Mobile World Congress 2016 OPEN SOURCE MANO (OSM) E2E Orchestration Demo. February 2016

Similar documents
AN UPDATE ON OSM TO THE NFVRG. Diego R. Lopez Telefónica I+D

ODL and NFV orchestration The OSM case

ONAP ETSI NFV ARCHITECTURE ALIGNEMENT

OSM: 7 FULLY FUNCTIONAL DEMOS Vanessa Little (VMware) - OSM TSC Chair

OSM Architecture Workshop

ETSI ISG NFV: WORK PROGRAM RELEASE 2 AND RELEASE 3 OVERVIEW

ETSI NFV CONCEPTS AND MANO DETAILS NFV#19 TUTORIAL 11 SEPTEMBER

MWC 2015 End to End NFV Architecture demo_

NFV ACCELERATION INTRODUCTION. Presenter Ning Zong

Deployment Case Study of SDN and NFV Transformation. Marcela Blanco-Luna Solutions Architect Advanced Services

The Virtual Brick Road Achievements and Challenges in NFV Space. Diego R. Lopez Telefónica NFV ISG Technical Manager October 2013

China Telecom NFV Lab Trial Decoupling of VNF/Hypervisor/Hardware/MANO

Elastic Network Functions: Opportunities and Challenges

ETSI Plugtests Test Plan V1.0.0 ( ) 1 st ETSI NFV Plugtests Madrid, Spain 23rd January 3 rd February

Multi-tenancy of network operators and edge cloud services using small cells

NFV. Cloud Standard Coordination Workshop January 28th 2016, Brussels. 1 Nokia 2016

Day-0, day-1 and day-2 configuration in OSM. Gerardo García (Telefónica)

Hybrid Cloud (Telco & IT) - en fleksibel og optimal implementering

VNF on-boarding CMCC

Introduction. Delivering Management as Agile as the Cloud: Enabling New Architectures with CA Technologies Virtual Network Assurance Solution

PAVING THE WAY TO OPEN SOURCE NFV. A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

The Interoperability Challenge in. Telecom and NFV Environments. Carsten Rossenhövel, EANTC Chris Price, Ericsson Ildikó Váncsa, OpenStack Foundation

ETSI Plugtests Test Plan V1.0.0 ( ) 2 nd ETSI NFV Plugtests Sophia Antipolis, France 15 th 19 th January 2018

PROVIDING NETWORK OPERATOR MULTI-TENANCY AND EDGE CLOUD SERVICES USING SMALL CELLS

VNF OPERATION USE CASES. Thinh Nguyenphu, ETSI NFV SOL Vice-Chair, Nokia Bell Labs and CTO Nokia

Network Automation. From 4G to 5G. Juan Carlos García López Global Director Technology and Architecture GCTIO, Telefonica. MWC 2018 Barcelona, Feb 27

NFV Case Study of China Mobile

UPDATE ON NFV PLUGTEST

CT and IT architecture reconstruction based on software_. Global CTO

System architecture and aspects of SESAME: Small cells coordination for Multi-tenancy and Edge services

Network Function Virtualization over Open DC/OS Yung-Han Chen

NFV Platform Service Assurance Intel Infrastructure Management Technologies

From Virtual to Real OPNFV Proof-of-Concepts

ETSI GR MEC 017 V1.1.1 ( )

Moving along the NFV Way_

MEF's Lifecycle Service Orchestration (LSO): Multi-operator Service Delivery from Months to Minutes..

nil.com 2017 NIL, Security Tag: PUBLIC 2017 NIL, Security Tag: INTERNAL 1

ONAP VoLTE Use Case Solution Brief

Orchestrated Assurance enabled by NFV 1 NFV ISG PoC Proposal

Abinash Vishwakarma(Netcracker)

KPI-validation and SLA monitoring in context of troubleshooting/isolating VNFs performance issues

ETSI GR NFV-IFA 028 V3.1.1 ( )

Network Functions Virtualisation. Kazuaki OBANA Media Innovation Laboratory, NTT Network Innovation Laboratories

