Ontology and Taxonomy Development for GEOSS AR-09-01d

Similar documents
EARTH OBSERVATION DATA INTEROPERABILITY ARRANGEMENT WITH ONTOLOGY REGISTRY

SEXTANT 1. Purpose of the Application

Heterogeneous Missions Accessibility: Interoperability for Earth Observation

Introduction to Prod-Trees

Initial Operating Capability & The INSPIRE Community Geoportal

Presented by Kit Na Goh

SC32 WG2 Metadata Standards Tutorial

EXTRA Examples of OGC standards in support of health applications

> Semantic Web Use Cases and Case Studies

Terminologies, Knowledge Organization Systems, Ontologies

Leveraging metadata standards in ArcGIS to support Interoperability. David Danko and Aleta Vienneau

Introduction to INSPIRE. Network Services

WEB ONTOLOGY SERVICE, A KEY COMPONENT OF A SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE

0.1 Knowledge Organization Systems for Semantic Web

Multi-disciplinary Interoperability: the EuroGEOSS Operating Capacities

Reducing Consumer Uncertainty

eresearch Collaboration across the Pacific:

INSPIRE & Environment Data in the EU

Linked Data: Fast, low cost semantic interoperability for health care?

Opus: University of Bath Online Publication Store

Data and information sharing WMO global systems

WEB ONTOLOGY SERVICE, A KEY COMPONENT OF A SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE

Call for Participation in AIP-6

The GeoPortal Cookbook Tutorial

Next GEOSS der neue europäische GEOSS Hub

Land Administration and Management: Big Data, Fast Data, Semantics, Graph Databases, Security, Collaboration, Open Source, Shareable Information

Description Cross-domain Task Force Research Design Statement

Metadata of geographic information

A generic approach to manage metadata standards

The MED Biodiversity Protection Know ledge Platform

Semantics and Ontologies for Geospatial Information. Dr Kristin Stock

Semantic Infrastructure and Platforms for Geospatial Services: A report from European Projects 4 th International Workshop on Semantic and

CMSP Discovery Vocabularies Workshop. A Joint WHOI/USGS/NOAA Workshop

Webservice-energy.org GEO Community Portal & Spatial Data Infrastructure for Energy

Uniform Resource Management

Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)/ Asian Water Cycle Initiative (AWCI) Philippines Pampanga Basin data

Using Linked Data and taxonomies to create a quick-start smart thesaurus

PUBLICATION OF INSPIRE-BASED AGRICULTURAL LINKED DATA

Metadata: The Theory Behind the Practice

Ontology Servers and Metadata Vocabulary Repositories

Connecting Distributed Geoservices: Interoperability research at ITC

Semantic challenges in sharing dataset metadata and creating federated dataset catalogs

Jeffery S. Horsburgh. Utah Water Research Laboratory Utah State University

Reducing Consumer Uncertainty Towards a Vocabulary for User-centric Geospatial Metadata

Long-term preservation for INSPIRE: a metadata framework and geo-portal implementation

The geospatial metadata catalogue. FOSS4G Barcelona. Jeroen Ticheler. Founder and chair. Director

(Geo)DCAT-AP Status, Usage, Implementation Guidelines, Extensions

A USER S GUIDE TO REGISTERING AND MAINTAINING DATA SERVICES IN HIS CENTRAL 2.0

Enrichment of Sensor Descriptions and Measurements Using Semantic Technologies. Student: Alexandra Moraru Mentor: Prof. Dr.

Spatial Data on the Web

Relation between Geospatial information projects related to GBIF

Metadata for Data Discovery: The NERC Data Catalogue Service. Steve Donegan

How to get to information without drilling down through a gazillion layers or being a GIS power user

Annabel Lee Enriquez Project Manager Getty Conservation Institute

PERIODIC REPORT 3 KYOTO, ICT version April 2012

Increasing dataset quality metadata presence: Quality focused metadata editor and catalogue queriables.

