Multiple Care-of Address Registration draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-04.txt

Similar documents
SHISA: The IPv6 Mobility Framework for BSD Operating Systems

Request for Comments: Wichorus G. Tsirtsis Qualcomm T. Ernst INRIA K. Nagami INTEC NetCore October 2009

Overview of the MIPv6 Implementation

SHISA: The Mobile IPv6/NEMO BS Stack Implementation Current Status

Route Optimization based on ND-Proxy for Mobile Nodes in IPv6 Mobile Networks

11. IP Mobility 최 양 희 서울대학교 컴퓨터공학부

Mobile Ad-hoc Network. WIDE project/keio University

Update of C2C-CC Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization

Multihoming for Mobile IPv6

Mobile IPv6. Raj Jain. Washington University in St. Louis

IPv4 Care-of Address Registration for IPv4 Support on the NEMO Basic Support Protocol

MULTIHOMING IN MOBILE IPv6. By: Rajat Singh Ahmed Abdul Haleem

Extended Correspondent Registration Scheme for Reducing Handover Delay in Mobile IPv6

Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6)

3GPP TS V ( )

Category: Standards Track June Mobile IPv6 Support for Dual Stack Hosts and Routers

Versatile IPv6 Mobility Deployment with Dual Stack Mobile IPv6

Proxy Mobile IPv6 draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-01.txt

Mobile IPv6. Washington University in St. Louis

Mobile IPv6 Overview

SHISA: The Mobile IPv6/NEMO BS Stack Implementation Current Status

LECTURE 8. Mobile IP

ETSI TS V8.0.0 ( ) Technical Specification

An Efficient Correspondent Registration to Reduce Signaling Overheads for Proxy Mobile IPv6

How Mobile IP Works? Presenter: Ajoy Singh

Implementation and Operation of Mobility in WIDE

Mobile IP and its trends for changing from IPv4 to IPv6

3GPP TS V9.4.0 ( )

PMIPv6 PROXY MOBILE IPV6 OVERVIEW OF PMIPV6, A PROXY-BASED MOBILITY PROTOCOL FOR IPV6 HOSTS. Proxy Mobile IPv6. Peter R. Egli INDIGOO.COM. indigoo.

Network Security. Security of Mobile Internet Communications. Chapter 17. Network Security (WS 2002): 17 Mobile Internet Security 1 Dr.-Ing G.

Report: the Simulation for Network Mobility based on NS2

NETWORK MOBILITY SUPPORTED PROXY MOBILE IPV6

Network Security: Security of Internet Mobility. Tuomas Aura T Network security Aalto University, Nov-Dec 2014

Network Layer. Mobile IP. Slides adapted from Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochen H. Schiller and W. Stallings

Mobile IP. rek. Petr Grygárek Petr Grygarek, Advanced Computer Networks Technologies 1

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6612 Category: Informational May 2012 ISSN:

CSE 4215/5431: Mobile Communications Winter Suprakash Datta

IPv6 Changes in Mobile IPv6 from Connectathon

NETLMM Security Threats on the MN-AR Interface draft-kempf-netlmm-threats-00.txt

MOBILE IP. Under the guidance of Mr. N. Srinivasu

ETSI TS V ( )

Outline. CS5984 Mobile Computing. Host Mobility Problem 1/2. Host Mobility Problem 2/2. Host Mobility Problem Solutions. Network Layer Solutions Model

Outline. CS6504 Mobile Computing. Host Mobility Problem 1/2. Host Mobility Problem 2/2. Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid. Mobile IPv4.

