Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5138 Category: Informational February 2008

Similar documents
Network Working Group. Category: Informational April A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)

Network Working Group. Category: Informational October 2005

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3937 Category: Informational October 2004

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8069 Category: Informational February 2017 ISSN:

* Network Working Group. Expires: January 6, 2005 August A URN namespace for the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)

Request for Comments: February 2006

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6061 Category: Informational January 2011 ISSN:

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option

EPFL S. Willmott UPC September 2003

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational. June A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for CableLabs

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track August Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option

Network Working Group Request for Comments: August Address-Prefix-Based Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4

Network Working Group. Category: Informational January 2006

Category: Standards Track June Requesting Attributes by Object Class in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Status of This Memo

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Network Working Group Internet-Draft October 27, 2007 Intended status: Experimental Expires: April 29, 2008

National Computerization Agency Category: Informational July 2004

Category: Standards Track September MIB Textual Conventions for Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)

Request for Comments: 5179 Category: Standards Track May 2008

Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-00.

Request for Comments: 3764 Category: Standards Track April enumservice registration for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Addresses-of-Record

Request for Comments: 3861 Category: Standards Track August 2004

Request for Comments: May 2007

Category: Best Current Practice February Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points

Category: Standards Track December 2007

Network Working Group. Category: Informational May OSPF Database Exchange Summary List Optimization

Network Working Group Request for Comments: September IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Options

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4143 Category: Standards Track Brandenburg November 2005

Request for Comments: 4759 Category: Standards Track Neustar Inc. L. Conroy Roke Manor Research November 2006

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) BCP: 183 May 2013 Category: Best Current Practice ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational March 2016 ISSN:

Expires: October 9, 2005 April 7, 2005

Request for Comments: 4393 Category: Standards Track March MIME Type Registrations for 3GPP2 Multimedia Files

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4424 February 2006 Updates: 4348 Category: Standards Track

Request for Comments: 4633 Category: Experimental August 2006

Network Working Group. Cisco Systems June 2007

February T11 Network Address Authority (NAA) Naming Format for iscsi Node Names

Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-03.

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4913 Category: Experimental July 2007

Category: Standards Track Cisco H. Tschofenig Nokia Siemens Networks August 2008

Request for Comments: 3934 Updates: 2418 October 2004 BCP: 94 Category: Best Current Practice

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4869 Category: Informational May Suite B Cryptographic Suites for IPsec. Status of This Memo

Network Working Group Internet-Draft January 25, 2006 Expires: July 29, Feed Rank draft-snell-atompub-feed-index-05.txt. Status of this Memo

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. March 2005

Request for Comments: 4680 Updates: 4346 September 2006 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group. Updates: 3463, 4468, 4954 June 2008 Category: Best Current Practice. A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes

Category: Standards Track June 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks August 2008

September The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) tel Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry. Status of This Memo

vcard Extensions for Instant Messaging (IM)

Category: Informational Woven Systems May 2008

Request for Comments: 3932 October 2004 BCP: 92 Updates: 3710, 2026 Category: Best Current Practice

Request for Comments: K. Norrman Ericsson June 2006

Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track January 2008

Request for Comments: 4315 December 2005 Obsoletes: 2359 Category: Standards Track. Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - UIDPLUS extension

Request for Comments: 5010 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. September 2007

Expires in six months 24 October 2004 Obsoletes: RFC , , 3377, 3771

IETF TRUST. Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents. February 12, Effective Date: February 15, 2009

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems May 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4603 Category: Informational Cisco Systems July Additional Values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute

IETF TRUST. Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents. Approved November 6, Effective Date: November 10, 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4573 Category: Standard Track July MIME Type Registration for RTP Payload Format for H.

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track July 2007

Category: Standards Track October Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4)

C. Martin ipath Services February A Policy Control Mechanism in IS-IS Using Administrative Tags

Network Working Group. February 2005

Request for Comments: 5079 Category: Standards Track December Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)

Isode Limited March 2008

Updates: 2409 May 2005 Category: Standards Track. Algorithms for Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1)

Request for Comments: 5208 Category: Informational May 2008

Request for Comments: 5115 Category: Standards Track UCL January Telephony Routing over IP (TRIP) Attribute for Resource Priority

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Obsoletes: 7302 September 2016 Category: Informational ISSN:

Request for Comments: 4715 Category: Informational NTT November 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Samsung S. Kumar Tech Mahindra Ltd S. Madanapalli Samsung May 2008

Category: Experimental June 2006

Network Working Group. Obsoletes: 2717, Category: Best Current Practice Adobe Systems February 2006

Network Working Group. R. Iannella DSTC Pty Ltd P. Faltstrom Tele2/Swipnet June 1999

Category: Standards Track March Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport Over TCP

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June 2005

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: A. Zinin Alcatel-Lucent March 2007

Jabber, Inc. August 20, 2004

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5235 January 2008 Obsoletes: 3685 Category: Standards Track

