CRONOS 3D DIMENSIONAL CERTIFICATION

Similar documents
BE INSPIRED.

A Comparison Study of 3D Scanners for Diagnosing Deviations in Their Outputs Using Reverse Engineering Technique

What s new in Solutionix s scanners?

Measurement report. Table of Contents

OPTICAL 3D SCANNER web skype

EMRP JRP IND62 TIM: Use of on-board metrology systems for area-scanning on machine tools

Japan Foundry Society, Inc. Application of Recent X-ray CT Technology to Investment Casting field. Kouichi Inagaki ICC / IHI Corporation

IND62 TIM CALIBRATION OF FREE-FORM STANDARD AND THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR IN-PROCESS MEASUREMENT ON MACHINE TOOLS

T-SCAN 3 3D DIGITIZING

Boresight alignment method for mobile laser scanning systems

MODERN DIMENSIONAL MEASURING TECHNIQUES BASED ON OPTICAL PRINCIPLES

Experimental Investigation on Reverse Engineering of a Typical Freeform Surface using Portable Laser Arm Scanner

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FROM 3D SCANNER TO CNC MACHINE IN REVERSE ENGINEERING

Point Cloud - Polygon Mesh. Wannes Van Isacker - Industrial Design 15

UNIT 10: Basic Geometric Shapes

MULTIPLE-SENSOR INTEGRATION FOR EFFICIENT REVERSE ENGINEERING OF GEOMETRY

Laser scanning and CAD conversion accuracy correction of a highly curved engineering component using a precision tactile measuring system

FARO Scanning Plugin

New Approach in Non- Contact 3D Free Form Scanning

Competence in Optical 3D Measuring

3D scanning verifies the precision of objects printed on 3D printers

Geometry Vocabulary. acute angle-an angle measuring less than 90 degrees

acute angle An angle with a measure less than that of a right angle. Houghton Mifflin Co. 2 Grade 5 Unit 6

COMET 5 3D DIGITIZING

(1)C-(CH) BU, Printed in Japan

FAST REGISTRATION OF TERRESTRIAL LIDAR POINT CLOUD AND SEQUENCE IMAGES

TRANSFORMATIONS AND CONGRUENCE

CREATING 3D WRL OBJECT BY USING 2D DATA

Lecture 3 Sections 2.2, 4.4. Mon, Aug 31, 2009

The measuring software of the 4 th generation

R(-14, 4) R'(-10, -2) S(-10, 7) S'(-6, 1) T(-5, 4) T'(-1, -2)

[Type text] [Type text] [Type text] GearPro Procedure

Micro Cutting Tool Measurement by Focus-Variation

INSPECTION OF THE TURBINE BLADES USING SCANNING TECHNIQUES

BACES3D is a trade mark of company: Friulrobot S.r.l.

Design Intent of Geometric Models

3-dimensional technology. January d Software for Maya archaeology research GEOMAGIC. Author: Cindy Contreras / Editor: Nicholas Hellmuth

3D CAD Systems: 3D Scanners, Reverse Engineering & Inspection Presenter

ARCHITECTURE & GAMES. A is for Architect Simple Mass Modeling FORM & SPACE. Industry Careers Framework. Applied. Getting Started.

GRADE 3 GRADE-LEVEL GOALS

PARAMETERS INFLUENCING THE PRECISION OF SLM PRODUCTION

Dedicated Software Algorithms for 3D Clouds of Points

Linear, and segmented over up to 1000 points Squareness calibration Matrix compensation over up to 30 x 30 points

An Acquisition Geometry-Independent Calibration Tool for Industrial Computed Tomography

Wieblinger Weg 92a, Heidelberg, Germany, Phone: , Fax: ;

Automatic Reconstruction of 3D Objects Using a Mobile Monoscopic Camera

Creating a solid documentation based on a 3D scans performed on. SMARTTECHs scanner scan3d

3DReshaper Help 2017 MR1. 3DReshaper Beginner's Guide. Tank

Complete 3D measurement solution

IMPROVEMENT OF AIRCRAFT MECHANICAL DAMAGE INSPECTION WITH ADVANCED 3D IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES

Computed Tomography & 3D Metrology Application of the VDI/VDE Directive 2630 and Optimization of the CT system

Components User Guide Component Modeller

STL Rapid Prototyping

Developments in Dimensional Metrology in X-ray Computed Tomography at NPL

6th Grade Advanced Math Algebra

Three-Dimensional Laser Scanner. Field Evaluation Specifications

3DReshaper Application. Tank Control with 3DReshaper

CurveAnalyzer - Presentation

3D Models from Range Sensors. Gianpaolo Palma

Strategy. Using Strategy 1

Lesson Polygons

INTRODUCTION TO MEDICAL IMAGING- 3D LOCALIZATION LAB MANUAL 1. Modifications for P551 Fall 2013 Medical Physics Laboratory

