Exercise 1: 3-Pt Bending using ANSYS Workbench

Similar documents
Aufgabe 1: Dreipunktbiegung mit ANSYS Workbench

Exercise 1. 3-Point Bending Using the Static Structural Module of. Ansys Workbench 14.0

Exercise 2: Mesh Resolution, Element Shapes, Basis Functions & Convergence Analyses

Exercise 1. 3-Point Bending Using the GUI and the Bottom-up-Method

ANSYS Workbench Guide

Module 1.3W Distributed Loading of a 1D Cantilever Beam

Finite Element Course ANSYS Mechanical Tutorial Tutorial 3 Cantilever Beam

Module 1.7W: Point Loading of a 3D Cantilever Beam

Finite Element Course ANSYS Mechanical Tutorial Tutorial 4 Plate With a Hole

Visit the following websites to learn more about this book:

ANSYS AIM Tutorial Structural Analysis of a Plate with Hole

Chapter 3 Analysis of Original Steel Post

Lab#5 Combined analysis types in ANSYS By C. Daley

ANSYS 5.6 Tutorials Lecture # 2 - Static Structural Analysis

Module 1.5: Moment Loading of a 2D Cantilever Beam

Module 1.7: Point Loading of a 3D Cantilever Beam

2: Static analysis of a plate

Learning Module 8 Shape Optimization

CHAPTER 4. Numerical Models. descriptions of the boundary conditions, element types, validation, and the force

TWO-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEM OF THE THEORY OF ELASTICITY. INVESTIGATION OF STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTORS.

FEA BENDING, TORSION, TENSION, and SHEAR TUTORIAL in CATIA

Torsional-lateral buckling large displacement analysis with a simple beam using Abaqus 6.10

Module 1.6: Distributed Loading of a 2D Cantilever Beam

SDC. Engineering Analysis with COSMOSWorks. Paul M. Kurowski Ph.D., P.Eng. SolidWorks 2003 / COSMOSWorks 2003

ME Optimization of a Frame

Analysis Steps 1. Start Abaqus and choose to create a new model database

CE Advanced Structural Analysis. Lab 4 SAP2000 Plane Elasticity

Installation Guide. Beginners guide to structural analysis

Appendix: To be performed during the lab session

ANSYS AIM Tutorial Thermal Stresses in a Bar

Appendix B: Creating and Analyzing a Simple Model in Abaqus/CAE

MAE Advanced Computer Aided Design. 02. Ansys Workbench Doc 01. Introduction to Ansys Workbench

WORKSHOP 6.3 WELD FATIGUE USING NOMINAL STRESS METHOD. For ANSYS release 14

Abaqus/CAE Axisymmetric Tutorial (Version 2016)

Supersonic Flow Over a Wedge

A pipe bend is subjected to a concentrated force as shown: y All dimensions in inches. Material is stainless steel.

ANSYS Mechanical Basic Structural Nonlinearities

The part to be analyzed is the bracket from the tutorial of Chapter 3.

Analysis of ANSI W W 6x9-118,

Plasticity Bending Machine Tutorial (FFlex)

ANSYS AIM Tutorial Stepped Shaft in Axial Tension

CHAPTER 8 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Engineering Effects of Boundary Conditions (Fixtures and Temperatures) J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mechanical Engineering

Revision of the SolidWorks Variable Pressure Simulation Tutorial J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mechanical Engineering. Introduction

ES 128: Computer Assignment #4. Due in class on Monday, 12 April 2010

Static Stress Analysis

CE366/ME380 Finite Elements in Applied Mechanics I Fall 2007

A B C D E. Settings Choose height, H, free stream velocity, U, and fluid (dynamic viscosity and density ) so that: Reynolds number

Abaqus CAE Tutorial 6: Contact Problem

ENGINEERING TRIPOS PART IIA FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

Introduction to MSC.Patran

Computations of stresses with volume-elements in rectangular and HE sections

Module 1.2: Moment of a 1D Cantilever Beam

Quarter Symmetry Tank Stress (Draft 4 Oct 24 06)

Multi-Step Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Finite Element Analysis Using NEi Nastran

Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Creating and Analyzing a Simple Model in Abaqus/CAE

WP1 NUMERICAL BENCHMARK INVESTIGATION

TUTORIAL 7: Stress Concentrations and Elastic-Plastic (Yielding) Material Behavior Initial Project Space Setup Static Structural ANSYS ZX Plane

Engineering Analysis with

ASME Fatigue DOCUMENTATION. ANSYS Mechanical Application. Extension version Compatible ANSYS version

Engineering Analysis with SolidWorks Simulation 2012

Manual for Abaqus CAE Topology Optimization

Tutorial 1: Welded Frame - Problem Description

Practice to Informatics for Energy and Environment

Linear Buckling Analysis of a Plate

FEMAP Tutorial 2. Figure 1: Bar with defined dimensions

COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING. Part-1

Institute of Mechatronics and Information Systems

Fully-Coupled Thermo-Mechanical Analysis

Lesson: Static Stress Analysis of a Connecting Rod Assembly

Similar Pulley Wheel Description J.E. Akin, Rice University

FOUNDATION IN OVERCONSOLIDATED CLAY

Workshop 15. Single Pass Rolling of a Thick Plate

ME 442. Marc/Mentat-2011 Tutorial-1

SUBMERGED CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXCAVATION

ME 475 FEA of a Composite Panel

In-plane principal stress output in DIANA

Exercise 2: Bike Frame Analysis

WORKSHOP 6.4 WELD FATIGUE USING HOT SPOT STRESS METHOD. For ANSYS release 14

3D Finite Element Software for Cracks. Version 3.2. Benchmarks and Validation

Exercise 2: Bike Frame Analysis

Introduction To Finite Element Analysis

PLAXIS 2D - SUBMERGED CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXCAVATION

THREE DIMENSIONAL DYNAMIC STRESS ANALYSES FOR A GEAR TEETH USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

Generative Part Structural Analysis Fundamentals

SETTLEMENT OF A CIRCULAR FOOTING ON SAND

Solving FSI Applications Using ANSYS Mechanical and ANSYS Fluent

Manual for Computational Exercises

Finite Element Analysis Using Pro/Engineer

Simulation and Validation of Turbulent Pipe Flows

Reinforced concrete beam under static load: simulation of an experimental test

1.992, 2.993, 3.04, 10.94, , Introduction to Modeling and Simulation Prof. F.-J. Ulm Spring FE Modeling Example Using ADINA

This tutorial will take you all the steps required to import files into ABAQUS from SolidWorks

General modeling guidelines

Recent Advances on Higher Order 27-node Hexahedral Element in LS-DYNA

NonLinear Materials AH-ALBERTA Web:

Tutorial. Spring Foundation

CATIA V5 FEA Tutorials Release 14

Transcription:

Exercise 1: 3-Pt Bending using ANSYS Workbench Contents Starting and Configuring ANSYS Workbench... 2 1. Starting Windows on the MAC... 2 2. Login into Windows... 2 3. Start ANSYS Workbench... 2 4. Configuring ANSYS Workbench... 3 Beam under 3-Pt Bending [Balken unter 3-Pkt-Biegung]... 5 Taking advantage of symmetries... 6 A. Pre-Processing: Setting up the Model... 7 A.1 Defining the Geometry... 7 A.2 Material Properties... 8 A.3 Material Properties... 9 A.4 Meshing... 9 A.5 Applying Loads and Boundary Conditions... 11 B. Solving... 12 C. Post-Processing: Evaluating the Solution... 12 C.1 Specifying Result Items... 12 C.2 Deformation [Verschiebung]... 13 C.3 Visualizing Stresses & Strains [Spannungen & Dehnungen]... 14 D. Analogous Models in Lower Dimensions... 16 D.1 2-Dimensional (Plane Stress)... 16 D.2 1-Dimensional Model (Beam Theory)... 19 www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 1 / 20

Starting and Configuring ANSYS Workbench 1. STARTING WINDOWS ON THE MAC Enforce a restart while holding down the [ALT] button would lead you into the boot camp program. Choose the windows disc boot partition to start Windows instead of MAC OS. 2. LOGIN INTO WINDOWS Login into Windows using your credintials 3. START ANSYS WORKBENCH From the Windows start menu select and run ANSYS Workbench (Figure 1), opening up ANSYS Workbench s project view (Figure 2). Figure 1: Starting ANSYS Workbench www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 2 / 20

The project schematic visualizes the work- and data-flow between the different project components and modules. The Toolbox contains preconfigured analysis systems, which form the building blocks of each Workbench project. Figure 2: A new (and yet empty) ANSYS Workbench session 4. CONFIGURING ANSYS WORKBENCH 4.1 License Please make sure to choose the right license type. After you have launched Workbench go to Tools License Preferences and make sure that ANSYS Academic Teaching Advanced is the default (i.e.: top-most) license option (Figure 3). Otherwise, use the Move up and Move down buttons to correct and finally Apply the settings. Attention: these license settings needs to be done at least 3 times within the tabs (Solver, PrepPost, Geometry). Each time you need to press the Apply button. The settings need to be redone each time if you login into a new machine or using a new account or a new ANSYS version. Do not use ANSYS Academic Research as license if not necessary! www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 3 / 20

Figure 3: Configuring the license settings 4.2 Language Be sure to change the language setting to English: In Workbench Project Window Main Menu: Tools Options Regional and Language Settings. 4.3 Units Also choose a metric unit system including mm as the default length unit: In Workbench Project Window Main Menu: Units. 4.3 Restart A restart of Workbench is necessary in order to let the changes to become active. www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 4 / 20

Beam under 3-Pt Bending [Balken unter 3-Pkt-Biegung] We want to simulate a beam under three point bending with a force F applied at the center as shown in Figure 4. w h F t L Figure 4: Beam under three point bending The following geometry and material data are required to model our problem: F L h t E ν = 500,000 N = 2,000 mm = 60 mm = 20 mm = 210,000 N/mm 2 = 0.3 Applied force Length of the beam Height of the beam cross section Thickness of the beam cross section Young s modulus [E-Modul] Poisson s ration [Querkontraktionszahl] σ yield = 235 N/mm 2 Allowable stress: yield stress of steel [Fließgrenze] Table 1: Geometry and material data. Questions With respect to this classic two-dimensional mechanical problem, we can state two questions: 1. Will the beam break? Where would it fail? 2. Assuming that it will not fail, what would be the maximum deflection [Durchbiegung] w? www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 5 / 20

Taking advantage of symmetries Can we take advantage of symmetries? Please, draw a simplified beam model, which takes advantage of potential symmetries (Figure 5). Choose appropriate boundary conditions for the simplified beam such that you would get the same displacement results than for the 3-pt bending all rigid body movements are fixed. Figure 5: Empty space for drawing a simplified beam model taking advantage of symmetries. This is the system that we now want to simulate using the ANSYS program. www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 6 / 20

A. Pre-Processing: Setting up the Model Before building the actual model, you need to create a new static-structural FE analysis by dragging and dropping the Static Structural analysis system onto the empty project schematic (Figure 6). Figure 6: Creating a new static structural analysis system A.1 Defining the Geometry In the newly created analysis system, double click the Geometry cell to start up the DesignModeler module; choose the desired units. Create the solid beam by choosing (from the main menu) Create Primitives Box. Use the Details pane to specify the desired dimensions of the new primitive. Please ensure that the origin of the coordinate system is located on the plane and at the center of the cross section of the beam. The beam s long axis must be oriented along the global x-axis (Figure 7). www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 7 / 20

Figure 7: The beam in DesignModeler A.2 Material Properties Material models define the mechanical behavior of the components of the FE model. We will use a simple linear-elastic and isotropic material model to represent the behavior of our steel beam. In your static structural analysis system in the Workbench project view, double click the Engineering Data cell. This opens up a window titled Outline of Schematic A2: Engineering Data. Structural steel is the default material and is always predefined. Click the row beneath (where it says Click here to add a new material ) and enter any name for your new material. In the Toolbox to the left, expand the Linear Elastic node and drag and drop Isotropic Elasticity onto the Material column of your material (Figure 8). Enter the appropriate values into the Properties window (Young s modulus, Poisson s ratio), before clicking Return to Project. www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 8 / 20

Figure 8: Defining a new linear-elastic material A.3 Material Properties In the project view, double click the Model cell to launch the Mechanical module. Your geometry should be imported automatically. Make sure that the correct material model is assigned: In the Mechanical module s Outline pane (to the left) select the solid body representing the beam (under the Geometry node). Then select the material in the Details pane (Details Material Assignment). A.4 Meshing The next pre-processing step is concerned with discretizing the continuous solid body geometry, also known as meshing. The outline tree view also contains a node called Mesh with a little yellow flash symbol. Right click on Mesh and select Insert Mapped Face Meshing from the context menu (Figure 9). Select all 6 faces of the beam and click Scope Geometry Apply in the details pane of the Mapped Face Meshing node. In the same way, add a Sizing sub-node to the Mesh node. This time, select the whole body and again apply your selection. In the Details pane of the (Body) Sizing node, select Definition Type Element Size and set the element size to 15 mm. In the Outline, right click on Mesh Generate Mesh. The result should resemble Figure 10. www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 9 / 20

Figure 9: Adding a meshing method Figure 10: Meshed beam in ANSYS Mechanical (536 elements) www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 10 / 20

A.5 Applying Loads and Boundary Conditions We now have to apply the loads and boundary conditions in such a way that the FE model represents our ideas from Figure 5. We therefore fix all degrees of freedom of one end. In the Outline right click on the Static Structural (A5) node and select Insert Fixed Support from the context menu. Select an appropriate face of your solid body to be fixed. Next, we need to apply the force to the other end of the beam. Again, right click on the Static Structural (A5) node, but this time Insert Force. Select the correct face and apply a force of the appropriate magnitude and direction. The result should resemble Figure 11. Figure 11: The model after applying loads and boundary conditions www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 11 / 20

B. Solving Because this is a simple linear problem, we do not need to modify the solver options manually (Analysis Settings in the Outline). Instead, simply right click on the Static Structural (A5) node and select Solve. This will bring up a status window, which should disappear again after a few seconds of computing. C. Post-Processing: Evaluating the Solution The primary results of an FEA are nodal displacements. Strains and stresses are computed on demand as a post-processing step based on the determined displacement field. C.1 Specifying Result Items Up until now, ANSYS only offers the solver log under Solution (A6) Solution Information. To visualize the results we are interested in, add the following Items to the Solution (A6) node (Figure 12): - Directional Deformation (vertical direction: y) - Normal Elastic Strain (in the beams axial direction) - Normal Stress (in the beams axial direction) - Equivalent (von Mises) Stress Right click on Solution (A6) and select Evaluate All Results. Figure 12: Analysis outline with added post-processing items www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 12 / 20

C.2 Deformation [Verschiebung] When performing FE analyses, it is always wise to first perform some plausibility checking. Create a contour plot of the deformation (= deflection = displacement) (Figure 13). Figure 13: (Scaled) contour plot of the directional (vertical) displacements. The predicted displacements seem to be totally fine at first glance. On closer look the maximum total displacement is more than 1000 mm, according to the scale to the left! The issue with this plot is that by default ANSYS automatically scales the displayed deformations so that they are easily visible. For very small displacements this behavior is totally fine, as they wouldn t be visible at all otherwise. In our case, however, this setting is deceptive. Changing the scaling factor to 1.0 (Results toolbar) yields a completely different picture, making it crystal clear that something has gone wrong awfully wrong: Figure 14: (Unscaled) contour plot of the directional (vertical) displacements www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 13 / 20

The reason for this huge displacement is that in Table 1, we (deliberately) assumed a much too high force. If we correct the force to be ( ) instead, we get the following (unscaled) deformation plot, which is much more reasonable. Figure 15: (Unscaled) contour plot of the total deformations after applying the correct load C.3 Visualizing Stresses & Strains [Spannungen & Dehnungen] Now that we have corrected our model, we can try to answer the question, whether the beam will be able to resist the given load or if it will fail. For that, create contour plots of the component strain and stress along the x-axis to investigate tensile and compressive stresses (Figure 16, Figure 17). For ductile materials like steel, the von Mises yield criterion can be used to predict, whether the material is likely to deform plastically. We therefore also plot the von Mises (equivalent) stresses (Figure 18). Figure 16: Elastic normal strain along x Figure 17: Elastic normal stress along x www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 14 / 20

Figure 18: Von Mises stress Answering the Questions: 1. Will the beam break? If so, where would it fail? With the corrected force (F = 5,000 N) the beam will not break. The maximal predicted von Mises stress reaches values of, and thus less than the ultimate yield stress of. That means the failure criterion is not fulfilled. The difference between the two values however is small ( reaches 94 % of ). Many technical applications require a safety factor (SF) of 2.0 or higher. In our example, the safety factor is much smaller. The critical region where we would expect the beam to start failing is located at the left end of the half beam, at the location of maximum stresses. For the full length beam the critical region would therefore be located in the middle of the beam where the force was applied. 2. Assuming that it would not fail, what would be the maximum deflection w? We predicted a maximum deflection of w = 11 mm appearing at the free end (right side) of the simplified half model. The full length beam under three point bending will show a maximum deflection of the same amount in the middle. www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 15 / 20

D. Analogous Models in Lower Dimensions It is possible to create equivalent but simplified, lower dimensional 2D and even 1D models. Let s look at how this is done. Create a new Static Structural Workbench project. D.1 2-Dimensional (Plane Stress) In order to create a 2D version of our previous analysis, we must first tell ANSYS to restrict itself to only two spatial dimensions. This is done by accessing the properties in the Geometry section of our model. Open the properties for the Geometry cell (right-click) and change the dimensionality as shown in the following figure: Figure 19: Changing the analysis type to 2D Ensure that your material properties are defined as described in the previous section (doubleclick on Engineering Data). Afterwards, launch DesignModeler (double-click the Geometry cell). We now need to sketch a rectangle. First, create a new Sketch in the XYPlane (Figure 20). Then switch to the Sketching Tab; from the Draw subsection select the Rectangle tool and draw a rectangle (size doesn t matter, Figure 21). Switch to the Dimension subsection and assign height and width dimensions to your rectangle (Figure 22). www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 16 / 20

Figure 20: Creating a new sketch Figure 21: Drawing a rectangle www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 17 / 20

Figure 22: Adding horizontal and vertical dimensions Create a Surface Body from your rectangle sketch by using Concept Surfaces From Sketches from the main menu. Generate the body and in the Surface Body s detail view, change the Thickness parameter appropriately. Figure 23 Thickness Assignment Now, close DesignModeler and open the Mechanical module. It is important to perform our analysis using the Plane Stress kinematic assumption. Ensure this is selected under as 2D Behavior in the Geometry detail view. Complete the model by applying appropriate load and boundary conditions. How does it compare to our 3D model? www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 18 / 20

Figure 24 Plane Stress Assignment D.2 1-Dimensional Model (Beam Theory) It is also possible to describe beam bending problem using a 1-dimensional model. Once again start a new Workbench project. Define material properties just as you did before and start the DesignModeler. Note that this time, we do not need to change the analysis type to 2D; we also won t use the sketching tools (although that would be possible as well). Instead we create a Line Segment directly from two Points. From the main menu, choose Create Point and in the detail view select Manual Input for the Definition option (Figure 25). You can now enter arbitrary coordinates for the point. Clicking the Generate button will create the point. Place the first point at the origin and place another one at (1000, 0, 0). Next, choose Concept Line From Points from the main menu and select both your points (you can select multiple entities by holding down Ctrl) and press Generate once more. This adds a new line body in the Tree Outline; however, the body is missing a cross-section definition. Remedy this by choosing Concept Cross Section Rectangular from the main menu and enter the appropriate values. Assign the newly created cross section to your line body (detail view). www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 19 / 20

Figure 25: Creating a point at arbitrary coordinates Complete your analysis analogous to the previous 3D and 2D FEAs and compare the simulation results. Likely your simulation result will be wrong; the reason is simple, though not obvious: You may have noticed that, once we generated our line body, there is a strange vector pointing out from it. This vector is used to determine the alignment of the cross-section. Open the DesignModeler again, right click on Line Body and choose Select Unaligned Line Edges. Choose Vector in the Alignment Mode section, and enter a vector such that the Y-Axis alignment of your cross-section corresponds with the direction of your vector. That is, if you entered a height H1 of 60mm for your cross section, you must define a vector of (0, 1, 0) in the Alignment Mode. You can verify whether your alignment was correct by entering the Mechanical module and choosing View Cross Section Solids. Your answer should now coincide with our previous simulations. Compare the results of the different models with each other. www.uni-ulm.de/uzwr 20 / 20