The Role of International Cooperation in Cyber Security

Similar documents
The Republic of Korea. economic and social benefits. However, on account of its open, anonymous and borderless

ASEAN: One Community, One Destiny.

'Cybersecurity' Threat or Opportunity. Saikat Datta Policy Director Centre for Internet & Society, India

Background Note on Possible arrangements for a Technology Facilitation Mechanism and other science, technology and innovation issues

2. What do you think is the significance, purpose and scope of enhanced cooperation as per the Tunis Agenda? a) Significance b) Purpose c) Scope

The Export Control and Related Border Security (EXBS) Program in ASEAN And ASEAN Single Window (ASW) Initiative

Brussels, 19 May 2011 COUNCIL THE EUROPEAN UNION 10299/11 TELECOM 71 DATAPROTECT 55 JAI 332 PROCIV 66. NOTE From : COREPER

Draft Resolution for Committee Consideration and Recommendation

Promoting Global Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity & Spam after WSIS: How MAAWG can help

China and International Governance of Cybercrime

JOINT MEDIA STATEMENT

MALAYSIA S APPROACH IN CAPACITY BUILDING. Dr Amirudin Abdul Wahab Chief Executive Officer CyberSecurity Malaysia 24 March 2017

SAINT PETERSBURG DECLARATION Building Confidence and Security in the Use of ICT to Promote Economic Growth and Prosperity

Forum. Ningbo, China 25 February

Commonwealth Cyber Declaration

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 21 December [on the report of the Second Committee (A/64/422/Add.3)]

ITU-ACMA Asia Pacific Regulators Roundtable July 2014

Donor Countries Security. Date

Australian Government Cyber-security Activities in the Pacific

Japan s Cyber Diplomacy

ADMM AND ESTABLISHMENT OF ASEAN POLITICAL SECURITY COMMUNITY 2015

Statement by Mr. Vladimir Voronkov, Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations Office of Counter-Terrorism

Comprehensive Study on Cybercrime

ENISA & Cybersecurity. Dr. Udo Helmbrecht Executive Director, European Network & Information Security Agency (ENISA) 25 October 2010

Internet Governance: Today and Tomorrow

Cybersecurity for ALL

WORKSHOP ON CYBERSECURITY 14 TO 17 AUGUST 2017

Plenipotentiary Conference (PP- 14) Busan, 20 October 7 November 2014

The UNODC Global Programme on Cybercrime Alexandru Caciuloiu CYBERCRIME COORDINATOR SOUTHEAST ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

Donor Countries Security. Date

Ms. Izumi Nakamitsu High Representative for Disarmament Affairs United Nations

U.S. Japan Internet Economy Industry Forum Joint Statement October 2013 Keidanren The American Chamber of Commerce in Japan

Cybersecurity & Digital Privacy in the Energy sector

World Telecommunication Development Conference (WTDC- 14) Dubai, 30 March 10 April 2014

RESOLUTION 45 (Rev. Hyderabad, 2010)

10025/16 MP/mj 1 DG D 2B

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMENTS ON THE REPORT OF THE WGIG

Preparatory process of the second High-level United Nations Conference on South-South Cooperation

Assistant Secretary-General Michèle Coninsx Executive Director, CTED

CONNECT ARAB STATES SUMMIT

EU P2P: Export Control Programme on Dual-Use Goods

8 th APEC Transportation Ministerial Meeting Tokyo, Japan SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 Ministerial Joint Statement

Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025: A Blueprint for a Stronger ASEAN

Security and resilience in Information Society: the European approach

RESOLUTION 130 (REV. BUSAN, 2014)

ASEAN s Cyber Confidence Building Measures

The APEC Model. Global Partnership through Regional Initiatives

NATIONAL CYBER SECURITY STRATEGY. - Version 2.0 -

THE MADRID PROTOCOL. A single trademark registration supports regional economic integration. A Case Study

PROGRAM SUMMARY OBJECTIVES RESULTS. Last updated date: 7/27/2017. Target Beneficiaries. Donor Security