Fixed Internetworking Protocols and Networks. IP mobility. Rune Hylsberg Jacobsen Aarhus School of Engineering

IP Mobility Support for QoS over Heterogeneous Networks

Operational Experiment of Seamless Handover of a Mobile Router using Multiple Care-of Address Registration

A Service Management Architecture for NEMO in IPv4 and IPv6 Networks

Seamless Handover Scheme for Proxy Mobile IPv6

Mobile SCTP for IP Mobility Support in All-IP Networks

IPv6 Multi-Prefix Environment ~ Concept, Issues, and Solutions ~

IPv6 NEMO. Finding Feature Information. Restrictions for IPv6 NEMO

Vehicle Communication Experiment Environment With MANET And NEMO

ECS-087: Mobile Computing

Virtual ID: A Technique for Mobility, Multi- Homing, and Location Privacy in Next Generation Wireless Networks

Optimal method to Reducing Link and Signaling Costs in Mobile IP

Securing Route Optimisation in NEMO

P A R T T W O MOBILE IPv6

An Analysis of the Flow-Based Fast Handover Method for Mobile IPv6 Network. Jani Puttonen, Ari Viinikainen, Miska Sulander and Timo Hämäläinen

Mobile IP. Mobile Computing. Mobility versus Portability

Objectives. Summary. Sum mmary. Summary (contd.) Concepts, solutions and open issues

Context Reflector for Proxy Mobile IPv6

Network PMIP Support COPYRIGHT. 3GPP2 X.S Version 1.0 Date: December 5, 2008

Virtual Hierarchical Architecture Integrating Mobile IPv6 and MANETs for Internet Connectivity

IPv6 Network Mobility Route Optimization Survey

Security Issues In Mobile IP

Extending Home Agent Migration To Mobile IPv6 based Protocols

Mobile Communications Chapter 9: Network Protocols/Mobile IP

Fast handoff for Mobile IP and Link Layer Triggers

IPv6 Protocols and Networks Hadassah College Spring 2018 Wireless Dr. Martin Land

SJTU 2018 Fall Computer Networking. Wireless Communication

Versatile IPv6 Mobility Deployment with Dual Stack Mobile IPv6

Adaptive Local Route Optimization in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Networks

Mobile IP. Page 1. 10/5/98 Mohamed Khalil IP10 MKIPM001

Comparision study of MobileIPv4 and MobileIPv6

Asian Info-communications Council. Document No November th Conference (Manila)

ETSI TS V ( )

Mobile IP. Mobile IP 1

generated, it must be associated with a new nonce index, e.g., j. CN keeps both the current value of N j and a small set of previous nonce values, N j

Introduction to IPv6. IPv6 addresses

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) February Home Agent-Assisted Route Optimization between Mobile IPv4 Networks

Applicability of IETF Mobility Solutions to the 3GPP All IP Network

MIP4 Working Group. Generic Notification Message for Mobile IPv4 draft-ietf-mip4-generic-notification-message-16

HA MN CN MN. (BC NOT available) Dst: HomeAddr via CoA. Src: CN. Dst: HomeAddr. (BC available) HAO. Src: HA Dst: CoA (IPv6inIPv6) CoA.

draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-07 Authors: Zach Shelby (ed.) Jonathan Hui Pascal Thubert Samita Chakrabarti Erik Nordmark Carsten Bormann

Mobile IP and Mobile Transport Protocols

Mobile & Wireless Networking. Lecture 9: Mobile IP. [Schiller, Section 8.1]

T Computer Networks II. Mobility Issues Contents. Mobility. Mobility. Classifying Mobility Protocols. Routing vs.

OPTIMIZING MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN FUTURE IPv6 MOBILE NETWORKS

Network Working Group

USAGI/WIDE Project Keio University. Hideaki YOSHIFUJI

Mobile Internet Protocol v6 MIPv6

Introduction Mobility Support Handover Management Conclutions. Mobility in IPv6. Thomas Liske. Dresden University of Technology

Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6)

Mobility in IPv6 (MIPv6)

Analysis of Proxy Mobile IPv6: A Network-based Mobility Solution

A Ticket Based Binding Update Authentication Method for Trusted Nodes in Mobile IPv6 Domain

Module 28 Mobile IP: Discovery, Registration and Tunneling

PMIPv6: A Network-Based Localized Mobility Management Solution

Seamless Network Mobility Management for Realtime Service

O-PMIPv6: Optimized Proxy Mobile IPv6. Ahmad Rasem, Bachelor of Communications Engineering

Transcription:

