U.S. TV and Internet Providers: Competing services for mobile consumers TV time. Market Study Second Quarter 2017

Similar documents
U.S. Home Broadband & Wi-Fi Usage Forecast, : More homes, Wi-Fi and data

U.S. Mobile Consumers and OTT Services: Who uses which apps to watch video and connect? Market Study 2Q 2017

Residential Femtocells: Impact on Carrier Grades. Market Brief Second Quarter, 2012

Mobile Devices in U.S. Consumer Households. A Market Study October 2008

U.S. 5G Revenues, : The need for new revenue sources. Market Study Third Quarter, 2016

Entertainment Services: The future is mobile White Paper December 2016

Global VoLTE Market Forecast, : A Growing Global Service. Market Report First Quarter, 2015

DISCOVERABILITY. How Canadians Find TV Content

Access and Entertainment Services in U.S. Broadband Households

Global Mobile Data Forecast, : Still Growing and No Signs of Slowing Market Study First Quarter 2017

CE Adoption and Trends

CONNECTED CONSUMER SURVEY 2017: TV AND VIDEO IN EUROPE AND THE USA

Mobile Virtualization: Impact on the Mobile Ecosystem. Market Study First Quarter, 2013

The Future of TV and Video, Clarified

CELEBRATING 20 YEARS Q2 2018

Leichtman Research Group Research Notes

TOP 5 SNEAK PEEK. A Brief Review of MTM s Latest Findings

CE Adoption and Trends

MULTI-CLIENT 2017 US INTERCHANGEABLE LENS CAMERA MARKET STUDY. Consumer Imaging Behaviors and Industry Trends SERVICE AREAS:

Direct Brands and the Ad-Supported OTT Video Viewer

Leichtman Research Group Research Notes

Global Mobile LTE RAN Virtualization Forecast, : Benefit of the BTS Hotel. Market Study Third Quarter, 2013

THE STATE OF ONLINE VIDEO 2017

TECH TRACKER QUARTERLY RELEASE: Q4 2013

MCA Market Research Consumer Perceptions Survey fixed broadband. April 2018

Tech Tracker + Social Networking module Quarterly Release: Q1 2012

THE AP/AOL POLL CONDUCTED BY IPSOS PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROJECT # ONLINE VIDEO STUDY

Mobile Internet & Smartphone Adoption

Topline Questionnaire

CE Adoption and Trends

2017 REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

Wave 9 Summary. Sept

The Smartphone Consumer June 2012

Students Preferences for Receiving Communication from the University: A Report from the Student Life Survey

TOP 5 SNEAK PEEK. A Brief Review of MTM s Latest Findings

The Nielsen Comparable Q2 2016

Video in Canadian Households

A Portrait of Today s Smartphone User

emarketer US Social Network Usage StatPack

Profiles of Subscribers in Multifamily Residences

AMERICANS USE OF THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: AN AARP BULLETIN SURVEY

Simmons OneView SM. How to Interpret Quick Reports Simmons OneView: How to Interpret Quick Reports Page 1

ONLINE TV VIEWING BY AGE

Contents. 1. Survey Background and Methodology. 2. Summary of Key Findings. 3. Survey Results. 4. Appendix

2013, Healthcare Intelligence Network

Consumer Insights. YouGov Omnibus, 5 th -6 th April

Victim Personal Statements 2017/18

Almost half of all internet users now use search engines on a typical day

September Real Sector Statistics Division. Methodology

IPSOS / REUTERS POLL DATA Prepared by Ipsos Public Affairs

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics

5 Reasons why Telcos need a Converged OTT Video Strategy

Internet, Science & Tech RESEARCH AREAS. Mobile Fact Sheet MORE FACT SHEETS: INTERNET/BROADBAND SOCIAL MEDIA

Network performance through the eyes of customers

State of OTT. An in-depth look at today s over-the-top content consumption and device usage. Susan Engleson SENIOR DIRECTOR, EMERGENT PRODUCTS