About the Asia-Pacific Regional Coordination Mechanism

The challenges of the NIS directive from the viewpoint of the Vienna Hospital Association

International cyber strategy for Norway

RESOLUTION 67 (Rev. Buenos Aires, 2017)

Statement by the President of the European Council. The Hague Nuclear Security Summit. Let me begin by thanking Prime Minister Rutte and the Dutch

EGM, 9-10 December A World that Counts: Mobilising the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development. 9 December 2014 BACKGROUND

21ST OSCE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL FORUM

JOINT MEDIA STATEMENT

CYBER INTELLIGENCE ASIA Combating Cybercrimes across the region Conference & Exhibition 20 th 22 nd March 2018 Singapore

JOINT MEDIA STATEMENT

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Second Committee (A/64/417)]

Regional Development Forum For the Arab States(RDF-ARB) 2018

Governance Structure and Terms of Reference for Climate Technology Centre and its Network

Input on Proposals and Positions for 2016 World Telecommunication Standardization

Assessment of the progress made in the implementation of and follow-up to the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society

ICT Policy Perspective for APEC. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications March 2015

UN General Assembly Resolution 68/243 GEORGIA. General appreciation of the issues of information security

KISH REMARKS APEC CBPR NOV 1 CYBER CONFERENCE KEIO Page 1 of 5 Revised 11/10/2016

(Islamabad, March 2015) MEDIUM TERM VISION FOR ENERGY CONNECTIVITY IN THE SAARC REGION

Inter-American Port Security Cooperation Plan

JOINT MEDIA STATEMENT

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 28 January 2003 (OR. en) 15723/02 TELECOM 78 JAI 307 PESC 593

G20 DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP INFRASTRUCTURE

Information sharing in the EU policy on NIS & CIIP. Andrea Servida European Commission DG INFSO-A3

HLG Briefly. HLG was established on March 6, 2015 during the 46 th Session of the UN Statistical Commission

Cybersecurity Capacity ITU Preetam Maloor Strategy & Policy Advisor 3 March 2015

Cybersecurity governance in Europe. Sokratis K. Katsikas Systems Security Laboratory Dept. of Digital Systems University of Piraeus

Promoting accountability and transparency of multistakeholder partnerships for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda

ITU-IMPACT Capacity Building for Least Developed & Developed Countries

Valérie Andrianavaly European Commission DG INFSO-A3

REPUBLIC OF KENYA MINISTRY OF INFORMATION, COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY

An Internet of Governments: How Policymakers Became Interested in Cyber. Maarten Van Horenbeeck, FIRST Klee Aiken, APNIC

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of on Coordinated Response to Large Scale Cybersecurity Incidents and Crises

An Overview of UN Technology Initiatives. Objective

NAVIGATING THE ITU. Four routes for civil society engagement. / December 2017

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION

Departamento de Asia y Pacífico

COUNTER-TERRORISM. Future-oriented policing projects

COMESA CYBER SECURITY PROGRAM KHARTOUM, SUDAN

Developing and Implementing Data Protection Law: Malaysia and Beyond

2009/7 Assessment of the progress made in the implementation of and follow-up to the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society

UNODC tackling cybercrime in support of a safe and secure AP-IS

RESPONSE TO 2016 DEFENCE WHITE PAPER APRIL 2016

WSIS Forum Open Consultation Process

RESOLUTION 140 (REV. BUSAN, 2014)

Governance Approaches to National Sustainable Development Strategy in Asia and the Pacific. UNEP, Bangkok. Background

Pakistan's Strategic Export Controls (Latest Developments)

Dialogue on Nonproliferation and Nuclear Security in Southeast Asia. Nuclear Cooperation in Southeast Asia. Stephanie Lieggi Senior Research Associate

Cyber Security Roadmap

Transcription:

Special Address by Ambassador Vijaya Latha Reddy, Formerly Dy. National Security Adviser and Secretary (East), Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India The Role of International Cooperation in Cyber Security This conference has given me a unique opportunity where I can discuss two of my passions- India-ASEAN relations and Cyber Security! May I express my grateful thanks to RIS and to Ambassador Shyam Saran for inviting me to this conference. My commitment to India-ASEAN relations began when I was posted as Ambassador to Thailand during the 18 month chairmanship of ASEAN by Thailand. Then, while I was serving as Secretary (East) in the Ministry of External Affairs and dealing with ASEAN and the EAS I did my best to promote India- ASEAN relations. We finalized the 2010-2015 Plan of Action then and are now finalizing the new five year plan to be adopted. I am delighted that we have moved from Looking to Engaging to Acting East! In 2012 we held the first ever India- ASEAN Commemorative Summit and that Summit and the allied activities have been a high point in India-ASEAN relations. I am also happy that we have appointed Ambassador Suresh Reddy as our Ambassador to ASEAN, as he was our first Joint Secretary exclusively dealing with ASEAN in the Foreign Ministry. We must move actively now on concrete issues such as Cyber Security cooperation. Let me begin by saying a few words on the nature of international cooperation in Cyber Security. Such cooperation can be bilateral, regional or multilateral. In all these cases, trust is essential between the countries involved. Trust on cyber issues has, however, been severely affected by revelations of large scale espionage and surveillance, especially after the Snowden revelations. As Professor Joseph Nye says: Trust will now have to be rebuilt bottom up, with new software technologies and procedures for inspection of hardware supply chains. Some argue that low trust will be a persistent condition and will exacerbate a fragmenting trend towards greater control by sovereign states. 1

However, I believe that trust does indeed exist between ASEAN countries and India, and we therefore begin with a major advantage when we discuss Cyber Security cooperation between ourselves. On Cyber Security itself, during my posting as the Deputy NSA, I was involved in evolving several measures to strengthen India s cyber security infrastructure, which included the followings: a) We formulated and published our Cyber Security Policy in 2013 (one of the very few countries to do so) b) We created an Architecture and Infrastructure for coordination and responsibilities within government (to deal with silos, overlaps, gaps). c) We did promote international cooperation through bilateral discussions with individual countries such as the US and Singapore, and in UN fora such as the UNGGE. d) We worked specifically on strengthening cyber security for the Critical Information Infrastructure or CII protection we have published identification of CII sectors, and the setting up of the NCIIPC e) A JWG was set up for PPP or for the Government and private sector to work together on cyber security f) A proposal to set up a National Cyber Coordination Centre was approved. g) The creation of an R&D Fund to encourage innovation in cyber security. h) Emphasis was laid on Capacity Building and setting up of Centres of Excellence We will need to consult on these and other issues on a regular and ongoing basis and in real time. We need to be actively present and vocal at UN-led meetings such as UNGGE and ITU or at all major track 1.5 and 2 global meetings. We need to consult before, during and post these meetings and evolve common positions where possible. I have been struck when I speak at various fora by the preponderance of US and European representatives and the absence of ASEAN countries and representatives. In contrast the OECD, the WEF, and other groups play a very prominent role. 2

It would also be important to have an ASEAN representative - as opposed to individual country representation -at all these important meetings on cyber security both Track I, Track 1.5 and Track II. As Deputy NSA Arvind Gupta mentioned we do need specific mechanisms between India and ASEAN. We can have CERT to CERT cooperation, R&D cooperation, cooperation on Cyber Crime and Cyber Terrorism, LEA-LEA contacts, Intelligence sharing, Social Media Analysis, Sharing of Best Practices,Capacity Building and Training, coordinating our positions at meetings such as the UNGGE and the ITU as well as at Track II meetings such as the IGF, Technical Institutional Cooperation in agencies such as ISOC, ITEF, ICANN issues. We also need to discuss the so-called Rules of Road particularly on Cyber Warfare and Cyber weapons. Can we think of setting up the followings in terms of specific outcomes to grow our cooperation in cyber security? a) A JWG (either Track 1 or 1.5) between India and ASEAN on Cyber Cooperation. b) Specific projects under the new 5 year POA. c) A Regular Review of progress at India-ASEAN SOMS, Ministerial and HTG/HOS Summits d) We need to create India-ASEAN PPP models to encourage a multi-pronged approach to cyber security cooperation e) Can we use the deliberations and recommendations of the CSCAP (Council for Security Cooperation in Asia Pacific) where most ASEAN countries are part of the study group on Cyber Security including Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam What the CSCAP essentially recommends is that each State creates a holistic domestic cyber security system and simultaneously common collective measures of cooperation should create a strategy to enhance Cyber Security to mutual benefit of all states. While the recommendations were drawn up for the ARF, they are equally applicable to India-ASEAN cooperation. In brief they advocate a holistic Cyber Security strategy, more Cyber Security awareness and education within the 3