SKOS Standards and Best Practises for USING Knowledge Organisation Systems ON THE Semantic Web

US Geo-Explorer User s Guide. Web:

From Open Data to Data- Intensive Science through CERIF

AutoFocus, an Open Source Facet-Driven Enterprise Search Solution

Linking datasets with user commentary, annotations and publications: the CHARMe project

AS/NZS ISO 19157:2015

Session 2 A virtual Observatory for TerraSAR-X data

ArcGIS 9.2 Works as a Complete System

Data is the new Oil (Ann Winblad)

Towards a Federated Collaborative Platform - From OGC Testbed13 to the Future

Linking and Finding Earth Observation (EO) Data on the Web

Volunteered Geographic Information

Interoperability Standards Rationale for PAPI. Sean McGrath Technical Lead Pan African Parliamentary Interoperability Framework Initiative

INSPIRE WS2 METADATA: Describing GeoSpatial Data

The European Soil Data Centre, the European Soil Bureau Network and INSPIRE Data Specifications for Soil

Improving Semantic Interoperability of Distributed Geospatial Web Services:

Spatial Data on the Web

Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis. Ken Baclawski Northeastern University

National Association of Regional Councils: SICoP DRM 2.0 Pilot

Interoperability in Science Data: Stories from the Trenches

Semantic Technologies and CDISC Standards. Frederik Malfait, Information Architect, IMOS Consulting Scott Bahlavooni, Independent

The UK Marine Environmental Data and Information Network MEDIN

Semantic Web. CS-E4410 Semantic Web, Eero Hyvönen Aalto University, Semantic Computing Research Group (SeCo)

Linked Data Practices for the Geospatial Community

The Jülich WCS interface for emissions, model products, and model evaluation

NextData System of Systems Infrastructure (ND-SoS-Ina)

Building the NNEW Weather Ontology

GeoNetwork User Manual

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology Metadata registries (MDR) Part 3: Registry metamodel and basic attributes

Spanish Water Information System ( SIA ) metadata management

How to use Water Data to Produce Knowledge: Data Sharing with the CUAHSI Water Data Center

For each use case, the business need, usage scenario and derived requirements are stated. 1.1 USE CASE 1: EXPLORE AND SEARCH FOR SEMANTIC ASSESTS

Management of Environmental Information in the European Information and Observation Network (EIONET)

INSPIRE overview and possible applications for IED and E-PRTR e- Reporting Alexander Kotsev

GeoNetwork User Manual

a ESRIN Via Galileo Galilei - Casella Postale Frascati - Italy Tel. (39) Fax (39)

The UNESCO Thesaurus

INSPIRE Geoportal Rich user experience across member states services

A Semantic MediaWiki-Empowered Terminology Registry

Detailed analysis + Integration plan

Semantic Similarity Assessment to Browse Resources exposed as Linked Data: an Application to Habitat and Species Datasets R. Albertoni, M.

A Dublin Core Application Profile in the Agricultural Domain

Lynnes, Yang, Hu, Domenico and Enloe Category: Technical Note March Interoperability between OGC CS/W and WCS Protocols

VocBench v2.0 User Manual

Transcription:

Ontology and Taxonomy Development for GEOSS AR-09-01d UT Japan, Ryosuke Shibasaki, shiba@csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp ESA, Sergio D'Elia, Sergio.DElia@esa.int IEEE, SJS Khalsa, sjsk@nsidc.org 1

350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 A1: 高度成長社会 A2: 多元化型 B1: 持続発展型 B2: 地域共存型 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Challenge for Data Interoperability Syntax Interoperability Proposal of Standard Schema and Interface. It is not always enough for diversified Geo spatial Information. Need more focus support Need to Manage Heterogeneous Data Very Large Image Data Semantic Interoperability Semantic Interoperability for geo spatial data by using data definitions, terminologies, relations, gazetteers (Ontology ) etc. Landuse data schema Integrating Observation Data and Model Simulation Data Stream from Sensor Networks 単位 :0.1 度 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 Year2010 Year2020 Year2030 Year2040 Year2050 月 Climate data schema Land use model Socio Economic data schema Crop Yield data schema Hydrology data schema +coreelement 0..* CoreElement (MD_Metadata) MetadataElement +organizationalelement 0..* 0..* +professionalelement ProfessionalElement OrganizationalElement Population data schema Health data shema Agriculture data schema 2

