Memorandum of Agreement

Similar documents
Mitigation Framework Leadership Group (MitFLG) Charter DRAFT

Disaster Management (DM) Program Overview

March 21, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES. Building National Capabilities for Long-Term Drought Resilience

Office for Interoperability and Compatibility Emergency Interoperable Standards Efforts

Section 1 Metrics: Community Adoption

300 Riverview Plaza Odysseus Marcopolus, Chief Operating Officer Trenton, NJ POLICY NO: SUPERSEDES: N/A VERSION: 1.0

Charter for the System Interoperability and Data Synchronization Requirements Team

Memorandum of Understanding

STRATEGIC PLAN VERSION 1.0 JANUARY 31, 2015

OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY

Government-Industry Collaboration: 7 Steps for Resiliency in Critical Infrastructure Protection

Disaster Management Interoperability Services (DMIS)

METHODOLOGY AND CRITERIA FOR THE CYBERSECURITY REPORTS

Participation Agreement for the ehealth Exchange

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 90

Administrative Policies and Business Contracts

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 4, 2016

CHAPTER 13 ELECTRONIC COMMERCE

Promoting accountability and transparency of multistakeholder partnerships for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda

The U.S. Government s Role in Standards and Conformity Assessment

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

System Chief Business Officer - B. J. Crain The Texas A&M University System Position Description--January 13, 2010

Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013

KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT OPORTUNITY (EXTERNAL ADVERTISEMENT)

Cybersecurity Presidential Policy Directive Frequently Asked Questions. kpmg.com

The Office of Infrastructure Protection

STRENGTHENING THE CYBERSECURITY OF FEDERAL NETWORKS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Guidance for Exchange and Medicaid Information Technology (IT) Systems

Virginia State University Policies Manual. Title: Information Security Program Policy: 6110

ACF Interoperability Human Services 2.0 Overview. August 2011 David Jenkins Administration for Children and Families

Kansas City s Metropolitan Emergency Information System (MEIS)

FIRE REDUCTION STRATEGY. Fire & Emergency Services Authority GOVERNMENT OF SAMOA April 2017

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary EXECUTIVE ORDER

Guiding principles on the Global Alliance against child sexual abuse online

Overview of the U.S. Approach to Standards. Jessica Hychalk American National Standards Institute June 29, 2010

Presidential Executive Order on Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure

Emergency Communications Preparedness Center (ECPC) Research and Development (R&D) Focus Group (FG)

RESOLUTION 47 (Rev. Buenos Aires, 2017)

Introduction to the National Response Plan and National Incident Management System

ISAO SO Product Outline

USA HEAD OFFICE 1818 N Street, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036

UAE National Space Policy Agenda Item 11; LSC April By: Space Policy and Regulations Directory

THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary EXECUTIVE ORDER

EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION (ESF) 13 PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY POLICY MEMORANDUM NUMBER

DOE OFFICE OF INDIAN ENERGY Program Overview May 5, Chris Deschene, Director

Critical Infrastructure Resilience

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release September 23, 2014 EXECUTIVE ORDER

Testimony. Christopher Krebs Director Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security FOR A HEARING ON

Oregon Climate Authority (SB928)

NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION Homeland Security Symposium

Technical Conference on Critical Infrastructure Protection Supply Chain Risk Management

Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement: General Introduction, Framework and Benefits

Cloud First Policy General Directorate of Governance and Operations Version April 2017

UPU UNIVERSAL POSTAL UNION. CA C 4 SDPG AHG DRM Doc 3. Original: English COUNCIL OF ADMINISTRATION. Committee 4 Development Cooperation

The Center of Innovation: Creating an Innovation

Executive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses

Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement: General Introduction, Framework and Benefits

Cyber Security Strategy

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY

NIEM in Action: Roadmap to Successful Standards- Based Information- Sharing

Integrated Consortium of Laboratory Networks (ICLN)

AUTOMATED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ARMS)

Developing a Holistic Strategy To Achieve Community Health Resilience

2 ESF 2 Communications

ACCAB. Accreditation Commission For Conformity Assessment Bodies

Alaska Land Mobile Radio Communications Planning and AS/NE 07 Readiness and Support. Alaskan Command J6 Mr. Timothy Woodall July 20, 2006

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Fifth Committee (A/61/592/Add.4)]

Emergency Operations Center Management Exercise Evaluation Guide

WORLD TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION ASSEMBLY Hammamet, 25 October 3 November 2016

Number: USF System Emergency Management Responsible Office: Administrative Services

