June Fairfax County Health Department

Similar documents
Reference Guide for the Value Assignment Web v

Office of Human Research

TITLE: HIE System Audit

CAP Quick Guide for Proficiency Testing

LabTrak Easy and Affordable. Laboratory Information System Solutions for the Physician Office Laboratory, Pain Management Clinics and Specialty Labs

Frequently Asked Questions

FDA Audit Preparation

Nursing and Midwifery Workload and Workforce Planning Programme

HIPAA RISK ADVISOR SAMPLE REPORT

NHS Health Check Internal/External Quality control Crib Sheet. Table of Contents. Alere Afinion HbA1c Control (Internal)

Information backup - diagnostic review Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board. Issued: September 2013 Document reference: 495A2013

Global Wind Organisation CRITERIA FOR THE CERTIFICATION BODY

Informational Guide for the NewSTEPs Data Repository

IT CONTINUITY, BACKUP AND RECOVERY POLICY

The University of Texas at Austin Animal Resources Center Animal Ordering Guide

Viral Load Scale-Up Facility Readiness Assessment Checklist

Data Quality and Integrity Investigation in Laboratories (Analytical)

Table of Contents 6.1 CORRESPONDENCE

GeneXpert Infinity Systems. The Most Automated Complete Molecular Diagnostic Systems. A better way.

EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION PROVIDER S MEETING

Informational Guide for the NewSTEPs Data Repository

Global Wind Organisation CRITERIA S FOR THE CERTIFICATION BODY

May Hands-on Guidance. Measurable Results. SUPPLIER EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

PROService REMOTE SERVICE APPLICATION. Frequently asked questions

Product Correction Urgent Immediate Action Required

IVDR Breakout. Copyright 2017 BSI. All rights reserved.

EMC LAB, TEST REPORTS DATABASE

Building strong relationships within a jurisdiction by utilizing Geographic Information

A COMPARISON OF TNI s ACCREDITATION STANDARD TO

BRE Global Limited Scheme Document SD 186: Issue No December 2017

MAKE THE CHANGE FOR BETTER NEONATAL SCREENING. Introducing the new AutoDELFIA immunoassay system for newborn screening

Scheme Document. For more information or help with your application contact BRE Global on +44 (0) or

VQA PROFICIENCY TESTING INVESTIGATION REPORT PROCEDURE

ACCREDITATION COMMISSION FOR CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES

Nursing and Midwifery Workload and Workforce Planning Programme

Oregon Board of Accountancy

Molecular diagnostics made fast, accurate and easy.

Postal Inspection Service Mail Covers Program

Online Specimen Tracking (OST) Newborn Screening Requirements and Training

Getting Started with e-lab Solutions User Guide

European Code of Conduct on Data Centre Energy Efficiency

National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance

Insight Program Modification

Title of Manual: Specimen Collection Document Number: GPA.SPC.52.0

CERTIFICATION GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Table of Contents RURO, Inc. All Rights Reserved

***** ***** August

Select Agents and Toxins Security Plan Template

FSMA Template Package List of Documents

CENTRAL STATE HOSPITAL POLICY SUBJECT: MAIL SERVICE/USE OF INTER-OFFICE/INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE AND URGENT MEDICAL INFO ENVELOPES

ELECTRONIC RESEARCH STUDY APPLICATION (ERSA) INITIAL APPLICATION GUIDEBOOK. (Version date 03/03/2006)

Data Storage, Recovery and Backup Checklists for Public Health Laboratories

Opportunity Lives Here

FedACH Risk Origination Monitoring Service

The American Society Of Phlebotomy Technicians, INC

for BacT/Alert System Issued by: LABORATORY MANAGER Original Date: January 10, 2000 Approved by: Laboratory Director Revision Date: December 17, 2004

FDA & Medical Device Cybersecurity

My Care Plus Your reference guide. MyCarePlusOnline.com

BIOSECURITY TOOLBOX A Personal Perspective

Source Documentation Standards for DMID Clinical Studies. Version Nov-2005

Process Safety Management in R&D

1.1 PROVIDER AUTHORIZATION. August 1, Version TRAINING GUIDE. Prepared By Gateway Health

MNsure Privacy Program Strategic Plan FY

IT SECURITY RISK ANALYSIS FOR MEANINGFUL USE STAGE I

ACCREDITATION COMMISSION FOR CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES

Table of Contents RURO, Inc. All Rights Reserved

RPR CRITERIA AND FORMATS

Use of Controlled Substances in Research

Data Integrity and the FDA AFDO Education Conference

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION TITLE: INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMS) NUMBER: DI-MGMT APPROVAL DATE:

The Texas A&M University System. Internal Audit Department. Fiscal Year 2014 Audit Plan

Trust Services Principles and Criteria

Implementation of UDI In the Medical Device Industry

Elements of Data Management

Information Technology Disaster Recovery Planning Audit Redacted Public Report

TERRORISM LIAISON OFFICER OUTREACH PROGRAM - (TLOOP)

This Policy has been prepared with due regard to the General Data Protection Regulation (EU Regulation 2016/679) ( GDPR ).

