Anne J. Gilliland-Swetland in the document Introduction to Metadata, Pathways to Digital Information, setting the Stage States:

Similar documents
Alphabet Soup: A Metadata Overview Melanie Schlosser Metadata Librarian

Rules of the Road for Scanning and Tossing. Imaging Requirements for Paper Based Records

Metadata Workshop 3 March 2006 Part 1

Summary of Bird and Simons Best Practices

DIGITAL IMAGING VIEW OF DIGITAL PRESERVATION

NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY

Archivists Toolkit: Description Functional Area

GUIDELINES FOR CREATION AND PRESERVATION OF DIGITAL FILES

GETTING STARTED WITH DIGITAL COMMONWEALTH

Archives in a Networked Information Society: The Problem of Sustainability in the Digital Information Environment

POLICY AND GUIDELINES FOR THE RETENTION AND DISPOSITION OF ORIGINAL COUNTY RECORDS COPIED ONTO OPTICAL IMAGING AND DATA STORAGE SYSTEMS

Slide 1 & 2 Technical issues Slide 3 Technical expertise (continued...)

Metadata: The Theory Behind the Practice

Table of contents for The organization of information / Arlene G. Taylor and Daniel N. Joudrey.

Terms in the glossary are listed alphabetically. Words highlighted in bold are defined in the Glossary.

Alphabet Soup: Choosing Among DC, QDC, MARC, MARCXML, and MODS. Jenn Riley IU Metadata Librarian DLP Brown Bag Series February 25, 2005

Guidelines for Developing Digital Cultural Collections

Session Two: OAIS Model & Digital Curation Lifecycle Model

Metadata for Digital Collections: A How-to-Do-It Manual. Introduction to Resource Description and Dublin Core

Metadata for Digital Collections: A How-to-Do-It Manual

Metadata and Encoding Standards for Digital Initiatives: An Introduction

Different Aspects of Digital Preservation

Two Traditions of Metadata Development

Metadata Overview: digital repositories

Metadata Standards and Applications

Record Retention Policies: How Long Do We Keep This Record? Pari J. Swift, CRM, Senior Records Manager

Data Partnerships to Improve Health Frequently Asked Questions. Glossary...9

Southington Public Schools

Data is the new Oil (Ann Winblad)

Metadata Uses for Networked Information Used with Digital Images at the Austin History Center

Creating descriptive metadata for patron browsing and selection on the Bryant & Stratton College Virtual Library

For those of you who may not have heard of the BHL let me give you some background. The Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL) is a consortium of

An Introduction to PREMIS. Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program

PRINCIPLES AND FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Information retrieval concepts Search and browsing on unstructured data sources Digital libraries applications

Comparison and mapping of VRA Core and IMS Meta-data

Managing Records in Electronic Formats. An Introduction

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information and documentation Managing metadata for records Part 2: Conceptual and implementation issues

Emory Libraries Digital Collections Steering Committee Policy Suite

Designing a Multi-level Metadata Standard based on Dublin Core for Museum data

Indexing Field Descriptions Recommended Practice

A Gentle Introduction to Metadata

Draft for discussion, by Karen Coyle, Diane Hillmann, Jonathan Rochkind, Paul Weiss

From Open Data to Data- Intensive Science through CERIF

Metadata Management System (MMS)

Contribution of OCLC, LC and IFLA

How Long to Keep Records & Legally Dispose of Them. Virginia Fritzsch Public Records Archivist Wisconsin Historical Society

Maennerchor Project Digital Collection

6JSC/Chair/8 25 July 2013 Page 1 of 34. From: Barbara Tillett, JSC Chair To: JSC Subject: Proposals for Subject Relationships

Hello, I m Melanie Feltner-Reichert, director of Digital Library Initiatives at the University of Tennessee. My colleague. Linda Phillips, is going

7.3. In t r o d u c t i o n to m e t a d a t a

RDA: a new cataloging standard for a digital future

Description Cross Domain - Metadata Schema Registry Presentation to ISO Working Group Sydney, 2 November 2004

Document Title Ingest Guide for University Electronic Records

Million Book Universal Library Project :Manual for Metadata Capture, Digitization, and OCR

ISO 2146 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information and documentation Registry services for libraries and related organizations

Smart Metadata and the Archives of the Future. Sue McKemmish Joanne Evans Anne Gilliland-Swetland Nadav Rouche Richard Marciano Hans Hofman

Best Practices for Organizing Electronic Records

1-9 August 2003, Berlin

A tool for Entering Structural Metadata in Digital Libraries

Content structure breakdown, re-use of components and the importance of metadata Carl Mann

Metadata registries for recordkeeping metadata interoperability

A Dublin Core Application Profile in the Agricultural Domain

The Road to Discovery is Paved with Standards

<goals> 10/15/11% From production to preservation to access to use: OAIS, TDR, and the FDLP

The Need for a Terminology Bridge. May 2009

Wendy Thomas Minnesota Population Center NADDI 2014

Table of Contents ARCHIVAL CONTENT STANDARD 7. Kris Kiesling. Cory L. Nimer. Kelcy Shepherd. Katherine M. Wisser. Aaron Rubinstein.