U.S. Japan Internet Economy Industry Forum Joint Statement October 2013 Keidanren The American Chamber of Commerce in Japan

NATIONAL GUIDELINES ON CLOUD COMPUTING FOR GOVERNMENT, MINISTRIES, DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

Business Model for Global Platform for Big Data for Official Statistics in support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

European Code of Conduct on Data Centre Energy Efficiency

Emergency Support Function #12 Energy Annex. ESF Coordinator: Support Agencies:

SOC 3 for Security and Availability

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Developing a National Emergency Telecommunications Plan. The Samoan Experience November 2012

Subject: University Information Technology Resource Security Policy: OUTDATED

Copernicus Space Component. Technical Collaborative Arrangement. between ESA. and. Enterprise Estonia

The National Medical Device Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (MD-ISAO) Initiative Session 2, February 19, 2017 Moderator: Suzanne

Annual Report for the Utility Savings Initiative

STRATEGIC PLAN. USF Emergency Management

Quadrennial Homeland Security Review (QHSR) Ensuring Resilience to Disasters

Texas Commission on Fire Protection

The President s Spectrum Policy Initiative

HUMBOLDT COUNTY Website Accessibility Policy

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3000DEFENSEPENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Good morning, Chairman Harman, Ranking Member Reichert, and Members of

Department of Homeland Security Updates

MEMORANDUM OF COOPERATION BETWEEN THE INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCT SAFETY POLICY GROUP OF THE MINISTRY OF ECONOMY, TRADE AND INDUSTRY OF JAPAN AND

The ACFE Law Enforcement and Government Alliance

Presidential Documents

The UNISDR Private Sector Alliance for Disaster Resilient Societies

National Strategy for CBRNE Standards

New cybersecurity landscape in the EU Sławek Górniak 9. CA-Day, Berlin, 28th November 2017

Perspectives from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission: Lessons Learned on ICTs in Disaster Prevention and Relief

Assessment of the progress made in the implementation of and follow-up to the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society

Section One of the Order: The Cybersecurity of Federal Networks.

Transcription:

Memorandum of Agreement I. Parties This agreement is entered into between the Disaster Management Electronic Government Initiative (DM Egov) in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Emergency Interoperability Consortium (EIC), a consortium primarily of software development and services industry members that provides emergency and disaster management tools and applications to federal, state, local and industry organizations. The EIC is a not-for-profit corporation that promotes standards development activities of which are affiliated with the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS). OASIS promotes and certifies open standards based information exchanges and formats. The EIC was formed to facilitate the removal of barriers that prevent or hinder emergency data, communications, and technology sharing within the emergency management and emergency response communities. Consortium members and DHS share the common goal of achieving seamless application and data information sharing among disparate systems, services, and functional assets to save lives, reduce injuries, protect property, and preserve homeland security during disasters or common emergencies and to facilitate the interoperability requirements of the National Incident Management System (NIMS). II. Authority Sections 102(g) and 502 of the Homeland Security Act, Public Law 107-296. III. Purpose This agreement establishes an alliance between DHS and the Consortium to promote the design, development, release and use of XML schema-based standards or other standards, tools, and processes that will help solve data sharing problems and meet the following objectives: Improving information sharing capabilities to protect the nation and its citizens from the consequences of disasters and other emergencies, regardless of cause; Encouraging broad-based participation in the design, development, acceptance and use of XML schema-based or other standards; Promoting the use of XML schema-based or other standards within industry and government after demonstration of their practical uses; Enabling emergency organizations to receive and share the data they need in real time, using flexible, open architecture and secure systems; Educating federal, state, local and tribal governments, the media, citizens and industry on the meaning and importance of data sharing within the emergency management and response communities; Page 1 of 6