Using Future OSS Orchestration to enhance operations and service agility

ETSI GS NFV-IFA 010 V2.2.1 ( )

NFV Infrastructure for Media Data Center Applications

UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI

Network Virtualisation Reference architecture and ecosystem_. Telefónica Global CTO

SDN, NFV, and Mobile Edge Enabling Future Carrier Networks. Gagan Puranik January 31, 2016

Accelerating SDN and NFV Deployments. Malathi Malla Spirent Communications

Open Source Networking Software Case studies and Roundtable. Arpit Joshipura GM, Networking

Telco Perceptions of OPNFV. Roz Roseboro, Senior Analyst, Heavy Reading

The LSO Progress Report: Multi-Operator Carrier Ethernet Service Orchestration from Months to Minutes

vbranch Introduction and Demo

TOSCA Templates for NFV and network topology description

VNF Benchmarking. Customer Profile. The Move to Virtualization. The Challenges. Case Study

ETSI GS NFV-IFA 007 V2.1.1 ( )

Preparing your Business for Virtualization

Testing Network Softwarization

Christopher Croot Programmable Networks Architect Dynamic Network Services BT BBF SDN/NFV Work Area Director

Bringing DevOps to Service Provider Networks & Scoping New Operational Platform Requirements for SDN & NFV

Virtualizing 5G Infrastructure using Cloud VIM. Sangho Shin SK Telecom

5G Network Slicing: Use Cases & Requirements

Network Virtualisation Vision and Strategy_ (based on lesson learned) Telefónica Global CTO

Progress report on NFV standardization in ETSI.

NFV ISG PoC Proposal Service Chaining for NW Function Selection in Carrier Networks

DevOps CICD for VNF a NetOps Approach

OPEN-O Unified NFV/SDN Open Source Orchestrator

Unlock the Benefits of Transport SDN OIF Transport SDN API Interop Demo

5G Core Network - ZTE 5G Cloud ServCore. Zhijun Li, ZTE Corporation

ETSI GS NFV 003 V1.3.1 ( )

ETSI GS NFV-IFA 010 V2.1.1 ( )

Customize OpenStack for Telco NFV

Orchestrating the Cloud Infrastructure using Cisco Intelligent Automation for Cloud

The way to «ABC Networks» Stefano Pileri, CEO, Italtel

Where is the Network Edge? MEC Deployment Options, Business Case & SDN Considerations

Network Enhanced Residential Gateway (NERG) Service Initialization with Overlay Logical Subscriber Link (LSL) Connectivity

ONAP CCVPN Blueprint Overview. ONAP CCVPN Blueprint Improves Agility and Provides Cross-Domain Connectivity. ONAP CCVPN Blueprint Overview 1

5G enabled autonomous cars

SDN and NFV: Why ODL ticks all the right boxes?

ETSI All rights reserved

ETSI GS NFV-IFA 008 V2.1.1 ( )

ETSI GR NFV-EVE 012 V3.1.1 ( )

Bridging OPNFV and ETSI Yardstick and the methodology for pre-deployment validation of NFV Infrastructure

MEF Strategy and Market Trends

ETSI Zero touch network and Service Management (ZSM)

Discovery Mechanisms in the MANO Stack

Hillstone CloudEdge For Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Solutions

Data Protection for Dell EMC Ready Solution for VMware NFV Platform using Avamar and Data Domain

Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13

Athens, Greece _ October 25, /26

Survey of ETSI NFV standardization documents BY ABHISHEK GUPTA FRIDAY GROUP MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 2016

Overall Assessment and Roadmap

Cisco Knowledge Network

STATE OF NFV AND OPNFV: AN UPDATE

BlueSPACE s SDN/NFV Architecture for 5G SDM/WDM-enabled Fronthaul with Edge Computing

ETSI GR NFV-TST 007 V1.1.1 ( )

NESMO: Network Slicing Management and Orchestration Framework

RDCL 3D, a Model Agnostic Web Framework for the Design and Composition of NFV Services

ETSI TS V ( )

