19% with those who say they will vote by absentee ballot (7% of all voters). Snyder leads by 11% with those who will be voting on Election Day (74%) of all voters. Republicans seem to be getting more engaged than Democrats as we head into the last week. At the same time, Peters also is pulling away from Land, Steve Mitchell CEO of Mitchell Research & Communications said.

Page 2 of 10 Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell Poll Press Release 10/28/14 50% 48% 46% 44% 42% 40% Snyder Schauer 38% 36% September 14 of 14 Sept 29 of 14 Oct. 9 of 14 Oct. 12 of 14 Oct. 19 of 14 Oct. 27 of 14 The chart above shows the race for Governor in the five most recent Mitchell Research/Fox 2 (WJBK-TV) Detroit Polls. Peters lead over Land remains in double digits and he has been above 50% in our last two polls. Unless there is a major change, Peters is on path to replace retiring U.S. Senator Carl Levin, said Mitchell. 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Land Peters 10% 0% September 14 of 14 Sept 29 of 14 Oct. 9 of 14 Oct. 12 of 14 Oct. 19 of 14 Oct. 27 of 14

Page 3 of 10 Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell Poll Press Release 10/28/14 Governor Snyder s favorability (49% favorable- 41% unfavorable) is down slightly from last week (50%-38%). His Job approval is also down 2 percent to 54 percent. Schauer s favorable/unfavororable (42%-38%) is very similar to last week (40%-37%), Mitchell said. [Note: Poll must be referred to as Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell Poll] FIELD COPY AGGREGATE PERCENTAGES Survey of the State of Michigan Likely November 2014 General Election Voters Conducted October 27, 2014 (N=1159) Margin of Error +/-2.88 Hi, we re conducting a survey of Michigan voters for TV and radio stations on the Governor s Race and other issues. 1. If you are a registered voter at the household we are calling please press 1. If you re not, press 2. Yes 100% 2. Thinking about the upcoming November General Election for U.S. Senate and Governor, if you have already voted by absentee ballot press 1, if you are planning to vote by absentee ballot press 2, if you are definitely voting on Election Day press 3, probably voting on Election Day press 4, not sure yet if you are voting press 5, or definitely not voting press 6. Voted by Absentee 17% Will vote Absentee 7 Definitely voting 74 Probably Voting 1 If you have already voted, please continue and answer questions the way you voted. Before statewide ballot questions, four quick questions for statistical purposes: 3. What is your age? If you are: 4. If you are a male press 1 or a female press 2. 18-29 press 8% 30-39 press 13 40-49 press 20 50-59 press 23 60-69 press 18 70 or older press 18 Male 48% Female 52

5. If you are white/caucasian press 1, African-American press 2, Hispanic press 3, Asian or something else press 4. White 84% African-American 12 Hispanic 1 Asian other 4 6. If you are a: Democrat or lean Democrat press 42% Republican or lean Republican press 38 Another party press 7 Or, Independent press 13 Now I m going to read you a few names. For each, please tell me if you have heard of that name. If you have heard of that name let me know if you have a favorable or unfavorable impression of that person. If you don t know the name, or don t know enough about them to say favorable or unfavorable, you can give me that answer too. 7. Rick Snyder. If you are not aware of Rick Snyder Press 1. Aware with a favorable impression Press 2. Aware with an unfavorable impression Press 3. If you are aware, but don t know enough to say favorable or unfavorable Press 4, and if you are not sure Press 5. Not Aware 5% Favorable 49 Unfavorable 41 Aware/No Impression 3 2 8. Mark Schauer. If you are not aware of Mark Schauer Press 1. Aware with a favorable impression Press 2. Aware with an unfavorable impression Press 3. If you are aware, but don t know enough to say favorable or unfavorable Press 4, and if you are not sure Press 5. Not Aware 9% Favorable 42 Unfavorable 38 Aware/No Impression 10 2 9. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as President? If you strongly approve press 1, somewhat approve press 2, somewhat disapprove press 3, strongly disapprove press 4, or if you are not sure press 5. Strongly Approve 26% Somewhat Approve 21 48% Somewhat Disapprove 8 51% Strongly Disapprove 43 2

10. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Rick Snyder is doing as Governor? If you strongly approve press 1, somewhat approve press 2, somewhat disapprove press 3, strongly disapprove press 4, or if you are not sure press 5. Strongly Approve 30% Somewhat Approve 24 54% Somewhat Disapprove 17 44% Strongly Disapprove 27 2 11. If the November 2014 General Election for Governor of Michigan was being held today, would you be voting for Rick Snyder the Republican, Mark Schauer the Democrat, Mary Buzuma the Libertarian, Mark McFarlin the U.S. Tax Payers, or Paul Homeniuk the Green Party Candidate? If you are voting for or lean towards Rick Snyder press 1, if you are voting for or lean towards Mark Schauer press 2, if you are voting for or lean towards Mary Buzuma press 3, if you are voting for or lean towards Mark McFarlin press 4, if you are voting for or lean towards Paul Homeniuk press 5, and if you re not sure yet press 6. Snyder 48% Schauer 43 Buzuma 2 McFarlin 1 Homeniuk <1 5 12. If the November 2014 General Election for U.S. Senator of Michigan was being held today, would you be voting for Terri Lynn Land the Republican, Gary Peters the Democrat, Jim Fulner the Libertarian, Richard A. Matkin the U.S. Tax Payers, or Chris Wahmhoff the Green Party Candidate? If you are voting for or lean towards Terri Lynn Land press 1, if you are voting for or lean towards Gary Peters press 2, if you are voting for or lean towards Jim Fulner press 3, if you are voting for or lean towards Richard A. Matkin press 4, if you are voting for or lean towards Chris Wahmhoff press 5, and if you re not sure yet press 6. Land 38% Peters 52 Fulner 3 Matkin 1 Wahmhoff 1 5 13. You must answer the last question or none of your answers will count. What area do you live in? If you live in the: City of Detroit press 6% Wayne County outside of Detroit 13 Oakland County 14 Macomb County 8 Flint, Saginaw, Bay City, Thumb --- 14 Monroe, Washtenaw, Lansing, Jackson, Mid-Michigan ---------------- 17 West Michigan 20 Northern Michigan/U.P. 9

