Year in Review. A Look Back at Commission on Paraoptometric Certification. 243 N. Lindbergh Blvd St. Louis MO

Similar documents
Commission on Paraoptometric Certification Year in Review

Manufactured Home Production by Product Mix ( )

Reporting Child Abuse Numbers by State

Chart 2: e-waste Processed by SRD Program in Unregulated States

AGILE BUSINESS MEDIA, LLC 500 E. Washington St. Established 2002 North Attleboro, MA Issues Per Year: 12 (412)

CONSOLIDATED MEDIA REPORT B2B Media 6 months ended June 30, 2018

What's Next for Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

The Promise of Brown v. Board Not Yet Realized The Economic Necessity to Deliver on the Promise

How Social is Your State Destination Marketing Organization (DMO)?

Alaska no no all drivers primary. Arizona no no no not applicable. primary: texting by all drivers but younger than

Summary of the State Elder Abuse. Questionnaire for Alaska

Summary of the State Elder Abuse. Questionnaire for Hawaii

Question by: Scott Primeau. Date: 20 December User Accounts 2010 Dec 20. Is an account unique to a business record or to a filer?

Arizona does not currently have this ability, nor is it part of the new system in development.

57,611 59,603. Print Pass-Along Recipients Website

Year in Review. A Study of Certification Examination Results

Alaska ATU 1 $13.85 $4.27 $ $ Tandem Switching $ Termination

CONSOLIDATED MEDIA REPORT Business Publication 6 months ended December 31, 2017

4/25/2013. Bevan Erickson VP, Marketing

C.A.S.E. Community Partner Application

Alaska ATU 1 $13.85 $4.27 $ $ Tandem Switching $ Termination

Terry McAuliffe-VA. Scott Walker-WI

User Experience Task Force

MapMarker Standard 10.0 Release Notes

NEHA-NRPP APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION

J.D. Power and Associates Reports: Overall Wireless Network Problem Rates Differ Considerably Based on Type of Usage Activity

Oklahoma Economic Outlook 2016

Bulk Resident Agent Change Filings. Question by: Stephanie Mickelsen. Jurisdiction. Date: 20 July Question(s)

2011 Aetna Producer Certification Help Guide. Updated July 28, 2011

Oklahoma Economic Outlook 2015

Managing Transportation Research with Databases and Spreadsheets: Survey of State Approaches and Capabilities

Ted C. Jones, PhD Chief Economist

Summary of the State Elder Abuse. Questionnaire for Nebraska

MapMarker Plus 10.2 Release Notes

Embedded Systems Conference Silicon Valley

Summary of the State Elder Abuse. Questionnaire for Texas

Publisher's Sworn Statement

How Employers Use E-Response Date: April 26th, 2016 Version: 6.51

Crop Progress. Corn Emerged - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2016 corn acreage]

Instructions for Enrollment

DATES OF NEXT EVENT: Conference: June 4 8, 2007 Exhibits: June 4 7, 2007 San Diego Convention Center, San Diego, CA

Wireless Network Data Speeds Improve but Not Incidence of Data Problems, J.D. Power Finds

Established Lafayette St., P.O. Box 998 Issues Per Year: 12 Yarmouth, ME 04096

DATES OF EVENT: Conference: March 31 April 2, 2009 Exhibits: April 1 3, Sands Expo & Convention Center, Las Vegas, NV

24-Month Extension of Post-Completion Optional Practical Training (OPT)

DATES OF EVENT: Conference: March 23 March 25, 2010 Exhibits: March 24 March 26, Sands Expo & Convention Center, Las Vegas, NV

MapMarker Plus v Release Notes

RECERTIFICATION BOOKLET

Crop Progress. Corn Dough Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage] Corn Dented Selected States ISSN:

MapMarker Plus 12.0 Release Notes

Distracted Driving Accident Claims Involving Mobile Devices Special Considerations and New Frontiers in Legal Liability

Is your standard BASED on the IACA standard, or is it a complete departure from the. If you did consider. using the IACA

Disaster Economic Impact

Summary of the State Elder Abuse. Questionnaire for New York

SECTION 2 NAVIGATION SYSTEM: DESTINATION SEARCH

45 th Design Automation Conference

Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2010

π H LBS. x.05 LB. PARCEL SCALE OVERVIEW OF CONTROLS uline.com CONTROL PANEL CONTROL FUNCTIONS lb kg 0

Real Estate Forecast 2017

BRAND REPORT FOR THE 6 MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 2014

Qualified recipients are Chief Executive Officers, Partners, Chairmen, Presidents, Owners, VPs, and other real estate management personnel.