Multiple Care-of Address Registration draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-04.txt Ryuji Wakikawa IETF 70th MEXT WG

Updates from -03 Change the handling of Status field. All the status value is defined for BA Alternate CoA option is omitted, but using C flag is recommended. Many editorial updates

Alternate CoA option For binding update protected by ESP, Alternate CoA option MUST be presented [RFC3776] BID option is used as a substitute of Alternate CoA option BID option carries the Care-of Address when C flag is set

Status Code Two status cods in binding acknowledgement status field in binding acknowledgement status field in BID option If the status value in BID set to zero, the receiver uses the status value in BA for all the bindings specified in BA. Otherwise, it uses the status value in BID examples [BA, status=0][bid, status=0] -> Accepted [BA, status=0][bid, status=128] -> Reason Unspecified

DSMIPv6 Support No support for IPv4 CoA BID option can be extended to carry IPv4 CoA instead of IPv4 CoA option

Bulk Registration for CN Bulk registration is only valid for home registration In order to support RO, we need certain extension to RR in order to carry multiple CoAs at once We had consensus not to support RO in the monami6 WG because of protocol simplicity

RR with Bulk Registration (slide used in IETF65) When multiple CoAs are in a Binding Update Authenticator cannot be calculated for all CoAs No authentication for all CoAs Two options forget bulk registration for CNs. Using separate binding update for CNs Extending BID option to carry authenticator. Keep the home/careof nonce index and authenticator in the BID option

Simultaneously Home and Foreign attachments (The slide used in IETF65) Three options when MN returns home keep IF attached to the home link deregistering binding (HA stop proxy ND) keep IF attached to the foreign link disable the interface attached to home (HA keep proxy ND) keep both IFs how?? The problem when MN uses both IF@home/foreign HA cannot intercept packets when MN returns home because it stop proxy ND If HA keep proxy ND, DAD will be occurred

H flag for BID sub-option (Slide used in IETF69) MN utilize interfaces attached to home and foreign links simultaneously with H flag set in BID sub-option Home Binding (H) flag indicates that the mobile node is attached to the home link. This flag is valid for Home Registration, Deregistration and bulk registration. Internet Assumption when H flag is used, HA MUST NOT use Proxy ND to intercept packets for MN on the home link. draft-wakikawa-mip6-no-ndp-01.txt HA 2001::1 (HA) 3ffe::1 (CoA) Binding 2001::2-2001::2 BID-1(H) 3ffe::1 BID-2 MN 2001::2 (HoA)

Comments from Keigo (Slide used in IETF67) When MN returns home, it creates CoA from its home prefix (Home-CoA) and registers it to HA Advantage MN can utilize an interface attached to the home link and other interfaces attached to foreign links Issues The definition of HoA and CoA (RFC3775) is modified. MN starts NS for the destination located on the home link (bypass tunnel?) Priority of NDP/Routing Table/Binding Cache?? I m afraid of side-effect of this changes. (ex. IKE?, MR routing update, etc) HA IP-in-IP tunnel HA IP-in-IP tunnel Binding 2001::2-2001::3 2001::1 (HA) MN 2001::1 (HA) MR 2001::3 (home-coa) 2001::2 (HoA) Binding 2001::2-2001::3 - MNP MNP 2001::3 (home-coa) 2001::2 (HoA)

Operational Solution for returning home (Slide used in IETF67) If a home link is multihomed (i.e. advertising one home prefix and another foreign prefix), similar configuration can be achieved HA IP-in-IP tunnel Binding 2001::2-2002::3 2001::1 (HA) MN 2002::3 (CoA) 2001::2 (HoA) HA 2001::1 (HA) No returning home RA (2001::/64 and 2002::/64) HA 2001::1 (HA) MN 2001::2 (HoA) MN Returning Home 2001::2 (HoA)

Comments from Vijay MN does not defend its HoA at the home link if HA still keeps bindings Let HA intercept all the packet first and tunnel/forward to MN by one of registered bindings For sending and receiving packets at the interface attached to home link HA learns the L2 address of the interface MN learns the L2 address of the HA Using learned L2 address to construct packets