CAPITAL METRO: AN UPDATE TO THE TRAVIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT

Similar documents
Making Mobility Better, Together JANUARY 31, 2013 AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL PROJECT CONNECT REGIONAL TRANSIT UPDATE

DRAFT INVESTMENT CORRIDORS

METRO SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY Executive Summary May 2009 DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS

Council of State Governments. Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing. October 28, 2013

MVTA-Prior Lake-Shakopee Merger. SCALE Presentation, October 10, 2014

MARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018

Looking Ahead. A Context for the Next Twenty Year Needs Assessment. July 2013

November 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING

Public Outreach Overview Tuesday, September 27. COTA William J. Lhota Building 33 N. High St. Columbus, OH 43215

The Maryland Transit Administration. A Plan to Connect Baltimore

April 2017 May 2017 Version 2

How to make MetroWorks work for you:

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master title style

MAJOR PROJECTS STRATEGY

Veirs Mill Road Metrobus Improvements Request to Conduct Public Hearing

Redesigning the Baltimore Transit Network

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 16, 2016 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

~ NOTICE OF MEETING ~ CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS WORKSESSION

Palm Beach TPA TAC September 5, 2018

Maximizing Asset ROI for Self & Clients in a Public Sector Setting. July 16 th San Diego

I-35 FROM THE RED RIVER TO THE RIO GRANDE

Metrobus 30s Line Enhancements

S-03-SegB: South Federal Way to Fife LRT

Transit Development Plan/Transportation Demand. Chuck Steigerwald Director of Strategic Planning. Management Plan

The Blue Line Extension

Board of Directors April 25, BART The Next 40 Years BART Metro Vision Update Enhancing Service, Capacity and Coverage

Core Capacity Transit Study. San Francisco County Transportation Authority October 17, 2017

Dallas Streetcar Central Link Locally Preferred Alternative Selection

Introduction... 1 Engaging Our Community... 2 Key Findings/Direction... 4 Situation Appraisal... 4 Setting Priorities... 5 Re-Imagined 2018

A Plan to Connect Baltimore

West of Hudson Regional Transit Access Study

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Texas Clear Lanes. Congestion Relief Initiative

Proposed FY 06 Project Development Program and FY 05 Project Development Program Update

2014 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (UTP) UPDATE

Business Advisory Committee. October 1, 2013

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension

Continual Innovation Through Diverse Funding Sources. Paul Comfort, Esq. CEO, Maryland Transit Administration

Creating Dallas-Fort Worth s Transportation System: Celebrating Partnerships and Milestones

Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan

Figure 1: Summary Status of Actions Recommended in June 2016 Committee Report. Status of Actions Recommended # of Actions Recommended

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project San Jose Downtown Association

Next Steps. Investing in the Future of. MASTER DEVELOPER PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW October 2016 July Chicago Union Station Chicago Union Station

Metropolitan Council. Transportation Division Proposed Transit Capital Program

Oregon House Transportation & Economic Development Committee

Recommendation to Board. Final Action

GO Transit s Plans Apr. 2008

Transit Oriented Development Best Practices Seminar Series

Virginia Transit Update

TOUR OF RAIL OPERATIONS CONTROL CENTER Washington Metropolitan Area Transport Authority Monday, September 23, 2013

Herzog History. and the future of transportation

MOU with Maryland DOT for New Carrollton Metrorail Station Transit-Oriented Development

Opportunity: BaltimoreLink

Meeting attendees are now required to go through security screenings upon entering the building. Please allow for extra time.

Des Moines Area Regional Transit Non Rider Survey

Bill Jackson Asst. Statewide Utility Engineer, Office of Construction MDOT SHA

Transit Development Plan - Draft October 2015

1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED

System Expansion Implementation Plan. Board Meeting, April 2017

North Denver Cornerstone Collaborative

DRCOG Board Meeting. July 18, 2018

Denver s Future. City Club of Denver

U.S. System Summary: OHIO HUB

SDOT TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS CENTER (TOC)

Facilities Master Plan Toronto Public Library Board Consultation

Dulles Area Transportation Association

5 Servicing Capacity Assignment for Aurora, East Gwillimbury and Newmarket

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Presentation to the Maryland Competitiveness Coalition. Michele L. Whelley, President & CEO June 19, 2013

Rail Division Update. Presented to Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation. Paul C. Worley, CPM Rail Division Director February 28, 2013

TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Business Plan

Subject YRRTC Accomplishments and Highlights

NEW SERVICES IN KAUFMAN COUNTY

LAWRENCE-DOUGLAS COUNTY INTELLIGENT JOURNEY

INTERCITY TRANSIT STRATEGIC PLAN

Northern Virginia Transportation Authority

Great Jobs are Incredibly Scarce

RIDE WITH TRANSLOC ANDROID USER GUIDE

Bus Rapid Transit in Montgomery County

Public-Private Partnerships in Transit

CLAYTON COUNTY TRANSIT INITIATIVE. Technical Advisory Committee/ Stakeholder Advisory Committee Webinar August 29, 2017

I-20 EAST TEXAS CORRIDOR STUDY. TxDOT Planning Conference, Corpus Christi June 4 th, 2014