N=1159 1. Total 11. Gov Ballot Yes Snyder Schauer Buzuma McFarlin Homeniuk Total 1159 560 503 25 12 5 54 100.0% 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV 200 82 102 4 3 0 9 100.0% 41.0% 51.0% 2.0% 1.5% 0.0% 4.5% 17.3% 14.6% 20.3% 16.0% 25.0% 0.0% 16.7% Will Vote AV 82 30 46 0 0 0 6 100.0% 36.6% 56.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.3% 7.1% 5.4% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% Definitely Voting 862 442 352 21 8 4 35 100.0% 51.3% 40.8% 2.4% 0.9% 0.5% 4.1% 74.4% 78.9% 70.0% 84.0% 66.7% 80.0% 64.8% Probably Voting 15 6 3 0 1 1 4 100.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 6.7% 6.7% 26.7% 1.3% 1.1% 0.6% 0.0% 8.3% 20.0% 7.4%

N=1159 1. Total 11. Gov Ballot Yes Snyder Schauer Buzuma McFarlin Homeniuk Total 1159 560 503 25 12 5 54 100.0% 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age 18-29 95 42 47 2 0 1 3 100.0% 44.2% 49.5% 2.1% 0.0% 1.1% 3.2% 8.2% 7.5% 9.3% 8.0% 0.0% 20.0% 5.6% 30-39 149 93 39 4 5 0 8 100.0% 62.4% 26.2% 2.7% 3.4% 0.0% 5.4% 12.9% 16.6% 7.8% 16.0% 41.7% 0.0% 14.8% 40-49 232 100 108 7 0 1 16 100.0% 43.1% 46.6% 3.0% 0.0% 0.4% 6.9% 20.0% 17.9% 21.5% 28.0% 0.0% 20.0% 29.6% 50-59 266 128 116 7 4 2 9 100.0% 48.1% 43.6% 2.6% 1.5% 0.8% 3.4% 23.0% 22.9% 23.1% 28.0% 33.3% 40.0% 16.7% 60-69 207 95 100 4 0 1 7 100.0% 45.9% 48.3% 1.9% 0.0% 0.5% 3.4% 17.9% 17.0% 19.9% 16.0% 0.0% 20.0% 13.0% 70+ 210 102 93 1 3 0 11 100.0% 48.6% 44.3% 0.5% 1.4% 0.0% 5.2% 18.1% 18.2% 18.5% 4.0% 25.0% 0.0% 20.4% Total 1159 560 503 25 12 5 54 100.0% 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male 555 293 216 16 2 3 25 100.0% 52.8% 38.9% 2.9% 0.4% 0.5% 4.5% 47.9% 52.3% 42.9% 64.0% 16.7% 60.0% 46.3% Female 604 267 287 9 10 2 29 100.0% 44.2% 47.5% 1.5% 1.7% 0.3% 4.8% 52.1% 47.7% 57.1% 36.0% 83.3% 40.0% 53.7%

N=1159 1. Total 11. Gov Ballot Yes Snyder Schauer Buzuma McFarlin Homeniuk Total 1159 560 503 25 12 5 54 100.0% 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White 971 522 372 19 12 4 42 100.0% 53.8% 38.3% 2.0% 1.2% 0.4% 4.3% 83.8% 93.2% 74.0% 76.0% 100.0% 80.0% 77.8% African-American 135 11 113 3 0 0 8 100.0% 8.1% 83.7% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 11.6% 2.0% 22.5% 12.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.8% Hispanic 13 5 5 3 0 0 0 100.0% 38.5% 38.5% 23.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0% 12.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian Other 40 22 13 0 0 1 4 100.0% 55.0% 32.5% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% 10.0% 3.5% 3.9% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 7.4% Total 1159 560 503 25 12 5 54 100.0% 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat 487 70 380 5 2 2 28 100.0% 14.4% 78.0% 1.0% 0.4% 0.4% 5.7% 42.0% 12.5% 75.5% 20.0% 16.7% 40.0% 51.9% Republican 440 391 26 6 9 1 7 100.0% 88.9% 5.9% 1.4% 2.0% 0.2% 1.6% 38.0% 69.8% 5.2% 24.0% 75.0% 20.0% 13.0% Another party 83 25 34 13 0 1 10 100.0% 30.1% 41.0% 15.7% 0.0% 1.2% 12.0% 7.2% 4.5% 6.8% 52.0% 0.0% 20.0% 18.5% Independent 149 74 63 1 1 1 9 100.0% 49.7% 42.3% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 6.0% 12.9% 13.2% 12.5% 4.0% 8.3% 20.0% 16.7%