Transcription:

osm.etsi.org

Mobile World Congress 2016 OPEN SOURCE MANO () E2E Orchestration Demo February 2016

Open Source MANO () aims to accelerate NFV adoption around a common IM for orchestration Delivering an open source MANO stack aligned to ETSI NFV Information Models Capable of consuming published Information Models (IM) for NFV service and deployment (VNFD, NSD, etc.) Extending the IM, and recommending back to ETSI NFV Assuring predictable behaviour of Virtualized Network Functions (VNF) and Network Services (NS) under said information models Enabling an eco-system of IM-compliant VNF vendors Ready to be offered to cloud and service providers No need of integration per- customer & MANO vendor basis 3

providing a friendly environment for developers, minimizing entry barriers & paving the way for DevOps LOCAL DEVELOPMENT &TESTING TEST POOL FOR DEVELOPERS SERVICE PROVIDER Descriptors Descriptors VM images VM images Open Development Env Functional tests Low cost Integration from the beginning Real servers and switches Performance tests (EPA can be enforced) Cost-effective shared infrastructure Move the value to VNF services Production/pre-production environment Real network scenarios Final service configuration Fast deployment Low final integration cost SAME IMAGES AND DESCRIPTORS ACROSS ALL THE CHAIN!

Why? 3 reasons that make the difference 5

1) Initiative driven by Service Providers requirements and supported by key players of the virtualization space REMAINING OPEN TO NEW FELLOW TRAVELLERS

2) Embraces the complexity required for deployments in field 1. EPA support 2. Multi-VIM x100 3. Multi-site 4. SO and RO can be detached 7

including the operational aspects and modelling of abstractions required for E2E service orchestration 8

3) And does not start from scratch! The project starts with running code from the beginning OpenMANO (RO) Juju Charms (VNF Modelling & Config) Rift.io (SO/NS management) Seed code represents an initial starting point, being all components pluggable/replaceable for which helps to: Avoid over-engineering due to excess of abstraction Start getting traction at SP level Help to understand the value Bridge between long and short term Assure prompt feedback from practical experiences Ecosystem steering Assure VNF availability Better influence (via credibility) in other forums 9

PROJECT SCOPE & AREAS 1 COMMUNITY-DRIVEN IMPLEMENTATION OF NFVO+VNFM+SO* NFV management and Orchestration OSS/BSS Os-Ma NFV Orchestrator Or-Vi NFVI VNF 1 EM(s) Virtual Computing Computing Hardware VNF 2 Virtual Storage Virtualisation Layer Vl-Ha Storage Hardware Specific VNF-M(s) Vn-Nf VNF 3 Virtual Network Hardware resources Network Hardware Ve-Vnfm (*) Note: Service Orchestrator (SO) is currently beyond ETSI scope for MANO Nf-Vi Generic VNF Manager Or-Vnfm Vi-Vnfm Virtualised Infrastructure Manager(s) 2 DESCRIPTORS (VNFD & NSD) Service, VNF and Infrastructure Description 3 INTEROP & EPA SUPPORT W/REFERENCE VIM(s)

COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS OPEN COMMUNITY-BASED NFVO, based on these principles: Compliance and Feedback to ETSI ISG Architecture and Specs Base implementation information model Evolution Independent IOP labs to test & integrate in the community With an open governance model based on technical meritocracy TYPES OF ENGAGEMENT Developers (of course!) Early adopters Testers (modules & IOP) Advisors END USER ADVISORY BOARD Service providers and other end users of the technology (not integrators or resellers) will become members Produce Feature requests to the technical groups 11

Demonstration: L3 VPN service with value added services Putting in practice 12

MWC 2016 Demo - Rationale OBJECTIVE: Demonstrate the feasibility of the concepts, starting with existing code seeds As realistic as possible, with commercial VNFs Proof of main concepts of : E2E automation EPA & underlay control SLA can be guaranteed Multi-Site Multi-VIM Combination of multi-tenant and single-tenant VNFs Connection to external physical lines Useful for next stages of the project Enabler for further code development Room for further evolution/complexity 13