TECH TRACKER QUARTERLY RELEASE: Q3 2012

COMPARABLE METRICS Q1 2016

Constant Contact. Responsyssy. VerticalResponse. Bronto. Monitor. Satisfaction

2017 USER SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Better connections: Australian attitudes to mail and . November 2013

Disrupting the Personal Lives

Comreg Study. (August 2016) For more information, contact Oisin Byrne, Managing Director Phone:

Research Report: Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)

SH 288 Express Lanes Stated Preference Survey Report. Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire

FTTH: The Progress The Drivers The Promise

TECH TRACKER QUARTERLY RELEASE: Q4 2017

2012 Cell Phone Consumer Attitudes Study

COMPARABLE METRICS Q4 2015

Reality. Myth. OTT is highly cannibalistic of traditional TV. Only somewhat. OTT TV Myth #3: OTT Is Highly Cannibalistic of Traditional TV

and Internet Services Integration Update & Business Outlook

Mobile Messaging Apps Study : India. August 2014

Time-Shifting: More Choices For Watching More Content

AudienceView How To Guides How to Run a Crosstab Report

Home Sweet Digital Home Mike Rich, Susan Engleson & Angela Bryant June 7, 2016

The Rise of the Connected Viewer

NRS STATE DATA QUALITY CHECKLIST

State of OTT An in-depth look at today s over-the-top content consumption and device usage

Future of Digital Home Entertainment

2016 Member Needs Survey Results

A Survey on Broadband Internet Usage in Taiwan

U.S. Consumers: Perceptions of Carriers and Services

What s Inside: MemberView Report User Guide: Page MemberXP (Permission to reprint for internal training only.) Rev.8.17

HOW THE SMART SPEAKER IS REVOLUTIONIZING THE HOME

ComReg Consumer FVCT Market Research

Hyacinth Macaws for Seniors Survey Report

Wi-Fi Hotspot Lending Project Phase 2 Findings and Future Directions

8 th World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Meeting (WTIM-10) Geneva, Switzerland, November 2010

The OTT Co-Viewing Experience: 2017 November 2017

2018 Canadian consumer tech market. Executive summary

A Portrait of Today s Tablet User

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: VALUES AND BELIEFS

OTT Video Opportunity, threat or something else?

IoT for Healthcare Forecast, : Lowering Costs while Increasing Patient Satisfaction

DATA MEMO. The volume of spam is growing in Americans personal and workplace accounts, but users are less bothered by it.

Left To Your Own Devices

ITU Asia-Pacific ICT Indicators Workshop. Session 15: IDI 2018 Use sub-index and indicators

OTT Churn and Retention: Increasing Lifetime Subscriber Value

U.S. LTE Network Infrastructure Spending Forecast, Market Study Fourth Quarter, 2015

A Survey on Broadband Internet Usage in Taiwan

31,000 1,880. September Unique individuals have received hours of CYC Training.

Transcription:

U.S. TV and Internet Providers: Competing services for mobile consumers TV time Market Study Second Quarter 2017

U.S. TV and Internet Providers: Competing services for mobile consumers TV time Market Study Published Second Quarter 2017 Version 1.1 Report Number: 02Q2017-04 igr 12400 W. Hwy 71 Suite 350 PMB 341 Austin TX 78738