N=1159 1. Total 11. Gov Ballot Yes Snyder Schauer Buzuma McFarlin Homeniuk Total 1159 560 503 25 12 5 54 100.0% 48.3% 43.4% 2.2% 1.0% 0.4% 4.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit 65 13 49 2 0 0 1 100.0% 20.0% 75.4% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 5.6% 2.3% 9.7% 8.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% Wayne 155 86 65 0 0 1 3 100.0% 55.5% 41.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 1.9% 13.4% 15.4% 12.9% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 5.6% Oakland 164 83 65 4 0 2 10 100.0% 50.6% 39.6% 2.4% 0.0% 1.2% 6.1% 14.2% 14.8% 12.9% 16.0% 0.0% 40.0% 18.5% Macomb 93 56 25 0 2 0 10 100.0% 60.2% 26.9% 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 10.8% 8.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 18.5% Thumb 156 62 77 5 6 1 5 100.0% 39.7% 49.4% 3.2% 3.8% 0.6% 3.2% 13.5% 11.1% 15.3% 20.0% 50.0% 20.0% 9.3% Mid-Michigan 198 94 84 5 1 0 14 100.0% 47.5% 42.4% 2.5% 0.5% 0.0% 7.1% 17.1% 16.8% 16.7% 20.0% 8.3% 0.0% 25.9% West Michigan 229 113 97 8 2 0 9 100.0% 49.3% 42.4% 3.5% 0.9% 0.0% 3.9% 19.8% 20.2% 19.3% 32.0% 16.7% 0.0% 16.7% Northern MI/U.P. 99 53 41 1 1 1 2 100.0% 53.5% 41.4% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 2.0% 8.5% 9.5% 8.2% 4.0% 8.3% 20.0% 3.7%

N=1159 1. Total 12. US Senate Ballot Yes Land Peters Fulner Matkin Wahmhoff Total 1159 441 605 37 9 7 60 100.0% 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV 200 69 115 5 2 2 7 100.0% 34.5% 57.5% 2.5% 1.0% 1.0% 3.5% 17.3% 15.6% 19.0% 13.5% 22.2% 28.6% 11.7% Will Vote AV 82 24 48 1 0 1 8 100.0% 29.3% 58.5% 1.2% 0.0% 1.2% 9.8% 7.1% 5.4% 7.9% 2.7% 0.0% 14.3% 13.3% Definitely Voting 862 345 439 31 4 4 39 100.0% 40.0% 50.9% 3.6% 0.5% 0.5% 4.5% 74.4% 78.2% 72.6% 83.8% 44.4% 57.1% 65.0% Probably Voting 15 3 3 0 3 0 6 100.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 1.3% 0.7% 0.5% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 10.0%

N=1159 1. Total 12. US Senate Ballot Yes Land Peters Fulner Matkin Wahmhoff Total 1159 441 605 37 9 7 60 100.0% 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age 18-29 95 26 62 3 1 0 3 100.0% 27.4% 65.3% 3.2% 1.1% 0.0% 3.2% 8.2% 5.9% 10.2% 8.1% 11.1% 0.0% 5.0% 30-39 149 66 70 13 0 0 0 100.0% 44.3% 47.0% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.9% 15.0% 11.6% 35.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40-49 232 82 121 8 2 2 17 100.0% 35.3% 52.2% 3.4% 0.9% 0.9% 7.3% 20.0% 18.6% 20.0% 21.6% 22.2% 28.6% 28.3% 50-59 266 106 133 7 2 3 15 100.0% 39.8% 50.0% 2.6% 0.8% 1.1% 5.6% 23.0% 24.0% 22.0% 18.9% 22.2% 42.9% 25.0% 60-69 207 83 112 4 1 1 6 100.0% 40.1% 54.1% 1.9% 0.5% 0.5% 2.9% 17.9% 18.8% 18.5% 10.8% 11.1% 14.3% 10.0% 70+ 210 78 107 2 3 1 19 100.0% 37.1% 51.0% 1.0% 1.4% 0.5% 9.0% 18.1% 17.7% 17.7% 5.4% 33.3% 14.3% 31.7% Total 1159 441 605 37 9 7 60 100.0% 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male 555 234 271 17 4 2 27 100.0% 42.2% 48.8% 3.1% 0.7% 0.4% 4.9% 47.9% 53.1% 44.8% 45.9% 44.4% 28.6% 45.0% Female 604 207 334 20 5 5 33 100.0% 34.3% 55.3% 3.3% 0.8% 0.8% 5.5% 52.1% 46.9% 55.2% 54.1% 55.6% 71.4% 55.0%

N=1159 1. Total 12. US Senate Ballot Yes Land Peters Fulner Matkin Wahmhoff Total 1159 441 605 37 9 7 60 100.0% 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White 971 413 460 33 8 5 52 100.0% 42.5% 47.4% 3.4% 0.8% 0.5% 5.4% 83.8% 93.7% 76.0% 89.2% 88.9% 71.4% 86.7% African-American 135 10 117 0 0 2 6 100.0% 7.4% 86.7% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 4.4% 11.6% 2.3% 19.3% 0.0% 0.0% 28.6% 10.0% Hispanic 13 4 6 3 0 0 0 100.0% 30.8% 46.2% 23.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0% 8.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian Other 40 14 22 1 1 0 2 100.0% 35.0% 55.0% 2.5% 2.5% 0.0% 5.0% 3.5% 3.2% 3.6% 2.7% 11.1% 0.0% 3.3% Total 1159 441 605 37 9 7 60 100.0% 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat 487 27 437 2 1 3 17 100.0% 5.5% 89.7% 0.4% 0.2% 0.6% 3.5% 42.0% 6.1% 72.2% 5.4% 11.1% 42.9% 28.3% Republican 440 357 41 13 4 3 22 100.0% 81.1% 9.3% 3.0% 0.9% 0.7% 5.0% 38.0% 81.0% 6.8% 35.1% 44.4% 42.9% 36.7% Another party 83 17 39 15 3 1 8 100.0% 20.5% 47.0% 18.1% 3.6% 1.2% 9.6% 7.2% 3.9% 6.4% 40.5% 33.3% 14.3% 13.3% Independent 149 40 88 7 1 0 13 100.0% 26.8% 59.1% 4.7% 0.7% 0.0% 8.7% 12.9% 9.1% 14.5% 18.9% 11.1% 0.0% 21.7%