Real operation is multi-layered by nature, so MANO needs to embrace it to have real operational impact NETWORK CREATION FULFILLMENT ASSURANCE (L3) SERVICE OPERATION (Chaining of VAS & selfcare portal) Add users to VPN Add and chain VAS to VPN (self-care) QoE monitoring (L2) SERVICE MANAGER (VPN service) VPN service design VPN deployment VPN service monitoring (L1) NETWORK DEPARTMENT (Network core) (L0) NFVI OPERATOR Network scenario creation & deployment (PE per site) Installation of switches & servers 14 Network scenario provisioning Tenant creation. Allocation of tenant quotes. Network scenario monitoring Monitoring of usage of resources by tenants. Monitoring of NFVI infrastructure

Real operation is multi-layered by nature, but current MANO approaches are partial (L3) SERVICE OPERATION (Chaining of VAS & selfcare portal) (L2) SERVICE MANAGER (VPN service) (L1) NETWORK DEPARTMENT (Network core) (L0) NFVI OPERATOR NETWORK CREATION VPN service design Network scenario creation & deployment (PE per site) Installation of switches & servers 15 FULFILLMENT Add users to VPN Add and chain VAS to VPN (self-care) VPN deployment Network scenario provisioning ASSURANCE QoE monitoring SCOPE OF CURRENT MANO APPROACHES Tenant creation. Allocation of tenant quotes. VPN service monitoring STATIC / TRADITIONAL OPERATION CLOUD OPERATION Network scenario monitoring Monitoring of usage of resources by tenants. Monitoring of NFVI infrastructure

Real operation is multi-layered by nature, but current MANO approaches are partial (L3) SERVICE OPERATION (Chaining of VAS & selfcare portal) (L2) SERVICE MANAGER (VPN service) (L1) NETWORK DEPARTMENT (Network core) (L0) NFVI OPERATOR NETWORK CREATION VPN service design Network scenario creation & deployment (PE per site) Installation of switches & servers 16 FULFILLMENT Add users to VPN Add and chain VAS to VPN (self-care) VPN deployment Network scenario provisioning ASSURANCE QoE monitoring STATIC / TRADITIONAL OPERATION Tenant creation. Allocation of tenant quotes. VPN service monitoring SCOPE OF CURRENT MANO APPROACHES Network scenario monitoring STATIC / TRADITIONAL OPERATION CLOUD OPERATION Monitoring of usage of resources by tenants. Monitoring of NFVI infrastructure

Real operation is multi-layered by nature, so MANO needs to embrace it to have real operational impact (L3) SERVICE OPERATION (Chaining of VAS & selfcare portal) (L2) SERVICE MANAGER (VPN service) (L1) NETWORK DEPARTMENT (Network core) (L0) NFVI OPERATOR NETWORK CREATION VPN service design Network scenario creation & deployment (PE per site) 17 FULFILLMENT Add users to VPN Add and chain VAS to VPN (self-care) VPN deployment SCOPE OF Installation of switches & servers Network scenario provisioning Tenant creation. Allocation of tenant quotes. CLOUD OPERATION ASSURANCE QoE monitoring VPN service monitoring Network scenario monitoring Monitoring of usage of resources by tenants. Monitoring of NFVI infrastructure

STEP 0: NFVI+VIM are available at different locations (L0) VIM 1 VIM 2 interdc VLAN Z Multi-tenant VNF Single-tenant VNF net-os VIM tenant L2 connection for dataplane L2 connection for low BW

STEP 1: PE core is deployed and configured (L1) 16data1 PE 1 PE 2 16data2 PE 3 VIM 1 VIM 2 interdc VLAN Z Multi-tenant VNF Single-tenant VNF net-os VIM tenant L2 connection for dataplane L2 connection for low BW

STEP 2: Monitoring VPN is provisioned (L1) Corp. SP 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN 3000 16data1 PE 1 PE 2 Corp. SP 10.0.2.0/24 16data2 VLAN 3000 PE 3 VIM 1 VIM 2 interdc VLAN Z Multi-tenant VNF Single-tenant VNF net-os VIM tenant L2 connection for dataplane L2 connection for low BW

