NIR Technologies Inc. FT-NIR Technical Note TN 005

Similar documents
LLA Instruments GmbH. Multiplexed Near-Infrared-Spectrometer KUSTA 4004M. Product description

Automating standard operating procedures using simple scripting

Spectrum 10 Spectroscopy Software

Determining satellite rotation rates for unresolved targets using temporal variations in spectral signatures

Bread Water Content Measurement Based on Hyperspectral Imaging

Data Preprocessing. D.N. Rutledge, AgroParisTech

Chemical Characterization of Diverse Pharmaceutical Samples by Confocal Raman Microscopy

Challenges of Statistical Analysis/Control in a Continuous Process

Hyperspectral Remote Sensing

C101-E137 TALK LETTER. Vol. 14

The Next Generation of Milk Analysis

Version 6. User Manual SEMI

Versatile laser Raman Spectrometer. RMP-500 series

WITec Raman Spectroscopy Solutions

Blend Uniformity PRODUCT OVERVIEW

ALPHA II. Innovation with Integrity. The new benchmark for compact FTIR spectrometers FTIR

Monitoring the Life Expectancy of Compact Discs

LED MINISPECTROMETER LMS-R

ALPHA II. Innovation with Integrity. The benchmark for compact FTIR spectrometers FTIR

PGx01 series. High Peak Power. Available models

Supervised Variable Clustering for Classification of NIR Spectra

User Manual STATISTICS

Experiment 5: Exploring Resolution, Signal, and Noise using an FTIR CH3400: Instrumental Analysis, Plymouth State University, Fall 2013

Quick Value Statistics in Presentation

The latest trend of hybrid instrumentation

Non-destructive techniques in seed quality determination

Infrared Scene Simulation for Chemical Standoff Detection System Evaluation

Tools for Monitoring and Controlling Uniformity of Solid Dosage Forms

How to Analyze Materials

Spatially Resolved Spectroscopy & Multipoint NIR spectroscopy for in-line real-time industrial applications

Relationship between Fourier Space and Image Space. Academic Resource Center

OPTIMIZING A VIDEO PREPROCESSOR FOR OCR. MR IBM Systems Dev Rochester, elopment Division Minnesota

Pre-processing method minimizing the need for reference analyses

FTIR-ATR Identification of a Food Oil Using Chemometrics

Vision Based Metal Spectral Analysis using

Hyperspectral Chemical Imaging: principles and Chemometrics.

To Plot a Graph in Origin. Example: Number of Counts from a Geiger- Müller Tube as a Function of Supply Voltage

COASTCOLOUR. CoastColour UCM1 * ESRIN *

CCD Report Radial Basis Function Modeling of CARS Data

Agilent MicroLab Quant Calibration Software: Measure Oil in Water using Method IP 426

Feature clustering and mutual information for the selection of variables in spectral data

SELECTION OF A MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION METHOD

MODULE 3. FACTORS AFFECTING 3D LASER SCANNING

Outline. Nuclear Forensics & Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy. Interferometry & Shadowgraphy. Conclusion & Future Work. Experimental Setup

NexGen Series FTS Combi

Validation of a Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry (DART-MS) Method for the Quantitation of Six Carbon Sugar in Saccharification Matrix

Hyperspectral Microscope based on Imaging Fourier transform Spectrometry. Dr. Li Jianping, Claude. Copyright: Claude.

CODE Analysis, design, production control of thin films

Multivariate Calibration Quick Guide

X-Ray fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy

Harris: Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Eight Edition CHAPTER 05: QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CALIBRATION METHODS

Notes on some items. 1. Installation

Instrument Specific Signal

Detection, Classification, & Identification of Objects in Cluttered Images

FFT and Spectrum Analyzer

Outlier and Target Detection in Aerial Hyperspectral Imagery: A Comparison of Traditional and Percentage Occupancy Hit or Miss Transform Techniques

Apex High Performance Spectrometer

The 4A/OP model: from NIR to TIR, new developments for time computing gain and validation results within the frame of international space missions

Version 6. User Manual

Dealing with Data in Excel 2013/2016

Predicting Percentage of Intramuscular Fat Using Two Types of Real-Time Ultrasound Equipment

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometer

NUS: non-uniform sampling

Chemometrical Optimization for Fourier Transform Near Infrared Analysis of Sugar Brix in Cane Sugar Intermediate

Interference of Light

Portable Benchtop Raman Instruments Agility Series

Accurate LED Source Modeling using TracePro

Safely Testing Circuit Breakers Using a Dual Ground Method. With the Vanguard CT-7000 S3 and CT-8000 S3

Classification of Hyperspectral Breast Images for Cancer Detection. Sander Parawira December 4, 2009

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

MEASURING SURFACE CURRENTS USING IR CAMERAS. Background. Optical Current Meter 06/10/2010. J.Paul Rinehimer ESS522

Predicting Percentage of Intramuscular Fat Using Two Types of Real-Time Ultrasound Equipment

From Color to Chemometrics

Near- Infrared Analyzer Beat Sensor GP

Control of Light. Emmett Ientilucci Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science 8 May 2007

Data: a collection of numbers or facts that require further processing before they are meaningful

Implementation of the STL-method for sorting potatoes in a flow.

