Wir stehen für Wettbewerb und Medienvielfalt. RTR-GmbH, Mariahilfer Straße 77 79, 1060 Wien

Similar documents
Wir stehen für Wettbewerb und Medienvielfalt

European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) GCRP - November 2009

Public debriefing 35 th BEREC Plenary Meeting

BoR (17) 182. BEREC Report on the New Forms of Sharing Passive Optical Networks Based on Wavelength Division Multiplexing

BoR (14) 142. Presented by ECTA in relation to the public hearing on the draft BEREC Strategy and draft BEREC Work Programme 2015

HEALTH IN ECSO (European Cyber Security Organisation) 18 October 2017

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Mobile broadband: approaches to regulation. Abigail Browne Cullen International

ENISA s Position on the NIS Directive

The 13 th Progress Report on the Single European Telecoms Market 2007: Frequently Asked Questions

European Cybersecurity cppp and ECSO. org.eu

MAWA Forum State of Play. Cooperation Planning & Support Henk Corporaal MAWA Forum Chair

Broadband Development in Republic of Moldova

Enhancing the security of CIIPs in Europe - ENISA s Approach Dimitra Liveri Network and Information Security Expert

Flash Eurobarometer 468. Report. The end of roaming charges one year later

BEREC Public debriefing

INTERNATIONAL ROAMING REGULATION

BoR (18) 41. BEREC preliminary analysis of intra-eu calls

Cybersecurity in the EU Steve Purser Head of Operational Departments, ENISA Regional Cybersecurity Forum Sofia, Bulgaria 29 th November 2016 European

International Roaming Charges: Frequently Asked Questions

Overview The EU SVOD market Facts & Figures

Answer to the public consultation of the BEREC about Common characteristics of Layer 2 Wholesale Access Products in the European Union

Status of the ecall initiative

5569/18 KM/ek 1 DG E2B

Fixed broadband solutions for rural areas: a techno-economic analysis

IPv6 Deployment Survey. Based on responses from the RIPE community during June 2009 Maarten Botterman RIPE 59, Lisbon, 6 October 2009

ETNO Reflection Document on the EC Proposal for a Directive on Network and Information Security (NIS Directive)

Market - Technology - Policy Regulatory Policy Developments

PUBLIC COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION. Brusels,13February /1/14 REV1 InterinstitutionalFile: 2012/0011(COD) LIMITE

NOTIFICATION FORM. Section 1 Market definition

Network Code on Emergency and Restoration - Implementation Guide for the Communication Systems Requirements. Final VERSION

INTERNATIONAL ROAMING REGULATION

APMS CONFERENCE 2017 EECC: GET PRO-INVESTMENT MEASURES BACK ON TRACK. Manuel Braga Monteiro Deutsche Telekom Group Prague, 31st October 2017

Transparency through Information

Wholesale Roaming Resale Access Reference Offer of Latvijas Mobilais Telefons SIA

Framework for Universal Service in Poland. Eastern Partnership (EaP) workshop Vienna, October 7 th -8 th, 2010

Country

TEPZZ Z47A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: G06Q 30/00 ( )

Enabling Environment for 5G. Stefan Felder, RTR

TMview - Euroclass Seminar on Community trade mark and design protection Sophia Bonne, ICLAD, OHIM Rospatent, Moscow, Russian Federation 7 March 2012

Broadband Investment in rural areas

Market Surveillance Action Plan

ACM Policy rule on the provision of information concerning internet speeds

PUBLIC COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION. Brusels,4April /2/14 REV2 InterinstitutionalFile: 2012/0011(COD) LIMITE

The Role of ENISA in the Implementation of the NIS Directive Anna Sarri Officer in NIS CIP Workshop Vienna 19 th September 2017

Guidelines 1/2018 on certification and identifying certification criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation 2016/679

Cybersecurity. Quality. security LED-Modul. basis. Comments by the electrical industry on the EU Cybersecurity Act. manufacturer s declaration

Pan-European Contribution of EUROCONTROL to the Single European Sky

Lex Mundi Telecommunications Regulation Multi-Jurisdictional Survey

GOING LOCAL DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET STRATEGY: A NEW START

ACER ON THE ADOPTION OF COMMON NETWORK OPERATION TOOLS BY ENTSOG. OPINION Of THE AGENCY FOR THE COOPERATION Of ENERGY REGULATORS No 04/2017

The Network and Information Security Directive - ENISA's contribution

European Union Agency for Network and Information Security

Mobile network sharing:

Whole Home Mesh WiFi System. Quick Installation Guide

PRIVACY STATEMENT FOR DATA COLLECTED FOR DATA COLLECTED VIA ON-LINE SURVEYS

INTERMEDIATE EVALUATION

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

WORKSHOP WITH STAKEHOLDERS ON THE CONNECTION NETWORK CODES NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS

Discussion on MS contribution to the WP2018

BEREC Report on Enabling the Internet of Things. Francesco Sciacchitano (AGCOM) GSMA workshop, 21 Jan 2015 Brussels