US STATE CONNECTIVITY

FDA's Collaborative Efforts to Promote ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Accreditation for the Nation's Food/Feed Testing Laboratories

The Center to Inform Personnel Preparation Policy and Practice in Early Intervention and Preschool Education Study V

Online Certification/Authentication of Documents re: Business Entities. Date: 05 April 2011

energy efficiency Building Energy Codes

Telephone Appends. White Paper. September Prepared by

For Every Action There is An Equal and Opposite Reaction Newton Was an Economist - The Outlook for Real Estate and the Economy

APCO Public Safety Broadband Summit Next Generation Policy-Makers Panel May 4, 2105

Student ID Upload System User Guide. Student ID Upload System. (For Student Precoded Barcode Labels) User Guide

Levels of Measurement. Data classing principles and methods. Nominal. Ordinal. Interval. Ratio. Nominal: Categorical measure [e.g.

5 August 22, USPS Network Optimization and First Class Mail Large Commercial Accounts Questionnaire Final August 22, 2011

76 Million Boomers. 83 Million Millennials 19 to Million Millennials 16 to 35

2018 Payroll Tax Table Update Instructions (Effective January 2, 2018)

Advanced LabVIEW for FTC

Ted C. Jones Chief Economist. Ted C. Jones, PhD Chief Economist

Professional Certification Purpose, Preparation & Passing

BUSINESS PUBLICATION CIRCULATION STATEMENT FOR THE 6 MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 2012

WINDSTREAM CARRIER ETHERNET: E-NNI Guide & ICB Processes

Commission Rate Schedule

JIM TAYLOR PILOT CAR SVC J & J PILOT CAR SVC PILOTCAR.NET ROYAL ESCORT

Guide to the Virginia Mericle Menu Collection

The State of E-Discovery: An Overview of State & Uniform Rulemaking Efforts

Legal-Compliance Department March 22, 2019 Page 1 of 7

ADJUSTER ONLINE UPDATING INSTRUCTIONS

Get Your Motor Running!

MapMarker Plus v Release Notes

The Cyber Hygiene Index: Measuring the Riskiest States

Legal-Compliance Department October 11, 2017 Page 1 of 8

Introduction to R for Epidemiologists

LAB #6: DATA HANDING AND MANIPULATION

E-Guides 21. Newsletter 188,167. Magazine E-Newsletter Website Webcasts E-Guides Social Media.

IC&RC Prevention Specialist Credential Overview NPN Conference November 18, 2015 Seattle, Washington

EyeforTravel s Hotel Distribution Index. EyeforTravel s Hotel Distribution Index

U.S. Residential High Speed Internet

IACMI - The Composites Institute

BRAND REPORT FOR THE 6 MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 2018

2016 NCCA Standards Revisions Recap and Takeaways: What You Need to Know

No Place But Up Interest Rates Rents, Prices Real Estate and the Economy

Unsupervised Learning

Transcription:

A Look Back at 217 Commission on Paraoptometric Certification 243 N. Lindbergh Blvd St. Louis MO 63141 8.365.2219 cpc@aoa.org

Table of Contents I. Background 3 II. Executive Summary 4-5 Mission Statement Program Overview Objectives Highlights III. 6-15 Overall Pass/Fail Education Level Employment Setting Candidate Age Candidate Gender Candidate Race State Statistics Reason for Certification IV. Appendix 16-19 Certified Paraoptometric (CPO) Exam Certified Paraoptometric Assistant (CPOA) Exam Certified Paraoptometric Technician (CPOT) Exam Certified Paraoptometric Coding (CPOC) Exam Page 2

Background The Commission on Paraoptometric Certification (CPC) was established in 2 by the American Optometric Association. This program replaced the National Paraoptometric Registry, which was established by the American Optometric Association in 1978. Certification focuses specifically on the individual and is an indication of current proficiency in a specialized field. Certification is highly valued and provides formal acknowledgement of knowledge and skills in a particular area of practice. The CPC offers four certification examinations for optometric staff. Each program requires successful completion of an examination prepared and administered by the CPC with the assistance of Professional Testing Corporation (PTC). The purpose of the examinations is to assure a level of knowledge to perform the functions necessary to each certified designation. Recipients must participate in continuing education activities and renew their certification every three years to maintain a current certification. Paraoptometric certification provides a formal declaration of education and skill achievement in the profession of optometric assisting by: Recognizing formally those individuals who meet all requirements of the Commission on Paraoptometric Certification of the American Optometric Association. Encouraging continued professional growth of the paraoptometric. Establishing and measuring the level of knowledge required for certification of paraoptometrics. Promoting a standard of requisite knowledge required for certification; thereby, assisting the employer, public, and members of the health professions in the assessment of paraoptometrics. The CPO TM, CPOA TM, and CPOT TM examinations are accredited by the National Commission for Certifying Agencies (NCCA). The NCCA accreditation serves as a benchmark on how organizations should conduct certification and clearly distinguishes the excellence and value of CPC certification. To receive this accreditation, the CPC completed an application for each certification demonstrating compliance with the NCCA s Standards for the Accreditation of Certification Programs, which were the first standards for professional certification programs developed by the industry. NCCA uses a peer review process to: establish accreditation standards; evaluate compliance with the standards; recognize organizations/ programs that demonstrate compliance; and serve as a resource on quality certification. Page 3

