Simulation of liquid cube fracture with SPH

Similar documents
Modelling of Impact on a Fuel Tank Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Acknowledgements. Prof. Dan Negrut Prof. Darryl Thelen Prof. Michael Zinn. SBEL Colleagues: Hammad Mazar, Toby Heyn, Manoj Kumar

Example 13 - Shock Tube

SPH: Why and what for?

Lagrangian methods and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Computation in Astrophysics Seminar (Spring 2006) L. J. Dursi

Technical Report TR

SPH METHOD IN APPLIED MECHANICS

Module 4: Fluid Dynamics Lecture 9: Lagrangian and Eulerian approaches; Euler's acceleration formula. Fluid Dynamics: description of fluid-motion

Thermal Coupling Method Between SPH Particles and Solid Elements in LS-DYNA

Simulation of Automotive Fuel Tank Sloshing using Radioss

Characteristic Aspects of SPH Solutions

A stable moving-particle semi-implicit method for free surface flows

PARALLEL SIMULATION OF A FLUID FLOW BY MEANS OF THE SPH METHOD: OPENMP VS. MPI COMPARISON. Pawe l Wróblewski, Krzysztof Boryczko

GPU Simulations of Violent Flows with Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Method

Particle-Based Fluid Simulation. CSE169: Computer Animation Steve Rotenberg UCSD, Spring 2016

Solving a Two Dimensional Unsteady-State. Flow Problem by Meshless Method

PySPH: A Python Framework for Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

CGT 581 G Fluids. Overview. Some terms. Some terms

Thermal Coupling Method Between SPH Particles and Solid Elements in LS-DYNA

IMPROVED WALL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS WITH IMPLICITLY DEFINED WALLS FOR PARTICLE BASED FLUID SIMULATION

Interaction of Fluid Simulation Based on PhysX Physics Engine. Huibai Wang, Jianfei Wan, Fengquan Zhang

Realtime Water Simulation on GPU. Nuttapong Chentanez NVIDIA Research

1.6 Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH)

Cloud Cavitating Flow around an Axisymmetric Projectile in the shallow water

Modeling Fluid-Structure Interaction in Cavitation Erosion using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Transfer and pouring processes of casting by smoothed particle. hydrodynamic method

MODELLING WATER ENTRY OF A WEDGE BY MULTIPHASE SPH METHOD. Kai GONG, Benlong WANG and Hua LIU 1

Lecture 1.1 Introduction to Fluid Dynamics

Interpolation error in DNS simulations of turbulence: consequences for particle tracking

Technology Assignment: Limits at Infinity

ALE Adaptive Mesh Refinement in LS-DYNA

SPH: Towards the simulation of wave-body interactions in extreme seas

True 3D CAE visualization of filling imbalance in geometry-balanced runners

CS-184: Computer Graphics Lecture #21: Fluid Simulation II

Interactive Fluid Simulation using Augmented Reality Interface

Finite Element Modeling and Multiphysics Simulation of Air Coupled Ultrasonic with Time Domain Analysis

Navier-Stokes & Flow Simulation

3D simulations of concrete penetration using SPH formulation and the RHT material model

Simulation of Liquid-Gas-Solid Flows with the Lattice Boltzmann Method

FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF THICK PLATE PENETRATIONS IN SMALL CAL MUNITIONS

Simulation of Fuel Sloshing Comparative Study

Overview of Traditional Surface Tracking Methods

Support for Multi physics in Chrono

Chapter 1 - Basic Equations

3D Simulation of Dam-break effect on a Solid Wall using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic

Three-dimensional fracture and fragmentation of artificial kidney stones

Shape of Things to Come: Next-Gen Physics Deep Dive

Chapter 11 Application of High Speed Imaging in Particle Dynamics Study with Explosives

Spatio-temporal Feature Exploration in Combined Particle/Volume Reference Frames

Design optimization method for Francis turbine

P052 3D Modeling of Acoustic Green's Function in Layered Media with Diffracting Edges

UCDs for simulations

Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

14 Dec 94. Hydrocode Micro-Model Concept for Multi-Component Flow in Sediments Hans U. Mair

Solidification using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Parallel Summation of Inter-Particle Forces in SPH

Smoke Simulation using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Shruti Jain MSc Computer Animation and Visual Eects Bournemouth University

LATTICE-BOLTZMANN METHOD FOR THE SIMULATION OF LAMINAR MIXERS

Realistic Animation of Fluids

Stability Analysis of Particle Methods with Corrected Derivatives

Solving Partial Differential Equations on Overlapping Grids

"The real world is nonlinear"... 7 main Advantages using Abaqus

Navier-Stokes & Flow Simulation

A MULTI-DOMAIN ALE ALGORITHM FOR SIMULATING FLOWS INSIDE FREE-PISTON DRIVEN HYPERSONIC TEST FACILITIES

FEMLAB Exercise 1 for ChE366

9. Three Dimensional Object Representations

A numerical computation with Topological Dipole Field Theory

Modeling the Acoustic Scattering from Axially Symmetric Fluid, Elastic, and Poroelastic Objects due to Nonsymmetric Forcing Using COMSOL Multiphysics

Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 20, 1998 WIT Press, ISSN X

CTH: A Software Family for Multi-Dimensional Shock Physics Analysis E. S. Hertel, Jr., R. L. Bell, M. G. Elrick, A. V. Farnsworth, G. I. Kerley, J.

