Comparison Between Numerical & PIV Experimental Results for Gas-Solid Flow in Ducts

Similar documents
Advances in Cyclonic Flow Regimes. Dr. Dimitrios Papoulias, Thomas Eppinger

CFD MODELING FOR PNEUMATIC CONVEYING

Tutorial 17. Using the Mixture and Eulerian Multiphase Models

Tutorial: Riser Simulation Using Dense Discrete Phase Model

Turbulencja w mikrokanale i jej wpływ na proces emulsyfikacji

Verification and Validation of Turbulent Flow around a Clark-Y Airfoil

Simulation of Turbulent Flow in an Asymmetric Diffuser

Non-Newtonian Transitional Flow in an Eccentric Annulus

Numerical Simulations of Granular Materials Flow around Obstacles: The role of the interstitial gas

HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTATION (HPC) FOR THE

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF ORIFICE PLATE METERING SITUATIONS UNDER ABNORMAL CONFIGURATIONS

Solution Recording and Playback: Vortex Shedding

Pressure Drop Evaluation in a Pilot Plant Hydrocyclone

Simulation of Flow Development in a Pipe

Verification and Validation in CFD and Heat Transfer: ANSYS Practice and the New ASME Standard

Using the Eulerian Multiphase Model for Granular Flow

Three Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow Over Spillways

EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF STAR-CCM+ FOR LIQUID CONTAINER SLOSH DYNAMICS

Isotropic Porous Media Tutorial

GLASGOW 2003 INTEGRATING CFD AND EXPERIMENT

Section 20.1: Choosing a General Multiphase Model. Section 20.2: Volume of Fluid (VOF) Model. Section 20.6: Setting Up a General Multiphase Problem

Multiphase Interactions: Which, When, Why, How? Ravindra Aglave, Ph.D Director, Chemical Process Industry

Accurate and Efficient Turbomachinery Simulation. Chad Custer, PhD Turbomachinery Technical Specialist

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulation in Air Duct Channels Using STAR CCM+

Offshore Platform Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) Simulation

ANSYS AIM Tutorial Turbulent Flow Over a Backward Facing Step

DNV GL s 16th Technology Week

3D Eulerian simulation of a gas-solid bubbling fluidized bed: assessment of drag coefficient correlations

S-ducts and Nozzles: STAR-CCM+ at the Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop. Peter Burns, CD-adapco

Stratified Oil-Water Two-Phases Flow of Subsea Pipeline

CFD Simulation for Stratified Oil-Water Two-Phase Flow in a Horizontal Pipe

Healthy Buildings 2017 Europe July 2-5, 2017, Lublin, Poland

Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics Mech 122 D. Fabris, K. Lynch, D. Rich

Use of CFD in Design and Development of R404A Reciprocating Compressor

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Analyzing wind flow around the square plate using ADINA Project. Ankur Bajoria

Steady Flow: Lid-Driven Cavity Flow

CFD Simulations of Multiphase Flows with Particles

Introduction to C omputational F luid Dynamics. D. Murrin

Adjoint Solver Workshop

High-Lift Aerodynamics: STAR-CCM+ Applied to AIAA HiLiftWS1 D. Snyder

A COMPARISON OF SIMULATION APPROACHES FOR SOLID LIQUID FLOWS

Optimization of under-relaxation factors. and Courant numbers for the simulation of. sloshing in the oil pan of an automobile

ON THE NUMERICAL MODELING OF IMPINGING JET HEAT TRANSFER

Verification of Laminar and Validation of Turbulent Pipe Flows

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for Built Environment

Introduction to ANSYS CFX

CFD VALIDATION FOR SURFACE COMBATANT 5415 STRAIGHT AHEAD AND STATIC DRIFT 20 DEGREE CONDITIONS USING STAR CCM+

Simulation of Laminar Pipe Flows

PREDICTING THE ENERGY DISSIPATION RATE IN A MECHANICALLY STIRRED TANK

CFD Analysis of a Fully Developed Turbulent Flow in a Pipe with a Constriction and an Obstacle

