Data Replication in the CNR Environment:

Similar documents
Topology Control from Bottom to Top

Balancing Transport and Physical Layers in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks: Jointly Optimal Congestion Control and Power Control

The C2 Workstation and Data Replication over Disadvantaged Tactical Communication Links

ATCCIS Replication Mechanism (ARM)

An Update on CORBA Performance for HPEC Algorithms. Bill Beckwith Objective Interface Systems, Inc.

DoD Common Access Card Information Brief. Smart Card Project Managers Group

ARINC653 AADL Annex Update

Multi-Modal Communication

Washington University

Distributed Real-Time Embedded Video Processing

Dana Sinno MIT Lincoln Laboratory 244 Wood Street Lexington, MA phone:

Service Level Agreements: An Approach to Software Lifecycle Management. CDR Leonard Gaines Naval Supply Systems Command 29 January 2003

Setting the Standard for Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Pentek Seminar Series. Digital IF Standardization

4. Lessons Learned in Introducing MBSE: 2009 to 2012

User Services of TASMUS in the Digital Battlefield

Running CyberCIEGE on Linux without Windows

High-Assurance Security/Safety on HPEC Systems: an Oxymoron?

Space and Missile Systems Center

Towards a Formal Pedigree Ontology for Level-One Sensor Fusion

Empirically Based Analysis: The DDoS Case

FUDSChem. Brian Jordan With the assistance of Deb Walker. Formerly Used Defense Site Chemistry Database. USACE-Albuquerque District.

Simulation of Routing Protocol with CoS/QoS Enhancements in Heterogeneous Communication Network

An Efficient Architecture for Ultra Long FFTs in FPGAs and ASICs

Using Model-Theoretic Invariants for Semantic Integration. Michael Gruninger NIST / Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland

SINOVIA An open approach for heterogeneous ISR systems inter-operability

Concept of Operations Discussion Summary

Technological Advances In Emergency Management

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Space and Missile Systems Center

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Nationwide Automatic Identification System (NAIS) Overview. CG 939 Mr. E. G. Lockhart TEXAS II Conference 3 Sep 2008

Vision Protection Army Technology Objective (ATO) Overview for GVSET VIP Day. Sensors from Laser Weapons Date: 17 Jul 09 UNCLASSIFIED

MODELING AND SIMULATION OF LIQUID MOLDING PROCESSES. Pavel Simacek Center for Composite Materials University of Delaware

SETTING UP AN NTP SERVER AT THE ROYAL OBSERVATORY OF BELGIUM

Kathleen Fisher Program Manager, Information Innovation Office

75 TH MORSS CD Cover Page. If you would like your presentation included in the 75 th MORSS Final Report CD it must :

2013 US State of Cybercrime Survey

Data Reorganization Interface

DoD M&S Project: Standardized Documentation for Verification, Validation, and Accreditation

A Review of the 2007 Air Force Inaugural Sustainability Report

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF HALON- REPLACEMENT FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS (PHASE II)

CASE STUDY: Using Field Programmable Gate Arrays in a Beowulf Cluster

Differentiating Congestion vs. Random Loss: A Method for Improving TCP Performance over Wireless Links

PEO C4I Remarks for NPS Acquisition Research Symposium

Wireless Connectivity of Swarms in Presence of Obstacles

Information, Decision, & Complex Networks AFOSR/RTC Overview

75th Air Base Wing. Effective Data Stewarding Measures in Support of EESOH-MIS

DISN Forecast to Industry. Ms. Cindy E. Moran Director for Network Services 8 August 2008

Architecting for Resiliency Army s Common Operating Environment (COE) SERC

Accuracy of Computed Water Surface Profiles

LARGE AREA, REAL TIME INSPECTION OF ROCKET MOTORS USING A NOVEL HANDHELD ULTRASOUND CAMERA

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WEB SITE (EMSWeb)

U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (IDAS) Briefer: Jason Morse ARMED Team Leader Ground System Survivability, TARDEC

