IEEE ah. sub 1GHz WLAN for IoT. What lies beneath Wi-Fi HaLow. Eduard Garcia-Villegas, Elena López-Aguilera Dept. of Network Engineering

Similar documents
Alternate PHYs

IEEE ah: A Long Range WLAN at Sub 1 GHz

3.1. Introduction to WLAN IEEE

Day 1: Wi-Fi Technology Overview

Advanced Computer Networks WLAN

IEEE WLAN Standardization

4.3 IEEE Physical Layer IEEE IEEE b IEEE a IEEE g IEEE n IEEE 802.

Announcements : Wireless Networks Lecture 11: * Outline. Power Management. Page 1

CSC344 Wireless and Mobile Computing. Department of Computer Science COMSATS Institute of Information Technology

Wireless Networked Systems

Hemanth Sampath August 27, Next Generation Wi-Fi IEEE Vehicular Technology Society Meeting

Mobile & Wireless Networking. Lecture 7: Wireless LAN

04/11/2011. Wireless LANs. CSE 3213 Fall November Overview

Wi-Fi Perfected. Dual-Band 11AX. By Dr. Sigurd Schelstraete WHITEPAPER. Dual-Band 11AX Quantenna Communications, Inc.

CSC344 Wireless and Mobile Computing. Department of Computer Science COMSATS Institute of Information Technology

Analysis of Energy Efficiency in IEEE ah

Wireless LAN -Architecture

Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs)) and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) Computer Networks: Wireless Networks 1

Overview : Computer Networking. Spectrum Use Comments. Spectrum Allocation in US Link layer challenges and WiFi WiFi

Local Area Networks NETW 901

802.11ax for 5G. Richard van Nee

Wireless Communication and Networking CMPT 371

An energy-efficient MAC protocol for infrastructure WLAN based on modified PCF/ DCF access schemes using a bidirectional data packet exchange

ECE442 Communications Lecture 3. Wireless Local Area Networks

IEEE MAC Sublayer (Based on IEEE )

Wi-Fi Technology, Standards,and Evolution. Dr. Srikanth Subramanian CKO, Nanocell Networks

Wireless and Mobile Networks 7-2

LiRa: a WLAN architecture for Visible Light Communication with a Wi-Fi uplink

Mohammad Hossein Manshaei 1393

Overview of Wi-Fi. Dr. Srikanth Subramanian CKO, Nanocell Networks Wi-Fi A Wireless Success Story

Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) Primer. Computer Networks: Wireless LANs

Data Communications. Data Link Layer Protocols Wireless LANs

Lecture 16: QoS and "

Mobile Communications Chapter 7: Wireless LANs

11ax MU-MIMO; how is it different from 11ac?

Wireless and WiFi. Daniel Zappala. CS 460 Computer Networking Brigham Young University

Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering

Wireless Local Area Networks. Networks: Wireless LANs 1

6.9 Summary. 11/20/2013 Wireless and Mobile Networks (SSL) 6-1. Characteristics of selected wireless link standards a, g point-to-point

standard. Acknowledgement: Slides borrowed from Richard Y. Yale

Wireless Networks. CSE 3461: Introduction to Computer Networking Reading: , Kurose and Ross

Data and Computer Communications. Chapter 13 Wireless LANs

Medium Access Control. MAC protocols: design goals, challenges, contention-based and contention-free protocols

whitepaper ac Wave 2 Technology White Paper

WHITE PAPER n Demystified. Key considerations for n-abling the Wireless Enterprise

Topic 2b Wireless MAC. Chapter 7. Wireless and Mobile Networks. Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach

Hands-On Exercises: IEEE Standard

Introduction to IEEE

CS 332 Computer Networks Wireless Networks

Configuring Advanced Radio Settings on the WAP371

Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) Part I

original standard a transmission at 5 GHz bit rate 54 Mbit/s b support for 5.5 and 11 Mbit/s e QoS

Configure n on the WLC

Wireless LANs. ITS 413 Internet Technologies and Applications

High-Throughput and Enhanced-QoS Technologies in Wireless LAN

IEEE Wireless LANs Part I: Basics

Optimizing TCP Goodput and Delay in Next Generation IEEE (ax) Devices

Scheduling strategies and throughput optimization for the Uplink for IEEE ax and IEEE ac based networks

Wireless Networks

WPAN/WBANs: ZigBee. Dmitri A. Moltchanov kurssit/elt-53306/

802.11n. Taking wireless to the next level. Carlo Terminiello Consulting SE Wireless & Mobility European Technology Marketing

