Administrative Policies and Business Contracts

Similar documents
Memorandum of Agreement

Request for Qualifications for Audit Services March 25, 2015

Chapter 4 EDGE Approval Protocol for Auditors Version 3.0 June 2017

CASA External Peer Review Program Guidelines. Table of Contents

Subject: University Information Technology Resource Security Policy: OUTDATED

TIER Program Funding Memorandum of Understanding For UCLA School of

Terms of Reference for the EIF Trust Fund Manager (TFM)

KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT OPORTUNITY (EXTERNAL ADVERTISEMENT)

NC Project Learning Tree Guidelines

Checklist According to ISO IEC 17065:2012 for bodies certifying products, process and services

ADDENDUM #1 Boulder Office of Emergency Management Ambulance Services for Boulder County RFS #

Rules for LNE Certification of Management Systems

Arkansas MAV Conservation Delivery Network

SUBJECT: PRESTO operating agreement renewal update. Committee of the Whole. Transit Department. Recommendation: Purpose: Page 1 of Report TR-01-17

Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL)

Constitution Towson University Sport Clubs Organization Campus Recreation Services. Article I Name. Article II Membership

Provider Monitoring Process

ASUW Communications Policy Created August 2013

Dated 3 rd of November 2017 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SIERRA LEONE NATIONAL ehealth COORDINATION HUB

Code of Ethics Certification 2018 CHECKLIST

Missouri Housing Development Commission Certified Property Management Agent Program

Institution Guide and Application Checklist

Global Specification Protocol for Organisations Certifying to an ISO Standard related to Market, Opinion and Social Research.

Director, Major Projects and Resilience. To: Planning and Performance Committee 6 November 2014

ATTACHMENT C. Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act SAMPLE Memorandum of Understanding Template

Table of Contents 6.1 CORRESPONDENCE

Goddard Procedures and Guidelines

Policy for Accrediting Assessment Bodies Operating within the Cradle to Cradle Certified Product Certification Scheme. Version 1.2

POWER AND WATER CORPORATION POLICY MANAGEMENT OF EXTERNAL SERVICE PROVIDERS

Use of Mobile Devices on Voice and Data Networks Policy

CERTIFICATION BODY (CB) APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE IFFO RESPONSIBLE SUPPLY (IFFO RS) AUDITS AND CERTIFICATION

ROJECT ANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND COURSE GUIDE

POSTGRADUATE CERTIFICATE IN LEARNING & TEACHING - REGULATIONS

AGREEMENT FOR RECEIPT AND USE OF MARKET DATA: ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS

China Code of Ethics Certification 2018 CHECKLIST

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES. HANDBOOK for

E-RATE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER (EPC)

Certification Body Audit Resources

2. Goals of IRWM Plan Water management goals within the Tahoe Sierra IRWM Plan include but are not limited to:

RSL NSW SUB-BRANCH STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

COLUMBUS CENTER SPACE POLICY

REPORT 2015/149 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

RENEWAL APPLICATION CERTIFIED NURSE MANAGER AND LEADER

DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM. Unified Certification Program OKLAHOMA

SCS FSC Chain-of-Custody Guidance for Certification of Multiple Sites FSC-STD V2-1

Credit Card Data Compromise: Incident Response Plan

Memoranda Of Understanding (MOU)

Timber Products Inspection, Inc.

PENN MANOR SCHOOL DISTRICT

OUTDATED. Policy and Procedures 1-12 : University Institutional Data Management Policy

CERTIFICATION CONDITIONS

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST INFORMATION SECURITY POLICY October 25, 2017

Information Technology Accessibility Policy

Effective: 12/31/17 Last Revised: 8/28/17. Responsible University Administrator: Vice Chancellor for Information Services & CIO

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Information Security Standard

Minimum Requirements For The Operation of Management System Certification Bodies

SLED Certification of 3 rd Party NCIC/SCIC Applications Overview February 2, 2004

