Request for Comments: 5156 Category: Informational April 2008

Similar documents
Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4147 Category: Informational August Proposed Changes to the Format of the IANA IPv6 Registry

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Obsoletes: 4773, 5156, 5735, JHU April 2013

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track August Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track G. Neville-Neil Neville-Neil Consulting December 2007

Category: Standards Track December 2007

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option

Network Working Group. Category: Informational May OSPF Database Exchange Summary List Optimization

Expires: October 9, 2005 April 7, 2005

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Category: Best Current Practice January 2004

Network Working Group Request for Comments: September IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Options

Network Working Group Request for Comments: August Address-Prefix-Based Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4

Request for Comments: 5220 Category: Informational R. Hiromi Intec Netcore K. Kanayama INTEC Systems July 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Informational Comcast J. Paugh Nominum, Inc. September 2007

Network Working Group. Cisco Systems June 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4242 Category: Standards Track University of Southampton B. Volz Cisco Systems, Inc.

Request for Comments: 5010 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. September 2007

Category: Standards Track Cisco H. Tschofenig Nokia Siemens Networks August 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Informational UNINETT A. Vijayabhaskar Cisco Systems (India) Private Limited May 2005

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) Bootstrap Router MIB

Request for Comments: 5453 Category: Standards Track February 2009

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Samsung S. Kumar Tech Mahindra Ltd S. Madanapalli Samsung May 2008

Request for Comments: 5179 Category: Standards Track May 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4424 February 2006 Updates: 4348 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4869 Category: Informational May Suite B Cryptographic Suites for IPsec. Status of This Memo

Category: Informational Woven Systems May 2008

Category: Standards Track September MIB Textual Conventions for Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)

Request for Comments: 3934 Updates: 2418 October 2004 BCP: 94 Category: Best Current Practice

HIIT L. Eggert Nokia April Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration Extension

Lecture notes of G. Q. Maguire Jr. IK2555, Spring Module 10

Network Working Group. BCP: 131 July 2007 Category: Best Current Practice

Request for Comments: 3932 October 2004 BCP: 92 Updates: 3710, 2026 Category: Best Current Practice

Request for Comments: May 2007

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks August 2008

Network Working Group. February 2005

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4603 Category: Informational Cisco Systems July Additional Values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute

vcard Extensions for Instant Messaging (IM)

Request for Comments: 4633 Category: Experimental August 2006

Network Working Group. Intended status: Standards Track Columbia U. Expires: March 5, 2009 September 1, 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5158 Category: Informational March 2008

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: T. Chown University of Southampton M. Eubanks Iformata Communications August 2012

Updates: 2710 September 2003 Category: Standards Track. Source Address Selection for the Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) Protocol

Network Working Group Request for Comments: A. Zinin Alcatel-Lucent March 2007

Network Working Group. Category: Informational January 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems May 2007

Network Working Group Internet-Draft January 25, 2006 Expires: July 29, Feed Rank draft-snell-atompub-feed-index-05.txt. Status of this Memo

Updates: 2409 May 2005 Category: Standards Track. Algorithms for Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1)

Request for Comments: A. Davey Data Connection Limited A. Lindem, Ed. Redback Networks September 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: December 2004

Request for Comments: Starent Networks A. Lior Bridgewater Systems K. Leung Cisco Systems October 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. June 2006

C. Martin ipath Services February A Policy Control Mechanism in IS-IS Using Administrative Tags

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4558 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems D. Papadimitriou Alcatel June 2006

Network Working Group. Updates: 3463, 4468, 4954 June 2008 Category: Best Current Practice. A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes

Request for Comments: 4509 Category: Standards Track May Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs)

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. March 2005

Category: Standards Track December 2003

Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-00.

Request for Comments: 3861 Category: Standards Track August 2004

Category: Standards Track Redback Networks June 2008

Category: Standards Track October Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4)

Category: Standards Track June Requesting Attributes by Object Class in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Status of This Memo

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track July 2007

Request for Comments: 4680 Updates: 4346 September 2006 Category: Standards Track

Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track January 2008

Request for Comments: K. Norrman Ericsson June 2006

Category: Standards Track March Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport Over TCP

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. December 2005

Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks E. Rosen Cisco Systems, Inc. August MPLS Upstream Label Assignment and Context-Specific Label Space

Request for Comments: 5079 Category: Standards Track December Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)

Request for Comments: 4755 Category: Standards Track December 2006

Request for Comments: 4255 Category: Standards Track SPARTA January Using DNS to Securely Publish Secure Shell (SSH) Key Fingerprints