N=1159 1. Total 12. US Senate Ballot Yes Land Peters Fulner Matkin Wahmhoff Total 1159 441 605 37 9 7 60 100.0% 38.1% 52.2% 3.2% 0.8% 0.6% 5.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit 65 9 52 2 0 2 0 100.0% 13.8% 80.0% 3.1% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 5.6% 2.0% 8.6% 5.4% 0.0% 28.6% 0.0% Wayne 155 51 92 8 0 1 3 100.0% 32.9% 59.4% 5.2% 0.0% 0.6% 1.9% 13.4% 11.6% 15.2% 21.6% 0.0% 14.3% 5.0% Oakland 164 63 87 4 1 0 9 100.0% 38.4% 53.0% 2.4% 0.6% 0.0% 5.5% 14.2% 14.3% 14.4% 10.8% 11.1% 0.0% 15.0% Macomb 93 46 31 2 3 0 11 100.0% 49.5% 33.3% 2.2% 3.2% 0.0% 11.8% 8.0% 10.4% 5.1% 5.4% 33.3% 0.0% 18.3% Thumb 156 49 89 8 1 0 9 100.0% 31.4% 57.1% 5.1% 0.6% 0.0% 5.8% 13.5% 11.1% 14.7% 21.6% 11.1% 0.0% 15.0% Mid-Michigan 198 75 106 5 1 1 10 100.0% 37.9% 53.5% 2.5% 0.5% 0.5% 5.1% 17.1% 17.0% 17.5% 13.5% 11.1% 14.3% 16.7% West Michigan 229 104 99 8 3 2 13 100.0% 45.4% 43.2% 3.5% 1.3% 0.9% 5.7% 19.8% 23.6% 16.4% 21.6% 33.3% 28.6% 21.7% Northern MI/U.P. 99 44 49 0 0 1 5 100.0% 44.4% 49.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 5.1% 8.5% 10.0% 8.1% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 8.3%

N=1159 1. Total 10. Snyder Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total 1159 621 511 27 100.0% 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV 200 103 93 4 100.0% 51.5% 46.5% 2.0% 17.3% 16.6% 18.2% 14.8% Will Vote AV 82 37 43 2 100.0% 45.1% 52.4% 2.4% 7.1% 6.0% 8.4% 7.4% Definitely Voting 862 473 371 18 100.0% 54.9% 43.0% 2.1% 74.4% 76.2% 72.6% 66.7% Probably Voting 15 8 4 3 100.0% 53.3% 26.7% 20.0% 1.3% 1.3% 0.8% 11.1%

N=1159 1. Total 10. Snyder Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total 1159 621 511 27 100.0% 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age 18-29 95 37 58 0 100.0% 38.9% 61.1% 0.0% 8.2% 6.0% 11.4% 0.0% 30-39 149 113 36 0 100.0% 75.8% 24.2% 0.0% 12.9% 18.2% 7.0% 0.0% 40-49 232 106 116 10 100.0% 45.7% 50.0% 4.3% 20.0% 17.1% 22.7% 37.0% 50-59 266 136 123 7 100.0% 51.1% 46.2% 2.6% 23.0% 21.9% 24.1% 25.9% 60-69 207 108 97 2 100.0% 52.2% 46.9% 1.0% 17.9% 17.4% 19.0% 7.4% 70+ 210 121 81 8 100.0% 57.6% 38.6% 3.8% 18.1% 19.5% 15.9% 29.6% Total 1159 621 511 27 100.0% 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male 555 312 236 7 100.0% 56.2% 42.5% 1.3% 47.9% 50.2% 46.2% 25.9% Female 604 309 275 20 100.0% 51.2% 45.5% 3.3% 52.1% 49.8% 53.8% 74.1%

N=1159 1. Total 10. Snyder Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total 1159 621 511 27 100.0% 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White 971 560 390 21 100.0% 57.7% 40.2% 2.2% 83.8% 90.2% 76.3% 77.8% African-American 135 32 97 6 100.0% 23.7% 71.9% 4.4% 11.6% 5.2% 19.0% 22.2% Hispanic 13 7 6 0 100.0% 53.8% 46.2% 0.0% 1.1% 1.1% 1.2% 0.0% Asian Other 40 22 18 0 100.0% 55.0% 45.0% 0.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 0.0% Total 1159 621 511 27 100.0% 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat 487 118 358 11 100.0% 24.2% 73.5% 2.3% 42.0% 19.0% 70.1% 40.7% Republican 440 388 44 8 100.0% 88.2% 10.0% 1.8% 38.0% 62.5% 8.6% 29.6% Another party 83 31 44 8 100.0% 37.3% 53.0% 9.6% 7.2% 5.0% 8.6% 29.6% Independent 149 84 65 0 100.0% 56.4% 43.6% 0.0% 12.9% 13.5% 12.7% 0.0%