Coordinating with appropriate organizations in adjoining countries based on existing protocols, treaties and international laws; Encouraging, promoting and fostering innovation in the emergency management and emergency response communities; and Fostering a collaborative working environment among federal, state, local and tribal jurisdictions. This agreement will promote higher quality services by utilizing the existing expertise of the private sector, reduce the technical complexity of integration, maximize industry choice, promote competition for such services, provide an open and standardized development roadmap for organizations, provide an open information architecture for transmitting and sharing emergency information, and should meet the objectives in the least costly manner. By working toward these goals, DHS and the Consortium can create an environment that provides greater certainty and less risk in the advancement of emergency management systems and data sharing. To accomplish the above stated objectives, DHS and the Consortium will work together to develop and deploy -- and make available to federal, state, local, tribal and industry organizations -- open standard data models that promote secure data sharing of emergency data. IV. RESPONSIBILITIES A. DHS and the Consortium will work jointly to establish the requirements and standards for deploying a data sharing service. The current Disaster Management Information Service (DMIS) solution will be a baseline that the parties will improve, change, enhance and modify as appropriate. B. The Consortium will develop its product sets in compliance with an open architecture, web services system, with common data sharing standards and application protocol interfaces (API s) in order to allow the sharing of information across their systems. C. The Consortium understands that DHS will not endorse any particular company or organization s products or services offerings. D. The Disaster Management E-Gov Initiative will coordinate with the DHS Office of Interoperability and Compatibility (OIC). Following the coordination process, DHS and the Consortium both will take reasonable steps to publicize the data exchange standards and encourage the use of such standards. E. The Consortium will work with DHS, emergency response organizations, public safety groups and other parties to create a plan, budget and other requirements to establish a process and a set of certification criteria for products that are compliant with these standards and architecture. The criteria will consider the following areas, as a minimum: Page 2 of 6

1. Demonstrable, verifiable field use of data sharing; 2. Security of various kinds, including communications and data; 3. Compliance with the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) and other standards; 4. Standards-based development processes and practices; and 5. Guidance on Service Level Agreements and Quality of Service commitments. 6. All standards will be available at no cost to the Federal government, state, local and tribal governments and the private sector. 7. Nothing in this Agreement prevents the Federal government from coordinating with other public and private entities. To achieve data sharing, the parties agree that it is critical to have a common, open information architecture to build to, and to promote its use at a national level. DHS standards activities will be conducted in accordance with section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-119, as required by subsection 102(g) of the Homeland Security Act, Public Law 107-296 and the National Incident Management System (NIMS). The DHS Office of Interoperability and Compatibility (OIC) will coordinate with the Disaster Management E-Gov Initiative to ensure that any standards process used under this MOA is inclusive of other key standards initiatives. V. POINTS OF CONTACT For DHS: Chip Hines Disaster Management E- Gov Initiative Office of the CIO Federal Emergency Management Agency For EIC: Mr. Matt Walton, Chairman Emergency Interoperability Consortium 1701 K Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006 mwalton@eteam.com Page 3 of 6

VII. OTHER PROVISIONS A. Governance Structure 1. The Consortium will be responsible for establishing its own governance structure. This structure shall be consistent with the Consortium s performance of its obligations hereunder and be designed to maximize broad participation by industry members. 2. The Consortium will develop an assessment process to determine the extent to which this agreement is accomplishing the objectives described in Section I. above. 3. The DM PMO will coordinate with other DHS Directorates or Offices and with other federal organizations to collect and present their respective inputs in a formal, coordinated and reportable way. 4. DHS and other interested federal agencies may nominate or appoint representatives who will participate in Consortium meetings or groups. 5. This Agreement makes no representation for the federal government in whole or in part and does not preclude other federal agencies to develop similar or like offerings. B. Outreach and Education 1. DHS and the Consortium will undertake appropriate joint outreach and education efforts and programs to promote the benefits and cost savings of data sharing, including technology demonstrations. These efforts will be jointly coordinated and directed to governmental, academic and private institutions that would most likely benefit from these services. 2. DHS and the Consortium may undertake individual efforts with the understanding the Parties will communicate such plans. The Parties do not require approval to undertake their own educational and outreach plans. 3. DHS will not promote or endorse any specific company offerings, but will promote interoperable services and the benefits of using compliant software. VIII. Term of Agreement; Termination A. This agreement has an initial term of three years from its Effective Date, and may be renewed for successive two-year periods thereafter. Representatives from the Parties will meet quarterly to review operation and results achieved through this agreement. The Page 4 of 6

Parties will review the terms of this agreement on an annual basis, and, upon mutual consent, may agree in writing to modify any provision of this agreement. B. Either Party may terminate this agreement upon the giving of written notice thirty (30) calendar days in advance of the termination date IX. Modifications This agreement may be modified upon the mutual written consent of the parties. X. Funding This Agreement does not obligate DHS funds and is not intended to provide any funding or financial support to EIC or OASIS. XI. Effective Date This agreement is effective on the date of last signature hereon by the Parties. XII. Miscellaneous This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the Parties. Federal law governs this Agreement. APPROVED BY: Steve Cooper Date: Print Name: Steve Cooper Title: DHS CIO Barry C. West Date: Print Name: Barry C. West Title: Chief Information Officer / Director ITSD Page 5 of 6

Matt Walton Date: Print Name: Matt Walton Title: Chairman, EIC Page 6 of 6