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4143 Category: Standards Track Brandenburg November 2005

Category: Standards Track LabN Consulting, LLC July 2008

Request for Comments: 2711 Category: Standards Track BBN October 1999

September The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) tel Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry. Status of This Memo

Network Working Group. Category: Informational June Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions for Traffic Engineering (TE)

Category: Informational September 2004

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc January The Secure Shell (SSH) Session Channel Break Extension

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. April 2004

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track September 2003

Network Working Group. Category: Informational March 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Informational April A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)

Request for Comments: M. Stillman Nokia M. Tuexen Muenster Univ. of Applied Sciences September 2008

Request for Comments: 4571 Category: Standards Track July 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3937 Category: Informational October 2004

Request for Comments: 4759 Category: Standards Track Neustar Inc. L. Conroy Roke Manor Research November 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Category: Experimental J. Postel ISI December 1998

Network Working Group Internet-Draft October 27, 2007 Intended status: Experimental Expires: April 29, 2008

Request for Comments: 4715 Category: Informational NTT November 2006

Category: Experimental SAMSUNG Electronics L. Beloeil France Telecom R&D S. Madanapalli Ordyn Technologies September 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: February 2006

Category: Standards Track June 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: A. Zinin Alcatel-Lucent March OSPF Out-of-Band Link State Database (LSDB) Resynchronization

Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-03.

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track September 2006

Network Working Group. M. Duckett T. Anschutz BellSouth J. Moisand Juniper Networks September 2006

Request for Comments: 3959 Category: Standards Track December 2004

Category: Best Current Practice February Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points

Network Working Group

Transcription:

Network Working Group M. Blanchet Request for Comments: 5156 Viagenie Category: Informational April 2008 Status of This Memo Special-Use IPv6 Addresses This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract This document is a compilation of special IPv6 addresses defined in other RFCs. It can be used as a checklist of invalid routing prefixes for developing filtering policies for routes and IP packets. It does not discuss addresses that are assigned to operators and users through the Regional Internet Registries. Table of Contents 1. Introduction......................... 2 2. Address Blocks........................ 2 2.1. Node-Scoped Unicast.................... 2 2.2. IPv4-Mapped Addresses................... 2 2.3. IPv4-Compatible Addresses................. 2 2.4. Link-Scoped Unicast.................... 2 2.5. Unique-Local....................... 3 2.6. Documentation Prefix................... 3 2.7. 6to4........................... 3 2.8. Teredo.......................... 3 2.9. 6bone........................... 3 2.10. ORCHID.......................... 3 2.11. Default Route....................... 4 2.12. IANA Special-Purpose IPv6 Address Registry........ 4 2.13. Multicast......................... 4 3. Security Considerations.................... 4 4. IANA Considerations...................... 4 5. Acknowledgements....................... 4 6. References.......................... 5 6.1. Normative References................... 5 6.2. Informative References.................. 5 Blanchet Informational [Page 1]

1. Introduction This document is a compilation of special IPv6 addresses defined in other RFCs. It can be used as a checklist of invalid routing prefixes for developing filtering policies for routes and IP packets. It does not discuss addresses that are assigned to operators and users through the Regional Internet Registries. The document is structured by address types. The document format is similar to [RFC3330]. Some tips about filtering are given, but are not mandatory to implement. The addresses listed in this document must not be hard-coded into implementations. 2. Address Blocks 2.1. Node-Scoped Unicast ::1/128 is the loopback address [RFC4291]. ::/128 is the unspecified address [RFC4291]. These two addresses should not appear on the public Internet. 2.2. IPv4-Mapped Addresses ::FFFF:0:0/96 are the IPv4-mapped addresses [RFC4291]. Addresses within this block should not appear on the public Internet. 2.3. IPv4-Compatible Addresses ::<ipv4-address>/96 are the IPv4-compatible addresses [RFC4291]. These addresses are deprecated and should not appear on the public Internet. 2.4. Link-Scoped Unicast fe80::/10 are the link-local unicast [RFC4291] addresses. Addresses within this block should not appear on the public Internet. Blanchet Informational [Page 2]

