Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: January 2011

Similar documents
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RTFM, Inc. January 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 5451 March 2012 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. S. Loreto Ericsson R. Seggelmann Metafinanz Informationssysteme GmbH November 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 4326 June 2014 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7319 BCP: 191 July 2014 Category: Best Current Practice ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational. May IEEE Information Element for the IETF

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: January 2010

Request for Comments: M. Stillman Nokia M. Tuexen Muenster Univ. of Applied Sciences September 2008

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7125 Category: Informational. February 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. Enterprise Architects February 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) October This document establishes an IETF URN Sub-namespace for use with OAuth-related specifications.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track. Cisco May 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7537 Updates: 4379, L. Andersson S. Aldrin Huawei Technologies May 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track April 2011 ISSN:

Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: March 2016

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6028 Category: Experimental ISSN: October 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: August 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7189 Category: Standards Track March 2014 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational. August IANA Registration for the Cryptographic Algorithm Object Identifier Range

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track May 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7192 Category: Standards Track April 2014 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6961 June 2013 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track ISSN: February 2016

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational October 2013 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational March 2016 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6309

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) June Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 6376 January 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: S. Previdi. Cisco Systems

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 2474 August 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: October 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: November 2015

Updates: 6126 May 2015 Category: Experimental ISSN: Extension Mechanism for the Babel Routing Protocol

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 5736 Category: Informational. ICANN January 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7725 Category: Standards Track February 2016 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Cisco Systems, Inc. April 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6379 Obsoletes: 4869 Category: Informational October 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8441 Updates: 6455 September 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6440 Category: Standards Track. Huawei December 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6160 Category: Standards Track April 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8035 Updates: 5761 November 2016 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7330 Category: Standards Track. Cisco Systems August 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6061 Category: Informational January 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6441 BCP: 171 November 2011 Category: Best Current Practice ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. March 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7213 Category: Standards Track. M. Bocci Alcatel-Lucent June 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8142 Category: Standards Track April 2017 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: April 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7504 June 2015 Updates: 1846, 5321 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track ISSN: July 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8186 Category: Standards Track. June 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6034 Category: Standards Track October 2010 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd July Rebind Capability in DHCPv6 Reconfigure Messages

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: November 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8440 Category: Standards Track ISSN: August 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: March 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6915 Updates: 6155 April 2013 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7237 Category: Informational June 2014 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6694 August 2012 Category: Informational ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8336 Category: Standards Track. March 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6522 STD: 73 January 2012 Obsoletes: 3462 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8069 Category: Informational February 2017 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) January 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: July 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational. August Using Trust Anchor Constraints during Certification Path Processing

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track ISSN: September 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track September 2018 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7193 Category: Informational. J. Schaad Soaring Hawk Consulting April 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track ISSN: September 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 5725 Category: Standards Track ISSN: February 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 5322 March 2013 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: November 2013

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Google K. Patel Cisco Systems August 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) ISSN: April 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 5904 Category: Informational June 2010 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track. January 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: Y. Umaoka IBM December 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6994 Category: Standards Track August 2013 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8516 Category: Standards Track January 2019 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) BCP: 183 May 2013 Category: Best Current Practice ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. R. Asati Cisco January 2013

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. J. Quittek. NEC Europe Ltd. October 2012

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5679 Category: Standards Track December Locating IEEE Mobility Services Using DNS

February Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Huawei Technologies November 2013

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) September Indicating Handling States in Trace Fields

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems D. Tappan Consultant October 2009

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: July 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. A. Langley Google Inc. E. Stephan Orange July 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 5959 Category: Standards Track August 2010 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 5066 February 2014 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Google Inc. October 2018

Category: Standards Track Motorola, Inc. M. Tuexen Univ. of Applied Sciences Muenster S. Maruyama M. Kozuka Kyoto University September 2007

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: July 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Obsoletes: 4049 September 2010 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track March 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6725 Category: Standards Track August 2012 ISSN:

Prefer Header for HTTP

An SCTP-Protocol Data Unit with several chunks

Transcription:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Tuexen Request for Comments: 6096 Muenster Univ. of Applied Sciences Updates: 4960 R. Stewart Category: Standards Track Huawei ISSN: 2070-1721 January 2011 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Chunk Flags Registration Abstract This document defines the procedure for registering chunk flags with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP). It updates RFC 4960 and also defines the IANA registry for contents for currently defined chunk types. It does not change SCTP in any other way. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6096. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust s Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Tuexen & Stewart Standards Track [Page 1]

Table of Contents 1. Introduction......................... 3 2. Conventions.......................... 3 3. IANA Considerations...................... 3 3.1. Updated IETF-Defined Chunk Extension........... 3 3.2. New IETF Chunk Flags Registration............. 4 3.3. Initial Registrations................... 4 3.3.1. DATA Chunk Flags................... 4 3.3.2. INIT Chunk Flags................... 5 3.3.3. INIT ACK Chunk Flags................. 5 3.3.4. SACK Chunk Flags................... 5 3.3.5. HEARTBEAT Chunk Flags................. 5 3.3.6. HEARTBEAT ACK Chunk Flags............... 5 3.3.7. ABORT Chunk Flags................... 5 3.3.8. SHUTDOWN Chunk Flags................. 5 3.3.9. SHUTDOWN ACK Chunk Flags............... 6 3.3.10. ERROR Chunk Flags................... 6 3.3.11. COOKIE ECHO Chunk Flags................ 6 3.3.12. COOKIE ACK Chunk Flags................ 6 3.3.13. ECNE Chunk Flags................... 6 3.3.14. CWR Chunk Flags.................... 6 3.3.15. SHUTDOWN COMPLETE Chunk Flags............. 6 3.3.16. AUTH Chunk Flags................... 7 3.3.17. ASCONF ACK Chunk Flags................ 7 3.3.18. PAD Chunk Flags.................... 7 3.3.19. FORWARD TSN Chunk Flags................ 7 3.3.20. ASCONF Chunk Flags.................. 7 4. Security Considerations.................... 7 5. Acknowledgments........................ 7 6. Normative References..................... 8 Tuexen & Stewart Standards Track [Page 2]