government, private sector and society in general, more effective PPP cooperation, creation of a legal framework, regional consultations and enforcement capabilities, and the need to establish CERT to CERT cooperation. For Regional Cooperation CSCAP recommends setting up mechanisms for information sharing and experiences of cyber threats detection, containment and mitigation measures coordinated responses and real time information sharing. Also we need to implement capacity building and technical assistance measures to strengthen crisis management of all states, especially those with weaker infrastructures. We need to work on legal harmonization first an inventory of international conventions on cyber security and eventually harmonization of laws to combat cyber crime. CSCAP also recommends that we establish a Regional Cyber Security Action Task Force (CSATF) to review all cyber-related activities of other regional or global organizations (UN, ITU, APEC, OECD) to assess what role our countries can play in supporting such solutions. The important point is that in our unity lies strength. If ASEAN efforts to coordinate between its members can be bolstered in any way by India s participation, while I can no longer speak for the government officially, I remain confident that India stands ready to assist in any way possible. As I mentioned, we face the same problems in forging our regional cooperation as exist in international cooperation: (a) (b) (c) Deficit of Trust Varying Capabilities Allegiances to multi-stakeholder model or to multilateral model Why is international cooperation such a complex and controversial issue? Firstly, the regime complex that currently governs various aspects of cyber space and internet governance is a huge interlocking and overlapping group of mechanisms and organizations. Those who advocate the multi-stakeholder model of internet governance and those who advocate the multilateral model are obviously at 4

loggerheads. Most of us fall somewhere between these two extremes. This is why we need to be actively present in deliberations of all these organizations which relate to cyber security and internet governance issues we need to be there as governments and as think-tanks and experts. There is also a certain confusion about various areas that affect cyber security including internet governance issues, critical information infrastructure, cyber warfare and cyber weapons, cyber espionage, cyber crime and terrorism. Each of them is elaborate and complex issue but they tend to be linked together. The issue of Cyber Security can become even more complex as threats can be transnational in various ways between States, Businesses, and Non-State Actors in various permutations and combinations. We must regularly consult on all these areas and cooperate to strengthen our individual and collective Cyber Security capabilities. To conclude therefore let me reiterate the way forward for enhanced cooperation between ASEAN and India. 1. Create a JWG with two ASEAN and Indian co-chairs to meet regularly (Track 1.5 preferably) to pursue ASEAN-INDIA Cyber Security Cooperation. 2. Ensure regular review of the progress in this area by ASEAN-INDIA SOM/Ministerial./Summit meetings. 3. Enhance institutional level dialogues between think tanks, academic R&D institutes as well as CERTS. 4. Enhance LEA cooperation in real time to deal with cyber crime and terrorism. 5. Synergize our strengths in software and hardware and set up joint testing labs. 6. Capacity building and skill development cooperation. 7. Set up specific projects under the ASEAN-India Plan of Action 2015-2020. 8. Study the CSCAP Study Group Recommendations and see whether they can be used as a template for India-ASEAN cooperation. 9. Actively participate in all important Track I, 1.5 and 2 international meetings and actively consult on an ongoing basis to coordinate our positions wherever possible. 5

Hopefully, I have managed to draw up a possible road map and way forward for our future cooperation in specific areas on the critical and vital subject of cyber security as well as on internet governance. Once again I thank RIS and Ambassador Shyam Saran for organizing this timely conference and giving me the proverbial last word today! 6