CENTER FOR ADVANCED ENERGY SYSTEM Rutgers University. Field Management for Industrial Assessment Centers Appointed By USDOE

ASPECTS OF USE OF CFD FOR UAV CONFIGURATION DESIGN

Requirements for Scalable Application Specific Processing in Commercial HPEC

Web Site update. 21st HCAT Program Review Toronto, September 26, Keith Legg

Sparse Linear Solver for Power System Analyis using FPGA

Title: An Integrated Design Environment to Evaluate Power/Performance Tradeoffs for Sensor Network Applications 1

A Distributed Parallel Processing System for Command and Control Imagery

SURVIVABILITY ENHANCED RUN-FLAT

Data Warehousing. HCAT Program Review Park City, UT July Keith Legg,

Dr. Stuart Dickinson Dr. Donald H. Steinbrecher Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport, RI May 10, 2011

ASSESSMENT OF A BAYESIAN MODEL AND TEST VALIDATION METHOD

Use of the Polarized Radiance Distribution Camera System in the RADYO Program

INTEGRATING LOCAL AND GLOBAL NAVIGATION IN UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES

Edwards Air Force Base Accelerates Flight Test Data Analysis Using MATLAB and Math Works. John Bourgeois EDWARDS AFB, CA. PRESENTED ON: 10 June 2010

NATO-IST-124 Experimentation Instructions

Cyber Threat Prioritization

AFRL-ML-WP-TM

VICTORY VALIDATION AN INTRODUCTION AND TECHNICAL OVERVIEW

Dr. ing. Rune Aasgaard SINTEF Applied Mathematics PO Box 124 Blindern N-0314 Oslo NORWAY

DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL MICROWAVE RADAR SYSTEM USING ANGULAR CORRELATION FOR THE DETECTION OF BURIED OBJECTS IN SANDY SOILS

Coalition Interoperability Ontology:

New Dimensions in Microarchitecture Harnessing 3D Integration Technologies

Development and Test of a Millimetre-Wave ISAR Images ATR System

Secure FAST: Security Enhancement in the NATO Time Sensitive Targeting Tool

Rockwell Science Center (RSC) Technologies for WDM Components

Smart Data Selection (SDS) Brief

Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Power in Aircraft T&E Tests. Todd Remund Dr. William Kitto EDWARDS AFB, CA. July 2011

Computer Aided Munitions Storage Planning

Ross Lazarus MB,BS MPH

High-Performance Linear Algebra Processor using FPGA

THE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM

Introducing I 3 CON. The Information Interpretation and Integration Conference

Headquarters U.S. Air Force. EMS Play-by-Play: Using Air Force Playbooks to Standardize EMS

COTS Multicore Processors in Avionics Systems: Challenges and Solutions

Corrosion Prevention and Control Database. Bob Barbin 07 February 2011 ASETSDefense 2011

Current Threat Environment

AIS Indexer User Guide

NEW FINITE ELEMENT / MULTIBODY SYSTEM ALGORITHM FOR MODELING FLEXIBLE TRACKED VEHICLES

Air Virtual At Sea (VAST) Platform Stimulation Analysis

Using Templates to Support Crisis Action Mission Planning

Office of Global Maritime Situational Awareness

Shallow Ocean Bottom BRDF Prediction, Modeling, and Inversion via Simulation with Surface/Volume Data Derived from X-Ray Tomography

Design Concepts for Resilient Database Replication In Tenuous Communication Environments

ENHANCED FRAGMENTATION MODELING

Parallel Matlab: RTExpress on 64-bit SGI Altix with SCSL and MPT

Spacecraft Communications Payload (SCP) for Swampworks

C2-Simulation Interoperability in NATO

Transcription:

Data Replication in the CNR Environment: The Harsh Reality of a Harsh Communications Environment presented by Tim Johnson, IP Unwired 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 01 DEC 2007 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Data Replication in the CNR Environment: The Harsh Reality of a Harsh Communications Environment 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) IP Unwired 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM002082., The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 27 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Outline The Requirement C4ISR(C2IS). The CNR Environment. TCP/IP Performance. Data Replication & Replication Transport Mechanisms. RTL Design Considerations. Low Bandwidth Test Bed DRDC Valcartier. Conclusion. 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 2

Application Presentation Session Transport Network Data Link Physical Terminology The Application The Network Database Replication Mech. RTL TCP/UDP IP CNR: VHF/UHF 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 3

To Strategic Network Wide Area Subsystem (WAS) XX X X X X X Mobile Subsystem (MS) XXX XX X X SCRA X X X PRN XX X PRN X X PRN/CNR CNR WS WS To WAS WS Wireless Access LAN WS ATM Switch LAS Backbone WS WS Access LAN RAP VIDEO PABX Local Area Subsystem (LAS) X X X CNR CNR X Radio Access Point (RAP) Headquarters (HQ) Unit Satellite Transceiver LOS Radio/Land Link Air/Ground/Air Comms Satellite Comms PRN Packet Radio Net SCRA Single Channel Radio Access CNR Combat Net Radio WS Work Station PABX Telephone Exchange

The Requirement Migration of C2ISs to FEBAwhere CNR is primary comms. DBMSs with Replication to partially replace/supplement MMHS. International programs like ATCCIS/MIP are moving in this direction. 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 5

CNR VHF: e.g. CNR(P), SINGARS CNR UHF: e.g. NTDR CNR HB UHF: e.g. 802.11 Medium Range Beyond Wireless: LOS: 400m 15+km 15km Short Range Wireless: 0-400m0 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 6

CNR Domain VHF: Vast Majority of radios capable of 16kbps half duplex. UHF: Radios capable of 288kbps full duplex. High Band UHF: (e.g. 802.11) capable of 11 Mbps. 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 7

CNR VHF (Cdn( Example) Reality: usable throughput at the application layer is a fraction of the base rate: CNR(P) Max throughput on DATA ONLY network: ~ 1kbps SHARED AMONGST USERS 25 radios/net = 40 bps/user Reality: residual BER as low as 10-5 Other VHF CNR radios have similar performance 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 8

CNR UHF (225-450Mhz) NTDR 288 kbps is for well situated sites Reality: truly tactical environment performance is approximately: ~16kbps from 22kbps link; and ~80kbps using a 100 kbps link; Available throughput is still shared amongst users (80kbps/25 = 3.2 kbps). Error conditions similar to VHF 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 9

CNR High UHF (2.4 GHz) 802.11 11,5,2, & 1 Mbps Throughput at application layer is ~50% of stated maximum (with AP). Throughput significantly effected by: Speed of units (36km/h = ~50% cut) ; and Foliage/Antenna position; Higher rates not realistic in tactical domain 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 10

TCP TCP was designed for wired networks : All controls designed for congestion, not errors TCP is very sensitive to BER and Latency Error in wireless domain trigger TCP congestion controls (e.g. 1 packet lost = 50% cut in tx rate) TCP is connection-oriented oriented in wireless tact. domain (high BER, latency, long fades) TCP connections timeout regularly 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 11

TCP THEREFORE: Standard TCP is non-functional in most tactical wireless environments!! 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 12

TCP and BER < 10% @ 10-7 ~0% @ 10-6 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 13

TCP and BER (con( con t) 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 14

Data Replication & the RTL Topology: Master/Slave, Peer-to to-peer Replication Transport Layer: Synchronous i.e. two-phase commit Asynchronous Periodic/Aperiodic All commercial RTLs use TCP! (No acceptable loss of data!!) 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 15

RTL for Tactical Comms. RTL must meet the requirements of IM and the capabilities of the network. IM Requirements affecting the RTL: Requirement to distribute data for operational purposes (e.g. position updates, compensate for losses) Network Capabilities affecting the RTL: Shared media (e.g. inherent broadcast) High Error and Latency; and Relatively low throughput. Unreliable links (e.g. prolonged fade) 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 16