USER MANUAL FOR. Nano-Checker 710 THE PIONEER AND CONSISTENT INNOVATOR FOR IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS

Lakeshore Technical College Official Policy

Objectives 6/15/2015. Review of Customer Communications. Benefits of Immucor s Website

STORAGE OF SSAN. Security Risk Assessment and SECURITY PLAN. (insert name of company) SUBMITTED TO REGULATORY AUTHORITY: (insert date)

DATA INTEGRITY (EMA AUGUST 2016)

ITSM20F_Umang. Number: ITSM20F Passing Score: 800 Time Limit: 120 min File Version: 4.0. Exin ITSM20F

The Recovery and Monitoring Program of New Jersey (Keep this sheet for your files)

Policy and Procedure: SDM Guidance for HIPAA Business Associates

MEMORANDUM. RE: Revised SHR Adult Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) for Saskatoon hospital sites

Cerner WebConnect. User Manual LB-079-MED* *ISO 15189:2012 accreditation applies for the NRL Dubai laboratory only

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MANUAL OF UNIVERSITY POLICIES PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES. Applies to: faculty staff students student employees visitors contractors

Requirements on clinical data in Europe

REPORT 2015/149 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

EasyElectrolytes. With EasyElectrolytes, Medica has redefined electrolyte analyzer design

Access to University Data Policy

EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE

Total WBC count and differential WBC count HemoCue WBC DIFF system

POWER AND WATER CORPORATION POLICY MANAGEMENT OF EXTERNAL SERVICE PROVIDERS

Cell Therapy Data Management

Port Facility Cyber Security

City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number

Transcription:

June 2016 Fairfax County Health Department

Cepheid GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay

CDC/CMS IQCP guidance IQCP Developing an IQCP, A Step-By-Step Guide Manufacturer s IQCP guidance Developing an Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP0For Cepheid s GeneXpert Diagnostic Systems COLA Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP) Implementation Guide

76 Questions Pre-analytic - 30 Analytic 29 Post-Analytic 9 Final Review - 8

Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment Pre-Analytic Pre-Analytic Pre-Analytic 7: Is the internal or electronic QC, or the test system itself, capable of detecting inadequate patient preparation? If YES, describe how internal QC or test system will detect this potential source of error. If NO, describe your laboratory process for ensuring patient preparation is consistently followed. Comment Staff are trained in the proper collection, handling, and transportation of specimens. FCHDL protocol for MTB/RIF testing states that staff must include on the test requisition, documentation of any drug therapy including the duration. Requests received without this information would require follow-up to determine if the sample meets criteria for this test. Staff are trained in the proper positioning of patients for specimen collection per PHN Procedural Memoranda NO Pre-Analytic 8: Does your laboratory have a written procedure for patient identification and labeling of specimens? If yes, describe your laboratory s procedure for patient identification and specimen labeling? If no, develop and describe your laboratory s procedure for patient identification and specimen labeling. Comment Two identifiers are required for patient identification and labeling. Patients are routinely asked to state their name and date of birth. Specimens have bar code labels that include two identifiers. See Patient Identification Procedural Memorandum. YES Analytic Analytic Analytic 2: Does your laboratory have a process to ensure all components for the test are storage under conditions required by the manufacturer? If YES, describe your process for monitoring conditions. If NO, develop and implement a process and describe below. Comment All storage temperatures are monitored and recorded daily and corrective action taken if out of range. YES Analytic 3: Are the reagents and supplies shipped under conditions that are consistent with the manufacturer s requirements? If yes, describe your process for receiving supplies and the conditions under which the supplies are delivered from your supplier. If no, develop a process for evaluating conditions of reagents upon receipt. Comment All applicable supplies are delivered to the laboratory upon receipt and stored according to manufacturer s requirements. All applicable supplies are shipped as per Manufacturer s requirements. YES

Risk Assessment Post Analytic Post Analytic Post Analytic 7: Has your laboratory verified the accuracy of the test calculation? If yes, describe how the calculation is verified. IF No, develop and implement a method for verifying calculated results. NA Post Analytic 8: Can the accuracy of this test result be corroborated by results of other tests or prior results for this patient? If yes, list any tests that can corroborate the results. If no, proceed to Post Analytic 9 Comment Results are compared to AFB smear, culture, and susceptibility testing results. YES Final Review Final Review Review 1: Have you previously performed an EQC study for this test? If yes, confirm control values used for the EQC study fell within the expected range. If no, proceed to Review 2. Review 2: Does your external QC data demonstrate that the test system is consistently stable? If yes, describe the general QC performance over time for this test. If No, describe any repeated QC failures and the corrective action taken. Comment External QC results over the past seven months have been consistently acceptable. NO YES

Summary of Risk Assessment Mitigation

Signature page

Risk Assessment Identifies potential failures and sources of error. Must document that potential errors an sources of errors have been reviewed by the laboratory. Quality Control Plan At a minimum, define type, number, and frequency of quality control methods to be utilized Quality Assessment Evaluates the overall IQCP implemented and must address preanalytic, analytic, and post-analytic Signature Page Statement of approval signed by lab director

Performed by in-house personnel Covers all three phases of testing: Pre-analytic Analytic Post-analytic Covers all 5 components: Specimen Reagent Environment Testing personnel Test system Includes in-house data: Previous QC records Environmental monitoring records Instrument/equipment performance records Review manufacturer s instructions and recommendations to identify potential risks processes to mitigate risk

QC Plan must be signed and dated by the laboratory director prior to implementation Approved annually Must be followed as approved Specifies number, type (internal/external), and frequency of quality control QC performed at least as frequently as required in manufacturer s instructions If ongoing assessments identify failures in one or more components of the QC Plan, the laboratory must investigate the cause and consider if modifications are needed to the plan to mitigate potential risk.

Must include how the entire method will be assessed for failures and corrective actions. Monthly review of QC, instrument maintenance Evaluation of errors in all phases Evaluation of corrective actions taken if errors are identified Reevaluation of risk assessment when failures are identified Annual re-approval of QC Plan

Incomplete risk assessments All 5 requirements All phases No mitigation identified Multiple instruments, multiple sites Inadequate quality control plans QC cannot be performed less than stated in manufacturer s package insert Insufficient monitoring Annual review of each IQCP Ongoing assessment of errors, QC failures, Individual laboratories not performing their own risk assessment, relying on manufacturer s risk assessment