Integration of Emerging Inspection Devices with Rapid Manufacturing Systems

Three-Dimensional Scanning and Graphic Processing System

Analog Clock. High School Math Alignment. Level 2 CSTA Alignment. Description

PC-DMIS Requirements


LATEST TRENDS on APPLIED MATHEMATICS, SIMULATION, MODELLING

Intersecting Simple Surfaces. Dr. Scott Schaefer

3D Body. Modified by Jason Howie on 8-Oct Parent page: PCB Dialogs. Other Related Resources 3D Body (Object)

A RADIAL WHITE LIGHT INTERFEROMETER FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYLINDRICAL GEOMETRIES

Vertical angle calibration of a theodolite

Project Title: Welding Machine Monitoring System Phase II. Name of PI: Prof. Kenneth K.M. LAM (EIE) Progress / Achievement: (with photos, if any)

Math 7 Glossary Terms

2h Public y-o. adult. Software. SketchUp

Mapping Non-Destructive Testing Data on the 3D Geometry of Objects with Complex Shapes

UNIT IV - Laser and advances in Metrology 2 MARKS

AND INSPECTION SOFTWARE

B. Number Operations and Relationships Grade 7

TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNER DATA PROCESSING

Rigorous Scan Data Adjustment for kinematic LIDAR systems

TERRESTRIAL LASER SYSTEM TESTING USING REFERENCE BODIES

Optimized Design of 3D Laser Triangulation Systems

The FaroArm. The world s best-selling measurement arm

Indian Journal of Engineering

SurfaceMeasure. Non-contact Line-Laser Probe for Coordinate Measuring Machines

Software Form Control

MobileScan3D. MobileScan3D PlugIn for Geomagic. By Steintek GmbH

Length, United States, NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology)

8.G Reflections, Rotations, and

Plant and Canopy Reconstruction User Documentation. The University of Nottingham

Ansoft HFSS Mesh Menu

SOLIDS.

Introduction to Transformations. In Geometry

QUALITY CONTROL OF PARTS AND ASSEMBLIES USING SOFTWARE GOM INSPECT BASED ON PORTABLE CMM DATA

Fast checking of CMM geometry with a patented tool

3D INSPECTION SOFTWARE

Calypso the Easy Way to Create Part Programs

FARO Scanning Plugin

AN EVALUATION OF NON-CONTACT LASER SCANNER PERFORMANCE USING CALIBRATED ARTIFACTS

Transcription:

CRONOS 3D DIMENSIONAL CERTIFICATION This dimensional certification is structured as follow: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Test description Dimensional report basic workflow Dimensional report, acquisition field 18mm Dimensional report, acquisition field 35mm Dimensional report, acquisition field 5mm 1.Test description 1.1. Given the fact that a common accepted norm to certify the accuracy of a white structured light scanner does not exist yet, Open Technology s.r.l adopted an highly accurate self-made method. 1.2. The test object has been designed and crafted by highly skilled engineers and technicians, the choice has fallen to a milled stone block with different geometric entities on its upper surface. The material was adopted due to its crushproof characteristics and resistance to external factors; the shapes help the user through the alignment and simplify the detection of significant points. The object appears as in the following picture.

1.3. The test object has been constantly measured with a Coordinates Measuring Machine by the College of engineering, Data analysis department of the University of Padova in order to regularly have, updated and accurate parameters (1792 certain points). 1.4. Softwares used for the test are Optical RevEng 2.2 (Open Technologies s.r.l) for the acquisition and Stl generation, and Geomagic Control (3D Systems) for the final alignment and 3D comparison. 2.Dimensional report basic workflow 2.1. Test calibration, eventually re-calibrate the system. 2.2. Set the test object on the turn table selecting Direct alignment as reconstruction method, start an automatic acquisition of eight range images. No alignment data were obtained from the turntable's axis of rotation. 2.3. Select and delete outliers points and cluster of outliers points with the respective tools. 2.4. Perform a global alignment on the pointclouds, checking the global optimization box. 2.5. Generate an optimized polygonal mesh. 2.6. Export the.stl(binary) file and import it in 3ds' Geomagic Control 2.7. Align the scan data with the CMM data using same features, pyramids vertex and centres of the two sphere projected on the base plane. 2.8. Geomagic Control's 3D comparison. 2.9. Detection of significant points and computation of distances.

3.Dimensional report, acquisition field 18mm 3.1. Equipment: OPT Cronos3D 18mm, 3. Mpx sensors Calibration master (Crystal, 15mm marker's pitch) Syncronized rotating table 3.2. Results: Reference model OpenMarble Test equipment Cronos 3D - 18mm 3. Mpx sensor No. of data points 1776 3.2.1. Alignment statistics Pair Distance Angle Plane base 5mm 2 Spheres line mm Projected centre_big sphere mm 3.2.2. 3D comparison results Tolerance Tolerance Type 3D deviation Units Millimeters Max. critical Max. nominal.6 Min. nominal -.6 Min. critical Max.upper deviation.59 Max.lower deviation.54 Average deviation.13/-.15 Standard deviation.16