The RTL should: RTL Design Criteria Take advantage of the shared media aspects; Be able to tolerate loss and high delay; Compensate for radio link loss; Ensure max. communications efficiency while providing guaranteed level of service for prime data; Be independent of the DM used; Use a standard, connectionless transport layer; and Be able to detect and route certain data to other units who enter the network. 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 17

LBTB - Background IRIS Corrective Options: Increase Network Throughput: Modify RDL; Data compression; Production of high-rate VHF modem; Purchase new data radio (e.g. NTDR); and Separate voice and data networks. Information Management The right information, to the right user, at the right time Data Fusion, Streamlining, Priority Levels, Data Replication, DBMS Triggers and Stored Procedures etc. 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 18

To: a. Design; b. Build; c. Test; and d. Install Test Bed Objective a research test bed to evaluate battlefield IM strategies applied in a low bandwidth tactical wireless communications environment. 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 19

System Overview Central Server Analysis Workstation(s) 1. Traffic Source/Sink 2. Comms Sys. Simulator 3. Measurement Capabilities 24 Port Ethernet Hub Interference/ Monitoring Rad. 24 Port Ethernet Hub Intranet 1 2 32 Simulated Tact. Node Simulated Tact. Node Simulated Tact. Node 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 20

High-Level Functional Architecture HCTCN Low Bandwidth Test Bed Test Bed Control and Management Scenario Evaluation & Analysis Radio Communications Simulator Scenario Script Generator Test Bed Visualization DBMS 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 21

DBMS DB Replication DBMS DB Server DBMS API DB Data DB Replication DB Log Manager Dictionary Manager External DB APIs DB Base API FTN DB Server API BTN DB Server API Replication Transport Layer (RTL) Replication Server Replication Agent(RA) Trigger Log RTL Log Trans. Log Rep. Log 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 22

Radio Communications Simulator Transport Network Data Link Physical Physical Layer: 2-State Markov process for VHF (CNR(P)) and UHF (NTDR) AWGN and Ricean channels Various SNRs. Data Link Layer Performance aspects of: CNR(P) RDL; and NTDR MIL-STD 188-220 Transport/Network Layer Performance aspects of: UDP/IP. 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 23

View D+10:35.00; # 114 D+10:35.15; # 115 D+10:37.00; # 116 D+10:38.00; # 117 D+10:38.30; # 118 D+10:39.00; # 119 D+10:39.23; # 120 D+10:40.02; # 121 D+10:40.37; # 122 D+10:41.14; # 123 D+10:41.32; # 124 D+10:42.00; # 125 D+10:42.43; # 126 D+10:43.04; # 127 D+10:43.17; # 128 D+10:43.17; # 129 D+10:43.19; # 130 D+10:43.22; # 131 D+10:43.23; # 132 D+10:43.30; # 133 D+10:44.01; # 134 D+10:44.14; # 135 D+10:44.22; # 136 D+10:44.29; # 137 D+10:44.36; # 138 D+10:47.52; # 139 D+10:4757; # 140 D+10:48.12; # 141 D+10:49.44; # 145 D+10:49.54; # 146 D+10:51.29; # 147 D+10:54.36; # 148 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 24 D+10:54.55; # 149 D+10:57.57; # 150

82 23 24 24 26 27 0 ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 84 83 86 120MRD 0 84 84 84 84 84 84 20CMBG 84 93 86-3 86 86-3 86-2 86 86-1 86-1 86-2 85 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 25

Conclusion Data Replication in CNR environment (VHF, UHF) requires redesign of RTL RTL must consider: Operational requirements for data distribution; and Capabilities/Constraints of VHF/UHF media LBTB has design and will implement a unique RTL for this environment. 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 26

Question 11 Sept 2002 UNCLASSIFIED - APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 27