1. Introduction [RFC4960], which currently defines the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), provides a procedure to define new chunk types. However, several protocol extensions currently being discussed need to define new chunk flags for existing chunks. This document updates RFC 4960 to overcome this limitation. It defines the procedure to register chunk flags and specifies the registry entries for existing chunk types. The protocol is not changed in any other way. Therefore, only Section 14.1 of [RFC4960] is affected. 2. Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 3. IANA Considerations Section 3.1 provides the updated procedure for SCTP Chunk Type registration; it replaces Section 14.1 of [RFC4960]. Section 3.2 provides a new procedure for SCTP Chunk Flag registration. A registry entry must be created for each SCTP Chunk Type. Section 3.3 provides the SCTP Chunk Flag registry values for the SCTP Chunk Types specified in [RFC3758], [RFC4820], [RFC4960], [RFC4895], and [RFC5061]. 3.1. Updated IETF-Defined Chunk Extension The assignment of new chunk type codes is done through an IETF Review action, as defined in [RFC5226]. Documentation of a new chunk MUST contain the following information: a) A long and short name for the new chunk type; b) A detailed description of the structure of the chunk, which MUST conform to the basic structure defined in Section 3.2 of [RFC4960]; c) A detailed definition and description of intended use of each field within the chunk, including the chunk flags if any. Defined chunk flags will be used as initial entries in the chunk flags table for the new chunk type; Tuexen & Stewart Standards Track [Page 3]

d) A detailed procedural description of the use of the new chunk type within the operation of the protocol. The last chunk type (255) is reserved for future extension if necessary. For each new chunk type, IANA creates a registration table for the chunk flags of that type. The procedure for registering particular chunk flags is described in the following Section 3.2. 3.2. New IETF Chunk Flags Registration The assignment of new chunk flags is done through an RFC required action, as defined in [RFC5226]. Documentation of the chunk flags MUST contain the following information: a) A name for the new chunk flag; b) A detailed procedural description of the use of the new chunk flag within the operation of the protocol. It MUST be considered that implementations not supporting the flag will send 0 on transmit and just ignore it on receipt. IANA selects a chunk flags value. This must be one of 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, or 0x80, which MUST be unique within the chunk flag values for the specific chunk type. 3.3. Initial Registrations This section describes the initial values of the chunk flag tables, one table for each chunk. Most tables are currently empty. IANA used these values to create the new registry. 3.3.1. DATA Chunk Flags 0x01 E bit [RFC4960] 0x02 B bit [RFC4960] 0x04 U bit [RFC4960] Tuexen & Stewart Standards Track [Page 4]

3.3.2. INIT Chunk Flags 3.3.3. INIT ACK Chunk Flags 3.3.4. SACK Chunk Flags 3.3.5. HEARTBEAT Chunk Flags 3.3.6. HEARTBEAT ACK Chunk Flags 3.3.7. ABORT Chunk Flags 0x01 T bit [RFC4960] 3.3.8. SHUTDOWN Chunk Flags Tuexen & Stewart Standards Track [Page 5]

3.3.9. SHUTDOWN ACK Chunk Flags 3.3.10. ERROR Chunk Flags 3.3.11. COOKIE ECHO Chunk Flags 3.3.12. COOKIE ACK Chunk Flags 3.3.13. ECNE Chunk Flags 3.3.14. CWR Chunk Flags 3.3.15. SHUTDOWN COMPLETE Chunk Flags 0x01 T bit [RFC4960] Tuexen & Stewart Standards Track [Page 6]

3.3.16. AUTH Chunk Flags 3.3.17. ASCONF ACK Chunk Flags 3.3.18. PAD Chunk Flags 3.3.19. FORWARD TSN Chunk Flags 3.3.20. ASCONF Chunk Flags 4. Security Considerations This document does not add any additional security considerations in addition to the ones given in [RFC4960]. 5. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Anna Brunstroem, Gorry Fairhurst, Russ Housley, Suresh Krishnan, and Dan Romascanu for their invaluable comments. Tuexen & Stewart Standards Track [Page 7]

6. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3758] Stewart, R., Ramalho, M., Xie, Q., Tuexen, M., and P. Conrad, "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Partial Reliability Extension", RFC 3758, May 2004. [RFC4820] Tuexen, M., Stewart, R., and P. Lei, "Padding Chunk and Parameter for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)", RFC 4820, March 2007. [RFC4895] Tuexen, M., Stewart, R., Lei, P., and E. Rescorla, "Authenticated Chunks for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)", RFC 4895, August 2007. [RFC4960] Stewart, R., "Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 4960, September 2007. [RFC5061] Stewart, R., Xie, Q., Tuexen, M., Maruyama, S., and M. Kozuka, "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Dynamic Address Reconfiguration", RFC 5061, September 2007. [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, May 2008. Authors Addresses Michael Tuexen Muenster University of Applied Sciences Stegerwaldstr. 39 48565 Steinfurt DE EMail: tuexen@fh-muenster.de Randall R. Stewart Huawei Chapin, SC 29036 US EMail: randall@lakerest.net Tuexen & Stewart Standards Track [Page 8]