STEP 3: Connectivity is validated with traffic generator (L1) Generator Corp. SP 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN 3000 16data1 PE 1 PE 2 Corp. SP 10.0.2.0/24 16data2 VLAN 3000 PE 3 VIM 1 VIM 2 interdc VLAN Z Multi-tenant VNF Single-tenant VNF net-os VIM tenant L2 connection for dataplane L2 connection for low BW

STEP 4: VPN for Corporation A is created (L2) Generator Corp. SP 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN 3000 16data1 PE 1 PE 2 Corp. SP 10.0.2.0/24 16data2 VLAN 3000 VLAN Y 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN X PE 3 10.0.2.0/24 VIM 1 VIM 2 interdc VLAN Z 10.0.4.0/24 Multi-tenant VNF Single-tenant VNF net-os VIM tenant L2 connection for dataplane L2 connection for low BW

STEP 5: SSL access for Corporation A is added in 2 sites (L3) Generator Corp. SP 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN 3000 16data1 PE 1 PE 2 Corp. SP 10.0.2.0/24 16data2 VLAN 3000 VLAN Y SSL VPN 1 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN X PE 3 10.0.2.0/24 SSL VPN 2 VIM 1 interdc VIM 2 VLAN Z Multi-tenant VNF 10.0.4.0/24 Single-tenant VNF net-os VIM tenant L2 connection for dataplane L2 connection for low BW

STEP 6: Corporate VoIP service added to Corporation A (L3) Generator Corp. SP 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN 3000 16data1 PE 1 PE 2 Corp. SP 10.0.2.0/24 16data2 VLAN 3000 VLAN Y SSL VPN 1 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN X PE 3 10.0.2.0/24 SSL VPN 2 VIM 1 interdc VIM 2 VLAN Z Multi-tenant VNF 10.0.4.0/24 Single-tenant VNF IMS-corpA net-os VIM tenant L2 connection for dataplane L2 connection for low BW

STEP 7: User is provisioned in corporate VoIP service (L3) Generator Corp. SP 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN 3000 16data1 PE 1 PE 2 Corp. SP 10.0.2.0/24 16data2 VLAN 3000 VLAN Y SSL VPN 1 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN X PE 3 10.0.2.0/24 SSL VPN 2 VIM 1 interdc VIM 2 VLAN Z Multi-tenant VNF 10.0.4.0/24 Single-tenant VNF IMS-corpA net-os VIM tenant L2 connection for dataplane (domain, users) L2 connection for low BW

STEP 8: VoIP call in Corporation A (L3) Generator Corp. SP 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN 3000 16data1 PE 1 PE 2 Corp. SP 10.0.2.0/24 16data2 VLAN 3000 VLAN Y SSL VPN 1 10.0.1.0/24 VLAN X PE 3 10.0.2.0/24 SSL VPN 2 VIM 1 interdc VIM 2 VLAN Z Multi-tenant VNF 10.0.4.0/24 Single-tenant VNF IMS-corpA net-os VIM tenant L2 connection for dataplane (domain, users) L2 connection for low BW

CONCLUSIONS E2E Service Orchestration is key to realizing the promised benefits of NFV It will deliver the broad multi use case benefits of NFV to the operator community The ability to integrate multi-vendor VNFs is essential to realize this vision Common procedures and mechanisms Lower cost of integration New competitive eco-system An open, well-understood and testable IM is key to enable such an open ecosystem of VNF providers The most effective vehicle to create certainty around the IM is a reference open source implementation 27

& NEXT STEPS was born to create such a reference implementation for the MANO stack The highest levels of openness and community access will be enabled through its widespread adoption VNF Vendors System Integrators Operators Academia The best way to stay involved in is to participate (many options are possible) Code Contributors Lab testers End user advisors General advisors in discussion s fora (osm.etsi.org) 28

Find out more at: osm.etsi.org 29