Sub task Definition (as given in the 2009 2011 Work Plan): As part of the Best Practices Registry, create an Ontology and Taxonomy section to get an overview of available ontologies and taxonomies. Compare and analyze ontologies and taxonomies such as to avoid unnecessary overlaps and conflicts. As appropriate, develop ontologies and taxonomies stored in the Best Practices Registry into standards. Assist in the deployment of a referenceable ontology for Earth observation to link the User Requirements Registry with the Components and Services Registry. Assess how to use the ontology and taxonomy section of the best practices registry for discovery composition and access in the frame of the GEOSS architecture. 3

Proposed approach 1.Collect outline information on existing ontologies and taxonomies associated with Earth observation, and provide an overview. 2.Compare and analyze the ontologies and taxonomies. + Scope, Objectives, Language? + Overlaps? Relationships? Maintenance? + Models? (format, logical structure etc.) 3. Populate Best Practice Wiki on Ontologies/Taxonomies as referenceable basis for GEOSS. 4. Assess the possibility of Standard Ontology/Taxonomies for GEOSS. 5. Assist in the deployment of the referenceable ontologies and taxonomies in Best Practice Wiki for Earth observation in populating the Registries. 6. Assess how to use the ontologies and taxonomies for discovery 4 composition and access in the frame of the GEOSS architecture.

Proposed approach 1.Collect outline information on existing ontologies and taxonomies associated with Earth observation, and provide an overview. 2.Compare and analyze the ontologies and taxonomies. + Scope, Objectives, Language? + Overlaps? Relationships? Maintenance? + Models? (format, logical structure etc.) 3. Populate Best Practice Wiki on Ontologies/Taxonomies as referenceable basis for GEOSS. 4. Assess the possibility of Standard Ontology/Taxonomies for GEOSS. 5. Assist in the deployment of the referenceable ontologies and taxonomies in Best Practice Wiki for Earth observation in populating the Registries. 6. Assess how to use the ontologies and taxonomies for discovery 5 composition and access in the frame of the GEOSS architecture.

Overview of existing ontologies/taxonomies http://babel.csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/dict/ontology/index.php/sweet http://babel.csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/rdic2-ontology/ Starting with the list of available ontology 6

Relationships among ontologies/taxonomies 7

Examples of Gazetteers Digital Gazetteer (Global) ADL Geonames Wikimapia Geospatial Ontology The Getty Thesaurus of Geographical names GEMET Geocoding Services Wikipedia Google Geocoding YahooGeocoding CSIS Address matching service (Japan)

Examples of Regional Gazetteers Geoscience Australia (Australia) Natural Resources Canada (Canada) China Historical GIS (China) genealogy.net (Germany) Base map information view service (Japan)

Proposed approach 1.Collect outline information on existing ontologies and taxonomies associated with Earth observation, and provide an overview. 2.Compare and analyze the ontologies and taxonomies. + Scope, Objectives, Language? + Overlaps? Relationships? Maintenance? + Models? (format, logical structure etc.) 3. Populate Best Practice Wiki on Ontologies/Taxonomies as referenceable basis for GEOSS. 4. Assess the possibility of Standard Ontology/Taxonomies for GEOSS. 5. Assist in the deployment of the referenceable ontologies and taxonomies in Best Practice Wiki for Earth observation in populating the Registries. 6. Assess how to use the ontologies and taxonomies for discovery 10 composition and access in the frame of the GEOSS architecture.