Table of Contents Abstract... 1 Executive Summary... 3 Figure A: TV Service Provider among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 3 Figure B: Preferred Sources for Video Content among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 4 Figure C: Why Disconnected TV Service among U.S. mobile consumers... 5 Figure D: How Watch TV at Home without TV Service... 6 Figure E: Likelihood to Disconnect TV Service in Next Six Months... 6 Methodology... 7 U.S. TV Service Providers... 8 TV Service Providers... 8 Table 1: TV Service Provider among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 8 Figure 1: TV Service Provider among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 9 Table 2: TV Service Provider by Age among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 9 Figure 2: TV Service Provider by Age among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 10 Table 3: TV Service Provider by Income among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 10 Figure 3: TV Service Provider by Income among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 11 TV Service Provider Net Promoter Score... 12 Table 4: Likelihood to Recommend TV Service Provider among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 12 Figure 4: Likelihood to Recommend TV Service Provider among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 13 Table 5: TV Service Provider Net Promoter Score among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 14 Figure 5: TV Service Provider Net Promoter Score among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 14 Table 6: Reasons for Likelihood to Recommend TV Service Provider... 15 Figure 6: Reasons for Likelihood to Recommend TV Service Provider... 15 Table 7: Reasons for Likelihood to Recommend TV Service Provider, by Promoters and Detractors... 16 Figure 7: Reasons for Likelihood to Recommend TV Service Provider, by Promoters and Detractors... 17 U.S. Internet Service Providers... 18 Internet Service Providers... 18 Table 8: Internet Service Provider among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 18 Figure 8: Internet Service Provider among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 19 Internet Service Provider Net Promoter Score... 19 Table 9: Likelihood to Recommend Internet Service Provider among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 19 Figure 9: Likelihood to Recommend Internet Service Provider among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 20 Table 10: Internet Service Provider Net Promoter Score among U.S. Mobile Consumers.. 21 Figure 10: Internet Service Provider Net Promoter Score among U.S. Mobile Consumers 21 Table 11: Reasons for Likelihood to Recommend Internet Service Provider... 22 Figure 11: Reasons for Likelihood to Recommend Internet Service Provider... 23

Table 12: Reasons for Likelihood to Recommend Internet Service Provider, by Promoters and Detractors... 23 Figure 12: Reasons for Likelihood to Recommend Internet Service Provider, by Promoters and Detractors... 24 Home Internet Service... 24 Table 13: Internet Service at Home among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 25 Figure 13: Internet Service at Home among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 25 Table 14: Speed of Internet Service at Home among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 26 Figure 14: Speed of Internet Service at Home among U.S. mobile consumers... 26 Devices Used for Internet and TV Service... 27 Table 15: Devices that can be used to watch TV among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 27 Figure 15: Devices that can be used to watch TV among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 28 Table 16: TV Devices Used among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 28 Figure 16: TV Devices Used among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 29 Table 17: Number of TV Devices Used among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 29 Figure 17: Number of TV Devices Used among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 30 Table 18: Connected TV Devices Used among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 30 Figure 18: Connected TV Devices Used among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 31 Table 19: Internet TV Set-up... 31 Figure 19: Internet TV Set-up... 32 How Mobile Consumers Watch Video... 33 Frequency... 33 Table 20: Frequency of Watching Video Content among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 33 Figure 20: Frequency of Watching Video Content among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 34 Table 21: Frequency for Different Types of Video Content among U.S. Mobile Consumers 34 Figure 21: Frequency for Different Types of Video Content among U.S. Mobile Consumers35 Table 22: Very Often and Often Frequency for Different Types of Video Content... 35 Figure 22: Very Often and Often Frequency for Different Types of Video Content... 36 Locations... 36 Table 23: Locations for Watching Video Content among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 36 Figure 23: Locations for Watching Video Content among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 37 Sources... 37 Table 24: Source for Different Types of Video Content... 38 Figure 24: Source for Different Types of Video Content... 38 Usage of Internet Apps for Video Content... 39 Table 25: Percent of Video-Watching Time on OTT Services... 39 Figure 25: Percent of Video-Watching Time on OTT Services... 39 Table 26: Preferred Sources for Video Content... 41 Figure 26: Preferred Sources for Video Content... 42 The Trend to Disconnect TV Service... 43 Mobile Consumers without TV Service... 43 Table 27: Disconnected Previous TV Service among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 43 Figure 27: Disconnected Previous TV Service among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 43 Table 28: Why Disconnected TV Service among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 44

