Food Safety System Certification 22000 Case study 4 Integrity Program Karen Smedley IP Assessor
Content Integrity Program Top 5 findings KPI s Case study
Focus during this case study session Understanding the Integrity Program Reducing NC s Improving CB performance
Integrity Program Team
Integrity Program Assessors Angelie Jansen Robert Readel Karen Smedley The Netherlands USA Australia Europe & Africa Americas Asia-Pacific Office Assessments Witness Audits Office Assessments Witness Audits Desk Reviews Office Assessments Desk Reviews Auditor Reviews Scope Reviews
IP and Sanction Team Cindy Smolder-van Velzen Marleen de Valk Nienke de Haan Aldin Hilbrands IP Officer IP Officer IP Manager Technical Director Gorinchem Gorinchem Gorinchem Gorinchem
Sanction and Appeals Committees Sanctions are reviewed independently and anonymously from the IP team Members of these committees are from the Board of Stakeholders (BoS) Chaired by Fons Schmid
Integrity Program
Integrity Program The following specific requirements are subject to the FSSC 22000 Sanction Policy: Application by CB and accreditation gained within one year; Payment of fees; Participation in Harmonization Day; Review of issued CB certificates on scope and category; Participation in annual enquiry; Participation in IP Desk Reviews and auditor reviews; Participation in IP CB Office audits and witness audits; Providing the necessary information for the measuring of CB KPIs.
Process for Desk Reviews
Process for Desk Reviews Corrective action plan Corrective action Evidence of corrective action Auditor related documents to upload into Auditor Register
Desk Review Findings
2017 Issues Driving Sanction Policy Not uploading documents for desk reviews within the timeframe Not responding to warnings Not closing Desk Reviews/Office Audit findings by the due date Not paying the invoice on time
2017 Issues Driving Sanction Policy Having received multiple Yellow Cards within 2 years Failing to adequately respond to a Yellow card
Documents for Desk Reviews Document Certificate Client Contract Audit Calculation Audit Report Technical Expert CV FSSC Waivers Comments Signed by CB and Client, additional translation if needed V4.1 changes Evidence of # HACCP studies, FTE, existing certifications etc. Stage 1 and stage 2 for initial audit Surveillance and recertification Follow-up audit reports if Major NC s result in visit Audit Plans for stage 1 and stage 2 If applicable If applicable
Documents for CB Office Assessments In addition to the Desk Review documents - Training records of other CB personnel: Planners ViaSyst data entry staff Certification committee Certification Committee minutes FSSC 22000 Licence(s) Accreditation Certificates QMS procedures etc. QMS records (MR, IA, CA etc.)
Key Performance Indicators
Key Performance Indicators % auditors meeting 5 GFSI per year % certificates entered within 4 weeks % audits with correct audit duration
5 GFSI per year Common finding for auditor maintenance in DR/OA/AR assessments ADS not completed with all team members If < 5 FSSC audits then Other GFSI Audits needs to be populated up to 5 GFSI per year From 1/1/18 it is 5 FSSC 22000 audits per year per auditor
Certificate Entry Effectiveness viewed during OA
Audit Duration Over 100 DR findings in 2017 Lack of justification if < than minimum time Lack of including FSSC 22000 time Not including stage 1 audit time when stage 2 report created in ADS Not including all team members during ADS upload
Case Study
Case Study Use the non-conformities from case study 2 prepare a Corrective Action Plan to address the findings In a team discuss: How you would approach this? What would you enter in ViaSyst in response to the findings? 15 minutes to discuss 15 minutes to develop a CAP Elect someone to document the CAP Elect someone to present the CAP
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Requirements The procedures shall define requirements for: a) identifying nonconformities (e.g. from valid complaints and internal audits); b) determining the causes of nonconformity; c) correcting nonconformities; d) evaluating the need for actions to ensure that nonconformities do not recur; e) determining and implementing in a timely manner, the actions needed; f) recording the results of actions taken; g) reviewing the effectiveness of corrective actions.
Interactive discussions Q&A Model Answers
Let s connect! Website www.fssc22000.com E-mail info@fssc22000.com Phone +31 183 645 028 Twitter @FSSC22000 LinkedIn Group FSSC 22000