Survey on OFDMA based MAC Protocols for the Next Generation WLAN

IEEE Wireless LANs

Junseok Kim Wireless Networking Lab (WINLAB) Konkuk University, South Korea

Computer Communication III

A Frame Aggregation Scheduler for IEEE n

Wireless# Guide to Wireless Communications. Objectives

CSMC 417. Computer Networks Prof. Ashok K Agrawala Ashok Agrawala. Fall 2018 CMSC417 Set 1 1

CSC 4900 Computer Networks: Wireless Networks

Wireless Communications

Impact of IEEE n Operation on IEEE Operation

Expanding the use of CTS-to-Self mechanism to improving broadcasting on IEEE networks

Multimedia Communication Services Traffic Modeling and Streaming

Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications. IEEE Computer Society

Optional Point Coordination Function (PCF)

MAC in /20/06

Wireless and Mobile Networks

802.11a/n Long Range Wireless Outdoor CB/A P

Multi-Channel MAC for Ad Hoc Networks: Handling Multi-Channel Hidden Terminals Using A Single Transceiver

IEEE WLANs (WiFi) Part II/III System Overview and MAC Layer

Performance Evaluation of WiFiRe using OPNET

Crash Course in Wireless Video

EE 597: Wireless Networks (Spring 12)

Investigation of WLAN

Wireless Sensor Networks

SharkFest 18 Europe. Troubleshooting WLANs (Part 2) Troubleshooting WLANs using Management & Control Frames. Rolf Leutert

Enabling Technologies

Wireless Communication Session 4 Wi-Fi IEEE standard

Multiple Access Links and Protocols

Neutron Series Indoor Managed Access Points

Mobile Communications Chapter 7: Wireless LANs

Wireless# Guide to Wireless Communications. Objectives

Guide to Wireless Communications, Third Edition. Objectives

Wireless Networks. CSE 3461: Introduction to Computer Networking Reading: , Kurose and Ross ( 6th ed.); , Kurose and Ross (7th ed.

OWL630 OUTDOOR ACCESS POINT

Wi-Fi Technology; Where are we and what to expect (?)

Interactions Between the Physical Layer and Upper Layers in Wireless Networks: The devil is in the details

Wireless Protocols. Training materials for wireless trainers

Advanced Computer Networks. WLAN, Cellular Networks

Table of Contents 1 WLAN Service Configuration 1-1

Transcription:

by wilgengebroed IEEE 802.11ah sub 1GHz WLAN for IoT What lies beneath Wi-Fi HaLow Eduard Garcia-Villegas, Elena López-Aguilera Dept. of Network Engineering eduardg@entel.upc.edu elopez@entel.upc.edu

Contents IEEE 802.11ah: sub 1GHz WLAN for IoT o Purpose, scope and use cases o PHY o MAC o Power saving o Other remarkable features by wilgengebroed 2

Purpose, scope and use cases IEEE 802.11ah sub 1GHz WLAN for IoT What lies beneath Wi-Fi HaLow

IEEE 802.11ah: purpose Defines operation of license-exempt (ISM) IEEE 802.11 wireless networks in frequency bands below 1 GHz o excluding the TV White Space bands (802.11af). IEEE 802.11 WLAN user experience for fixed, outdoor, point to multi point applications by Atmel Corp. 4

IEEE 802.11ah: scope Defines an OFDM PHY operating in the license-exempt bands below 1 GHz o and enhancements to the IEEE 802.11 MAC to support this PHY, and to provide mechanisms that enable coexistence with other systems in the bands (e.g. IEEE 802.15.4 P802.15.4g) The PHY is meant to optimize the rate vs. range performance of the specific channelization in a given band. o transmission range up to 1 km o data rates > 100 kbit/s The MAC is designed to support thousands of connected devices 5

IEEE 802.11ah: use cases Use Case 1 : Sensors and meters o Smart Grid - meter to pole o Environmental monitoring o Industrial process sensors o Healthcare o Home/Building automation o Smart city Use Case 2 : Backhaul sensor and meter data o Backhaul aggregation of sensor networks o Long point-to-point wireless links Use Case 3 : Extended range Wi-Fi o o Outdoor extended range hotspot Outdoor Wi-Fi for cellular traffic offloading 6

The PHY IEEE 802.11ah sub 1GHz WLAN for IoT What lies beneath Wi-Fi HaLow

IEEE 802.11ah: PHY (1) Advantages of transmitting in sub 1 GHz: o Spectrum characteristics good propagation and penetration large coverage area and one-hop reach license-exempt, light licensing o Reliability: less congested frequency band high sensitivity and link margin available diversity (frequency, time, space) o Battery operation long battery life short data transmissions 8