GENERAL OBJECTIVES CONSORTIUM. Strategies for safeguarding & improving Access to primary care in PHAMEU countries

CEF eid SMO The use of eid in ehealth. ehealth Network meeting 7 June 2016 Amsterdam

Road to broadband society: Lithuanian case

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Enterprise Directorate-General

Memo on Stakeholder Consultation on Article 10(2) of Directive 2012/19/EU

WIK Investment Workshop 2017 Physical infrastructure access: a critical assessment based on EU case studies

Guidelines 4/2018 on the accreditation of certification bodies under Article 43 of the General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679)

BoR (18) 31. International Roaming BEREC Benchmark Data Report April September 2017

All Baltic CCR TSOs amended proposal for the fallback procedures in accordance with Article 44 of the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July

Privacy Statement for Use of the Trust Service of Swisscom IT Services Finance S.E., Austria

Monitoring and Reporting Drafting Team Monitoring Indicators Justification Document

ETNO Reflection Document in response to ECC/ CEPT consultation on Fixed-Mobile Convergence with Survey of Numbering Related Issues

To make that choice, please click under privacy policy the checkbox (

ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY

UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF egovernment IN EUROPE

TEPZZ Z5_748A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION

Digital Agenda and RTR-GmbH Seite 1

Mi A2 Lite. User Guide

ITU-BDT Regional Seminar on Fixed Mobile Convergence and Guidelines on the smooth transition of existing mobile networks to IMT Session 2.2.

Proposal for a model to address the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

BNetzA therefore requests a BEREC Opinion on the above measures until June 1.

Eurostat s s Information Society Statistics

NOTIFICATION FOR PRIOR CHECKING INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN(2)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 24 May /13. Interinstitutional File: 2013/0027 (COD)

Impacts of the GDPR in Afnic - Registrar relations: FAQ

Deployment is underway!

Data Processing Clauses

TEPZZ Z7999A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: B05B 15/04 ( )

New Zealand Telecommunications Forum. Code for Vulnerable End Users of Telecommunication Services. ( Vulnerable End User Code )

Document for item 4.2 of the agenda

Network Code on Operational Security. User s Group System Operations 06/11/2013

Comparison of Electronic Signature between Europe and Japan: Possibiltiy of Mutual Recognition

Progress Report Workflow Create the Progress Report Record/Edit the Progress Report General Version Information...

Ex-post analysis of two mobile operator mergers in Austria

Mobile telephones/international roaming frequently asked questions (see also IP/05/161)

New cybersecurity landscape in the EU Sławek Górniak 9. CA-Day, Berlin, 28th November 2017

GDPR AMC SAAS AND HOSTED MODULES. UK version. AMC Consult A/S June 26, 2018 Version 1.10

ehealth Ministerial Conference 2013 Dublin May 2013 Irish Presidency Declaration

PS Mailing Services Ltd Data Protection Policy May 2018

Transcription:

Wir stehen für Wettbewerb und Medienvielfalt RTR-GmbH, Mariahilfer Straße 77 79, 1060 Wien www.rtr.at

BEREC Report Location of the Network Termination Point Wilhelm Schramm https://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/reports/8252-berec-report-on-the-locationof-the-network-termination-point

Introduction (1) According to the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC, recital 19) the network termination point (NTP) represents a boundary Source: BEREC The location of the NTP has an impact on whether an equipment is part of the public network or part of the telecommunications terminal equipment (TTE)

Introduction (2) Several legal provisions at the EU level are related to the topic NTP e.g.: Definition of the term NTP (EECC Art. 2(9)) The right of end-users of internet access services to use the terminal equipment of their choice (Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 Art. 3.1) Market participants (e.g. network operators, end-users) may interpret these legal provisions differently NRAs and also other national authorities may therefore issue legal provisions which explicitly define the NTP location In the future, the definition of the NTP location by NRAs will be harmonised through the guidelines which BEREC has to prepare (EECC Art. 61(7))

Objective Objectives of the report: To give an overview of the definition of the NTP location in the EU To analyse the legal provisions of NRAs or other national authorities which define the NTP location in general (i.e. for all NTPs) To examine Layer 2/Layer 3 wholesale access products imposed by NRAs with regard to characteristics which may have an impact on the NTP location Goals: Get a deeper insight into the legal provisions of NRAs (and other national authorities) on the NTP location Foster the exchange of experiences between NRAs Not: to be normative or to recommend best practice

Overview of the definition of the NTP location in the EU

Overview of the definition of the fixed NTP location in the EU Fixed NTP is typically located at a point which allows end-users to use their own modem/router (point A or B).