Importance of cultural heritage:

critically examined in the Federal Archives.

Sustainable File Formats for Electronic Records A Guide for Government Agencies

Digital Preservation with Special Reference to the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model: An Overview

DRS Policy Guide. Management of DRS operations is the responsibility of staff in Library Technology Services (LTS).

Workshop B: Application Profiles Canadian Metadata Forum September 28, 2005

Utilizing PBCore as a Foundation for Archiving and Workflow Management

METADATA AT DIGITAL-INFORMATIVE ERA

IRM Standard 20, Version 1.3. Title: Minnesota Recordkeeping Metadata Standard. Table of Contents

Metadata. Week 4 LBSC 671 Creating Information Infrastructures

Data management Backgrounds and steps to implementation; A pragmatic approach.

Smarter Document Capture

Creating our Digital Cultural Heritage. Characteristics of Digital Information

CONTENTdm Basic Skills 1: Getting Started with CONTENTdm

UKOLN involvement in the ARCO Project. Manjula Patel UKOLN, University of Bath

DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT GLOSSARY

Building Consensus: An Overview of Metadata Standards Development

Re: Special Publication Revision 4, Security Controls of Federal Information Systems and Organizations: Appendix J, Privacy Control Catalog

Create Once Use Many Times

3. Technical and administrative metadata standards. Metadata Standards and Applications

International Implementation of Digital Library Software/Platforms 2009 ASIS&T Annual Meeting Vancouver, November 2009

Direct, DirectTrust, and FHIR: A Value Proposition

Regional Workshop: Cataloging and Metadata 101

National Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy-2012 (NDSAP-2012)

Increasing access to OA material through metadata aggregation

WM2015 Conference, March 15 19, 2015, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

This presentation is on issues that span most every digitization project.

RDA Resource Description and Access

Preserving State Government Digital Information Core Legislative XML Schema Meeting. Minnesota Historical Society

Towards a joint service catalogue for e-infrastructure services

Category: Data/Information Keywords: Records Management, Digitization, Imaging, Image capture, Scanning, Process

The Power of Metadata Is Propelling Digital Imaging Beyond the Limitations of Conventional Photography

Transcription:

Herbert J. White II Digital Imaging Operations Manger Family and Church History Department The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints INTRODUCTION This document will present a set of Categories, which will contain Metadata Elements and Sub-Elements that will assist in the description of a stored digital object. Anne J. Gilliland-Swetland in the document Introduction to Metadata, Pathways to Digital Information, setting the Stage States: All of these perspectives on Metadata become important in the development of networked digital information systems, but they lead to a very broad conception of metadata. To understand this conception better, it is helpful to break it down into distinct categories administrative, descriptive, preservation, use and technical metadata that reflect key aspects of metadata functionality. (http://www.getty.edu/gri/standard/intrometadata) This document will outline for the user, information regarding the categories for metadata, as well as the element and sub-elements within each of the categories. This will also bring together diverse document imaging metadata elements, which have been described across the document imaging industry, under one umbrella of understanding. It needs to be understood that Metadata is very fluid. There is not attempt to state that these are the only elements for a Document Imaging System. It is our belief that elements will be added and taken from this standard, as needs change in the document imaging industry. There is also no attempt to state that all of the elements listed must be used to describe a digital object. One must only use what is available and necessary to obtain access to the object. OBJECTIVE The object is to define the critical metadata elements within a document imaging system, enabling users to begin saving common meta elements. These elements can be directly tied to the digital object for better understanding of those objects. Again, Anne J. Gilliland-Swetland in the document Introduction to Metadata, Pathways to Digital Information, setting the Stage States: Metadata creation and management have become a very complex mix of manual and automatic processes and layers created by many different functions and individuals at different points in the life of an information object. As they move through each phase, the object acquires layers of metadata that can be associated with the object in several ways. This metadata can be contained within the same envelope as the information object. Metadata can also be attached to the information object through bi-directional pointers or hyperlinks, while the relationships between metadata and information objects, and between different aspects of metadata can be documented by registering them with a metadata registry. (http://www.getty.edu/gri/standard/intrometadata) The categories and elements identified in this document will be submitted to the Association for Information and Image Management (AIIM). AIIM is the Standard Developer for the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) who is responsible for the development of Standards in the United States. WHAT IS METADATA?