Executive Summary The Commission on Paraoptometric Certification (CPC) continues to offer the only certification available for paraoptometrics and seeks to make this experience valuable and desirable for all interested participants. The CPC certified population represents more than 6,5 participants throughout the United States, Canada, and the Armed Forces. The CPC continues to improve the quality and integrity of the program to maintain the positive perception of the program within the optometric community. Mission Statement The Commission on Paraoptometric Certification serves the public by developing, maintaining, and promoting a certification process which reflects current modes of optometric practice and grants certification to those candidates who satisfy the set requirements throughout the world. Program Overview The certified paraoptometric examinations are prepared and administered by the CPC with the assistance of the Professional Testing Corporation. The purpose of the examinations is to ensure a level of knowledge to perform the functions of a certified paraoptometric at each appropriate level. Those who have successfully completed the appropriate examination will be certified with the Commission on Paraoptometric Certification as a Certified Paraoptometric (CPO), Certified Paraoptometric Assistant (CPOA), Certified Paraoptometric Coder (CPOC), or Certified Paraoptometric Technician (CPOT). The passing score for each examination is set annually after all examination forms have been reviewed for currency, appropriateness, and accuracy by an appointed committee that is responsible for examination development. During the process, this committee meets with a psychometrician who serves to guide committee deliberations and ensures psychometric soundness of the decisions reached. The primary consideration in the examination review process is to ensure representation of the basic body of knowledge required for practice. A second consideration is to maintain the equivalent difficulty level of successive examinations. Based on Standard 4.21 of the AERA, APA, and NCME Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, the passing scores are established so that the test review committee can bring their knowledge and experience to bear in a reasonable way. Objectives The purpose of this Year in Review report is two fold. First, it assures that the examinations are compliant with NCCA standards and assists the Commission on Paraoptometric Certification in identifying trends, targeting audiences, and ensuring that the examinations are reliable. Second, these metrics are valuable to stakeholders as they identify potential training opportunities that are lacking; personal development needs that are not being met; and identify target demographic audiences for marketing purposes. The information in this report is derived from candidate responses on the examination applications and the stringent review of score reports. All documentation regarding these reports is kept on file for five (5) years. Only through extensive task analysis studies can the CPC Page 4

Executive Summary determine the body of knowledge. Task analyses assess how a task is accomplished, including a detailed description of both manual and mental activities, task and element durations, frequency, allocation, complexity, necessary equipment and precautions, and any other unique factors involved in or required for one or more people to perform a given task. The CPC conducts these analyses every three to five years. In between these studies, test reviews and item performance reviews are conducted annually. Test specifications are updated frequently according to the environmental scan of the optometric practice. Highlights The Commission on Paraoptometric Certification is pleased to report that we have completed another successful year of providing certifications to paraoptometrics. The examinations are developed in cooperation with Professional Testing Corporation (PTC), which provides professional organizations of all sizes with quality psychometric services. The CPO, CPOA, and CPOT programs are accredited by the National Commission for Certifying Agencies (NCCA). The NCCA helps to ensure the health, welfare, and safety of the public through the accreditation of a variety of certification programs/organizations that assess professional competency. In 217, there were 1,74 candidates for the CPO, CPOA, CPOT, and CPOC examinations. As of December 217, approximately 7,187 paraoptometrics were certified. 4,999 Certified Paraoptometrics (CPO) 1,51 Certified Paraoptometric Assistants (CPOA) 577 Certified Paraoptometric Technicians (CPOT) 24 Certified Paraoptometric Coders (CPOC) Of the total certified, 94 held dual certifications Page 5

All examinations are computer based and offered during four, two week testing periods. These are the results for 217. Overall Pass/Fail The majority of the 1,74 candidates who took an examination in 217 (89%) passed. 217 Candidate Pass/Fail Rate 11% Pass rate is up 3% over 216. 89% Pass Fail Page 6