SemiconSoft, Inc. Optical Metrology Company. MProbe: Measurement Guide Thin-films measurement using Reflectance or/and Transmittance spectroscopy

Expectations from 2D NIRS

Optical properties and characterization

c. Saturday and Sunday: 10 minute time blocks and unlimited time.

NMRProcFlow Macro-command Reference Guide

UNIFIT - Spectrum Processing, Peak Fitting, Analysis and Presentation Software for XPS, AES, XAS and RAMAN Spectroscopy Based on WINDOWS

UV WinLab Software The Lambda Series

PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION FOR SAS PLS PROGRAM I. This document describes the source code for the first program described in the article titled:

Chapter 5. Track Geometry Data Analysis

CrIS Full Spectral Resolution SDR and S-NPP/JPSS-1 CrIS Performance Status

TOCSY 15. Goto. Introduction Pulse Sequence Diagram AVANCE User s Guide Bruker 167

The Impact of Diffuse Illumination on Iris Recognition

2008 Cemagref. Reprinted with permission.

Component Level Prediction Versus System Level Measurement of SABER Relative Spectral Response

1.6 Rough Surface Scattering Applications Computer Graphic Shading and Rendering

This chapter contains basic information about the most important OPUS features and provides useful notes on how to work with the OPUS tools.

COMBINING HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION OPTICAL AND LIDAR DATA FOR OBJECT-BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATION

Effects of assuming constant optical scattering on haemoglobin concentration measurements using NIRS during a Valsalva Manoeuvre

Diffraction gratings. e.g., CDs and DVDs

Renishaw invia Raman Microscope (April 2006)

40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Clause 86 40GBASE-SR4 and 100GBASE-SR10 PMD Test Suite v0.1 Technical Document

TISSUE SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY USING 3D PRFILOMETRY

High Spectral Resolution Infrared Radiance Modeling Using Optimal Spectral Sampling (OSS) Method

Transcription:

NIR Technologies Inc. FT-NIR Technical Note TN 00 IDENTIFICATION OF PURE AND BLENDED FOOD SPICES Fourier Transform Near Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-NIR) (Fast, Accurate, Reliable, and Non-destructive) Identification Process: The outcome of the scanning process is an absorption spectrum. The NIR absorption and its characteristics are described in the Technical Note (TN 00 - Materials Identification). The focus of this technical note is the identification of food spices and the development of a spectral model for this purpose. In this particular study, all scanned powders of interest were used in developing an FT-NIR spectral reference model for the follow up identification purposes. Like many other spectroscopic techniques, the FT-NIR technique is a comparative technology, so, once a reference spectral model is developed, identification of a test sample can be achieved within seconds! All absorption spectra for different spices and their blends were averaged and a Factorized Analysis of the averaged spectra was then carried out. The following graph shows the scatter of the four pure spices and several blends. Distribution of Pure and Blended Food Spice Powders The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of FT-NIR technology in the identification of a variety of pure and blended food spices. Initially, an FT- NIR reference library was created using four different spices consisting of Onion Powder, Paprika, Black Pepper (ground) and Nutmeg. In a follow up study, several mixtures of Onion powder and Paprika of different percentages and Paprika and Nutmeg, again, of different percentages were included in the reference library. This study demonstrates that the FT-NIR technology is not only capable of identifying pure spices but also the blends of spices. This technical note describes the application of FT-NIR technology in the easy identification of food spices. We hope that the readers will be able to see the simplicity and speed with which the FT-NIR technology can help in the identification of food spices and enhancement of Quality Control and Quality Assurance programs. Samples were tested as received with no sample preparation. A more general description of the FT-NIR technology can be found in Technical Note (TN 00 - Materials Identification). Scanning: All spices were scanned using a fibre optic probe and the Bruker Vector /N or Matrix-F Fourier Transform Near Infrared Spectrometers. Scanning time: Each measurement took about seconds, and in most cases, five to ten measurements were taken for spectral averaging and identification purposes. Vector 0.8 0.7 0.6 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0-0. -0. -0. - -0.8-0.6-0. -0. 0 0. 0. 0.6 Vector Paprika Nutmeg Onion Black Pepper Onion 0% Paprika 80% Onion 0% Paprika 60% Onion 0% Paprika 0% Onion 60% Paprika 0% Onion 70% Paprika 0% Onion 80% Paprika 0% Onion 90% Paprika 0% Paprika % Nutmeg 7% Paprika 0% Nutmeg 0% Paprika 7% Nutmeg % Paprika 90% Nutmeg 0% As can be seen from the above scatter graph, the four pure spices show up at four different coordinates (Vector and Vector ). Furthermore, the scatter graph also shows that as the concentration of Onion or Nutmeg are increased the coordinates of the blended powder move from pure Paprika towards the pure Onion or Nutmeg. Identification of test samples: An individual Identity Test Report for each powder composed of four sections; ) Sample Information, ), ), Second Derivative Spectrum comparison to the respective reference spices, and ) was then generated. Several Identity Test Reports are shown in the following pages for different spices or their blends. us Tel: (90) 69-6767; Fax: (90) 69-088; e-mail research@nirtechnologies.com