In discussions with Archivists and Librarians it has been identified that metadata elements are not something new. These elements have been used in Catalogs, Registers, Abstracts, and Indexes for years on end. It has only been in recent history that Metadata has taken on a new meaning in the computer environment. The Dublin Core has stated: The term Metadata has been used only in the past 15 years, and has become particularly common with the popularity of the World Wide Web. But the underlying concepts have been in use for as long as collections of information have been organized. Library catalogs represent a well established variety of metadata that has served for decades as collection management and resource discovery tools. (http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/core/education/index.htm) Metadata has been described by many as DATA ABOUT DATA. Metadata is specifically identified data about other data or objects. It is the internet-age term for those elements, as stated previously, that librarians and archivists have traditionally put into Catalogs, Registers, Abstracts, and Indexes. In today s world these elements are most commonly referred to as descriptive information about Web based resources. Metadata records consist of a set of elements with attributes, necessary to describe the resource, other data or objects, in question. For example within the Family and Church History Library Catalog, systems commonly use sets of metadata records with elements that describe a microfilm, book or resource file. Other library elements such as author, title, date of creation or publication, subject coverage, and the call number specifying location of the item on the shelf are referred to as Metadata. Although the concept of metadata predates the Internet and the Web, worldwide interest in metadata standards and practices has exploded with the increase in digital imaging. The wide scale adoption of descriptive standards and practices for electronic resources will improve retrieval of resources from common internet sites. As noted by Weible and Lagoze, two leaders in the field of metadata development: The association of standardized descriptive metadata with networked objects has the potential for substantially improving resource discovery capabilities by enabling field-based (e.g., author, title) searches, permitting indexing of non-textual objects, and allowing access to the surrogate content that is distinct from access to the content of the resource itself. (Weibel and Lagoze, 1997) (http://www.oclc.org/oclc/research/projects/core/documents/wd-guide-current.htm) It is the need for standardized descriptive metadata that has compelled document-imaging industry and the Family and Church History Department to develop the overall metadata elements for digital images. At this point in time, extensive metadata is our best way of minimizing the risk of a digital object becoming inaccessible. Properly used metadata can: Identify the name of the work, who created it, who reformatted it, and other descriptive information Provide unique identification and links to organizations, files, or databases which have more extensive descriptive metadata about the work (this is particularly important in the likely event that the digital file and its external metadata become separated) Explain the technical environment needed to view the work, including applications and version numbers needed, decompression schemes, other files that need to be linked to it etc

There are various types of metadata, which appear unimportant today, but may prove critical for properly viewing these files in the future. (For example, saved information about a particular scanner s color profile will be critical for future color management systems to account for display device differences and to properly display colors on a particular device.) A good rule of thumb is to save any metadata that is cheap/easy to capture, or that someone has indicated might eventually be important. (Howard Besser, 1999 Digital Longevity, Chapter for School for Scanning Book (http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/~howard/papers/sfs-longevity.html)) What is Metadata? In the document-imaging context our definition would be: Useful as well as usable informational data which provides the Administrative, Descriptive, Preservation, Technical and Use descriptions regarding the digital or analog object, within a document imaging environment. WHAT ARE THE CORE ELEMENTS IN THIS SCHEME? This Metadata Standard is intended to be a set of simple yet effective elements for describing a wide range of informational resources. The meta elements are listed within Five major categories. These Categories are: Administrative Discovery and Description Preservation Technical Use Within these five categories are listed the meta elements and their sub-elements. These elements have been obtained by reviewing various metadata recommended practices on the World Wide Web. From these recommended practices we have taken those elements which apply to the document imaging industry. The web sites used to acquire this data are: Pandora: http://www.nla.gov.au/pandora/ldmv2.html Dublin Core: http://purl.org/dc/documents/rec-dces-19990702.htm RLG: http://www.rlg.org/preserv/presmeta.html Cedar Preservation Elements http://users.ox.ac.uk/cedars/papersaiw02.html Meta Data Coalition: http://www.mdcinfo.com Visual Resources Association Data Standards Committee (VRA Core Categories V3.0: http://ww.gsd.harvard.edu/~staffaw3/vra/vracore3.html ICA http://www.ica.org/cds/isad(g).pdf DIG35 http://www.digitalimaging.org