N=1159 1. Total 10. Snyder Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total 1159 621 511 27 100.0% 53.6% 44.1% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit 65 19 42 4 100.0% 29.2% 64.6% 6.2% 5.6% 3.1% 8.2% 14.8% Wayne 155 95 60 0 100.0% 61.3% 38.7% 0.0% 13.4% 15.3% 11.7% 0.0% Oakland 164 101 62 1 100.0% 61.6% 37.8% 0.6% 14.2% 16.3% 12.1% 3.7% Macomb 93 59 28 6 100.0% 63.4% 30.1% 6.5% 8.0% 9.5% 5.5% 22.2% Thumb 156 70 80 6 100.0% 44.9% 51.3% 3.8% 13.5% 11.3% 15.7% 22.2% Mid-Michigan 198 106 89 3 100.0% 53.5% 44.9% 1.5% 17.1% 17.1% 17.4% 11.1% West Michigan 229 120 103 6 100.0% 52.4% 45.0% 2.6% 19.8% 19.3% 20.2% 22.2% Northern MI/U.P. 99 51 47 1 100.0% 51.5% 47.5% 1.0% 8.5% 8.2% 9.2% 3.7%

N=1159 1. Total 7. Snyder ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total 1159 54 573 470 35 27 100.0% 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV 200 16 82 86 11 5 100.0% 8.0% 41.0% 43.0% 5.5% 2.5% 17.3% 29.6% 14.3% 18.3% 31.4% 18.5% Will Vote AV 82 6 30 42 1 3 100.0% 7.3% 36.6% 51.2% 1.2% 3.7% 7.1% 11.1% 5.2% 8.9% 2.9% 11.1% Definitely Voting 862 29 455 338 21 19 100.0% 3.4% 52.8% 39.2% 2.4% 2.2% 74.4% 53.7% 79.4% 71.9% 60.0% 70.4% Probably Voting 15 3 6 4 2 0 100.0% 20.0% 40.0% 26.7% 13.3% 0.0% 1.3% 5.6% 1.0% 0.9% 5.7% 0.0%

N=1159 1. Total 7. Snyder ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total 1159 54 573 470 35 27 100.0% 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age 18-29 95 16 47 32 0 0 100.0% 16.8% 49.5% 33.7% 0.0% 0.0% 8.2% 29.6% 8.2% 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% 30-39 149 3 99 38 9 0 100.0% 2.0% 66.4% 25.5% 6.0% 0.0% 12.9% 5.6% 17.3% 8.1% 25.7% 0.0% 40-49 232 7 101 111 8 5 100.0% 3.0% 43.5% 47.8% 3.4% 2.2% 20.0% 13.0% 17.6% 23.6% 22.9% 18.5% 50-59 266 4 128 115 11 8 100.0% 1.5% 48.1% 43.2% 4.1% 3.0% 23.0% 7.4% 22.3% 24.5% 31.4% 29.6% 60-69 207 5 100 95 3 4 100.0% 2.4% 48.3% 45.9% 1.4% 1.9% 17.9% 9.3% 17.5% 20.2% 8.6% 14.8% 70+ 210 19 98 79 4 10 100.0% 9.0% 46.7% 37.6% 1.9% 4.8% 18.1% 35.2% 17.1% 16.8% 11.4% 37.0% Total 1159 54 573 470 35 27 100.0% 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male 555 35 294 211 6 9 100.0% 6.3% 53.0% 38.0% 1.1% 1.6% 47.9% 64.8% 51.3% 44.9% 17.1% 33.3% Female 604 19 279 259 29 18 100.0% 3.1% 46.2% 42.9% 4.8% 3.0% 52.1% 35.2% 48.7% 55.1% 82.9% 66.7%

N=1159 1. Total 7. Snyder ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total 1159 54 573 470 35 27 100.0% 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White 971 49 520 360 27 15 100.0% 5.0% 53.6% 37.1% 2.8% 1.5% 83.8% 90.7% 90.8% 76.6% 77.1% 55.6% African-American 135 4 23 92 6 10 100.0% 3.0% 17.0% 68.1% 4.4% 7.4% 11.6% 7.4% 4.0% 19.6% 17.1% 37.0% Hispanic 13 0 6 6 0 1 100.0% 0.0% 46.2% 46.2% 0.0% 7.7% 1.1% 0.0% 1.0% 1.3% 0.0% 3.7% Asian Other 40 1 24 12 2 1 100.0% 2.5% 60.0% 30.0% 5.0% 2.5% 3.5% 1.9% 4.2% 2.6% 5.7% 3.7% Total 1159 54 573 470 35 27 100.0% 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat 487 27 80 348 18 14 100.0% 5.5% 16.4% 71.5% 3.7% 2.9% 42.0% 50.0% 14.0% 74.0% 51.4% 51.9% Republican 440 17 367 37 13 6 100.0% 3.9% 83.4% 8.4% 3.0% 1.4% 38.0% 31.5% 64.0% 7.9% 37.1% 22.2% Another party 83 7 49 22 1 4 100.0% 8.4% 59.0% 26.5% 1.2% 4.8% 7.2% 13.0% 8.6% 4.7% 2.9% 14.8% Independent 149 3 77 63 3 3 100.0% 2.0% 51.7% 42.3% 2.0% 2.0% 12.9% 5.6% 13.4% 13.4% 8.6% 11.1%