IEEE 802.11ah: PHY (2) Channelization: o Each regulatory domain defines a different band and different tx power limits 750 MHz 1 GHz (755-787 MHz) (863-868 MHz) (916.5-927.5 MHz) (917.5-923.5 MHz) (866-869 MHz) (920-925) China Europe Japan Korea Singapore o Configurable bandwidth (channel bonding) of: 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16MHz 902MHz (902-928 MHz) USA 928MHz Example of bandwidth options in the US 1MHz 2MHz 4MHz 8MHz 16MHz 9

IEEE 802.11ah: PHY (3) Inherited from IEEE 802.11ac (adapted to S1G): o OFDM 10 times down-clocking.11ac symbol duration x 10 40µs Same number of OFDM subcarriers: bandwidth /10 20MHz 2MHz (52/64 data subcarriers) o MIMO + MU-MIMO Up to 4 spatial streams (NSS > 2 are optional) o PHY rates ranging from 150kbps to 347Mbps Min: MCS10 (BPSK 1/2 with repetition) x 1 stream x 1MHz x Long Guard Interval (GI) MAX: MCS9 (256-QAM 5/6) x 4 streams x 16MHz x Short GI 10

Range IEEE 802.11ah: PHY (4) Expected throughput vs. coverage Mandatory for APs Mandatory for STAs (Globally interoperable) 1MHz 2MHz 0.15 4.40Mbps x NSS 0.65 8.67Mbps x NSS 4MHz 1.35 20.00Mbps x NSS Rate 8MHz 2.92 43.33Mbps x NSS 16MHz 5.85-86.67Mbps x NSS NSS = number of spatial streams 11

IEEE 802.11ah: PHY (5) Expected throughput vs. coverage (min and max) Additional step thanks to MCS10 (only available with 1MHz and NSS 1) NSS = number of spatial streams 12

The MAC IEEE 802.11ah sub 1GHz WLAN for IoT What lies beneath Wi-Fi HaLow

IEEE 802.11ah: MAC (1) Need to reduce overhead: low data rates + short frames (typical in some use cases) o Short MAC headers: Removed fields (Duration, QoS control, HT control, optionally Sequence control) Option to use only two addresses (instead of three) Option to use 2B AID instead of 6B MAC address Example: send frame with 100 Bytes of data Legacy: 100B of data + 36B of header + FCS 26% overhead! 11ah short MAC header: 100B of data + 14B of header + FCS 12% overhead AID = Association ID (unique value assigned to a STA during association) 14

IEEE 802.11ah: MAC (2) Need to reduce overhead: low data rates + short frames (typical in some use cases) o NULL Data Packets (NDP) Concentrate relevant information of control frames in the PHY header (avoid MAC header + payload) Example: 11ah transmission of 100B frame at lowest rate (1MHz x NSS 1 x MCS10) takes ~8ms o Short Beacons» Legacy ACK: ~1.5ms (20% of the data frame!)» NDP ACK: ~0.5ms (6% of the data frame) Beacons are sent frequently at the lowest rate short (more frequent) and full beacons (less frequent) 15

IEEE 802.11ah: MAC (3) Need to reduce overhead: low data rates + short frames (typical in some use cases) o Implicit acknowledgement (no ACK needed) Bidirectional TXOP (BDT): extension of 802.11n s Reverse Direction protocol (RD) With RD: exchange of uplink and downlink frames during a single TXOP With BDT: reception of next data frame implies that previous data was successfully received (no ACK needed). Reduces channel access attempts, number of frames exchanged Increases channel efficiency, battery lifetime 16

IEEE 802.11ah: MAC (4) Need to reduce overhead: low data rates + short frames (typical in some use cases) o Implicit acknowledgement (no ACK needed) STA A (legacy) DATA ACK DATA ACK STA B (legacy) ACK DATA ACK DATA SIFS DIFS + Backoff STA A (BDT Init.) DATA More Data = 1 Long Resp. DATA More Data = 0 Long Resp. ACK STA B (BDT Resp.) DATA More Data = 1 Long Resp. DATA More Data = 0 Normal Resp. SIFS 17

IEEE 802.11ah: MAC (5) Need to support thousands of associated devices (increases coverage increases reachable STAs) o Legacy 802.11 limited to 2007 associated STAs 11ah increases to >8000 Hierarchical Association ID (AID) assignment (uses 13bits): page/block/sub-block/sta Allows grouping STAs according to different criteria» Device type, power constraints, application, location, etc. Increased TIM size (one bit per each associated STA) 1kB each Beacon frame!?! No, it can be compressed 18

IEEE 802.11ah: MAC (6) Need to support thousands of associated devices o Thousands of STAs huge collision probability! o Restricted Access Window (RAW): regular RAW Divide STAs into groups (AID) Split channel access into time slots Assign slots to groups (AP indicates RAW allocation and slot assignments in its Beacons) STAs are only allowed to transmit during its group s slot Cross Slot Boundary option enables STAs to cross its assigned RAW slot to complete the ongoing exchange. STAs can sleep during other groups slots Different backoff rules apply during RAW (due to different contention conditions) 19