DART s Program of Inter-Related Projects. Joint DART and Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 10 November 2014

SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT

Deployment of ITS Projects in Pasadena A Local Agency Perspective

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee. September 12, 2016

SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT

Bus Circulator Feasibility Study Scope of Work March 12, 2018

Off- Peak +46% Peak +24% NJT- North New vs. Old. NJT- North New vs. Old. NJT-North Off-Peak cost now 38% higher

Downtown Boise Multimodal Center

Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO

An Assessment of Congestion in the Kansas City Region using the MARC Travel Demand Model

GATEWAY. Action Plan JULY Gateway Action Plan DRAFT - July Portland Development Commission

STATEWIDE INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION RELIABILITY PROGRAM

Muni Service Equity Strategy. Presentation to SFCTA Plans and Programs Committee April 19, 2016

A RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, Title 6, Subtitle C, Local Government Code (Local Government Records Act),

Design Considerations for Real-time Arterial Performance Measurement Systems Using Transit Bus Probes

Transportation & Mobility

DC Circulator. Transit Development Plan

Implementation Plan FY

Transcription:

FILED FOR RECORD 5/19/2015 9:00 AM Dana Debeauvoir - County Clerk, Travis County,TX Item 19 - LATE CAPITAL METRO: AN UPDATE TO THE TRAVIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT May 19, 2015 Presented by: Beverly Silas, Capital Metro Board Member Todd Hemingson, VP Strategic Planning and Development

Travis County Population now : 1.144 million Population by 2040: 1.733 million

Capital Metro At-a-Glance Our business is connecting people, jobs and communities by providing quality transportation choices. We traveled nearly 11 million miles last year and gave 33 million rides. We move 107,000 riders each weekday.

Capital Metro At-a-Glance Created in 1985, celebrating 30 years of serving Central Texas 535 sq. mile Service Area 3,000 bus stops More than 837 million trips delivered since inception First transit authority in Texas to have 100% accessible fleet Eight-member Board of Directors

Strategic Plan DRIVING PROGRESS

Driving Progress into the Future Capital Metro s Strategic Plan: Vision: A driving force for quality of life in our community. Mission: Capital Metro connects people, jobs and communities by providing quality transportation choices. Goal 1: Provide a great customer experience Goal 2: Improve business practices Goal 3: Demonstrate the value of public transportation Goal 4: Be a regional leader

Internal Transformation New board New CEO Hired local respected CFO Raised the bar internally Updated policies Improved business practices Achieved full compliance with Sunset findings ahead of schedule

CURRENT STATUS

Launched and now upgrading Mobile App Expanding reach by partnering with RideScout and other apps Completing refresh of www.capmetro.org Implemented real-time arrival info system-wide

Continue to seek input on ideas for service improvement Provide information about pending changes, including ServicePlan2020 Update Keep partner organizations informed Expand the pool of transit stakeholders

A METRO SERVICE PLANNING IS ABOUT TRADE-OFFS AND COMMUNITY VALUES Coverage Dispersed Service Everywhere vs Productivity* Frequency and Speed Where There's Demand Low IUdership but really Important for the people who use it. Singl~Seat Rides Close Route Spacing High Ridership but no service in many places. Frequency Frequency

A QUICK RECAP OF CURRENT STATUS Since 1985, Capital Metro has provided more than 837 million passenger trips Since 2010, we ve launched MetroRail and MetroRapid But, service levels are not keeping up with population growth

SERVICEPLAN2020 Conducted in 2010 Goals: Improving route directness and system connectivity Increasing ridership Increasing cost effectiveness of bus operations Sample Outcomes: Re-aligned #100 MetroAirport to Riverside, ridership up 80% Added new #111 South Mopac Flyer Re-aligned service in downtown Austin to Guadalupe and Lavaca

PROJECT CONNECT The first regional transit system plan for Central Texas Completed in 2013 Includes a range of transit services: MetroRail MetroRapid Priority Express Lone Star Rail ROW Preservation Provides trunk services for region

PROJECT CONNECT IMPLEMENTATION MetroRail MetroRapid Express service on Mopac Express Lanes Other Plan elements Completed Corridor Study: North Corridor The Project Connect System Plan continues to serve as the cornerstone for regional transit system planning

METRORAIL Ridership has quadrupled since service began in 2010 Peak hour trains operate at standing capacity Special event services can see up to 10,000 passenger trips per day More than $153M in Transit-Oriented Development near stations with more than $1B planned or under development

METRORAPID Funded by largest FTA grant in agency history ($38M) Implemented on time and $8M under budget Project included two critical firsts in Austin: Transit Priority Lanes Transit Signal Priority Ridership meeting (#801) and exceeding (#803) projections #801 now has highest avg. weekday ridership in system Efforts continue to upgrade service and increase value to community

NEAR TERM PROJECTS AND INITIATIVES

NEAR-TERM ACTIONS AND NEXT STEPS Build upon MetroRapid success Optimize MetroRapid routes #801 and #803 Continue to pursue transit priority treatments on major routes Five Frequent Service Routes launch this June Park and Ride expansion underway at Lakeline and Howard Stations Pursue Regional Park and Ride initiative Complete 2015 Origin and Destination Study Initiate ServicePlan2025