Overview of the definition of the mobile NTP location in the EU *) In preparation

Legal provisions in the five countries (CY, DE, IT, LV, NL*) which defined or plans to define the NTP location in general *) In preparation

Authority, legal instrument and main reasons Authority and legal instrument Different authorities (parliament, ministry, NRA) defined the NTP location Different legal instruments (law, guidelines, regulation) were used Year when the legal instrument entered into force Main reasons for the definition of the NTP location: To provide clarity on the NTP location (all 5) To enable end-users to use the TTE of their choice (DE, IT (fixed), LV, NL) To respond to significant complaints from market players (DE, IT(fixed), NL)

Stakeholders and their positions Stakeholders involved: Network operators and service providers and depending on the main reasons also CPE manufacturers, consumers and further stakeholders Main positions of the stakeholders in case a main reason was to enable the end-users to use the TTE of their choice: Point A: CPE manufacturers and consumers Point B or C: network operators/service providers

Definition of the fixed NTP location (1) Definition of the fixed NTP location: Point A (CY, DE, IT, NL) Point A, B, C or somewhere else depending on the ownership of the equipment (LV) CPE/modem end-users are allowed to use: All modems/routers which fulfil the characteristics of the NTP (no restriction to a white list or certification) (CY, DE, IT, NL) The use of own modem/router is only possible if offered voluntarily by network operators or service providers (LV) Interoperability between public network and CPE/modem: @@

Definition of the fixed NTP location (2) Simplicity of network operation: Network operators and/or service providers complained that network operation is more difficult (DE, IT, NL), Increase of complexity of network operation does not justify to limit the freedom of end-users to use the CPEs/modems of their choice (DE, IT, NL) Security and data protection Network operators complained that security issues in the public network may be caused by the CPE/modem of the end-users (DE, IT) End-users complained that in case NTP would be at point B or C network operators may get access to their private data (DE) End-users are responsible for the damage they caused and have to pay compensation Network operators have the possibility to disconnect such CPEs/modems (or request such a permission from the NRA)@

Location of the mobile NTP Definition of the mobile NTP location: Mobile NTP is at a point which allows end-users to use their own mobile equipment (all 3 IT, LV, NL*) With removable SIM card (e.g. mobile phone) and also With non-removable SIM card (e.g. IoT device)

L2 WAPs and L3 WAPs imposed by NRAs (14 countries 1 ) 1) AT, BE, CZ, DK, FR, GR, HR, HU, IE, LT, LU, MT, PT, SI

L2/3 WAPs available on copper-based access lines Nearly all L2 WAPs and L3 WAPs allow ANOs to use their own CPE including modem Therefore, ANOs are able to provide retail services with an NTP at point A (or B, C) About two third of the L2/L3 WAPs allows ANOs to use any CPE which fulfils the requirements of the SMP operator The other third allows ANOs to use CPEs which are on a white list

L2/3 WAPs available on fibre-based access lines About half of the L2 WAPs and L3 WAPs allows ANOs to use their own CPE including modem In these cases, ANOs are able to provide retail services with an NTP at point A (or B, C) About half of them allows ANOs to use any CPE which fulfils the requirements of the SMP operator The other half allows ANOs to use CPEs which are on a white list Nearly all other L2 WAPs and L3 WAPs allow ANOs to use their own CPE excluding modem which enables ANOs to provide retail services with an NTP at point B (or C)

Conclusions

Conclusions Only in some countries there was the need to define the NTP location In case of the fixed NTP, it seems this was driven mainly by End-users who demanded to be able to use their own CPE The need to define the demarcation line between public network infrastructure and private in-building network infrastructure (1 country - CY) In most cases The fixed NTP is located at point A End-users are allowed to use all CPEs (including modem) which fulfils the characteristics of the NTP The report also constitutes a comprehensive basis for the guidelines on the topic location of the NTP that BEREC has to adopt (EECC Art. 61(7))

RTR-GmbH, Mariahilfer Straße 77 79, 1060 Wien www.rtr.at Wir stehen für Wettbewerb und Medienvielfalt Auf Wiedersehen!

Backup

Legal provisions EECC Art. 61.7: by 18 months after the date of entry into force of the EECC, in order to contribute to a consistent definition of the location of NTPs by NRAs, BEREC shall, after consulting stakeholders and in close cooperation with the Commission, adopt guidelines on common approaches to the identification of the NTP in different network topologies. NRAs shall take utmost account of those guidelines when defining the location of NTPs. EECC Art. 2(9): network termination point means the physical point at which an end-user is provided with access to a public electronic communications network, and which, in the case of networks involving switching or routing, is identified by means of a specific network address and may be linked to an end-user's number or name