The first part of the Identity Test Report shows the sample and test information, i.e., what method file was used, the time and date of the test, and the result (see below for more details). The second part of the Identity Test Report is the average report. As mentioned above and in Technical Note (TN 00), on average, each spice powder was scanned at least five times and the resulting spectra were averaged. The average report contains the value and the file name. is defined as a measure of the spectral distance between the average spectrum and the individual spectrum. The individual spectra are then sorted according to spectral distances in ascending order. is the sample spectrum that is the most similar to the average spectrum while the last spectrum in the list shows the greatest difference to the average spectrum. Two parameters are derived from the spectral distance to define the confidence region for the average spectrum: Mean Distance, D m ; and Standard Deviation, S 0. The closer the values the more consistent are the spectral measurements. These calculations are automatically carried out within the OPUS/IDENT software. It can be confused with <N> samples: A second possible result of an Identity Test is CAN BE CONFUSED WITH <N> OTHER HITS. This result appears if is smaller than the threshold of the expected reference, but the Hit Quality of one or more other reference spectra are also found to be below this limit value. Not identical: The third outcome is NOT IDENTICAL. In this case no match has been found for the test sample, therefore, the test sample is not identical to any of the references in the library. This situation may also arise if the sample is not scanned properly or the batch to batch variation is so different that the is greater than the threshold, therefore, it is not statistically identical even though chemically it may be a similar material. The third part of the Identity Test Report is the comparison of the second derivative spectrum of the average file and the matching reference i.e., Nutmeg, Onion, Paprika and Black Pepper. Depending on the chemical composition of each spice, the FT-NIR response would be different, as can be seen in the second derivative spectra. The final and most important part of the report is the identity report and, in addition to values, it also contains threshold values for the references. The threshold values for each spice reference were automatically calculated within the OPUS/IDENT method development function. The threshold value is calculated from the worst hit (the greatest distance from D max in the average report), the standard deviation S 0, and a probability factor in this case a 99% confidence interval. These parameters were also set during the method development using OPUS/IDENT software. The section is the result of the comparison between the spectral differences of the test spice powder with those of the references (in this case, four different spices and their blends). As a result of this comparison, OPUS software provides three possible outcomes: Identical: If the for the test sample is lower than the threshold value of the reference sample and no other Hits are found to match this criterion, the result is reported as IDENTICAL; that is, the test sample is identical to the reference material. us Tel: (90) 69-6767; Fax: (90) 69-088; e-mail research@nirtechnologies.com

Black Pepper (Ground) from (date): /06/0 (time): 6:6:6 IDENTICAL TO: Black Pepper: for expected reference: 0.008 0.780 0.8 * S.Dev BLPEPPER.0 0.80 0.8 * S.Dev BLPEPPER.0 0.970 0.8888 * S.Dev BLPEPPER.0 0.900 0.99 * S.Dev BLPEPPER.0 0.0 0.9677 * S.Dev BLPEPPER.0-0.0000 6000 00 000 00 000-0.0000 6000 00 000 Wavenumber cm- 00 000 Black Pepper Av. of BLPEPPER.00 0.008 0.9000 Onion 60% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI6PAP.00 0.08977 0.9096 Onion 0% Paprika 0% Av. of ONIPAP.00 0.007 0.9770 Onion 0% Paprika 60% Av. of ONIPAP6.00 0.007 0.9 Onion 70% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI7PAP.00 0.08 us Tel: (90) 69-6767; Fax: (90) 69-088; e-mail research@nirtechnologies.com