JT BUSINESS CONTINUITY VOICE RE-ROUTING

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 90

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR: REGIONAL CLIMATE AND GREEN GROWTH CONSULTANT EASTERN AFRICA

FY2017 FCC Form 470 and Competitive Bidding

Webinar will start soon

Certification. What: Who: Where:

Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit

The Open Group Professional Certification Program. Accreditation Requirements

Accreditation Body Evaluation Procedure for AASHTO R18 Accreditation

Information Security Incident Response Plan

Information Security Incident Response Plan

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Loughborough University (LU) Research Office SOP 1027 LU

Payment Card Industry (PCI) 3-D Secure (PCI 3DS) Qualification Requirements for 3DS Assessors

MANUAL OF UNIVERSITY POLICIES PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES. Applies to: faculty staff students student employees visitors contractors

ISO/IEC/ IEEE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Systems and software engineering Requirements for acquirers and suppliers of user documentation

RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE BUICK CLUB OF AMERICA

IT Governance Framework at KIT

C-BPVCA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DELEGATED TO ASME CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT STAFF

Norme NET 4 Européenne de Télécommunication

TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT TO PROVIDE ACCESSIBILITY CONSULTING SERVICES BY A CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST (CASp)

Invitation to Participate

FY2016 FCC Form 470 and Competitive Bidding

Mobile Communication Devices. 1.0 Purpose. 2.0 Policy NO Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED

Virginia State University Policies Manual. Title: Information Security Program Policy: 6110

MFC Power General Partner Ltd.,

OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SECTION 10 CONTRACTING FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTANT COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION ACT (CCNA)

Ch. 5 UPC SCANNING SYSTEMS CHAPTER 5. UPC SCANNING SYSTEMS AND PLU DEVICES GENERAL

Subcontracted Delivery Policy

Website Guidelines. Website Guidelines. North Orange County Community College District

Stanislaus County Fire Warden. Authority Business Plan

SSC Transformation Initiative Fairness Monitoring Services

GIF Submission Website - Instructions How to Fill In your Online Application in the GIF Regular Program

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

Requirements for Forensic Photography & Imaging Certification (08/2017)

System Chief Business Officer - B. J. Crain The Texas A&M University System Position Description--January 13, 2010

Accountable Care Organizations: Testing Their Impact

WEBSITE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND HOSTING SERVICES

TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESS POLICY 2011

Government Resolution No of February 15, Resolution: Advancing National Regulation and Governmental Leadership in Cyber Security

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Transcription:

Page 1 of 11 Responsible Officer: Responsible Office: Catherine Montano Administrative Policies and Business Contracts Issuance Date: 08/01/2011 Effective Date: 08/01/2012 Last Review Date: 08/01/2012 Scope: MOUs Contact: Catherine Montano Title: Controller Email: catherine.montano@ucop.edu Phone: (510) 676 5727 Contact: Robin Sanchez Title: Principal Analyst Email: rgsanchez@ucanr.edu Phone: (916) 750 1235 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. POLICY SUMMARY... 2 II. DEFINITIONS... 2 III. POLICY TEXT... 2 IV. COMPLIANCE / RESPONSIBILITIES... 5 V. PROCEDURES... 6 VI. RELATED INFORMATION... 11 VII. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS... 11 VIII. REVISION HISTORY... 11 11/07/2017 Reformatted for Accessibility