2005 Assessment Existing resource GEMET (General Multilingual Environmental Thesaurus) Groups / Themes, 21 languages EARTh (Environmental Applications Reference Thesaurus) GEMET for Italy (English Italian version) Wiktionary (~ Wikipedia) Multilingual dictionary with definitions, etymologies, Eurovoc Thesaurus On EC fields, 21 languages SWEET (Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology) Earth science data / information None focused on EO applications (see also InterRisk) ESA ESRIN Ontology / Terminology August 24, 2009 Slide 11

Proposed approach 1.Collect outline information on existing ontologies and taxonomies associated with Earth observation, and provide an overview. 2.Compare and analyze the ontologies and taxonomies. + Scope, Objectives, Language? + Overlaps? Relationships? Maintenance? + Models? (format, logical structure etc.) 3. Populate Best Practice Wiki on Ontologies/Taxonomies as referenceable basis for GEOSS. 4. Assess the possibility of a Standard Ontology/Taxonomy for GEOSS. 5. Assist in the deployment of the referenceable ontologies and taxonomies in Best Practice Wiki for Earth observation in populating the Registries. 6. Assess how to use the ontologies and taxonomies for discovery 12 composition and access in the frame of the GEOSS architecture.

Overview of existing ontologies/taxonomies Starting with the list of available ontology 13

Individual terms can also be managed with Wiki Relationships among terms http://babel.csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/vrdic-awci/ Converted to/from RDF

http://babel.csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/vrdic-awci/ KeyGraph Viewer

Proposed approach 1.Collect outline information on existing ontologies and taxonomies associated with Earth observation, and provide an overview. 2.Compare and analyze the ontologies and taxonomies. + Scope, Objectives, Language? + Overlaps? Relationships? Maintenance? + Models? (format, logical structure etc.) 3. Populate Best Practice Wiki on Ontologies/Taxonomies as referenceable basis for GEOSS. 4. Assess the possibility of a Standard Ontology/Taxonomy for GEOSS. 5. Assist in the deployment of the referenceable ontologies and taxonomies in Best Practice Wiki for Earth observation in populating the Registries. 6. Assess how to use the ontologies and taxonomies for discovery 16 composition and access in the frame of the GEOSS architecture.

Minimum EO Ontology Existing efforts Application Term Product = Packed data or information Product Service Processor Unstable: many changes possible below Application Term ESA ESRIN Ontology / Terminology August 24, 2009 Slide 17

Separation to Improve Stability Multi-domain Thesaurus (shared, stable, multilingual) Semantic links Application Term System Specific Taxonomy (dynamic, selected language) Product Application Term Service Processor ESA ESRIN Ontology / Terminology August 24, 2009 Slide 18

Multi-domain Thesaurus Application Termscan be related to Multi-domain Thesaurus health environment climate deterioration of environment marine deterioration natural environment terrestrial environment marine environment water quality themes domains oil spill drift forecas t oil pollution oil spill monitorin g oil spill surveillanc e alga bloom map alga bloom alga bloom monitoring alga bloom location / extent waves wave heigh t wave perio d water turbidit y water transparenc y Secchi depth ESA ESRIN Ontology / Terminology August 24, 2009 Slide 19 information measures

Multi-domain Vocabulary Multidomain Vocabulary Term Type Term Application Domain Description Synonyms Related terms Application Application alga bloom alga bloom marine deterioration An alga bloom is a rapid increase in the population harmful alga bloom, marine bloom, water bloom, eutrophication, marine environment ESA ESRIN Ontology / Terminology August 24, 2009 Slide 20

Proposed approach 1.Collect outline information on existing ontologies and taxonomies associated with Earth observation, and provide an overview. 2.Compare and analyze the ontologies and taxonomies. + Scope, Objectives, Language? + Overlaps? Relationships? Maintenance? + Models? (format, logical structure etc.) 3. Populate Best Practice Wiki on Ontologies/Taxonomies as referenceable basis for GEOSS. 4. Assess the possibility of a Standard Ontology/Taxonomy for GEOSS. 5. Assist in the deployment of the referenceable ontologies and taxonomies in Best Practice Wiki for Earth observation in populating the Registries. 6. Assess how to use the ontologies and taxonomies for discovery 21 composition and access in the frame of the GEOSS architecture.

