WebAIM's Screen Reader, Motor, Low Vision, and Web Accessibility Practitioner Surveys. Jared webaim.org

Similar documents
An introduction to screen readers

The Perils of Using Assistive Technology for Testing

Bridging the Digital Divide for the Differently-Abled (Tamil) Students in Higher Education

Top Tips for School Website Accessibility

Accessibility Crash Course for Web Developers. Dan Lewis Clemson University

OUR COMMITMENT TO ACCESSIBILITY

While you re waiting, you can set up your computer by installing these programs

Accessibility Evaluation Tools

Through a different lens. Sarah Pulis, Head of Accessibility Services

Web Accessibility Evaluation Methodologies and Tools

Web Accessibility Evaluation Methodologies and Tools. Jared Smith & Jonathan Whiting webaim.org

Accessibility Resources Sambhavi

REVEL Screen Reader Accessibility Documentation for Students

Screen Readers, ARIA & HTML5

Macmillan Learning iclicker Reef Accessibility Conformance Report

Flash Accessibility. Jared Smith webaim.org FlashAccessibility.pdf

Instructions for downloading paid media from BSO.org and playing paid media in the BSO Media Center Revised as of 12/23/2011

The Growing Gap between Landline and Dual Frame Election Polls

Reading Introduction to Web Accessibility

Accessibility Statement COGBOOKS LEARNER WEB APPLICATION. COGBOOKS LIMITED Registered Office 5th Floor, 125 Princes Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4AD

2. Zoom Video Webinar runs on Windows, macos, Linux, Chrome OS, ios, Android, and

2. Zoom Video Webinar runs on Windows, macos, Linux, Chrome OS, ios, Android, and

Today. Web Accessibility. No class next week. Spring Break

Accessible Web Mapping Apps. Kelly Hutchins Tao Zhang

The Demographics of Mobile News Habits

HOW THE SMART SPEAKER IS REVOLUTIONIZING THE HOME

US 2013 Consumer Data Privacy Study Mobile Edition

Pilot Deployment of HTML5 Video Descriptions

The Rise of the Connected Viewer

Design, Code, Test, Comply: Web Accessibility Demystified

estatements Help Document October 2016

Accessibility Interview Questions:

2013 Local Arts Agency Salary & Benefits Summary EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO

Bank of Hawaii Protecting Confidential . What's in this User Guide

Contemporary Accessible Technologies and Web Standards. Dr Scott Hollier

MOBILE SECURITY. Fixing the Disconnect Between Employer and Employee for BYOD (Bring Your Own Device)

How does software accessibility work?

CISC 1600 Lecture 1.4 Design, part 2. Topics: Accessibility Responsive web design Example design review

ACCESSING THE LIBRARY THROUGH ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY

Quick and Practical Web Accessibility Testing for First Impressions

Date: December 21, 2017 Name of Product: Cisco WebEx Web App Meeting Center v3.4 Contact for more information:

Module 9: Audience Analysis, Usability, and Information Architecture COM 420

2018 California Higher Education Collaborative Conference SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 1-3, 2018

Introducing web-accessibility. Making night and day difference as a developer.

Q2 TLS 1.0 Disablement Frequently Asked Questions 12/4/17

Accessibility Building Accessible Apps. Klara Schmitt

Section Software Applications and Operating Systems - Detail Criteria Supporting Features Remarks and explanations (a) When software is design

GCRO 2011 QoL Survey Viewer

Accessibility. Content Management

Making Content Accessible

Digital Test. Coverage Index

ACCESSIBILITY TESTING WITHIN PATIENT PORTAL

ICSP Section 508 System Catalog Meeting. Wednesday, February 29, 2012

How to clear a web browsers cache, cookies and history last updated on 8/28/2013

GSMA Research into mobile users privacy attitudes. Key findings from Brazil. Conducted by in November 2012

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION GENERAL Q&A

Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT ) About This Document

i2b2 User Guide Informatics for Integrating Biology & the Bedside Version 1.0 October 2012

Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT ) About This Document

November 2016 G. Oscar Anderson, Senior Research Advisor AARP Research

The SAPS Johannesburg Area Police Transformation Survey Results

Product Name: OmniPage Professional Enterprise Product Version: 17.0 Product Release Date: May 2009

Cisco Accessibility Conformance Report VPAT Version 2.0

California Open Online Library for Education & Accessibility

ShowNTell - An easy-to-use tool for answering students questions with voiceover

Tech Tracker + Social Networking module Quarterly Release: Q1 2012

The power of the Web is in its universality. Access by everyone regardless of disability is an essential aspect.