Lattice Boltzmann with CUDA

Lagrangian and Eulerian Representations of Fluid Flow: Kinematics and the Equations of Motion

Technical Report Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics in Acoustic Simulations. Philipp Hahn, Dan Negrut

Parallelization study of a VOF/Navier-Stokes model for 3D unstructured staggered meshes

Simulation of Flow Development in a Pipe

Interactive Fluid Simulation Using Augmented Reality Interface

MESHLESS SOLUTION OF INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW OVER BACKWARD-FACING STEP

Bubble Dynamics using Free Surfaces in a VOF framework

Development of Compressible-Incompressible Link to Efficiently Model Bubble Dynamics near Floating Body Chao-Tsung Hsiao 1, Georges L.

Animation of Fluids. Animating Fluid is Hard

Particle-based simulations in Astrophysics

C. A. D. Fraga Filho 1,2, D. F. Pezzin 1 & J. T. A. Chacaltana 1. Abstract

Computational Fluid Dynamic Hydraulic Characterization: G3 Cube vs. Dolos Armour Unit. IS le Roux, WJS van der Merwe & CL de Wet

Modeling Evaporating Liquid Spray

Validation of an Automatic Mesh Generation Technique in Engine Simulations

Non-Newtonian Transitional Flow in an Eccentric Annulus

Table of contents for: Waves and Mean Flows by Oliver Bühler Cambridge University Press 2009 Monographs on Mechanics. Contents.

2.11 Particle Systems

Particle-based Fluid Simulation

NOISE PROPAGATION FROM VIBRATING STRUCTURES

Technical Sciences Academy of Romania Received 3 February 2016 Accepted 2 September 2016 Received in revised from 1 August 2016

Self-formation, Development and Reproduction of the Artificial System

Numerical Simulation of Coastal Wave Processes with the Use of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Method

Robust Simulation of Sparsely Sampled Thin Features in SPH-Based Free Surface Flows

CFD MODELING FOR PNEUMATIC CONVEYING

Revision of the SolidWorks Variable Pressure Simulation Tutorial J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mechanical Engineering. Introduction

Structural characterization of nano and micro-fractals using lacunarity analysis and small-angle scattering

SIMULATION OF FLOW AROUND KCS-HULL

CHAPTER 3. Elementary Fluid Dynamics

ALE and Fluid-Structure Interaction in LS-DYNA March 2004

Transcription:

Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Simulation of liquid cube fracture with SPH To cite this article: M N Davydov 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 754 062001 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 46.3.201.225 on 24/11/2017 at 01:14

Simulation of liquid cube fracture with SPH M N Davydov Lavrentyev Institute of Hydrodynamics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia E-mail: davydov@hydro.nsc.ru Abstract. The dynamics of fracture of liquid cube with high-pressure cavity is studied numerically in a three-dimensional formulation using the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics method(sph). It is shown that the propogation of shock wave from growing cavity and reflection from the free side is due to relaation of tensile stresses in the liquid volume and formation of quasistationary mass-velocity field which provides fracture of the fluid. 1. Introduction The problem of liquid breakdown in intense rarefaction waves is directly related to the notion of strength, which does not have a precise and clear definition in the mechanics of liquids under dynamic loading, unlike in solid mechanics [1]. A typical eamples of this process is the ejection fraction of magmatic melt from the channel of the volcano during the eposive eruption [2] or the formation of sultans out on the free surface at shallow underwater eplosions. Numerical methods based on finite differences are unable to solve such problems, therefore it is required to use methods that can simulate of flows in the comple variable geometry region. In this paper, a model problem of an underwater eplosion in the cubeof pure(one-phase) liquid using the SPH method [3] is considered. 2. SPH method The smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method [4, 3] is an effective meshless Lagrangian numerical method used to calculate flow structures with an unknown free boundary, in particular, high-velocity processes in media with the modeled object topology appreciably changed under intense dynamic loading. In this method N spherical particles are placed into the modeled physical space. Each particle has a mass m i, internal energy e i, and velocity v i. The particles move in accordance with the laws of mechanics. If these physical quantities are known at a certain time at all points j = 1,...,N to which N particles are placed, i.e., if a certain function f(r j ) is specified, then its value at an arbitrary point of the modeled space can be obtained by means of discretiation of the interpolation formula f(r) = f(r )W(r r,h)dr, where h is the smoothing radius and W(r r,h) is the smoothing function (kernel) for which Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Published under licence by Ltd 1