Standard s Distribution (+/-) No. of points Percentage -6 * Std. Dev. -5 * Std. Dev. -4 * Std. Dev. -3 * Std. Dev. 11.614-2 * Std. Dev. 217 12.19-1 * Std. Dev. 727 4.569 1 * Std. Dev. 636 35.491 2 * Std. Dev. 149 8.315 3 * Std. Dev. 24 1.339 4 * Std. Dev. 15.837 5 * Std. Dev. 8.446 6 * Std. Dev. 5.279 3.2.3 Significant points C1: Projected centre of the bigger sphere on the plane base C2: Projected centre of the smaller sphere on the plane base C3: Centre of the central sphere V1: Vertex of the pyramid lying beside the bigger cylinder V2: Vertex of the pyramid lying beside the smaller cylinder Name Measured Nominal C1_C2 246.877 246.872 V1_V2 219.892 Status Upper tol. Lower tol..4 219.875.18 12.888 12.886.2 C1_V1 143.796 143.789.7 C2_V2 142.315 142.315 C1_V2 195.4 195.371.29 V1_C2 198.863 198.848.15 12.888 12.886.2 C2_C3

4.Dimensional report, acquisition field mm35 4.1. Equipment: OPT Cronos3D 35mm, 2. Mpx sensors Calibration master (Crystal, 15mm marker's pitch) Syncronized rotating table 4.2. Results: Reference model OpenMarble Test equipment Cronos 3D - 35 2.Mpx sensor No. of data points 1764 4.2.1. Alignment statistics Pair Distance Angle Plane base mm Spheres line mm Projected centre_big sphere mm 4.2.2. 3D comparison results Tolerance Tolerance Type 3D deviation Units Millimeters Max. critical Max. nominal.6 Min. nominal -.6 Min. critical Max.upper deviation.58 Max.lower deviation.56 Average deviation.39/-.2 Standard deviation.2

Standard s Distribution (+/-) No. of points Percentage -6 * Std. Dev. -5 * Std. Dev. -4 * Std. Dev. -3 * Std. Dev. 6 3.41-2 * Std. Dev. 365 2.691-1 * Std. Dev. 675 38.265 1 * Std. Dev. 58 28.798 2 * Std. Dev. 131 7.426 3 * Std. Dev. 25 1,417 4 * Std. Dev. 5 * Std. Dev. 6 * Std. Dev. 4.2.3 Significant points C1: Projected centre of the bigger sphere on the plane base C2: Projected centre of the smaller sphere on the plane base C3: Centre of the central sphere V1: Vertex of the pyramid lying beside the bigger cylinder V2: Vertex of the pyramid lying beside the smaller cylinder Name Measured Nominal C1_C2 246.87 246.872 V1_V2 219.96 Status Upper tol. Lower tol. -.2 219.875.31 12.885 12.886.1 C1_V1 143.786 143.789 -.3 C2_V2 142.38 142.315 -.7 C1_V2 195.395 195.371.24 V1_C2 198.849 198.848.1 12.885 12.886 -.1 C2_C3 128.65 -.3

5.Dimensional report, acquisition field 5mm 5.1. Equipment: OPT Cronos3D 5mm, 1.3 Mpx sensors Calibration master (Crystal, 3mm marker's pitch) Syncronized rotating table 5.2. Results: Reference model OpenMarble Test equipment Cronos 3D - 5mm 1.3 Mpx sensor No. of data points 1769 5.2.1. Alignment statistics Pair Distance Angle Plane base mm Spheres line mm Projected centre_big sphere mm 5.2.2. 3D comparison results Tolerance Tolerance Type 3D deviation Units Millimeters Max. critical Max. nominal.6 Min. nominal -.6 Min. critical Max.upper deviation.74 Max.lower deviation -.91 Average deviation.12/-.17 Standard deviation.19

Standard s Distribution (+/-) No. of points Percentage -6 * Std. Dev. -5 * Std. Dev. 3.167-4 * Std. Dev. 8.446-3 * Std. Dev. 43 2.4-2 * Std. Dev. 171 9.542-1 * Std. Dev. 657 36.663 1 * Std. Dev. 679 37.891 2 * Std. Dev. 188 1.491 3 * Std. Dev. 32 1,786 4 * Std. Dev. 8.446 5 * Std. Dev. 3.167 6 * Std. Dev. 5.2.3 Significant points C1: Projected centre of the bigger sphere on the plane base C2: Projected centre of the smaller sphere on the plane base C3: Centre of the central sphere V1: Vertex of the pyramid lying beside the bigger cylinder V2: Vertex of the pyramid lying beside the smaller cylinder Name Measured Nominal C1_C2 246.887 246.872 V1_V2 219.874 Status Upper tol. Lower tol..15 219.875 -.1 12.9 12.886.13 C1_V1 143.792 143.789.3 C2_V2 142.294 142.315 -.21 C1_V2 195.49 195.371.38 V1_C2 198.843 198.848 -.5 12.9 12.886.13 C2_C3