Poll Everywhere Accessibility Conformance Report

Operating System Support Plan for Test Delivery System

Smartphone Ownership 2013 Update

mycoresource.com Member User Guide

Internet, Science & Tech RESEARCH AREAS. Mobile Fact Sheet MORE FACT SHEETS: INTERNET/BROADBAND SOCIAL MEDIA

U.S. Mobile Benchmark Report

Section Software Applications and Operating Systems - Detail Criteria Supporting Features Remarks and explanations (a) When software is design

Memorial Hermann ecredentialing Portal & Application Frequently Asked Questions

A Portrait of Today s Smartphone User

ITSMR Research Note KEY FINDINGS. Crash Analyses: Ticket Analyses:

Accessibility testing tools

Some accessibility requires expert knowledge ARIA markup Writing good ALT text Knowing how to use a screen reader

Sample: n=2,252 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,127 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates:

Designing accessible applications

2016 Member Needs Survey Results

The Night Light Monthly newsletter with tech tips for teachers of the visually impaired By Mary Fran Anderson and Scott McCallum.

Blackboard Voluntary Product Accessibility Template September 2015

Usability Report for Online Writing Portfolio

Mobile data usage & habits of MENA Internet users. Research conducted by Effective Measure in conjunction with Spot On PR January 2011

Web-One Infographics

A Comparative Usability Test. Orbitz.com vs. Hipmunk.com

Arena: Membership Lists Foundations (Hands On)

Mobile Access July 7, 2010 Aaron Smith, Research Specialist.

POST EVENTS Prepared by: Gini Pedersen (ITTF Chair) (updated: 3/18/2018)

SES E-Reader App User Guide

California Open Online Library for Education & Accessibility

Dealer Instructions for the Product Configurator

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS

Voluntary Product Evaluation Template (VPAT)

Student Guide to elearn

SERVICES REMOTE AUCTION. Live Auction Broadcast and Mobile Lot Board. Both of these services are available in English and Chinese.

SAM Assessment, Training and Projects for Microsoft Office

California Open Online Library for Education & Accessibility

Transcription:

WebAIM's Screen Reader, Motor, Low Vision, and Web Accessibility Practitioner Surveys Jared Smith @jared_w_smith webaim.org

Screen reader users prefer Blind users do

Disclaimers Samples are not controlled Is data representative? Representative of whom? Surveys do not explore highly technical topics

We need more, better data (preferably from user testing, not just surveys)

We must be careful with the data we have due to loss aversion http://webaim.org/blog/loss-aversion-and-web-accessibility/

Be careful of false inferences

Low Vision Survey Conducted March 2013 216 respondents http://webaim.org/projects/ lowvisionsurvey/

Low Vision Survey Respondents were very diverse in vision level, age, expertise, technologies used, etc. Twice as likely to use IE than the overall population 80.6% use a mobile device. 43.1% use Apple devices. 91% indicate contrast is important

How Useful To You Are Text Resizing Widgets? Not at all useful 27% Very useful 27% Somewhat useful 45%

Do You Wish More Pages Included Text Resizing Widgets? No 22% Yes 78%

Motor Disability Survey Conducted March 2013 46 respondents http://webaim.org/projects/ motordisabilitysurvey/

Motor Disability Survey Diverse types of disabilities 22% reported multiple disabilities Most common browsers: Internet Explorer for keyboard users, Firefox for voice control users, and Chrome for mouse users. 58% use a mobile device. Notably lower than overall population, screen reader users, and those with low vision.

Motor Disability Survey What is your primary means of interacting with a web page? Voice Control 13% Keyboard 33% Mouse 53%

Screen Reader User Surveys January 2009 October 2009 December 2010 May 2012 January 2014 Soon

Screen Reader User Surveys Number of Respondents 1,800 1,782 1,200 1,121 1,245 1,465 600 665 0 Jan 2009 Oct 2009 Dec 2010 May 2012 Jan 2014

Do you use a screen reader due to a disability? No 5% Yes 95%

Screen Reader Proficiency Rate your screen reader proficiency Beginner 3% Intermediate 39% Advanced 58%

Primary Screen Reader SA or SAToGo 8% Others 7% Window-Eyes 7% VoiceOver 10% JAWS 50% NVDA 19%

Primary Screen Reader 70% JAWS Window-Eyes VoiceOver NVDA SA or SAToGo 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% October 2009 December 2010 May 2012 January 2014

Screen Readers Commonly Used 75% 64% 50% 51% 25% 37% 26% 0% 14% 5% 5% 9% JAWS NVDA VoiceOver SA WE ZoomTextChromeVox Others

Screen Readers Commonly Used 80% JAWS Window-Eyes VoiceOver NVDA SA or SAToGo 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% January 2009 December 2010 May 2012 January 2014

Do You See Free/Low Cost Screen Readers (such as NVDA or VoiceOver) as Viable Alternatives to Commercial Screen Readers No 12% I Don't Know 14% Yes 74%

See Free/Low Cost Screen Readers As Viable Alternatives 100% 93% 94% 75% 50% 58% 65% 72% 25% 0% Window-Eyes JAWS SA or SAToGo NVDA VoiceOver Those that actually use free/low cost screen readers are much more favorable of them.