the following conditions should be satisfied: W(r,h)dr = 1, lim W(r,h) = δ(r) h 0 In this work we use the known definition of the kernel based on third-order piecewise-spline functions [4]. As the smoothing function W is not equal to ero only in a certain (small) neighborhood of the point with the coordinate r, the result of interpolation is affected only by those nodes that are located in the neighborhood of smoothing of this point. Therefore, it is possible to avoid summation over all known values of the function and to perform it only over the neighboring nodes (particles) located at distances smaller than 2h. It should be noted that the procedure of sampling of all particles in space has a quadratic order of compleity, and it is net to impossible to implement it in practice. As the particles arbitrarily move in space and can freely mi, the task of effective (time-efficient) searching for the neighboring particles is etremely important for the SPH method. One possible approach to solving this problem is to divide the space into cells and to perform summation only over particles in the neighboring cells. It should be noted that the mesh constructed for this purpose is an auiliary tool used for accelerating the process of searching for the neighboring particles rather than for approimation; therefore, it does not affect the resultant solution, and the SPH method is still a meshless one. In the SPH method the gas dynamic equations have the form ρ i N t = ρ i j=1 v N ( i t = pi m j ρ 2 j=1 i m j ρ j (v j v i ) W(r i r j,h) + p ) j ρ 2 W(r i r j,h). j We use the known definition of the liquid state equation: p = p 0 + ρ 0c 2 0 γ [( ρ ρ0 ) γ 1], whereγ = 7.15, ρ 0 andp 0 is areferencedensity and pressure, c 0 is aspeedof sound(approimate 1500 m/s). 3. Results of numerical simulations Initially, the liquid is a cube with sides of 1 cm, located on the XY plane, OZ ais passes through the center of the cube. Inside the liquid, at a distance of 2.5 mm from the top side of the cube, there is a spherical cavity radius of 1 mm, the center of which is located on the ais OZ. The pressure in the cavity is 10000 atm, the rest of the liquid is at atmospheric pressure p 0. Figure 1 3 shows the distribution of pressure and particle velocities in the central section of the cube (the plane y = 0). The shock wave propagates from the high-pressure cavity. The amplitude of shock wave decreases as it propagates. Figure 1 shows the begin of reflection the shock wave from the top of the cube at time 1 µs. Near to the cavity layer of liquid starts to move. Only particles in which v 0 is painted on the figure. It is clearly seen that the velocity distribution is symmetric with respect to the cavity. Figure 2 shows that the wave reaches the faces of the cubeand is reflected from its borders, at firstit occurs on theside face, then on the bottom. By this time, theupperboundis significantly 2

P, atm - - 1000 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 50 00 - - Figure 1. Distribution of pressure and particle velocities in the central section of the cube (1 µs) P, atm 30 25 20 15 10 50 - - 00 - - Figure 2. Distribution of pressure and particle velocities in the central section of the cube (5 µs) deformed, curling up. Almost all particles are in motion, it is clear that the particles at the boundary of the cavity push other particles. After a few tens of microseconds pressure field substantially relaes, only individual particles have the pressure greater then p 0, and scored the particle velocity continues to scatter out of inertia, thereby simulating the fraction of the liquid (Fig. 3). One clearly sees a deformation of the side and bottom faces of the cube. The particle sie distribution shows that inside a cube formed low-density ones, which lead to the growth medium fracture into fragments. Figure 4 shows the development of process in 3D view, it is an isosurface of the density field for the half of the cube, the value of the density is ρ = 0.45 g/cm 3. It means that the isosurface bounds the area where the density of the liquid is greater than or equal to the ρ. Clearly that by the time 500 µs (Fig. 4a) the cavity has increased in sie by several times, stretched up and deformed the top face of the cube, the hole is formed. Bottom and side faces of the cube is 3

P, atm 10 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 00 - - - 00 - - - Figure 3. Distribution of pressure and particle velocities in the central section of the cube (25 µs) Figure 4. Isosurface ρ = 0.45 g/cm 3 for the half cube in times 500 and 10000 µs slightly deformed. It should be noted that the same liquid particles spreads to distances greater than the smoothing radius, which means the loss of bonding in the SPH formulation and is interpreted as the medium fracture [5]. In the future, the vertical jet of liquid is formed on the top face of the cube, which gradually destroyed. Flying off individual spalls are formed on the side and bottom faces, where the destruction is not so strongly epressed (Fig. 4b). In the future and in these areas the destruction of the liquid will occur and the emergence of a breakaway from the main volume of layers. It is evident that the environment, flying away, loses consistency and disintegrates into fragments. Further development of the process leads to the dissipation of the particles and the final destruction of the liquid. 4

4. Conclusion The results of the numerical analysis of the processes of formation and dynamics of the structure of spalling ones after reflection of the shock wave generated by an underwater eplosion from the free surface are presented. It shows that the SPH method can be used to study the dynamics of the liquid cube fracture. A numerical simulation shows that the shock wave reflection from the free surface leads to rela of a high pressure and subsequent decomposition into individual fragments and clusters of almost free particles. Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant No. 15-05- 03336). References [1] Davydov M N and Kedrinskii V K 2008 J. Appl. Mech. and Tech. Phys. 49 209 216 [2] Davydov M N 2012 J. Appl. Mech. and Tech. Phys. 53 324 332 [3] Monaghan J J 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics 68 1703 [4] Monaghan J J 1992 Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 30 543 574 (Preprint http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551) [5] Davydov M N and Kedrinskii V K 2013 J. Appl. Mech. and Tech. Phys. 54 5