N=1159 1. Total 7. Snyder ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total 1159 54 573 470 35 27 100.0% 4.7% 49.4% 40.6% 3.0% 2.3% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit 65 7 14 37 3 4 100.0% 10.8% 21.5% 56.9% 4.6% 6.2% 5.6% 13.0% 2.4% 7.9% 8.6% 14.8% Wayne 155 2 89 58 2 4 100.0% 1.3% 57.4% 37.4% 1.3% 2.6% 13.4% 3.7% 15.5% 12.3% 5.7% 14.8% Oakland 164 5 84 65 6 4 100.0% 3.0% 51.2% 39.6% 3.7% 2.4% 14.2% 9.3% 14.7% 13.8% 17.1% 14.8% Macomb 93 5 58 27 0 3 100.0% 5.4% 62.4% 29.0% 0.0% 3.2% 8.0% 9.3% 10.1% 5.7% 0.0% 11.1% Thumb 156 21 46 75 11 3 100.0% 13.5% 29.5% 48.1% 7.1% 1.9% 13.5% 38.9% 8.0% 16.0% 31.4% 11.1% Mid-Michigan 198 5 101 85 4 3 100.0% 2.5% 51.0% 42.9% 2.0% 1.5% 17.1% 9.3% 17.6% 18.1% 11.4% 11.1% West Michigan 229 4 131 81 8 5 100.0% 1.7% 57.2% 35.4% 3.5% 2.2% 19.8% 7.4% 22.9% 17.2% 22.9% 18.5% Northern MI/U.P. 99 5 50 42 1 1 100.0% 5.1% 50.5% 42.4% 1.0% 1.0% 8.5% 9.3% 8.7% 8.9% 2.9% 3.7%

N=1159 1. Total 8. Schauer ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total 1159 102 486 439 110 22 100.0% 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV 200 32 90 62 12 4 100.0% 16.0% 45.0% 31.0% 6.0% 2.0% 17.3% 31.4% 18.5% 14.1% 10.9% 18.2% Will Vote AV 82 8 36 21 14 3 100.0% 9.8% 43.9% 25.6% 17.1% 3.7% 7.1% 7.8% 7.4% 4.8% 12.7% 13.6% Definitely Voting 862 57 357 352 81 15 100.0% 6.6% 41.4% 40.8% 9.4% 1.7% 74.4% 55.9% 73.5% 80.2% 73.6% 68.2% Probably Voting 15 5 3 4 3 0 100.0% 33.3% 20.0% 26.7% 20.0% 0.0% 1.3% 4.9% 0.6% 0.9% 2.7% 0.0%

N=1159 1. Total 8. Schauer ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total 1159 102 486 439 110 22 100.0% 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age 18-29 95 26 46 23 0 0 100.0% 27.4% 48.4% 24.2% 0.0% 0.0% 8.2% 25.5% 9.5% 5.2% 0.0% 0.0% 30-39 149 4 52 71 22 0 100.0% 2.7% 34.9% 47.7% 14.8% 0.0% 12.9% 3.9% 10.7% 16.2% 20.0% 0.0% 40-49 232 16 106 83 24 3 100.0% 6.9% 45.7% 35.8% 10.3% 1.3% 20.0% 15.7% 21.8% 18.9% 21.8% 13.6% 50-59 266 24 103 109 26 4 100.0% 9.0% 38.7% 41.0% 9.8% 1.5% 23.0% 23.5% 21.2% 24.8% 23.6% 18.2% 60-69 207 13 97 71 21 5 100.0% 6.3% 46.9% 34.3% 10.1% 2.4% 17.9% 12.7% 20.0% 16.2% 19.1% 22.7% 70+ 210 19 82 82 17 10 100.0% 9.0% 39.0% 39.0% 8.1% 4.8% 18.1% 18.6% 16.9% 18.7% 15.5% 45.5% Total 1159 102 486 439 110 22 100.0% 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male 555 58 217 217 57 6 100.0% 10.5% 39.1% 39.1% 10.3% 1.1% 47.9% 56.9% 44.7% 49.4% 51.8% 27.3% Female 604 44 269 222 53 16 100.0% 7.3% 44.5% 36.8% 8.8% 2.6% 52.1% 43.1% 55.3% 50.6% 48.2% 72.7%

N=1159 1. Total 8. Schauer ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total 1159 102 486 439 110 22 100.0% 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White 971 86 362 407 99 17 100.0% 8.9% 37.3% 41.9% 10.2% 1.8% 83.8% 84.3% 74.5% 92.7% 90.0% 77.3% African-American 135 10 100 14 6 5 100.0% 7.4% 74.1% 10.4% 4.4% 3.7% 11.6% 9.8% 20.6% 3.2% 5.5% 22.7% Hispanic 13 1 6 6 0 0 100.0% 7.7% 46.2% 46.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% Asian Other 40 5 18 12 5 0 100.0% 12.5% 45.0% 30.0% 12.5% 0.0% 3.5% 4.9% 3.7% 2.7% 4.5% 0.0% Total 1159 102 486 439 110 22 100.0% 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat 487 49 352 41 38 7 100.0% 10.1% 72.3% 8.4% 7.8% 1.4% 42.0% 48.0% 72.4% 9.3% 34.5% 31.8% Republican 440 35 34 315 45 11 100.0% 8.0% 7.7% 71.6% 10.2% 2.5% 38.0% 34.3% 7.0% 71.8% 40.9% 50.0% Another party 83 9 42 26 4 2 100.0% 10.8% 50.6% 31.3% 4.8% 2.4% 7.2% 8.8% 8.6% 5.9% 3.6% 9.1% Independent 149 9 58 57 23 2 100.0% 6.0% 38.9% 38.3% 15.4% 1.3% 12.9% 8.8% 11.9% 13.0% 20.9% 9.1%