I. POLICY SUMMARY Page 2 of 11 This section of the does not address memoranda of understanding (MOUs) with California counties for the establishment and continuation of the UC Cooperative Extension program. For information on such MOUs, please contact the Coordinator, Administrative Policies & Business Contracts. The University of California s (UC) division of Agriculture and Natural Resources (ANR) frequently collaborates with external (non-uc) agencies to provide programs and services in the furtherance of ANR s mission. As well, ANR makes collaborative agreements internal to the University (such as between ANR and a campus), and internal to ANR (such as between county-based Cooperative Extension (CE) offices and Statewide Programs). Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) record the terms of the agreements reached between the parties and provide a mechanism for the management of those partnerships. This Handbook section intended to provide administrative guidance to those working with such programmatic MOUs. Within the Office of the Controller and Business Services Director (OCBS), the Administrative Policies and Business Contracts unit has responsibility for MOUs. The information presented here is general, but each MOU is specific and unique. If you have questions and/or are experiencing any administrative difficulty with an MOU, please contact ANR s Administrative Policies and Business Contracts unit for assistance. II. DEFINITIONS An MOU is a statement of understanding between two or more parties that establishes a mutually beneficial exchange of services and/or resources. MOUs are the right form of agreement to use when ANR wishes to create partnerships with other entities to deliver programs and provide supportive services. A MOU will serve as a basis of collaboration by outlining the parties commitment to work together toward the same purpose or goal. MOUs provide a general description of the agreement reached, and record the responsibilities assumed by each of the parties in pursuit of specific objectives. MOUs can usually be processed relatively quickly and modified without lengthy negotiations. Within the ANR environment MOUs do not usually involve the exchange of funding and/or other monies. As a general rule, MOUs do not usually include the following. Funding or Other Monies: Agreements with monetary provisions usually require redirection to the ANR Office of Contracts and Grants for processing. Gifts: Agreements with gift provisions usually require redirection to the ANR Office of Development Services for processing. Facilities Use Agreements (FUAs), Leases and Licenses: Agreements related

Page 3 of 11 to leasing and licensing transactions usually require redirection to the ANR Office of Risk Services for processing. Business Contracts and Independent Consulting Agreements: MOUs do not typically address business transactions (e.g., buying equipment, etc.). For assistance with such transactions, contact the Business Operations Center- Kearney ( BOC-Kearney - for personnel associated with Cooperative Extension offices) or the Business Operations Center-Davis ( BOC Davis - for personnel associated with Research & Extension Centers (RECs), Statewide Programs, and ANR service units located in Davis). Sometimes the opportunity being pursued does not fit neatly into one of the above categories, or it fits into two or more of them simultaneously. For example, the proposed collaboration may involve the use of the external party s facility (an FUA), as well as program delivery (an MOU). ANR personnel dealing with such a situation should consult with ANR s Administrative Policies and Business Contracts unit. In turn, that unit will involve other ANR administrative offices (such as Risk Services, Contracts and Grants, etc.) as may be necessary. Together they will identify the type of contract best suited to the subject situation. External MOUs define a relationship between UC and the external party and create a clear record of the commitments to be undertaken by each. [Note: throughout the remainder of this document the non-anr party or parties may also be referred to as the potential partner or the partner.] It is especially important to issue an MOU if the parties will share resources and/or responsibilities over a period of time. As well, it is critical to address the assignment of risk. Depending on the nature of the collaboration, it may also be important to address responsibility for background screening. Internal MOUs define a relationship between two or more UC units. As all units within the UC organization fall under similar control structures, internal MOUs do not usually need to address the legal/risk issues associated with working with an external partner. III. POLICY TEXT A. Deciding When To Issue An MOU 1. As a broad generalization, an MOU is appropriate for situations, which seem to present some level of risk greater than that of standard operations, and/or to involve a commitment of significant importance to UC. 2. The decision to initiate a MOU can come down to a judgment call. Appendix A provides guidance by indicating whether or not an MOU is needed in several real world situations. Please contact ANR s Administrative Policies and Business Contracts unit for assistance in evaluating the need for an MOU. 3. The decision not to initiate a formal MOU processed by the ANR Administrative Policies and Business Contracts unit does not preclude the issuance of written