Education Level Most candidates (6%) hold a minimum of a high school diploma or equivalent. Thirty-four percent (34%) of candidates hold an Associate s, Bachelor s, or Master s degree, and six percent (6%) of candidates are enrolled or are graduates of a CPC or ACOE approved assistant or technician program. 217 Candidate Academic Level 19% 1% HS or Equiv Assistant Program 14% 4% 2% 6% Technician Program Associates Degree Bachelors Degree Masters Degree 217 Candidate Pass/Fail Rate by Academic Level 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 88 145 HS or Equiv 42 49 11 22 8 1 Assistant Prog Technician Prog 217 Associates Degree 32 Bachelors Degree Masters Degree Pass Fail Page 7

Employment Setting Overall, 82% of candidates are employed by a private practice. Of the 1,344 candidates in this category, 9% or 1,213 passed the CPO, CPOA, CPOT, or CPOC examination on the first or second attempt. 217 Candidate Employment Setting 1% 2% 2% Private Practice employment is up 2% from 216. 2% % 1% % 5% 5% 82% Private Practice Community Health Agency Academic HMO MD Office Retail Store Industry/Lab Student Military Other 217 Candidate Pass/Fail Rate by Employment Setting 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Pass Fail Page 8

Candidate Age A little over half the candidates (51%) are between the ages of 25-39, one quarter (25%) are under the age of 25, and the remaining 24% are over the age of 4. 217 Candidate Age 1% 6% % 8% 25% Under 25 25 to 29 3 to 39 4 to 49 5 to 59 23% 28% 6+ No Response 217 Candidate Age by Exam 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Under 25 25 to 29 3 to 39 4 to 49 5 to 59 6+ No Response CPO CPOA CPOT CPOC Page 9

217 Candidate Pass/Fail Rate by Age 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Under 25 25 to 29 3 to 39 4 to 49 5 to 59 6+ No Response Pass 381 415 358 142 93 8 121 Fail 48 57 35 22 7 17 Pass Fail Page 1

Candidate Gender In 217, examination candidates were primarily female (84%) with just a slight increase in the number of male candidates since 216. 217 Candidate Gender 7% 9% 1% more men than in 216. 84% Male Female No Response 14 217 Candidate Pass/Fail Rate by Gender 1279 12 1 8 6 4 2 132 154 17 14 18 Male Female No Response Pass Fail Page 11

Candidate Race Of those who indicated race on the application, Caucasians accounted for 72% of all candidates. Hispanics made up 1% of the candidate pool, with the remaining 7% of respondents being comprised of African American, Asian, and Native American candidates. 217 Candidate Race 2% 11% 3% 1% 2% African American Asian Hispanic Native American Caucasian No Response 72% 217 Candidate Pass/Fail Rate by Race 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Pass Fail Total African American 42 13 55 Asian 31 3 34 Hispanic 139 33 172 Native American 23 5 28 Caucasian 1112 18 122 No Response 171 24 195 Page 12

State Statistics The three states with the most exam candidates in 217 were Texas, Florida, and Virginia. For the fourth consecutive year, Texas produced the greatest number of candidates. 162 83 93 Military Foreign Wyoming Wisconsin West Virginia Washington Virginia Vermont Utah Texas Tennessee South Dakota South Carolina Rhode Island Pennsylvania Oregon Oklahoma Ohio North Dakota North Carolina New York New Mexico New Jersey New Hampshire Nevada Nebraska Montana Missouri Mississippi Minnesota Michigan Massachusetts Maryland Maine Louisiana Kentucky Kansas Iowa Indiana Illinois Idaho Hawaii Georgia Florida Delaware Connecticut Colorado California Arkansas Arizona Alaska Alabama 1 3 6 6 5 9 7 8 13 11 13 1 11 13 13 7 11 12 17 16 25 28 25 23 35 32 27 26 29 3 34 33 35 33 33 39 42 43 44 45 49 57 55 6 59 73 79 83 81 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 93 162 Page 13

Reason for Certification More than half (62%) of 217 CPO, CPOA, and CPOT candidates stated their employer required certification, while 31% of candidates indicated they were self-motivated to sit for the exam. 217 Candidate Reason for Certification (CPO/A/T) 2% 1% 4% Employer 31% 62% Self Colleague Coworker Other 217 Candidate Pass/Fail Rate by Reason (CPO/A/T) 1 914 8 6 4 2 461 12 43 58 8 32 3 1 2 Employer Self Colleague Coworker Other Pass Fail Page 14

In 217, 33% of CPOC candidates were self-motivated to sit for the exam, while (67%) stated their employer was the reason they took the exam. Coworkers reportedly had little to no influence on whether the CPOC exam was taken. 217 Candidate Reason for Certification (CPOC) % 33% Employer Employer required exam increased by 22% since 216 67% Self Coworker 217 Candidate Pass/Fail Rate by Reason (CPOC) 35 3 29 25 2 15 1 5 14 6 3 Employer Self Coworker Pass Fail Page 15