FREQUENT SERVICE NETWORK

FREQUENT SERVICE NETWORK Phases 2 and 3 are programmed in the Long Range Financial Forecast

THE BASIS FOR A PARK AND RIDE SYSTEM Service Plan 2020 is our current guide for express bus and parkand-rides Project Connect Transit Plan proposes new bus & park-andride investments Why Park-and-Rides? Park-and-rides provide access to transit from outlying, auto-oriented suburban areas Most effective when buses have travel time advantage over autos Important tool in congestion mitigation Can serve as transition zones for future Transit Oriented Development

A METRO ~ EXISTING PARK AND RIDE FACILITIES [!ffi 8,,.. I,. Bi: :5 '.!!]...,. nm. '~... IT:2l ~ \11 :.!!!!I ~!!Ir al. iw)...,_ flau nd!oct I'll Ho a [i'i] ~~ Park & Ride {#of s~aces} ~- 1. Leander (635},.,.. 2. Jonestown (13) *.GJ 3. Lakeline (485} 4. Lago Vista (16} * (IOIO 5. Pavilion (348) luj C»o1 d 6. Howard (200}!'.. 7. Great Hills (127} * "';ii" 8. Tech Ridge (476} 9. North Lamar TC (268} 9 ~ 14 10. Triangle (200) * i~,...~ 11. South Congress TC (32) [I!) 12. Oak Hill (181) *!L:. I 13. Manor (70) 14. Elgin [CARTS owned] e Aall Service bpnin Bua Suvlc1 r!.'.i 13 e l ocal Sus Service 1!...6l!l Pro mlum llu1s.rvic UT!.huttlt Service * Lease or O&M agreement

ROLE OF SERVICEPLAN2020 Capital Metro s Service Plan 2020 ranked top regional commuter sheds and travel demand into downtown This data gives an indication of where parkand-rides are most likely to attract new riders

REGIONAL PARK AND RIDE INITIATIVE capmetro.org May 8, 2015 Board Worksession Capital Metro is coordinating with TXDOT & CTRMA to fund and implement six high priority express bus routes & park-and-rides as alternatives to drive-alone regional commuters 1. Howard Station 2. South I-35 3. North 183 4. South MoPac 5. Four Points 6. Manor Next Steps include refining capital, bus and operating costs and pursuing funding Supplemental funding is needed to advance these in near term!

SERVICE EXPANSION POLICY A METRO \ Austion Urbanized Area, Service Area, and CARTS Service Area 1\J r, 1r " 29 Blanco County I! I I D County Boundary CARTS Service Area - 2010Austin Urban Gap - Capital Metro Service Area I' Austin UZA within Round Rock ET J Non-urbanized Area within Austin UZA Bastrop County 71 N A~ -=:::::i-- M1les 0 2.5 5 10

SERVICE EXPANSION POLICY Active Transit Development Plans Upcoming Transit Development Plans

PROJECT CONNECT CENTRAL CORRIDOR Major Tasks: East-West Transit Connection / Downtown Circulator Guadalupe/Lavaca Transit Priority Lanes Eastern Transit Corridor Preservation (Lady Bird Lake to UT) Downtown Rail Station at Convention Center West Downtown Transit Station Central Corridor Transit Entryways Status: Funding available, Scope of Work ready, Request for Qualifications process pending

CONNECTING THE DOTS

HOW OUR TRANSIT PLANS WORK TOGETHER Regional Capital Metro Service Area Geographic Scale Project Connect System Plan Urban Core Transit Intensity (Level of Service/Investment) Local Bus High Capacity Transit

HOW OUR TRANSIT PLANS WORK TOGETHER Regional Capital Metro Service Area Geographic Scale Project Connect Corridor Studies Urban Core Local Bus Transit Intensity (Level of Service/Investment) High Capacity Transit

HOW OUR TRANSIT PLANS WORK TOGETHER Regional Capital Metro Service Area Transit Development Plans Geographic Scale Urban Core Local Bus Transit Intensity (Level of Service/Investment) High Capacity Transit

HOW OUR TRANSIT PLANS WORK TOGETHER Regional Capital Metro Service Area Geographic Scale ServicePlan 2025 Urban Core Local Bus Transit Intensity (Level of Service/Investment) High Capacity Transit

HOW OUR TRANSIT PLANS WORK TOGETHER Regional Capital Metro Service Area Geographic Scale Urban Core Central Corridor Local Bus Transit Intensity (Level of Service/Investment) High Capacity Transit

HOW OUR TRANSIT PLANS WORK TOGETHER Regional Capital Metro Service Area Geographic Scale Transit Development Plans Project Connect Corridor Studies Project Connect System Plan ServicePlan 2025 Central Corridor Urban Core Local Bus Transit Intensity (Level of Service/Investment) High Capacity Transit

MAPPING IT OUT Central Corridor Study ServicePlan2025 Project Connect Active Transit Development Plans Upcoming Transit Development Plans

QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION