Accuracy of Computed Water Surface Profiles

Similar documents
HEC-FFA Flood Frequency Analysis

DoD Common Access Card Information Brief. Smart Card Project Managers Group

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF HALON- REPLACEMENT FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS (PHASE II)

FUDSChem. Brian Jordan With the assistance of Deb Walker. Formerly Used Defense Site Chemistry Database. USACE-Albuquerque District.

Multi-Modal Communication

Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Power in Aircraft T&E Tests. Todd Remund Dr. William Kitto EDWARDS AFB, CA. July 2011

ARINC653 AADL Annex Update

Empirically Based Analysis: The DDoS Case

Dana Sinno MIT Lincoln Laboratory 244 Wood Street Lexington, MA phone:

Service Level Agreements: An Approach to Software Lifecycle Management. CDR Leonard Gaines Naval Supply Systems Command 29 January 2003

Distributed Real-Time Embedded Video Processing

Basing a Modeling Environment on a General Purpose Theorem Prover

4. Lessons Learned in Introducing MBSE: 2009 to 2012

Kathleen Fisher Program Manager, Information Innovation Office

Using Model-Theoretic Invariants for Semantic Integration. Michael Gruninger NIST / Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland

WAITING ON MORE THAN 64 HANDLES

2013 US State of Cybercrime Survey

DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL MICROWAVE RADAR SYSTEM USING ANGULAR CORRELATION FOR THE DETECTION OF BURIED OBJECTS IN SANDY SOILS

High-Assurance Security/Safety on HPEC Systems: an Oxymoron?

Running CyberCIEGE on Linux without Windows

Setting the Standard for Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Pentek Seminar Series. Digital IF Standardization

INTEGRATING LOCAL AND GLOBAL NAVIGATION IN UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

A Distributed Parallel Processing System for Command and Control Imagery

Vision Protection Army Technology Objective (ATO) Overview for GVSET VIP Day. Sensors from Laser Weapons Date: 17 Jul 09 UNCLASSIFIED

Edwards Air Force Base Accelerates Flight Test Data Analysis Using MATLAB and Math Works. John Bourgeois EDWARDS AFB, CA. PRESENTED ON: 10 June 2010

ASSESSMENT OF A BAYESIAN MODEL AND TEST VALIDATION METHOD

U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (IDAS) Briefer: Jason Morse ARMED Team Leader Ground System Survivability, TARDEC

Architecting for Resiliency Army s Common Operating Environment (COE) SERC

A Review of the 2007 Air Force Inaugural Sustainability Report

AFRL-ML-WP-TM

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Use of the Polarized Radiance Distribution Camera System in the RADYO Program

MODELING AND SIMULATION OF LIQUID MOLDING PROCESSES. Pavel Simacek Center for Composite Materials University of Delaware

David W. Hyde US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg, Mississippi ABSTRACT

Web Site update. 21st HCAT Program Review Toronto, September 26, Keith Legg

Using Templates to Support Crisis Action Mission Planning

Washington University

Towards a Formal Pedigree Ontology for Level-One Sensor Fusion

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WEB SITE (EMSWeb)

SINOVIA An open approach for heterogeneous ISR systems inter-operability

Topology Control from Bottom to Top

Defense Hotline Allegations Concerning Contractor-Invoiced Travel for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Contracts W912DY-10-D-0014 and W912DY-10-D-0024

SURVIVABILITY ENHANCED RUN-FLAT

Shallow Ocean Bottom BRDF Prediction, Modeling, and Inversion via Simulation with Surface/Volume Data Derived from X-Ray Tomography

Space and Missile Systems Center

Smart Data Selection (SDS) Brief

Approaches to Improving Transmon Qubits

TARGET IMPACT DETECTION ALGORITHM USING COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD) MODEL GEOMETRY

Corrosion Prevention and Control Database. Bob Barbin 07 February 2011 ASETSDefense 2011

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Uniform Tests of File Converters Using Unit Cubes

CENTER FOR ADVANCED ENERGY SYSTEM Rutgers University. Field Management for Industrial Assessment Centers Appointed By USDOE

Exploring the Query Expansion Methods for Concept Based Representation

Data Warehousing. HCAT Program Review Park City, UT July Keith Legg,

Information, Decision, & Complex Networks AFOSR/RTC Overview

Stereo Vision Inside Tire

NEW FINITE ELEMENT / MULTIBODY SYSTEM ALGORITHM FOR MODELING FLEXIBLE TRACKED VEHICLES

Advanced Numerical Methods for Numerical Weather Prediction

Application of Hydrodynamics and Dynamics Models for Efficient Operation of Modular Mini-AUVs in Shallow and Very-Shallow Waters

LARGE AREA, REAL TIME INSPECTION OF ROCKET MOTORS USING A NOVEL HANDHELD ULTRASOUND CAMERA

The C2 Workstation and Data Replication over Disadvantaged Tactical Communication Links

Concept of Operations Discussion Summary

DoD M&S Project: Standardized Documentation for Verification, Validation, and Accreditation

Army Research Laboratory

Android: Call C Functions with the Native Development Kit (NDK)

Advanced Numerical Methods for Numerical Weather Prediction

SCICEX Data Stewardship: FY2012 Report

A Methodology for End-to-End Evaluation of Arabic Document Image Processing Software

An Update on CORBA Performance for HPEC Algorithms. Bill Beckwith Objective Interface Systems, Inc.

Speaker Verification Using SVM

Wireless Connectivity of Swarms in Presence of Obstacles

Space and Missile Systems Center

Computer Aided Munitions Storage Planning

Dynamic Information Management and Exchange for Command and Control Applications

Parallelization of a Electromagnetic Analysis Tool

Title: An Integrated Design Environment to Evaluate Power/Performance Tradeoffs for Sensor Network Applications 1

MATREX Run Time Interface (RTI) DoD M&S Conference 10 March 2008

NATO-IST-124 Experimentation Instructions

Technological Advances In Emergency Management

US Army Industry Day Conference Boeing SBIR/STTR Program Overview

Guide to Windows 2000 Kerberos Settings

75th Air Base Wing. Effective Data Stewarding Measures in Support of EESOH-MIS

Apparel Research Network Upgrade Special Measurement Electronic Order File Final Technical Report September 27, 2004

UMass at TREC 2006: Enterprise Track

Lessons Learned in Adapting a Software System to a Micro Computer

Creating, Positioning, and Rotating Rectangles Using C++

C2-Simulation Interoperability in NATO

Fall 2014 SEI Research Review Verifying Evolving Software

Office of Global Maritime Situational Awareness

Use of the Polarized Radiance Distribution Camera System in the RADYO Program

DATA COLLECTION AND TESTING TOOL: SAUDAS

75 TH MORSS CD Cover Page. If you would like your presentation included in the 75 th MORSS Final Report CD it must :

SCIENTIFIC VISUALIZATION OF SOIL LIQUEFACTION

Dr. ing. Rune Aasgaard SINTEF Applied Mathematics PO Box 124 Blindern N-0314 Oslo NORWAY

Can Wing Tip Vortices Be Accurately Simulated? Ryan Termath, Science and Teacher Researcher (STAR) Program, CAL POLY SAN LUIS OBISPO

A Multilevel Secure MapReduce Framework for Cross-Domain Information Sharing in the Cloud

ATCCIS Replication Mechanism (ARM)

Introducing I 3 CON. The Information Interpretation and Integration Conference

Transcription:

US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center Accuracy of Computed Water Surface Profiles Appendix D Data Management and Processing Procedures February 1987 Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited. RD-26D

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services and Communications Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE February 1987 Research Document 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Accuracy of Computed Water Surface Profiles Appendix D Data Management and Processing Procedures 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) CEIWR-HEC 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5F. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) US Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) 609 Second Street Davis, CA 95616-4687 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER RD-26D 10. SPONSOR/ MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/ MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT The purpose of the Water Surface Profile Error Analysis Study is to determine guidelines which indicate the effect that geometric accuracy and boundary friction accuracy have on computed water surface profiles. The study procedures and results are documented in RD-26 and RD-26A. This appendix describes only the data management and processing portion of the study. To analyze the accuracy of computer water surface profiles as a function of several variables, the Monte-Carlo simulation technique was applied. This technique required over 40,000 executions of HEC-2. The input data to and the results from HEC-2 had to be systematically and automatically manipulated and processed. A preprocessor program (SETUP) modified simplified HEC-2 input data to do the following: simulate errors in measuring geometry and in determining roughness coefficients, interpolate intermediate cross-sections, optionally determine topographic crosssections, and automatically submit the manipulated input data as a "batch" computer job. A postprocessor (H2POST) reads HEC-2 computed results, forms a unique data base label to identify each computed profile, and stores the computed profile in a data base file (HECDSS data file) using that label. An error computational program (COMPER) accesses the HECDSS data file, calculates errors in computed water surface elevations between a base "error free" profile and other manipulated data set profile and formats the results (as well as pertinent identifiers) for input to a relational data management system file. The relational data management system (INFO) is used to store computed errors and stream characteristics and write reports containing errors and characteristics that meet user specified criteria. The reports are then used as input to regression software (HEC's Multiple Linear Regression Program or the personal computer software package STATGRAPHICS). This appendix describes the details of data processing, the assumptions that were made, and the software that was developed and applied to meet the study needs. 15. SUBJECT TERMS water surface profile accuracy, Monte-Carlo simulation, data management, manipulated input data, post-processing HEC-2 results, data storage system, relation database 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE OF OF ABSTRACT PAGES U U U 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER UU 126 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18

Accuracy of Computed Water Surface Profiles Appendix D Data Management and Processing Procedures February 1987 Prepared for: Federal Highway Administration Prepared by: US Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, CA 95616 (530) 756-1104 (530) 756-8250 FAX www.hec.usace.army.mil RD-26D