N=1159 1. Total 8. Schauer ID Yes Not Aware Favorable Unfavorable Aware/ No Impression Total 1159 102 486 439 110 22 100.0% 8.8% 41.9% 37.9% 9.5% 1.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit 65 10 42 7 3 3 100.0% 15.4% 64.6% 10.8% 4.6% 4.6% 5.6% 9.8% 8.6% 1.6% 2.7% 13.6% Wayne 155 4 71 59 19 2 100.0% 2.6% 45.8% 38.1% 12.3% 1.3% 13.4% 3.9% 14.6% 13.4% 17.3% 9.1% Oakland 164 9 61 76 18 0 100.0% 5.5% 37.2% 46.3% 11.0% 0.0% 14.2% 8.8% 12.6% 17.3% 16.4% 0.0% Macomb 93 11 26 49 4 3 100.0% 11.8% 28.0% 52.7% 4.3% 3.2% 8.0% 10.8% 5.3% 11.2% 3.6% 13.6% Thumb 156 23 64 50 16 3 100.0% 14.7% 41.0% 32.1% 10.3% 1.9% 13.5% 22.5% 13.2% 11.4% 14.5% 13.6% Mid-Michigan 198 15 84 74 21 4 100.0% 7.6% 42.4% 37.4% 10.6% 2.0% 17.1% 14.7% 17.3% 16.9% 19.1% 18.2% West Michigan 229 16 101 86 20 6 100.0% 7.0% 44.1% 37.6% 8.7% 2.6% 19.8% 15.7% 20.8% 19.6% 18.2% 27.3% Northern MI/U.P. 99 14 37 38 9 1 100.0% 14.1% 37.4% 38.4% 9.1% 1.0% 8.5% 13.7% 7.6% 8.7% 8.2% 4.5%

N=1159 1. Total 9. Obama Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total 1159 552 590 17 100.0% 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV 200 118 79 3 100.0% 59.0% 39.5% 1.5% 17.3% 21.4% 13.4% 17.6% Will Vote AV 82 45 34 3 100.0% 54.9% 41.5% 3.7% 7.1% 8.2% 5.8% 17.6% Definitely Voting 862 384 468 10 100.0% 44.5% 54.3% 1.2% 74.4% 69.6% 79.3% 58.8% Probably Voting 15 5 9 1 100.0% 33.3% 60.0% 6.7% 1.3% 0.9% 1.5% 5.9%

N=1159 1. Total 9. Obama Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total 1159 552 590 17 100.0% 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age 18-29 95 43 52 0 100.0% 45.3% 54.7% 0.0% 8.2% 7.8% 8.8% 0.0% 30-39 149 65 80 4 100.0% 43.6% 53.7% 2.7% 12.9% 11.8% 13.6% 23.5% 40-49 232 107 120 5 100.0% 46.1% 51.7% 2.2% 20.0% 19.4% 20.3% 29.4% 50-59 266 123 143 0 100.0% 46.2% 53.8% 0.0% 23.0% 22.3% 24.2% 0.0% 60-69 207 113 91 3 100.0% 54.6% 44.0% 1.4% 17.9% 20.5% 15.4% 17.6% 70+ 210 101 104 5 100.0% 48.1% 49.5% 2.4% 18.1% 18.3% 17.6% 29.4% Total 1159 552 590 17 100.0% 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male 555 257 290 8 100.0% 46.3% 52.3% 1.4% 47.9% 46.6% 49.2% 47.1% Female 604 295 300 9 100.0% 48.8% 49.7% 1.5% 52.1% 53.4% 50.8% 52.9%

N=1159 1. Total 9. Obama Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total 1159 552 590 17 100.0% 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White 971 401 554 16 100.0% 41.3% 57.1% 1.6% 83.8% 72.6% 93.9% 94.1% African-American 135 125 10 0 100.0% 92.6% 7.4% 0.0% 11.6% 22.6% 1.7% 0.0% Hispanic 13 5 7 1 100.0% 38.5% 53.8% 7.7% 1.1% 0.9% 1.2% 5.9% Asian Other 40 21 19 0 100.0% 52.5% 47.5% 0.0% 3.5% 3.8% 3.2% 0.0% Total 1159 552 590 17 100.0% 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 6. Party Democrat 487 437 43 7 100.0% 89.7% 8.8% 1.4% 42.0% 79.2% 7.3% 41.2% Republican 440 29 408 3 100.0% 6.6% 92.7% 0.7% 38.0% 5.3% 69.2% 17.6% Another party 83 37 43 3 100.0% 44.6% 51.8% 3.6% 7.2% 6.7% 7.3% 17.6% Independent 149 49 96 4 100.0% 32.9% 64.4% 2.7% 12.9% 8.9% 16.3% 23.5%