Category: Standards Track LabN Consulting, LLC July 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. December 2005

Network Working Group. Intended status: Standards Track Columbia U. Expires: March 5, 2009 September 1, 2008

Request for Comments: 4255 Category: Standards Track SPARTA January Using DNS to Securely Publish Secure Shell (SSH) Key Fingerprints

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc January The Secure Shell (SSH) Session Channel Break Extension

Request for Comments: 3968 Updates: 3427 December 2004 BCP: 98 Category: Best Current Practice

Network Working Group Request for Comments: February 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. April 2004

Category: Standards Track Redback Networks June 2008

Request for Comments: 3905 Category: Informational September A Template for IETF Patent Disclosures and Licensing Declarations

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4792 Updates: 3641 January 2007 Category: Standards Track

Request for Comments: 5369 Category: Informational October Framework for Transcoding with the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)

Network Working Group Request for Comments: December 2004

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. June 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Informational SPARTA, Inc. S. Crocker Shinkuro Inc. S. Krishnaswamy SPARTA, Inc. August 2007

Intended status: Standards Track August 15, 2008 Expires: February 16, 2009

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational March 2017 ISSN:

Transcription:

Network Working Group S. Cox Request for Comments: 5138 CSIRO Category: Informational February 2008 A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information (CGI) Status of This Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract This document describes a URN (Uniform Resource Name) namespace that is engineered by the Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information (CGI) for naming (i) persistent resources published by the CGI and (ii) resources published by organizations that wish them to be used in the context of services conforming to protocols and agreements issued by CGI. The formal Namespace Identifier (NID) is "cgi". 1. Introduction CGI is a Commission of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) concerned with developing best practices in the management and application of geoscience information. The active membership is primarily drawn from organizations with statutory responsibility for providing geoscience information to external users (e.g., Geologic Surveys). An important focus of activity is the development of standards for networked data interchange to complement or supersede the traditional map product. A number of documents, definitions, and other artifacts, are required to support this. CGI wishes to provide persistent, location-independent identifiers for these resources. In addition, organizations that subscribe to the interchange standards proposed by CGI require external identifiers for data objects that are transferred. CGI wishes to provide a scheme to enable data providers to uniquely identify data, which is consistent with the requirements of the interchange framework. Products and services that conform to CGI endorsed interchange specifications enable users to exchange and process geoscience information across networks, computing platforms, and products. Interoperability in such an environment is facilitated by the use of Cox Informational [Page 1]

a system of identifiers that is global in scope. CGI is the lead forum for statutory organizations that act as primary providers of technical data in this application domain. Motivated by these concerns, CGI would like to assign formal URNs to published resources in order to provide persistent, location-independent identifiers for them. The process for registering a namespace identifier is documented in [RFC3406]. The official IANA registry of URN namespaces is available online at: <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces> 2. URN Specification for the "cgi" NID Namespace ID: cgi Registration Information: Registration Version Number: 1 Registration Date: 2007-10-04 Declared registrant of the namespace: Commission for Geoscience Information (Secretariat) c/o British Geological Survey Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth Nottingham Nottinghamshire NG12 5GG U K Attn. Ian Jackson (ij@bgs.ac.uk) Declaration of syntactic structure: The Namespace Specific String (NSS) of all URNs that use the "cgi" NID has the following structure: urn:cgi:{cgiresource}:{resourcespecificstring} where the "CGIResource" is a US-ASCII string that conforms to the URN syntax requirements [RFC2141] and defines a specific class of resource type. Each resource type has a specific labeling scheme that is covered by "ResourceSpecificString", which also conforms to the naming requirements of [RFC2141]. Cox Informational [Page 2]

The CGI maintains a naming authority, the CGI Naming Authority (CGINA), that manages the assignment of CGIResource classes and the specific registration values assigned for each resource class. Relevant ancillary documentation: The CGI Naming Authority (CGINA) provides information on the registered resources and the registrations for each. More information about CGINA and the registration activities and procedures to be followed are available at: <http://www.cgi-iugs.org/cgiidentifierscheme> A URN resolver is available at: <http://www.cgi-iugs.org/uri> The resolver provides a registry of CGI URNs used in CGI services. Identifier uniqueness considerations: The CGINA manages resources using the "cgi" NID and is the authority for managing the resources and subsequent strings associated. In the associated procedures, CGINA ensures the uniqueness of the strings themselves or permits secondary responsibility for management of well-defined sub-trees. CGI may permit use of experimental-type values that will not be registered. As a consequence, multiple users may end up using the same value for separate uses. As experimental usage is only intended for testing purposes, this should not interfere with operational services. Identifier persistence considerations: CGINA provides clear documentation of the registered uses of the "cgi" NID. This is structured such that each CGIResource has a separate description and associated ResourceSpecificString with separate registration tables for elements of the strings that are separately maintained. The registration tables and information are published and maintained by CGINA on the CGI web site, indicated above. Cox Informational [Page 3]