Application of CFD to Industrial Safety Studies (with Prediction Accuracy and Error estimations)

Investigation of cross flow over a circular cylinder at low Re using the Immersed Boundary Method (IBM)

Gear interlocking effect study using CFD

Tutorial 1. Introduction to Using FLUENT: Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in a Mixing Elbow

Numerical Simulation of Heat Transfer by Natural Convection in Horizontal Finned Channels

Compressible Flow in a Nozzle

Multi-Objective Optimization of a Grease Mechanical Filter using modefrontier & STAR-CCM+ Marco Carriglio, Alberto Clarich ESTECO SpA Trieste (Italy)

Coupled Analysis of FSI

A study of Jumper FIV due to multiphase internal flow: understanding life-cycle fatigue. Alan Mueller & Oleg Voronkov

Tutorial: Hydrodynamics of Bubble Column Reactors

CFD modelling of thickened tailings Final project report

NUMERICAL STUDY OF CAVITATING FLOW INSIDE A FLUSH VALVE

Advanced Applications of STAR- CCM+ in Chemical Process Industry Ravindra Aglave Director, Chemical Process Industry

CGT 581 G Fluids. Overview. Some terms. Some terms

Coupling of STAR-CCM+ to Other Theoretical or Numerical Solutions. Milovan Perić

The viscous forces on the cylinder are proportional to the gradient of the velocity field at the

The study of air distribution in tunnels and large industrial buildings

CFD Best Practice Guidelines: A process to understand CFD results and establish Simulation versus Reality

SPC 307 Aerodynamics. Lecture 1. February 10, 2018

Application of Wray-Agarwal Turbulence Model for Accurate Numerical Simulation of Flow Past a Three-Dimensional Wing-body

Direct Numerical Simulation of a Low Pressure Turbine Cascade. Christoph Müller

Simulation of a Free Surface Flow over a Container Vessel Using CFD

CFD Project Workflow Guide

FEMLAB Exercise 1 for ChE366

Debojyoti Ghosh. Adviser: Dr. James Baeder Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Department of Aerospace Engineering

CFD Modeling of Lapple Cyclone for Gas-Solid Separation

ANSYS AIM Tutorial Compressible Flow in a Nozzle

Pressure Losses Analysis in Air Duct Flow Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

Axisymmetric Viscous Flow Modeling for Meridional Flow Calculation in Aerodynamic Design of Half-Ducted Blade Rows

KEY STAR TECHNOLOGIES: DISPERSED MULTIPHASE FLOW AND LIQUID FILM MODELLING DAVID GOSMAN EXEC VP TECHNOLOGY, CD-adapco

Validation of CFD Simulation with Scaled Physical Model of Tailings Dissipation Boxes

Simulation of Turbulent Flow over the Ahmed Body

Pitz-Daily Turbulence Case. Jonathan Russell

Fluent Software Training TRN Modeling Multiphase Flows

Numerical Simulation of Fuel Filling with Volume of Fluid

Microwell Mixing with Surface Tension

Industrial wind tunnel analysis based on current modeling and future outlook

CHAPTER 3. Elementary Fluid Dynamics

CFD model of a Hydrocyclone

McNair Scholars Research Journal

Dispersion Modelling for Explosion Risk Analysis

12th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Technology

Effects on a Wedge Flowmeter Installed Downstream of a Double Elbow Out of Plane

STAR-CCM+: Wind loading on buildings SPRING 2018

Turbulence Modeling. Gilles Eggenspieler, Ph.D. Senior Product Manager

Design Optimization of a Weather Radar Antenna using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

CFD in COMSOL Multiphysics

A steady-state Eulerian-Lagrangian solver for non-reactive sprays

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FLOW BEHAVIOR INTO THE INLET GUIDE VANE SYSTEM (IGV)

2008 International ANSYS Conference

Transcription:

Fabio Kasper Comparison Between Numerical & PIV Experimental Results for Gas-Solid Flow in Ducts Rodrigo Decker, Oscar Sgrott Jr., Henry F. Meier Waldir Martignoni

Agenda Introduction The Test Bench Case Studies Mesh Studies Grid Convergence Index Assessment Results Conclusions

Introduction There are many processes from different industries containing particulate flows Object of study of many groups Different variables change flow characteristics and is difficult to study Studies are typically conducted with Experiments and/or Numerical Simulation Objectives of this work Present an experimental measure of Particle Solid Velocity component in two duct sessions, with a Particle Image Velocimetry device (PIV) Assess numerically this particular gas-solid flow with CAE software STAR-CCM+

The Test Bench Facility located at Regional University of Blumenau (FURB).