Page 4 of 11 confirmation between ANR (e.g., a UCCE office, a Research and Extension Center, etc.) and its potential partner. However, such documentation should not be referred to as a. Rather, the term Letter of Agreement would usually be appropriate. ANR s Administrative Policies and Business Contracts can provide further information as may be needed. B. 4-H MOUS MOUs are frequently needed in the delivery of the 4-H California Youth Development Program (4-H YDP). Please see Appendix B for additional information and a template 4-H MOU. C. MGP MOUS MOUs are often needed in the delivery of the UCCE Master Gardener Program (MGP). Please see Appendix C for additional information and a template MGP MOU. D. MOUs Regarding The Assignment Of ANR Academic Appointees An MOU may be appropriate if an academic appointee will be assigned to more than one ANR unit (e.g., a county-based Cooperative Extension Advisor who is also affiliated with a Statewide Program). For samples of such MOUs and related information, contact Administrative Policies and Business Contracts. Any such MOUs will be coordinated with ANR s Academic Personnel unit. [Note: for the sake of brevity, throughout the remainder of this document the initiator of the MOU (i.e., the ANR academic appointee) will be referred to simply as the academic.] E. Space Sharing MOUs It is strongly suggested that an MOU be issued when an ANR office wishes to give or receive the use of space at a campus or other UC entity that is external to ANR. For samples of such MOUs and related information, contact Administrative Policies and Business Contracts. F. Addendum To MOUs Issuance of an addendum is strongly encouraged whenever the parties to the MOU agree upon a material change to the existing MOU, or agree to a new provision. Please see Appendix D for additional information and a template addendum. G. FSNEP MOUs Most Food Stamp Nutrition Education Program (FSNEP) MOUs are an exception to the above-described process. Such funding and/or cost-sharing agreements between a UCCE county office and their programmatic partner (i.e., a school district, etc.) should usually be processed by the UCD-FSNEP statewide office as per their established procedures. Contact information is available here.

IV. COMPLIANCE / RESPONSIBILITIES A. Elements Of An MOU Page 5 of 11 An MOU generally contains a standard series of elements describing the purpose of the relationship and the obligations of the parties. Common elements usually include: 1. Identification of Parties This section must clearly and properly identify all of the parties to the MOU. If desired, other key groups involved in executing the objectives of the MOU may be referenced, provided that it is clear that these groups are not named parties to the MOU. All named parties (and only the named parties) must sign the MOU. 2. Statement of Purpose This section should outline the purpose for the MOU itself. In the ANR environment, MOUs often emphasize cooperation and coordination between the parties. Given the open nature of such an MOU, they will also often reflect that the parties commit to or undertake their various responsibilities. Generally, the provisions in the MOU should be broad in scope. However, depending on the nature of the relationship contemplated in the MOU, the text may be more specific if appropriate to that particular agreement. 3. Responsibilities of the Parties a. This section should clearly delineate the responsibilities of each party. The section is usually broken down into subsections, one for each of the parties to the MOU, with another regarding general or mutual responsibilities of both parties. b. The principal functions that each party will be responsible to perform should be identified and outlined. A comprehensive list of the specific duties, however, does not need to be included. If desired, details that are inappropriate for the body of the MOU may be attached as exhibits, or recorded in other forms of written communication. 4. Risk and Liability a. The assignment of risk is a critical element of any MOU. UC s standard text should be used and is available from Administrative Policies & Business Contracts. If the potential partner wants to use wording of their own, Administrative Policies & Business Contracts will consult with ANR's Risk Services Analyst as necessary. b. Note that this section would rarely (if ever) apply to an MOU between two or more UC entities.

Page 6 of 11 c. If needed, standard text regarding insurance coverage for UC volunteers is available from Administrative Policies & Business Contracts. 5. Criminal History and Identity Check of UC Volunteers Depending on the nature of the collaboration, it may be prudent to address responsibility for background screening of participants. If the project could involve adult-youth contact, the MOU should address the issue of background screening. Standard text is available from Administrative Policies & Business Contracts. 6. Other Terms It is prudent to address additional issues such as term of the MOU, future modification of the MOU, addresses for notices, UC s policy of nondiscrimination, etc. Standard text is available from Administrative Policies & Business Contracts. 7. Signature Block a. A signature block for each party to the MOU is required. Signature blocks for individuals and/or entities that are not a party to the MOU are usually inappropriate and should not be included. b. Within ANR, signature blocks are usually required for the Associate Vice President Academic Programs and Strategic Initiatives and for the applicable Director (e.g., of the UCCE office, of the Research Extension Center, etc.). If the signatures of other ANR personnel are desired they usually appear beneath the words Reviewed and Recommended. 8. Addendum If a revision to the MOU is required, it may be recorded by issuing an addendum. Addenda are issued in consecutive order, and there is no particular limit to the number of addenda that may be issued. Addenda must be executed (signed) by a representative of each of the parties that executed the original MOU. A sample document is available as Appendix D. V. PROCEDURES A. A simple overview of the MOU processing procedure is shown in the below flowchart. The flowchart is followed by text providing additional information and a greater level of detail.