Paprika from (date): /06/0 (time): 6:6:6 IDENTICAL TO: Paprika: for expected reference: 0.009 0.7 0.797 * S.Dev PAPRIKA.0 0.87 0.8608 * S.Dev PAPRIKA.0 0.78 0.8688 * S.Dev PAPRIKA.0 0.6798 0.9 * S.Dev PAPRIKA.0 0.90.09 * S.Dev PAPRIKA.0-0.000 0.0000-0.000 0.0000 6000 00 000 6000 00 000 Wavenumber cm- 00 00 000 000 Paprika Av. of PAPRIKA.00 0.009 0.09 Paprika 90% Nutmeg 0% Av. of PPR9NUT.00 0.00707 0.0699 Onion 0% Paprika 80% Av. of ONIPAP8.00 0.00779 0.7809 Onion 0% Paprika 60% Av. of ONIPAP6.00 0.007 0.88 Paprika 7% Nutmeg % Av. of PR7NU.00 0.00968 us Tel: (90) 69-6767; Fax: (90) 69-088; e-mail research@nirtechnologies.com

Nutmeg from (date): /06/0 (time): 6:6:6 IDENTICAL TO: Nutmeg: for expected reference: 0.00700 0.066 0.76699 * S.Dev RNUTMEG.0 0.96 0.879 * S.Dev RNUTMEG.0 0.0 0.8806 * S.Dev RNUTMEG.0 0. 0.900 * S.Dev RNUTMEG.0 0.99.086 * S.Dev RNUTMEG.0-0.0006 0.000-0.0006 0.000 6000 00 000 6000 00 000 Wavenumber cm- 00 00 000 000 Nutmeg Av. of RNUTMEG.00 0.00700 0.08 Paprika % Nutmeg 7% Av. of PRNU7.00 0.00609 0.8 Paprika 0% Nutmeg 0% Av. of PR0NU0.00 0.00700 0.786 Onion 70% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI7PAP.00 0.08 0.7900 Onion 60% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI6PAP.00 0.08977 us Tel: (90) 69-6767; Fax: (90) 69-088; e-mail research@nirtechnologies.com

Onion Powder from (date): /06/0 (time): 6:6:6 IDENTICAL TO: Onion Powder: for expected reference: 0.088 0.778 0.680879 * S.Dev RONION.0 0.86 0.808 * S.Dev RONION.0 0.778 0.90 * S.Dev RONION.0 0.8 0.9677 * S.Dev RONION.0 0.89.0086 * S.Dev RONION.0-0.00008 0.00000-0.00008 0.00000 6000 00 000 6000 00 000 Wavenumber cm- 00 00 000 000 Onion Av. of RONION.00 0.088 0.0097 Onion 90% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI9PAP.00 0.0608 0.08 Onion 80% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI8PAP.00 0.0098 0.68 Onion 70% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI7PAP.00 0.08 0.6088 Nutmeg Av. of RNUTMEG.00 0.00700 us Tel: (90) 69-6767; Fax: (90) 69-088; e-mail research@nirtechnologies.com

Onion Powder 90% - Paprika 0% from (date): /06/0 (time): 6:6:6 IDENTICAL TO: Onion Powder 90% Paprika 0%: for expected reference: 0.0608 0.90 0.7876 * S.Dev ONI9PAP.0 0.9 0.7877 * S.Dev ONI9PAP.0 0.70 0.899 * S.Dev ONI9PAP.0 0.97 0.96 * S.Dev ONI9PAP.0 0.986.0999 * S.Dev ONI9PAP.0-0.000 0.00000-0.000 0.00000 6000 00 000 6000 00 000 Wavenumber cm- 00 00 000 000 Onion 90% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI9PAP.00 0.0608 0.00079 Onion 80% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI8PAP.00 0.0098 0.6097 Onion 70% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI7PAP.00 0.08 0.0096 Onion Av. of RONION.00 0.088 0.80 Onion 60% Paprika 0% Av. of ONI6PAP.00 0.08977 us Tel: (90) 69-6767; Fax: (90) 69-088; e-mail research@nirtechnologies.com

Paprika 90% - Nutmeg 0% from (date): /06/0 (time): 6:6:6 IDENTICAL TO: Paprika 90% Nutmeg 0%: for expected reference: 0.00707 0.009 0.779 * S.Dev PPR9NUT.0 0.060 0.8 * S.Dev PPR9NUT.0 0.068 0.976 * S.Dev PPR9NUT.0 0.0698 0.9078 * S.Dev PPR9NUT.0 0.06867.00 * S.Dev PPR9NUT.0-0.000 0.0000-0.000 0.0000 6000 00 000 6000 00 000 Wavenumber cm- 00 00 000 000 Paprika 90% Nutmeg 0% Av. of PPR9NUT.00 0.00707 0.000 Onion 0% Paprika 80% Av. of ONIPAP8.00 0.00779 0.09 Paprika Av. of PAPRIKA.00 0.009 0.0700 Paprika 7% Nutmeg % Av. of PR7NU.00 0.00968 0.09077 Onion 0% Paprika 60% Av. of ONIPAP6.00 0.007 us Tel: (90) 69-6767; Fax: (90) 69-088; e-mail research@nirtechnologies.com