ELEMENT CONTENT AND CONTROLLED VOCABULARIES The elements and sub-elements have been selected from those Standards Practices listed above. This provides for a Controlled Vocabulary which will unify the Practices through common definition. This will enable the sharing of common Meta elements between organizations. Through the adoption of these elements as the Document Imaging Metadata Elements, Organizations can share images and metadata associated with them. COMMON DESCRIPTION TABLES FOR THE METADATA ELEMENTS For each of the Elements and Sub-Elements there is a common table, which provide the following information: Element Definition of the Element An area to list the various computer systems where the data can be found and if the element is applicable. The Sub-Elements with Definitions XML Code for the element The crosswalk between other Recommended Practice for Metadata The version number that the present metadata element is under Who is the registration authority for the metadata The reason for the Data to exist The data type The language of the Data The Origin of the Data The obligation level Any comments that would be necessary. ELEMENTS AND SUB-ELEMENTS The following list of Metadata Categories, Elements and Sub-Elements are the recommended elements that should be considered for use in the Document Imaging Environment. 4.1.1 ADMINISTRATIVE METADATA RIGHTS AND SECURITY INFORMATION RESTRICTIONS Terms, License, Use Access Restrictions Rights Restrictions COPYRIGHT Owner Warnings Conditions Access Controls RIGHTS Negotiation Status Legal Status Retention Period Resource Rights Rules SECURITY Access Inhibitors Authentication Encryption Validation Watermarking GATHERING INFORMATION Frequency Regime Accruals METADATA INFORMATION Creator Description Date created and updated NOTES AND COMMENTS Free text Notes 4.1.2 DISCOVERY OR DESCRIPTION

CORE METADATA CONTRIBUTOR Individual Library Archive Other COVERAGE Time Location Content - Note CREATOR / AUTHOR Individual Library Archive Other DATE Created Available Issued Modified Restoration Beginning Completion DESCRIPTION Open Text Field - Notes Defined Category MARC FORMAT (See also Preservation) IDENTIFIER (PERSISTENT) Project Project Number Current Document ID Former Document ID Current Object ID Former Object ID Unique Number Assignment Link with external Catalog ENTITY IDENTIFIER TITLE Working Title Official Title LANGUAGE Language PUBLISHER Individual Library Archive Other RELATION Relationship between works Reference to another work Identification from which the digital object was created SUBJECT Key-word describing resource Census Death Records Birth Records Marriage Records Commissary Court Records Etc... TYPE Text Image Data Database Software Physical Object Sound Video Multimedia Notes RIGHTS STATEMENT Rights Statement (optional) NOTES AND COMMENTS Free text Notes 4.1.3 PRESERVATION INFORMATION IDENTIFIERS Persistent Identifiers Version or Position Use Information for Patron Title Level of Granularity Culture or Period Genre Location HISTORY Preservation History of Object Preservation History of Change Process Preservation History Copies Agencies Responsibilities for Preservation FORMAT Digital Storage Formats Human Readable (Y/N) HARDWARE Details SOFTWARE Critical Software QUIRKS Quirks

4.1.4 TECHNICAL METADATA CAPTURE Bit Depth (Tonal Resolution) Color Space / Management Color Bar, Grayscale Bar Scanner Profile Compression - Uncompression File Type and Version Procedures Dimensions Orientation Capture Details Resolution Targets Reduction Film Size File Equivalents File Description Format Version Image Size Number of Files Operator Information Filming Location History CHARACTER SETS Text Character Sets Character encoding FINDING AND SEARCHING AIDS Open Text HARDWARE Details SOFTWARE Critical Software SYSTEM Dependencies Requirements NOTES AND COMMENTS Free text Notes 4.1.4.1 EVALUATION AND QUALITY CONTROL EVALUATION / QUALITY Evaluator / Auditor / No. Operator / Scanner ID No. Location of Evaluator Audit Session Start Time Audit Session Stop Time Audit Session Date Image File Status (Status of the Image) EVALUATOR FOLDER ID (Where Image was pulled from) Evaluator Audit Lot ID Evaluator Image File ID Evaluator Image Pass / Fail Status Evaluator Image Pass / Fail Code AUDIT FOLDER ID (Where image was pulled from) Auditor Audit Lot ID Auditor image File ID Auditor Image Pass / Fail Status Auditor Image Pass / Fail Code 4.1.5 USE IMAGE (OBJECT) VIEW CATEGORY VIEW CATEGORY PRINT CATEGORY DOWNLOAD CATEGORY METADATA / INDEX VIEW CATEGORY VIEW CATEGORY PRINT CATEGORY DOWNLOAD CATEGORY