L = 1.18m The Test Bench (cont d) Overview of measured stations. L = 2.1m L/D = 10.3 L/D = 5.8 L/D = 1.8 D = 100mm

Case Studies Physical properties Gas Density: 1.18 kg/m 3 Dynamic Viscosity: 1.85e -5 Pa.s Solid Density: 1,845 kg/m 3 Mean diameter: 56.7 µm Operating conditions Volume Flow Rate: 140 m g3 /h Mass Load Ratio: 40 g s /m 3 g Re g : 28,000 (Reynolds number) St: 0.9 (Stokes number)

Case Studies (cont d) Overview of physics and numerical setup Eulerian Multiphase (EMP): 2 phases Interphase momentum transfer through Drag Force Isothermal and incompressible RANS approach 1 st order Implicit Unsteady with a time step of 5e -4 s; CFL ave ~ 1.0 and CFL max ~ 3.0 (Grid 1) 10 inner iterations URFs: 0.6 for Pressure; 0.9 for all others Advection schemes 2 nd order for momentum 1 st order for everything else Total physical time: 3s Corresponds to 3 flows through Mean variables collected after 1.5s Simulations carried out in STAR-CCM+ v9.02

Case Studies (cont d) It was chosen to evaluate two closures for the Solid phase Inviscid (µ s 0) Kinetic Theory of Granular Materials (KTGF) Known as Granular Pressure in STAR-CCM+ (Transport Equation Model) Particle Kinetic Viscosity by Syamlal Friction Regime by Schaeffer With two different High-Re turbulence models for the Gas phase Standard k- Reynolds Stress Model with Quadratic Pressure Strain (RSM SSG) Drag Force correlation was tied to Solid phase stresses closure Inviscid: Schiller-Naumann KTGF: Gidaspow Free-slip walls were considered for the Solid phase

Mesh Studies Grids overview 100% hexahedron cells Very high quality O-Grid topology with Directed Meshing Aspect ratio adjusted accordingly Grid Process was automated with a refinement factor of 1.5 based on the area of the cells at inlet Best grid for each refinement was obtained with HEEDS Cell Count Grid 1 5.8M Grid 2 2.8M Grid 3 1.8M Grid Convergence Index Based on the approach proposed by Patrick J. Roache Richardson extrapolation of successive refined grids Process was automated in STAR-CCM+ Safety factor used: 1.25 Case studies were simulated on Grid 1

Mesh Studies (cont d) Best grid for each mesh refinement found by SHERPA (HEEDS)

Mesh Studies (cont d) Grid 1 overview and inlet detail

Grid Convergence Index Assessment Vertical profiles on mean Solid axial velocity (Inviscid k- )

Grid Convergence Index Assessment (cont d) Horizontal profiles on mean Solid axial velocity (Inviscid k- )

Results Solid Velocity magnitude on first curvature Inviscid k- Inviscid RSM SSG KTGF k- KTGF RSM SSG Discontinuities

Results (cont d) Solid Velocity magnitude on second curvature KTGF RSM SSG KTGF k- Inviscid RSM SSG Inviscid k-

Results (cont d) Vertical profiles on mean Solid axial velocity

Results (cont d) Horizontal profiles on mean Solid axial velocity

Conclusions Overall good agreement was obtained between the numerical and experimental results Best predictions given at developed flow sessions Inviscid approach provides a cheap and valid strategy of modeling these diluted regimes transported gas-solid flows Grid Convergence Index is a valuable methodology to assess uncertainties over consistently refined meshes Some discontinuities highlighted with the KTGF closure will be investigated

Obrigado!