Page 7 of 11 Processing an ANR MOU Collaboration opportunity identified by ANR academic. ANR academic or potential partner drafts MOU. ANR academic forwards first draft to APBC Specialist. APBC Specialist, academic and potential partner work together in iterative manner to develop a mutually-acceptable final draft. APBC Specialist circulates final draft MOU to key administrators as necessary (i.e., Budget Director, etc.) APBC Specialist routes multiple counterparts of MOU for signature by all parties. APBC Specialist distributes copies of fully-executed MOU to all parties. At a future date academic consults with APBC Specialist to issue addenda if necessary, and/or to renew the MOU. B. Who May Initiate an MOU? 1. MOUs are usually initiated when an ANR academic identifies an opportunity to collaborate with another party for purposes of program delivery. Such MOUs are usually initiated by an academic with the relevant programmatic responsibility, after s/he has obtained the approval of their supervisor and/or unit head (usually a UCCE Director, a Statewide Program Director, or a Research Extension Center Director). 2. MOUs may also be initiated as the result of two or more UC units reaching agreement on the sharing of resources or other important matters. Such MOUs are usually initiated by a UCCE County Director, a Statewide Program Director, the Associate Research and Extension Center (REC) Director, or by other ANR directors and executives. 3. Regardless of its origins, every MOU shall be tied to a specific ANR employee with relevant subject matter expertise who agrees to serve as the responsible administrator. C. How an MOU is Initiated 1. MOUs are initiated in one of the following ways:

Page 8 of 11 a. The academic receives a proposed first draft from the potential partner, b. The academic creates a first draft based on one of the available ANR MOU templates, or c. The academic creates a first draft by revising an existing MOU that is similar in nature. 2. As mentioned above, the potential partner may propose use of a draft MOU with the terms and conditions preferred by the potential partner s entity/institution. In such cases Administrative Policies & Business Contracts will work with the academic to review the draft and to propose modifications as may be necessary (i.e., to conform to UC policy, etc.). If required, modifications will be reviewed by both the academic and the potential partner. Modifications will not be finalized unless and until they are approved by all parties to the MOU. 3. In contrast, the academic may choose to initiate an MOU by customizing one of ANR s templates or by editing an existing MOU that is similar in nature. a. In creating the first draft, the academic need not concern themselves with editing the document for formatting, typos, and so on. Rather, they should focus on describing the programmatic and/or technical elements of the MOU that require their particular professional expertise to convey. Academics initiating an MOU are encouraged to provide this information in as plain and straightforward a manner as possible. 4. Regardless of the MOU s origin, as soon as a reasonably acceptable draft is available the academic should forward it to Administrative Policies & Business Contracts. D. Revising and Finalizing the MOU 1. Upon receipt from the academic, Administrative Policies & Business Contracts reviews the first draft of the MOU. If necessary they will propose modifications to the non-programmatic text. (In contrast, Administrative Policies & Business Contracts will rarely if ever propose material changes to the programmatic/technical content of the MOU.) Administrative Policies & Business Contracts will consult with other ANR units if appropriate. 2. Administrative Policies & Business Contracts will submit the revised draft to the academic for review and approval If any changes proposed by Administrative Policies & Business Contracts are problematic, further revision will be made. 3. The academic and Administrative Policies & Business Contracts will continue to work together in an iterative manner until the wording of the MOU is mutually satisfactory. It is usually appropriate to include the potential partner in this process. At the academic s discretion the potential partner may be communicated with only through the academic. Alternatively, the academic may ask