2.5. Unique-Local fc00::/7 are the unique-local addresses [RFC4193]. Addresses within this block should not appear by default on the public Internet. Procedures for advertising these addresses are further described in [RFC4193]. 2.6. Documentation Prefix The 2001:db8::/32 are the documentation addresses [RFC3849]. They are used for documentation purposes such as user manuals, RFCs, etc. Addresses within this block should not appear on the public Internet. 2.7. 6to4 2002::/16 are the 6to4 addresses [RFC3056]. The 6to4 addresses may be advertised when the site is running a 6to4 relay or offering a 6to4 transit service. Running such a service [RFC3964] entails filtering rules specific to 6to4 [RFC3964]. IPv4 addresses disallowed in 6to4 prefixes are listed in section 5.3.1 of [RFC3964]. 2.8. Teredo 2001::/32 are the Teredo addresses [RFC4380]. The Teredo addresses may be advertised when the site is running a Teredo relay or offering a Teredo transit service. 2.9. 6bone 5f00::/8 were the addresses of the first instance of the 6bone experimental network [RFC1897]. 3ffe::/16 were the addresses of the second instance of the 6bone experimental network [RFC2471]. Both 5f00::/8 and 3ffe::/16 were returned to IANA [RFC3701]. These addresses are subject to future allocation, similar to current unallocated address space. Addresses within these blocks should not appear on the public Internet until they are reallocated. 2.10. ORCHID 2001:10::/28 are Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash IDentifiers (ORCHID) addresses [RFC4843]. These addresses are used as identifiers and are not routable at the IP layer. Addresses within this block should not appear on the public Internet. Blanchet Informational [Page 3]

2.11. Default Route ::/0 is the default unicast route address. 2.12. IANA Special-Purpose IPv6 Address Registry An IANA registry (iana-ipv6-special-registry) exists [RFC4773] for Special-Purpose IPv6 address block assignments for experiments and other purposes. Addresses within this registry should be reviewed for Internet routing considerations. 2.13. Multicast ff00::/8 are multicast addresses [RFC4291]. They contain a 4-bit scope in the address field where only some values are of global scope [RFC4291]. Only addresses with global scope in this block may appear on the public Internet. Multicast routes must not appear in unicast routing tables. 3. Security Considerations Filtering the invalid routing prefixes listed in this document should improve the security of networks. 4. IANA Considerations To ensure consistency and to provide cross-referencing for the benefit of the community, IANA has inserted the following paragraph in the header of the iana-ipv6-special-registry. "Other special IPv6 addresses requiring specific considerations for global routing are listed in RFC 5156." 5. Acknowledgements Florent Parent, Pekka Savola, Tim Chown, Alain Baudot, Stig Venaas, Vincent Jardin, Olaf Bonness, David Green, Gunter Van de Velde, Michael Barnes, Fred Baker, Edward Lewis, Marla Azinger, Brian Carpenter, Mark Smith, Kevin Loch, Alain Durand, Jim Bound, Peter Sherbin, Bob Hinden, Gert Doering, Niall O Reilly, Mark Townsley, Jari Arkko, and Iain Calder have provided input and suggestions to this document. Blanchet Informational [Page 4]

6. References 6.1. Normative References [RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006. 6.2. Informative References [RFC1897] Hinden, R. and J. Postel, "IPv6 Testing Address Allocation", RFC 1897, January 1996. [RFC2471] Hinden, R., Fink, R., and J. Postel, "IPv6 Testing Address Allocation", RFC 2471, December 1998. [RFC3056] Carpenter, B. and K. Moore, "Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds", RFC 3056, February 2001. [RFC3330] IANA, "Special-Use IPv4 Addresses", RFC 3330, September 2002. [RFC3701] Fink, R. and R. Hinden, "6bone (IPv6 Testing Address Allocation) Phaseout", RFC 3701, March 2004. [RFC3849] Huston, G., Lord, A., and P. Smith, "IPv6 Address Prefix Reserved for Documentation", RFC 3849, July 2004. [RFC3964] Savola, P. and C. Patel, "Security Considerations for 6to4", RFC 3964, December 2004. [RFC4193] Hinden, R. and B. Haberman, "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses", RFC 4193, October 2005. [RFC4380] Huitema, C., "Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through Network Address Translations (NATs)", RFC 4380, February 2006. [RFC4773] Huston, G., "Administration of the IANA Special Purpose IPv6 Address Block", RFC 4773, December 2006. [RFC4843] Nikander, P., Laganier, J., and F. Dupont, "An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers (ORCHID)", RFC 4843, April 2007. Blanchet Informational [Page 5]

Author s Address Marc Blanchet Viagenie 2600 boul. Laurier, suite 625 Quebec, QC G1V 4W1 Canada EMail: Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca URI: http://www.viagenie.ca Blanchet Informational [Page 6]

Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Blanchet Informational [Page 7]