N=1159 1. Total 9. Obama Approval Yes Approve Disapprove Total 1159 552 590 17 100.0% 47.6% 50.9% 1.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit 65 55 10 0 100.0% 84.6% 15.4% 0.0% 5.6% 10.0% 1.7% 0.0% Wayne 155 83 71 1 100.0% 53.5% 45.8% 0.6% 13.4% 15.0% 12.0% 5.9% Oakland 164 90 74 0 100.0% 54.9% 45.1% 0.0% 14.2% 16.3% 12.5% 0.0% Macomb 93 29 64 0 100.0% 31.2% 68.8% 0.0% 8.0% 5.3% 10.8% 0.0% Thumb 156 68 87 1 100.0% 43.6% 55.8% 0.6% 13.5% 12.3% 14.7% 5.9% Mid-Michigan 198 89 103 6 100.0% 44.9% 52.0% 3.0% 17.1% 16.1% 17.5% 35.3% West Michigan 229 97 125 7 100.0% 42.4% 54.6% 3.1% 19.8% 17.6% 21.2% 41.2% Northern MI/U.P. 99 41 56 2 100.0% 41.4% 56.6% 2.0% 8.5% 7.4% 9.5% 11.8%

N=1159 1. Total 6. Party Yes Democrat Republican Another party Independent Total 1159 487 440 83 149 100.0% 42.0% 38.0% 7.2% 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. Voter Prob Voted AV 200 108 69 12 11 100.0% 54.0% 34.5% 6.0% 5.5% 17.3% 22.2% 15.7% 14.5% 7.4% Will Vote AV 82 37 30 2 13 100.0% 45.1% 36.6% 2.4% 15.9% 7.1% 7.6% 6.8% 2.4% 8.7% Definitely Voting 862 339 335 66 122 100.0% 39.3% 38.9% 7.7% 14.2% 74.4% 69.6% 76.1% 79.5% 81.9% Probably Voting 15 3 6 3 3 100.0% 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 1.3% 0.6% 1.4% 3.6% 2.0%

N=1159 1. Total 6. Party Yes Democrat Republican Another party Independent Total 1159 487 440 83 149 100.0% 42.0% 38.0% 7.2% 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 3. Age 18-29 95 30 18 25 22 100.0% 31.6% 18.9% 26.3% 23.2% 8.2% 6.2% 4.1% 30.1% 14.8% 30-39 149 48 58 12 31 100.0% 32.2% 38.9% 8.1% 20.8% 12.9% 9.9% 13.2% 14.5% 20.8% 40-49 232 109 86 15 22 100.0% 47.0% 37.1% 6.5% 9.5% 20.0% 22.4% 19.5% 18.1% 14.8% 50-59 266 108 106 15 37 100.0% 40.6% 39.8% 5.6% 13.9% 23.0% 22.2% 24.1% 18.1% 24.8% 60-69 207 101 77 7 22 100.0% 48.8% 37.2% 3.4% 10.6% 17.9% 20.7% 17.5% 8.4% 14.8% 70+ 210 91 95 9 15 100.0% 43.3% 45.2% 4.3% 7.1% 18.1% 18.7% 21.6% 10.8% 10.1% Total 1159 487 440 83 149 100.0% 42.0% 38.0% 7.2% 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4. Gender Male 555 203 221 52 79 100.0% 36.6% 39.8% 9.4% 14.2% 47.9% 41.7% 50.2% 62.7% 53.0% Female 604 284 219 31 70 100.0% 47.0% 36.3% 5.1% 11.6% 52.1% 58.3% 49.8% 37.3% 47.0%

N=1159 1. Total 6. Party Yes Democrat Republican Another party Independent Total 1159 487 440 83 149 100.0% 42.0% 38.0% 7.2% 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5. Race White 971 337 420 75 139 100.0% 34.7% 43.3% 7.7% 14.3% 83.8% 69.2% 95.5% 90.4% 93.3% African-American 135 124 7 2 2 100.0% 91.9% 5.2% 1.5% 1.5% 11.6% 25.5% 1.6% 2.4% 1.3% Hispanic 13 8 3 2 0 100.0% 61.5% 23.1% 15.4% 0.0% 1.1% 1.6% 0.7% 2.4% 0.0% Asian Other 40 18 10 4 8 100.0% 45.0% 25.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.5% 3.7% 2.3% 4.8% 5.4%

N=1159 1. Total 6. Party Yes Democrat Republican Another party Independent Total 1159 487 440 83 149 100.0% 42.0% 38.0% 7.2% 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13. Area Detroit 65 55 4 2 4 100.0% 84.6% 6.2% 3.1% 6.2% 5.6% 11.3% 0.9% 2.4% 2.7% Wayne 155 73 42 14 26 100.0% 47.1% 27.1% 9.0% 16.8% 13.4% 15.0% 9.5% 16.9% 17.4% Oakland 164 79 69 2 14 100.0% 48.2% 42.1% 1.2% 8.5% 14.2% 16.2% 15.7% 2.4% 9.4% Macomb 93 25 44 6 18 100.0% 26.9% 47.3% 6.5% 19.4% 8.0% 5.1% 10.0% 7.2% 12.1% Thumb 156 63 60 4 29 100.0% 40.4% 38.5% 2.6% 18.6% 13.5% 12.9% 13.6% 4.8% 19.5% Mid-Michigan 198 89 66 15 28 100.0% 44.9% 33.3% 7.6% 14.1% 17.1% 18.3% 15.0% 18.1% 18.8% West Michigan 229 64 105 38 22 100.0% 27.9% 45.9% 16.6% 9.6% 19.8% 13.1% 23.9% 45.8% 14.8% Northern MI/U.P. 99 39 50 2 8 100.0% 39.4% 50.5% 2.0% 8.1% 8.5% 8.0% 11.4% 2.4% 5.4%