Figure 28: Why Disconnected TV Service among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 45 Table 29: How Watch TV at Home without TV Service among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 46 Figure 29: How Watch TV at Home without TV Service among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 46 Mobile Consumers with TV Service... 47 Table 30: Likelihood to Disconnect TV Service among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 47 Figure 30: Likelihood to Disconnect TV Service among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 47 Table 31: Why Might Disconnect TV Service among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 49 Figure 31: Why Might Disconnect TV Service among U.S. Mobile Consumers... 49 Survey Demographics... 50 Demographic Profile of U.S. Consumer Respondents in early March survey... 50 Table 32: Respondent Age... 50 Figure 32: Respondent Age... 51 Table 33: Respondent Gender... 51 Figure 33: Respondent Gender... 52 Table 34: Respondent Ethnic Background... 52 Figure 34: Respondent Ethnic Background... 53 Table 35: Respondent Annual Household Income... 53 Figure 35: Respondent Annual Household Income... 54 Table 36: Respondent Level of Education... 54 Figure 36: Respondent Level of Education... 55 Table 37: Age of Children in Household... 55 Figure 37: Age of Children in Household... 56 Table 38: Respondent Region... 56 Figure 38: Respondent Region... 57 Table 39: Respondent Marital Status... 57 Figure 39: Respondent Marital Status... 58 Demographic Profile of U.S. Consumer Respondents in late March survey... 58 Table 40: Respondent Age... 58 Figure 40: Respondent Age... 59 Table 41: Respondent Gender... 60 Figure 41: Respondent Gender... 60 Table 42: Respondent Ethnic Background... 60 Figure 42: Respondent Ethnic Background... 61 Table 43: Respondent Annual Household Income... 61 Figure 43: Respondent Annual Household Income... 62 Table 44: Respondent Level of Education... 63 Figure 44: Respondent Level of Education... 63 Table 45: Age of Children in Household... 64 Figure 45: Age of Children in Household... 64 Table 46: Respondent Region... 65 Figure 46: Respondent Region... 65 Table 47: Respondent Marital Status... 65 Figure 47: Respondent Marital Status... 66 Definitions... 67 General... 67

Device Types... 67 Services... 68 Network Technology... 69 About igr... 74 Disclaimer... 74

Abstract U.S. mobile consumers have a wide range of options when they want to watch video content both inside and outside of their home. No longer is TV simply the channels provided by a cable or satellite TV provider, as a number of popular Internet video services, such as Netflix, YouTube, and WatchESPN, offer alternatives. A significant number of U.S. mobile consumers no longer have a cable or satellite service, and igr explores why they disconnected their service and how they watch TV now. This market study also measures how likely other U.S. mobile consumers are to disconnect their TV service in the near future. How do U.S. mobile consumers use their cable or satellite TV service and their Internet service to watch video and what is the impact of video OTT services? This market study provides data to answer these questions, such as which of the two services consumers use for various types of content, including series, news, talk shows and movies, where consumers watch video, and how often consumers watch video content. As part of the analysis of the cable and satellite TV service and home Internet service used by U.S. mobile consumers, the study includes the Net Promoter Scores that U.S. consumers gave their current providers. This market study is based on results from two online surveys, each with over 1,000 U.S. mobile consumers, that igr fielded in March 2017. Key questions addressed: Which cable or satellite TV service providers are used by U.S. mobile consumers? Which home Internet service providers are used by U.S. mobile consumers? What is the Net Promoter Score for the top TV and home Internet service providers? What devices, from smartphones to Internet-enabled TVs, are used in U.S. consumer households? How do consumers watch video? What sources, such as cable TV or Internet OTT services, do they use for various types of content and how often do they watch? What percentage of consumers do not have a TV or home Internet service provider? Why have consumers disconnected their cable or satellite TV service?

How likely are consumers to disconnect their cable or satellite TV service in the future? Why might they do so? How do consumers use of video services vary according to demographic variables, such as age, employment status, and education? Who should read this report? Mobile operators Cable MSOs and other fixed broadband providers Device OEMs Content providers and distributors Financial analysts and investors.