Process of identifier assignment: CGINA defines CGIResource classes used with the "cgi" NID, and specifies the process for identifier assignment for each class. These are described at: <http://www.cgi-iugs.org/cgiidentifierscheme> and a set of registers is linked from there. Each such resource may have three types of registration activities: 1) Registered values associated with CGI resources 2) Registration of values or sub-trees to other entities 3) Name models for use in experimental purposes Process for Identifier Resolution: The namespace is not listed with a Resolution Discovery System (RDS); this is not relevant. Rules for Lexical Equivalence: No special considerations; the rules for lexical equivalence of [RFC2141] apply. Conformance with URN Syntax: No special considerations. Validation mechanism: None specified. URN assignment will be handled by procedures implemented in support of CGINA activities. Scope: Global 3. Examples The following examples are representative URNs that have been assigned by CGINA: urn:cgi:document:cgi:cgiidentifierscheme - identifies the document that describes the CGI Identifier Scheme. Cox Informational [Page 4]

urn:cgi:register:cgi:cgiresourceclasses - identifies the register of resource classes for which identifiers from the CGI scheme may be provided. urn:cgi:xmlns:cgi:geosciml:2.0 - is the XML namespace for version 2.0 of GeoSciML, which is owned by CGI. urn:cgi:schema:ggic:mineraloccurences:1.0:xmi - identifies the XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) representation of version 1.0 of the Mineral Occurrences information model owned by the (Australasian) Government Geoscience Information Committee. urn:cgi:featuretype:cgi:geosciml:2.0:fault - identifies the Fault feature-type from version 2.0 of the GeoSciML schema that is owned by CGI. urn:ogc:servicetype:cgi:gsml-fs:1.0 - identifies version 1.0 of the "GSML-FS" service-type owned by CGI. urn:cgi:classifierscheme:ics:stratchart:2004 - identifies the 2004 edition of the Stratigraphic Chart published by the International Commission for Stratigraphy. urn:cgi:classifier:ics:stratchart:2004:silurian - identifies the geologic period designated Silurian from the 2004 edition of the Stratigraphic Chart published by the International Commission for Stratigraphy. urn:cgi:classifier:gsv:lithology:uiuyg1245nn07 - identifies the concept given the designation UIUYG1245NN07 from the lithology scheme published by Geoscience Victoria (Australia). Cox Informational [Page 5]

urn:cgi:feature:usgs:2feb49bc-6755-11dc-8314-0800200c9a66 - identifies a feature instance given the designation 2feb49bc-6755-11dc-8314-0800200c9a66 by the US Geological Survey. urn:cgi:object:sgu:552cb080-6755-11dc-8314-0800200c9a66 - identifies an object given the designation 552cb080-6755-11dc-8314-0800200c9a66 by the Geological Survey of Sweden. 4. Namespace Considerations There is currently no available namespace that will allow the CGI to uniquely specify and access resources, such as schemas and registries, that are required by organizations implementing CGI standards. There is also a need for other standards organizations, such as the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) to be able to access CGI-specific resources. The CGI members considered use of other existing NIDs, such as those for OGC. However, these do not support the semantics required and in particular do not allow for the delegation of identifier assignment within the CGI community that is demonstrated here. 5. Community Considerations CGI standards require access to resources, such as schemas, registries, catalogues, documents, and services. In order for the larger IT community to be able to implement applications that access CGI resources effectively, a unique namespace is required. We desire these resources to be freely and openly available as a set of community resources. The design of the CGI namespace builds on the experience of the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) which has defined the framework of geospatial services within which CGI standards have been developed. The OGC membership has expertise in using the OGC URN [OGC-URN] [OGC-DEF], gained through implementation experiments and a variety of operational testbeds. The CGI namespace is compatible with this experience. 6. Security Considerations There are no additional security considerations other than those normally associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general. Cox Informational [Page 6]

7. IANA Considerations This document defines a URN NID registration of "cgi", which has been entered into the IANA registry located at: <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces> 8. References 8.1 Normative References [RFC2141] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997. [RFC3406] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom, "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition Mechanisms", BCP 66, RFC 3406, October 2002. 8.2 Informative References [OGC-URN] Reed, C., "A URN namespace for the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)", Work in Progress, October 2007. [OGC-DEF] Whiteside, A., "Definition identifier URNs in OGC namespace", OpenGIS Best Practice document, OGC 06-023r1, August 2006. Available [online]: <http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=16339> 9. Acknowledgement Thanks to Carl Reed for preparing the document, "A URN Namespace for the Open Geospatial Consortium", upon which this submission is based. Author s Address S.J.D. Cox Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation PO Box 1130 Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia EMail: Simon.Cox@csiro.au Cox Informational [Page 7]

Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Cox Informational [Page 8]