Page 9 of 11 Administrative Policies & Business Contracts to interact directly with the potential partner on non-programmatic issues that do not require specific subject matter expertise. Either approach is acceptable. E. At the same time or shortly thereafter, Administrative Policies & Business Contracts will forward the draft MOU to the ANR Risk Services Analyst for his/her review. The ANR Risk Services Analyst will review the portion(s) of the MOU relevant to insurance and other risk issues, and will advise of any changes that may be needed. The ANR Risk Services Analyst will also call for a certificate of insurance from the potential partner, and/or issue a certificate of insurance on behalf of UC as may be needed. Administrative Policies & Business Contracts will be responsible to facilitate and bring to completion all action items associated with risk. F. Routing the MOU for Approval 1. As a matter of standard operating procedure, Administrative Policies & Business Contracts will then route the MOU (now in final draft form) for ANR internal approval as follows. a. Director, Budget b. Director, Contracts and Grants c. Director, Financial Services 2. Approval of other ANR Directors and/or UC personnel is sought as may be appropriate on a case-by-case basis. For example, if the MOU provided that an academic appointee be assigned to more than one ANR unit (e.g., a countybased Cooperative Extension Advisor who is also affiliated with a Statewide Program), ANR s Academic Personnel unit would be given the opportunity to review the MOU in draft form. 3. Directors and other reviewers will generally be given at least five (5) working days to examine the draft MOU. If at the end of this period no response to the call for comments is received, it is assumed that the reviewer has given their approval. If a reviewer wants to comment but cannot respond within five (5) working days, they should contact Administrative Policies & Business Contracts to arrange an extension of time so that their comments may be taken into account. If comments are received, Administrative Policies & Business Contracts will work with the academic to revise the draft as may be appropriate. 4. The academic and Administrative Policies & Business Contracts complete their work by producing a mutually agreeable final version of the MOU. Administrative Policies & Business Contracts then generates a sufficient number of counterparts to ensure that one ink-signed original may be retained in the Administrative Policies & Business Contracts file. 5. Preferably the external party signs the MOU first and UC signs last. Accordingly,

Page 10 of 11 Administrative Policies & Business Contracts (or the academic her/himself if s/he prefers) transmits all of the original counterparts of the final MOU to the partner for their signature. 6. The partner returns all of the original counterparts of the MOU to Administrative Policies & Business Contracts, each of which bears the ink-signature of the partner representative. 7. Administrative Policies & Business Contracts routes all original counterparts for signature by the appropriate individuals within ANR. Typically signatures are required as follows: Review, Recommendation, and Execution of ANR MOUs Reviewed and Recommended - Academic (initiator of the MOU) Approved (signed) on behalf of The Regents of the University of California - County-based Cooperative Extension Director (or Statewide Program Director or REC Center Director as applicable) - Controller (MOUs establishing or continuing UCCE in County) -or- - Associate Vice President Academic Programs & Strategic Initiatives (MOUs establishing or continuing programmatic collaborations with external or internal parties) As is reflected above, county-based Cooperative Extension Directors (or Statewide Program Directors or REC Directors) cannot sign MOUs on behalf of The Regents. However, MOUs must bear their signature verifying that they have reviewed and recommended the document. 8. All original counterparts of the MOU are returned to Administrative Policies & Business Contracts who distributes them as follows. Distribution of Fully-Executed MOUs Original hardcopy counterpart via US Mail - Partner Original hardcopy counterpart PDF copy issued as email attachment - ANR Master File (Administrative Policies & Business Contracts) - Academic - County-based Cooperative Extension Director (or Statewide Program Director or REC Associate Director) - Others as may be appropriate such as ANR Business Operations Center Director, etc.

G. Renewing the MOU Page 11 of 11 The academic should make a notation on his/her calendar to consider renewal of the MOU a few months prior to its expiration. If renewal is desired, the ANR employee may initiate that process by so informing Administrative Policies & Business Contracts. H. Administrative Policies & Business Contracts is the office of record for all ANR MOUs. VI. VII. RELATED INFORMATION - Food Stamp Nutrition Education Program (FSNEP) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS VIII. REVISION HISTORY November 2017: Format updated.