Appendix Certified Paraoptometric (CPO) Exam The CPO examination is comprised of 1 multiple choice questions. A minimum score of 75% is required to pass. The examination is divided into four domains: basic science (27%), clinical principles and procedures (35%), ophthalmic optics and dispensing (2%), and professional issues (18%). A total of 1,267 candidates sat for the CPO examination in 217. Month Total Candidates Average Repeat High Low % Candidates Score Score Correct Pass Fail Pass Fail February 155 13 99 58 87% 9 3 May 334 35 1 42 88% 18 1 August 272 33 1 56 86% 16 2 November 32 29 1 47 87% 24 3 Just over half (53%) of CPO, CPOA, and CPOT candidates who tested in 217 had between one and five years of experience, with 31% having less than one year. 217 Candidate Experience Level (CPO/CPOA/CPOT) 1% 53% 6% 31% < than 1 yr 1 to 5 yrs 5 to 1 yrs 1 + yrs Page 16

Appendix Certified Paraoptometric Assistant (CPOA) Exam The CPOA examination is comprised of 2 multiple choice questions. A minimum score of 7% is required to pass. The examination is divided into six domains: office operations (15%), ophthalmic optics and dispensing (2%), testing and procedures (18%), special procedures (17%), refractive status of the eye and binocularity (13%), and basic ocular anatomy and physiology (17%). A total of 273 candidates sat for the CPOA examination in 217. Month Total Candidates Average Repeat High Low % Candidates Score Score Pass Fail Correct Pass Fail February 36 6 187 128 79% 1 May 76 12 194 85 8% 1 1 August 54 8 187 112 8% 4 1 November 63 7 191 125 81% 3 The majority of candidates testing at the all three levels had between one and five years of experience. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 444 217 Candidate Experience Level by Exam (CPO/A/T) 64 3 654 144 75 12 43 67 17 22 16 < than 1 yr 1 to 5 yrs 5 to 1 yrs 1 + yrs CPO CPOA CPOT Page 17

Appendix Certified Paraoptometric Technician (CPOT) Exam Written The CPOT Written examination is comprised of 225 multiple choice questions. A minimum score of 69% is required to pass. The examination is divided into six domains: pre-testing procedures (2%), clinical procedures (28%), ophthalmic optics and dispensing (18%), refractive status of the eye and binocularity (12%), anatomy and physiology (15%), and practice management (7%). A total of 62 candidates sat for the CPOT Written examination in 217. Month Total Candidates Average Repeat High Low % Candidates Score Score Pass Fail Correct Pass Fail February 9 2 28 148 77% May 13 3 29 138 76% 1 1 August 15 2 198 146 76% 2 1 November 11 1 25 138 77% 1 Certified Paraoptometric Technician (CPOT) Exam Clinical The CPOT Clinical examination is comprised of 1 multiple choice questions. A minimum score of 75% is required to pass. The examination is divided into four domains: case history scenarios (1%), pretesting procedures (3%), special procedures (3%), and optical dispensing techniques and recording (3%). A total of 49 candidates sat for the CPOT Clinical examination in 217. Month Average Repeat Total Candidates High Low % Candidates Score Score Pass Fail Correct Pass Fail February 7 2 91 66 81% May 11 1 92 69 81% 1 August 1 4 9 65 78% 2 1 November 5 93 69 8% 4 1 Page 18

Appendix Certified Paraoptometric Coding (CPOC) Exam The CPOC examination is comprised of 125 multiple choice questions. A minimum score of 7% is required to pass. The examination is divided into seven domains: anatomy and physiology (8%), medical terminology (8%), review of Current Procedural Terminology (22%), diagnosis codes (24%), medical records (14%), claim filing (12%), and compliance (12%). A total of 53 candidates sat for the CPOC examination in 217. 43% more candidate took the CPOC exam than in 216 Month Total Candidates Average Repeat High Low % Candidates Score Score Pass Fail Correct Pass Fail February 5 1 17 8 76% 1 1 May 12 2 11 6 76% 1 August 11 1 11 78 77% 2 November 1 4 16 62 74% 1 1 Experience level for the CPOCs is evenly distributed. A little under one-third (32%) of the CPOC candidates had five or more years of experience, and a little over one-third of all the candidates (34%) had two to five years of experience. 217 CPOC Candidate Experience Level 32% 34% 2 yrs 3 to 5 yrs 5 + yrs 34% Page 19