IE6 4% IE7 3% IE8 13% Primary Browser Chrome 3% Others 4% Safari 10% IE9+ 39% Firefox 24%

Mobile Screen Reader Usage 90% 82% 60% 67% 72% 30% 12% 0% January 2009 December 2010 May 2012 January 2014

Mobile Platforms 75% 50% 43% 33% 25% 4% 59% 20% 8% 65% 16% 14% ios Nokia Android 0% December 2010 May 2012 January 2014

ios Device Usage Across Surveys 75% 65% 50% 25% 35% 43% 0% Motor Disabilities Low Vision Screen Reader

Web Accessibility Progress Over the Previous Year No Change 42% Less Accessible 22% More Accessible 37%

Which would have a bigger impact on web accessibility? Better (more accessible) web sites 81% Better assistive technology 19%

Which would have a bigger impact on web accessibility? More Accessible Sites Better AT 90% 60% 69% 76% 81% 30% 31% 24% 19% 0% October 2009 December 2010 January 2014

Primary Method Of Finding Information On A Lengthy Web Page Read the page 7% Landmarks 3% Links 10% "Find" feature 15% Headings 66%

Method of finding information Headings "Find" Links Reading Landmarks 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% October 2009 December 2010 May 2012 January 2014

How Comfortable Would You Be With Allowing Web Sites To Detect Whether You Are Using A Screen Reader? I don't know 5% Not at all comfortable 9% Not very comfortable 8% Somewhat comfortable 24% Very comfortable 54%

Screen Reader Detection Why screen reader detection on the web is a bad thing - Marco Zehe Thoughts on screen reader detection - Léonie Watson Assistive Technology Detection: It can be done right - Dylan Barrell Should we detect screen readers? is the wrong question - Karl Groves Detecting Screen Readers No! - Dennis Lembree On Screen Reader Detection - Adrian Roselli Am I Vision Impaired? Who Wants To Know? - Eitan Isaacson

You Asked The Wrong Question!

Survey of Web Accessibility Practitioners

Those in the web accessibility field are generally older, better paid, and better educated than our peers in broader web design/development.

Gender Male 61.4% Female 38.6%

Do you have a disability? Yes 21.8% No 78.2%

How many of you have been implementing web accessibility for more than 5 years?

How many years have you actively been implementing web accessibility? 12+ Years 16% 0-2 Years 25.7% 9-11 Years 15% 6-8 Years 20% 3-5 Years 23.5%

JavaScript Enabled 100% 99.5% 97.6% 99.5% 100.0% 75% 50% 25% 0% Practitioners Screen Reader Users Low Vision Motor Disabilities

Salary $120K+ 6.9% $100-$120K 10.6% <$20K 8.5% $20-$40K 14.4% $80-$100K 16.8% $40-$60K 20.6% $60-$80K 22.2%

Gender Pay Gap Men Women 30% 20% 10% 0% <$20K $20-$40K $40-$60K $60-$80K $80K-$100K $100K-$120K $120K+

Disability Pay Gap Without Disability With Disability 24% 16% 8% 0% <$20K $20-$40K $40-$60K $60-$80K $80K-$100K $100K-$120K $120K+

Web Accessibility Progress Over the Previous Year Less Accessible 10% No Change 36% More Accessible 54%

Improved Over the Previous Year 75% 50% 54% 25% 37% 29% 23% 0% Practitioners Screen Reader Users Low Vision Motor Disabilities

Primary Screen Reader 50% 37% 25% 28% 15% 12% 0% 4% 4% 1% JAWS NVDA VoiceOver ChromeVox WE Others None

Primary Screen Reader 75% 57.1% With Disability Without Disability 50% 25% 0% 32.0% 28.3% 24.3% 15.7% 10.6% 5.5% 1.1% JAWS NVDA VoiceOver ChromeVox

Personal vs. Organizational Motivations for Accessibility 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 82.1% 31.4% 25.7% 14.8% Guidelines/Best Practices Morals 25.6% 1.6% Legal/Contractual 10.9% 6.3% 0.6% 0.9% Fear of Lawsuit Personal Organization No Implementation Yet

Much, much more in the survey results articles http://webaim.org/projects/

There is no typical user

Questions? Jared Smith @jared_w_smith webaim.org