Developing the support tool for generating metadata PDF HTML Data provider Manual input Publishing Document User Automatic extraction XML API Metadata registration interface Storing to database Search Datasets 用語集用語集 Thesauri Ontologies Taxonomies Reference Metadata (ISO19115/19139) Best Practice Wiki Search & browse interface (e.g. GeoNetwork)

Proposed approach 1.Collect outline information on existing ontologies and taxonomies associated with Earth observation, and provide an overview. 2.Compare and analyze the ontologies and taxonomies. + Scope, Objectives, Language? + Overlaps? Relationships? Maintenance? + Models? (format, logical structure etc.) 3. Populate Best Practice Wiki on Ontologies/Taxonomies as referenceable basis for GEOSS. 4. Assess the possibility of a Standard Ontology/Taxonomy for GEOSS. 5. Assist in the deployment of the referenceable ontologies and taxonomies in Best Practice Wiki for Earth observation in populating the Registries. 6. Assess how to use the ontologies and taxonomies for discovery 23 composition and access in the frame of the GEOSS architecture.

Multi-domain Search Tool (http://dimeola.esrin.esa.int/ote/navigateinfodomain) Requires Java 1.6 Link to 2D Navigator Multi-domain Thesaurus and Vocabulary ESA ESRIN Ontology / Terminology August 24, 2009 Slide 24

Reverse Dictionary to help find exact entry words for search

Possible use case of ontology/taxonomy registry for GCI suggests entry words for search uses registered terms uses registered terms ontology ontology ontology Ontology/taxonomy registry

1.Collect outline information (inventory development) on existing ontologies and taxonomies associated with Earth observation, and provide an overview. Dec. 2009 2.Compare and analyze the ontologies and taxonomies. Mar. 2010 3. Populate Best Practice Wiki on Ontologies/Taxonomies as referenceable basis for GEOSS. Mar.2010 3. Assess the possibility of Standard Ontology/Taxonomies for GEOSS. After the end of AIP 3? 4. Assist in the deployment of the referenceable ontologies and taxonomies in populating the registries. AIP 3? 5. Assess how to use the ontologies and taxonomies for discovery composition and access in the frame of the GEOSS architecture. AIP 3? Draft Roadmap 27

Immediate actions Monthly telecon Start the development of Wiki based inventory Invite volunteers by circulating CFP among GEO members. (CEOS, WMO etc.) Collect information on existing ontology/taxonomy. Determine which to be invented. Develop the inventory. Earth Observation ontology/taxonomy should be prioritized. 28

Gazetteer Geospatial domain related concepts Digital gazetteer is the dictionary of types, names and locations. Focuses on database equipment. Geospatial ontology Geospatial ontology is the knowledge resources about geospatial features, place names or spatial relations. Focuses conceptual modeling Geocoding Geocoding is the act of transforming descriptive text into a valid spatial representation. Focuses on translation process. Query Gazetteer Geocoding Keyword 1 Keyword 2 Name Feature Types Name Location Australian city Melbourne City Melbourne 37 49 14 S, 144 57 41 E Geospatial ontology Resources Features Place names Spatial relations

Quality Criteria of Digital Gazetteer The quality element in evaluating each digital gazetteers. 1)Availability Use constraint or restriction for digital gazetteer (ex. right, security, policy) 2)Scope Target scope on earth surface. Regional/ National/ Worldwide level? 3)Completeness Degrees on covering various kinds of data within target scope 4)Currency Handling famous, familiar name? Managing update and change? 5)Accuracy Degrees of correctness for name or accuracy for location. 6)Granularity Degrees of resolution or scale 7)Richness of annotation/description/information Association with database.

END 31