UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8W: IT Software Development Initiatives. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Applied Research. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #193

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #192

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Data to Decisions Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #18

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Facility Restoration and Modernization - T&E

UNCLASSIFIED. All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Polar MILSATCOM (Space) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #49 Page 1 of 10

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Network Centric Collaborative Targeting FY 2012 OCO

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Tactical Data Links

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 110

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Lightweight Torpedo Development

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Navy Tactical Computer Resources

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date February 2007 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E Defense-Wide, BA 7

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #65

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #218

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface ASW

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2008 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E, Dw BA 06

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 IT President's Budget Request Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Overview

Airmen & community support missions. Two decades of taking risk in infrastructure created a fiscally unsustainable posture.

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Cost to Complete

Implementing a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) to Achieve Acquisition Agility in Defense Acquisition Programs

New Zealand Government IbM Infrastructure as a service

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

Federal Government. Each fiscal year the Federal Government is challenged CATEGORY MANAGEMENT IN THE WHAT IS CATEGORY MANAGEMENT?

DRAFT. IT Services Strategic Plan

The Perfect Storm Cyber RDT&E

IT-CNP, Inc. Capability Statement

Transformation in Technology Barbara Duck Chief Information Officer. Investor Day 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Software Engineering Institute (SEI) FY 2012 OCO

AFCEA BELVOIR. Industry Day. Joint Service Provider Overview. Victor O. Shirley Chief of Staff Joint Service Provider April 4, 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE K: Long-Haul Communications - DCS

Test Resource Management Center Directed Energy T&E Conference A Joint DEPS ITEA Event

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Implementing ITIL v3 Service Lifecycle

INFORMATION ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Command Control and Communications. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Office of Acquisition Program Management (OAPM)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

Proven Integration Strategies for Government

US Air Force Initiative to Enhance Hypersonic Test Capabilities

MOVING MISSION IT SERVICES TO THE CLOUD

Annual Report for the Utility Savings Initiative

Association for International PMOs. Expert. Practitioner. Foundation PMO. Learning.

STRATEGIC PLAN

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004

Accelerate Your Enterprise Private Cloud Initiative

New Zealand Government IBM Infrastructure as a Service

TRIAEM LLC Corporate Capabilities Briefing

OSD Product Support BCA Guidebook. Joseph Colt Murphy Senior Financial Analyst ODASD Materiel Readiness 9 May 2011

Section One of the Order: The Cybersecurity of Federal Networks.

In 2017, the Auditor General initiated an audit of the City s information technology infrastructure and assets.

CASE STUDY: RELOCATE THE DATA CENTER OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. Alan Stuart, Managing Director System Infrastructure Innovators, LLC

Assessing the impacts of Amended Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to the DoD Mission and the Defense Industrial Base (DIB)

PREPARE FOR TAKE OFF. Accelerate your organisation s journey to the Cloud.

Information Systems Security Requirements for Federal GIS Initiatives

The Journey Towards Serving a Digital Government

Health Information Technology - Supporting Joint Readiness

CollabNet. Case Study: Building Agile ALM in the Cloud. Mike Kochanik Vice President CollabNet Federal. Agile ALM for Distributed Development

OVERVIEW BROCHURE GRC. When you have to be right

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary EXECUTIVE ORDER

Defense Engineering Excellence

Agile Master Data Management TM : Data Governance in Action. A whitepaper by First San Francisco Partners

SIMPLIFY IT. Transform IT with VCE and Vblock TM Infrastructure Platforms. Copyright 2011 VCE Company LLC, All rights reserved.

Transcription:

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 24.074 31.962 42.430-42.430 38.811 35.707 36.723 31.886 Continuing Continuing 66ACS1: Acquistion and Command Support 24.074 31.962 37.512-37.512 33.814 30.589 31.461 31.886 Continuing Continuing 66ACSI: ACSI - - 4.918-4.918 4.997 5.118 5.262 - Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The program funds efforts to meet the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA) (Public Law 101-510, Title XII), as well as Congressional and SECDEF mandates to provide acquisition and engineering process research and cost estimating, systems integration modeling and architectural analysis, information technology infrastructure development, and technical workforce. Funding also provides the framework for Air Force business and acquisition transformation in developing capabilities-based architectures, re-engineering and enabling technologies, integrating robust systems engineering into early acquisition processes, and developing and managing a larger, more relevant technical workforce with the expertise to uniformly implement OSD and Air Force engineering guidance and policies. Leveraging the Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment, restores stability in Air Force acquisition systems by integrating major processes to reverse trends toward unpredictable program cost, schedule, and performance to facilitate quick response to urgent operational needs from across the entire spectrum of potential conflicts. Efforts include: - Increasing technical and analytical support through training development; independent cost estimating and assessment to help analyze cost/risk growth and create defendable risk analyses for cost, schedule, and technical risks; information technology infrastructure development; and economic, statistical, and engineering analyses of acquisition programs - Initiating performance measures for capability-based planning constructs, aligning relevant science and technology areas with operational requirements to include systems integration modeling and architecture analysis - Increasing activities to recruit, develop, and manage the technical workforce, enhancing business and engineering processes to develop leaders to manage the acquisition and engineering transformation and interface with the academic community - Transforming acquisition review processes to re-establish clean lines of responsibility, authority, and accountability at appropriate levels - Exploring methods to operate a materiel solution development process that is responsive to COCOM capability needs, aligned with the OSD Joint Task Assignment Process - Develop and implement a services-oriented acquisition business systems environment to deliver capabilities for the acquisition professional that support acquisition transformation. This effort consists of three components (1) establishing a foundational integrated environment, (2) leveraging the existing technologies and data to standardize access and use, and (3) investing in specific capabilities that enhance process transformation and are interoperable within the overall environment. - The foundational integrated environment supports the portfolio of acquisition business systems hardware and software, and implements standards for data management and service-oriented design methodology to facilitate efficiency and interoperability by: -- Exposing core business services currently existing in multiple tools and subsequently retiring duplicative capabilities -- Reducing training on multiple acquisitions systems by providing all core functionality through a single common interface -- Consolidating infrastructure to reduce hosting and infrastructure sustainment costs. Air Force Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #107

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 - Existing technologies and data are leveraged to standardize on proven capabilities, and to make existing data stores more accessible and useful across the acquisition domain roles. - Focused investments in specific capabilities address critical gaps supporting the efficient operation of the Acquisition Domain, in areas such as: -- Conducting program management and oversight -- Conducting program resources management -- Planning and executing on-time acquisition milestone readiness -- Preparing Purchase Requisitions and Contract Orders -- Managing contract writing -- Adopting commercial enterprise concept of Product Lifecycle Management for the production of traceable requirements -- Planning and execution of technology development and transition -- Standardizing risk management -- Managing access to scientific and technical information -- Increasing industrial base decision-support information. These integrated capabilities will provide OSD and AF acquisition leadership insights needed to effectively manage a complex portfolio of acquisition programs through more timely and reliable access to authoritative acquisition data. This program is in Budget Activity 6, RDT&E Management Support because this budget activity includes research, development, test and evaluation efforts and funds to sustain and/or modernize the installations or operations required for general research, development, test and evaluation. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total Previous President's Budget 24.968 31.966 28.384-28.384 Current President's Budget 24.074 31.962 42.430-42.430 Total Adjustments -0.894-0.004 14.046-14.046 Congressional General Reductions - -0.004 Congressional Directed Reductions - - Congressional Rescissions - - Congressional Adds - - Congressional Directed Transfers - - Reprogrammings - - SBIR/STTR Transfer -0.699 - Other Adjustments -0.195-14.046-14.046 Change Summary Explanation FY11: Other Adjustments includes -0.195 Congressional General Reductions Air Force Page 2 of 10 R-1 Line #107

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 FY13: Increase to improve Acquisition IT systems, to include Electronic Acquisition Services Environment (New Start), and technical workforce development and training. Air Force Page 3 of 10 R-1 Line #107

COST ($ in Millions) 66ACS1: Acquistion and Command Support FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Air Force Page 4 of 10 R-1 Line #107 66ACS1: Acquistion and Command Support Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost 24.074 31.962 37.512-37.512 33.814 30.589 31.461 31.886 Continuing Continuing Quantity of RDT&E Articles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The program funds efforts to meet the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA) (Public Law 101-510, Title XII), as well as Congressional and SECDEF mandates to provide acquisition and engineering process research and cost estimating, systems integration modeling and architectural analysis, information technology infrastructure development, and technical workforce. Funding also provides the framework for Air Force business and acquisition transformation in developing capabilities-based architectures, re-engineering and enabling technologies, integrating robust systems engineering into early acquisition processes, and developing and managing a larger, more relevant technical workforce with the expertise to uniformly implement OSD and Air Force engineering guidance and policies. Leveraging the Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment, restores stability in Air Force acquisition systems by integrating major processes to reverse trends toward unpredictable program cost, schedule, and performance to facilitate quick response to urgent operational needs from across the entire spectrum of potential conflicts. Efforts include: - Increasing technical and analytical support through training development; independent cost estimating and assessment to help analyze cost/risk growth and create defendable risk analyses for cost, schedule, and technical risks; information technology infrastructure development; and economic, statistical, and engineering analyses of acquisition programs - Initiating performance measures for capability-based planning constructs, aligning relevant science and technology areas with operational requirements to include systems integration modeling and architecture analysis - Increasing activities to recruit, develop, and manage the technical workforce, enhancing business and engineering processes to develop leaders to manage the acquisition and engineering transformation and interface with the academic community - Transforming acquisition review processes to re-establish clean lines of responsibility, authority, and accountability at appropriate levels - Exploring methods to operate a materiel solution development process that is responsive to COCOM capability needs, aligned with the OSD Joint Task Assignment Process - Develop and implement a services-oriented acquisition business systems environment to deliver capabilities for the acquisition professional that support acquisition transformation. This effort consists of three components (1) establishing a foundational integrated environment, (2) leveraging the existing technologies and data to standardize access and use, and (3) investing in specific capabilities that enhance process transformation and are interoperable within the overall environment. - The foundational integrated environment supports the portfolio of acquisition business systems hardware and software, and implements standards for data management and service-oriented design methodology to facilitate efficiency and interoperability by: -- Exposing core business services currently existing in multiple tools and subsequently retiring duplicative capabilities -- Reducing training on multiple acquisitions systems by providing all core functionality through a single common interface -- Consolidating infrastructure to reduce hosting and infrastructure sustainment costs. - Existing technologies and data are leveraged to standardize on proven capabilities, and to make existing data stores more accessible and useful across the acquisition domain roles.

66ACS1: Acquistion and Command Support - Focused investments in specific capabilities address critical gaps supporting the efficient operation of the Acquisition Domain, in areas such as: -- Conducting program management and oversight -- Conducting program resources management -- Planning and executing on-time acquisition milestone readiness -- Preparing Purchase Requisitions and Contract Orders -- Managing contract writing -- Adopting commercial enterprise concept of Product Lifecycle Management for the production of traceable requirements -- Planning and execution of technology development and transition -- Standardizing risk management -- Managing access to scientific and technical information -- Increasing industrial base decision-support information. These integrated capabilities will provide OSD and AF acquisition leadership insights needed to effectively manage a complex portfolio of acquisition programs through more timely and reliable access to authoritative acquisition data. This program is in Budget Activity 6, RDT&E Management Support because this budget activity includes research, development, test and evaluation efforts and funds to sustain and/or modernize the installations or operations required for general research, development, test and evaluation. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Title: Acquisition Mandates Description: Supporting Congressional and SECDEF mandates. Program funding provides the framework for Air Force business and acquisition. FY 2011 Accomplishments: Continue acquisition/engineering process research/cost estimating. FY 2012 Plans: Continue acquisition/engineering process research/cost estimating Plans: Continue acquisition/engineering process research/cost estimating 4.819 5.300 0.600 Title: Performance Measurements 2.960 5.869 6.100 Air Force Page 5 of 10 R-1 Line #107

66ACS1: Acquistion and Command Support B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Description: Initiating performance measures for capability-based planning constructs FY 2011 Accomplishments: Continue performance measures for capability-based planning constructs, aligning relevant science and technology areas with operational requirements to include systems integration modeling and architecture analysis. FY 2012 Plans: Continue performance measures for capability-based planning constructs, aligning relevant science and technology areas with operational requirements to include systems integration modeling and architecture analysis. Plans: Continue performance measures for capability-based planning constructs, aligning relevant science and technology areas with operational requirements to include systems integration modeling and architecture analysis. Title: Technical and Analytical Support Description: Increasing technical and analytical support through information technology infrastructure development; economic, statistical, and engineering analyses of acquisition programs. 13.501 11.894 19.200 FY 2011 Accomplishments: Continue development of information technology (IT) development. FY 2012 Plans: Continue development of information technology (IT) development. Plans: Continue development of information technology (IT) development. Title: Recruiting and Development 2.794 8.899 11.612 Air Force Page 6 of 10 R-1 Line #107

66ACS1: Acquistion and Command Support B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Description: Increasing activities to recruit, develop, and manage the technical workforce FY 2011 Accomplishments: Continue activities to recruit, develop, and manage the technical workforce, enhancing business and engineering processes to develop leaders to manage the acquisition and engineering transformation and interface with the academic community. FY 2012 Plans: Continue activities to recruit, develop, and manage the technical workforce, enhancing business and engineering processes to develop leaders to manage the acquisition and engineering transformation and interface with the academic community. Plans: Continue activities to recruit, develop, and manage the technical workforce, enhancing business and engineering processes to develop leaders to manage the acquisition and engineering transformation and interface with the academic community. Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals 24.074 31.962 37.512 C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Not Applicable: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Continuing Continuing D. Acquisition Strategy E. Performance Metrics Please refer to the Performance Base Budget Overview Book for information on how Air Force resources are applied and how those resources are contributing to Air Force performance goals and most importantly, how they contribute to our mission. Air Force Page 7 of 10 R-1 Line #107

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Air Force Page 8 of 10 R-1 Line #107 66ACSI: ACSI Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost 66ACSI: ACSI - - 4.918-4.918 4.997 5.118 5.262 - Continuing Continuing Quantity of RDT&E Articles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The program funds efforts to meet the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA) (Public Law 101-510, Title XII), as well as Congressional and SECDEF mandates to provide acquisition and engineering process research and cost estimating, systems integration modeling and architectural analysis, information technology infrastructure development, and technical workforce. Funding also provides the framework for Air Force business and acquisition transformation in developing capabilities-based architectures, re-engineering and enabling technologies, integrating robust systems engineering into early acquisition processes, and developing and managing a larger, more relevant technical workforce with the expertise to uniformly implement OSD and Air Force engineering guidance and policies. Leveraging the Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment, restores stability in Air Force acquisition systems by integrating major processes to reverse trends toward unpredictable program cost, schedule, and performance to facilitate quick response to urgent operational needs from across the entire spectrum of potential conflicts. Efforts include: - Increasing technical and analytical support through training development; independent cost estimating and assessment to help analyze cost/risk growth and create defendable risk analyses for cost, schedule, and technical risks; information technology infrastructure development; and economic, statistical, and engineering analyses of acquisition programs - Initiating performance measures for capability-based planning constructs, aligning relevant science and technology areas with operational requirements to include systems integration modeling and architecture analysis - Increasing activities to recruit, develop, and manage the technical workforce, enhancing business and engineering processes to develop leaders to manage the acquisition and engineering transformation and interface with the academic community - Transforming acquisition review processes to re-establish clean lines of responsibility, authority, and accountability at appropriate levels - Exploring methods to operate a materiel solution development process that is responsive to COCOM capability needs, aligned with the OSD Joint Task Assignment Process - Develop and implement a services-oriented acquisition business systems environment to deliver capabilities for the acquisition professional that support acquisition transformation. This effort consists of three components (1) establishing a foundational integrated environment, (2) leveraging the existing technologies and data to standardize access and use, and (3) investing in specific capabilities that enhance process transformation and are interoperable within the overall environment. - The foundational integrated environment supports the portfolio of acquisition business systems hardware and software, and implements standards for data management and service-oriented design methodology to facilitate efficiency and interoperability by: -- Exposing core business services currently existing in multiple tools and subsequently retiring duplicative capabilities -- Reducing training on multiple acquisitions systems by providing all core functionality through a single common interface -- Consolidating infrastructure to reduce hosting and infrastructure sustainment costs. - Existing technologies and data are leveraged to standardize on proven capabilities, and to make existing data stores more accessible and useful across the acquisition domain roles. - Focused investments in specific capabilities address critical gaps supporting the efficient operation of the Acquisition Domain, in areas such as:

66ACSI: ACSI -- Conducting program management and oversight -- Conducting program resources management -- Planning and executing on-time acquisition milestone readiness -- Preparing Purchase Requisitions and Contract Orders -- Managing contract writing -- Adopting commercial enterprise concept of Product Lifecycle Management for the production of traceable requirements -- Planning and execution of technology development and transition -- Standardizing risk management -- Managing access to scientific and technical information -- Increasing industrial base decision-support information. These integrated capabilities will provide OSD and AF acquisition leadership insights needed to effectively manage a complex portfolio of acquisition programs through more timely and reliable access to authoritative acquisition data. This program is in Budget Activity 6, RDT&E Management Support because this budget activity includes research, development, test and evaluation efforts and funds to sustain and/or modernize the installations or operations required for general research, development, test and evaluation. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Title: Acquisition Mandates Description: Support Congressional and SECDEF mandates. Program funding provides the framework for Air Force business and acquisition. - - 4.918 Plans: Continue acquisition/engineering process research/cost estimating. Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals - - 4.918 C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Continuing Continuing D. Acquisition Strategy Air Force Page 9 of 10 R-1 Line #107

66ACSI: ACSI E. Performance Metrics Please refer to the Performance Base Budget Overview Book for information on how Air Force resources are applied and how those resources are contributing to Air Force performance goals and most importantly, how they contribute to our mission. Air Force Page 10 of 10 R-1 Line #107