Throughut (Mbps) IEEE 802.11ah: MAC (7) Need to support thousands of associated devices o Thousands of STAs huge collision probability! o Restricted Access Window (RAW): regular RAW Example: 2MHz MCS 5 NSS 1 Payload 1000B Saturation 3,0 2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 256 STAs RAW 512 STAs RAW 1024 STAs RAW 256 STAs DCF 512 STAs DCF 1024 STAs DCF 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 Number of groups of equal size 20

Beacon Beacon IEEE 802.11ah: MAC (8) Need to support thousands of associated devices o Thousands of STAs huge collision probability! o Restricted Access Window (RAW): triggering frame RAW and resource allocation (an example) RAW 1 reserved for triggering frames (e.g. PS-Poll for STAs with pending UL or DL frames) AP s scheduling algorithm distributes resources among STAs AP starts RAW 2 with Resource Allocation frame (contains scheduling information) Beacon Interval Slot duration = T s1 Slot duration = T s2!= T s1 P A P A R D A D A RAW1 RAW2 Normal contention * P: PS-Poll/Trigger frame, D: DATA, A: ACK, R: Resource Allocation 21

Power saving IEEE 802.11ah sub 1GHz WLAN for IoT What lies beneath Wi-Fi HaLow

IEEE 802.11ah: power saving (1) Need to reduce power consumption (battery powered devices) o PS mode allows STAs to remain inactive during max idle period after which, the STA is disassociated. Legacy max idle period: 16 bits (units of 1024ms) 1.024s (2 16 1) > 18h Some use cases require days/weeks of inactivity waste of energy sending keep-alive messages. IEEE 802.11ah: two first bits used as scaling factor (1, 10, 10 3 or 10 4 ) 10 4 (2 14-1) > 5 years sleeping! 23

IEEE 802.11ah: power saving (2) Need to reduce power consumption (battery powered devices) o Beacons carry TIM bitmap (0 or 1 for each associated STA depending on whether that STAs has buffered frames) Beacons are too big!! TIM segmentation Some Beacons carry bitmap at page/block level» Rest of the Beacons carry a partial bitmap at STA level A STA calculates the moment when the Beacon with its corresponding TIM is going to be sent» Sleep until then! 24

IEEE 802.11ah: power saving (3) Need to reduce power consumption (battery powered devices) o Beacons carry TIM bitmap even receiving and decoding Beacons consumes energy!! Target Wake Time (TWT): intended for STAs rarely transmitting/receiving data (i.e. TWT STAs) TWT STA and AP negotiate when, for how long and how frequently the TWT STA will be awake. AP STA frame exchanges occur only during those TWT service periods. Recall that Beacons are used to distribute AP s timer reference for synchronization purposes Missing beacons other synchronization mechanisms are needed for TWT STAs 25

Other remarkable features IEEE 802.11ah sub 1GHz WLAN for IoT What lies beneath Wi-Fi HaLow

IEEE 802.11ah: other features (1) Multihop relay operation o Extend (root) AP coverage o STAs will require lower tx power o STAs may use faster MCS (less tx time) from IEEE P802.11ah /D5.0 27

IEEE 802.11ah: other features (2) Fast association and authentication o When AP (re)boots thousands of STAs simultaneously requesting association/authentication collapse channel access!! Centralized approach STAs choose a number [0, 1023] at random AP sets an Authentication Control Threshold (announced in Beacons) STAs with random number < threshold are allowed to attempt authentication (otherwise, wait for next Beacon) Distributed approach STAs wait a random time (e.g. several Beacon intervals) before attempting authentication Each unsuccessful attempt increases window 28

IEEE 802.11ah: other features (3) Subchannel selective transmission (SST) o STAs with limited capabilities (e.g. sensor nodes) may support only 1 and 2MHz (mandatory) APs are likely to support wider bandwidth o SST APs allow the use of subchannels within a wider bandwidth AP announces in Beacons which subchannels are temporarily available for SST Beacons are duplicated on a set of different subchannels STAs choose the best subchannel (e.g. less affected by fading) 29

IEEE 802.11ah: summary LONG RANGE SCALABILITY EFFICIENCY Lower frequency band Longer OFDM symbols Robust modulation and coding schemes Support for >8000 nodes Grouping RAW access Reduced frame formats Efficient frame exchanges Enhanced power saving mechanisms 30

Special Thanks to: M.Shahwaiz Afaqui Víctor H. Baños IEEE 802.11ah sub 1GHz WLAN for IoT What lies beneath Wi-Fi HaLow