Recent developments in tracking and

Similar documents
Tracking POG Update. Tracking POG Meeting March 17, 2009

Track reconstruction with the CMS tracking detector

Tracking and Vertexing performance in CMS

Physics CMS Muon High Level Trigger: Level 3 reconstruction algorithm development and optimization

Robustness Studies of the CMS Tracker for the LHC Upgrade Phase I

PoS(TIPP2014)204. Tracking at High Level Trigger in CMS. Mia TOSI Universitá degli Studi di Padova e INFN (IT)

Performance of Tracking, b-tagging and Jet/MET reconstruction at the CMS High Level Trigger

b-tagging activities Aug 9, 2007

CMS Conference Report

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)523. The CMS trigger in Run 2. Mia Tosi CERN

Design of the new ATLAS Inner Tracker (ITk) for the High Luminosity LHC

LAr Event Reconstruction with the PANDORA Software Development Kit

Track reconstruction of real cosmic muon events with CMS tracker detector

Full Silicon Tracking Studies for CEPC

CMS reconstruction improvements for the tracking in large pile-up events

b-jet slice performances at L2/EF

PoS(High-pT physics09)036

Real-time Analysis with the ALICE High Level Trigger.

Electron and Photon Reconstruction and Identification with the ATLAS Detector

ATLAS ITk Layout Design and Optimisation

Tracking and Vertex reconstruction at LHCb for Run II

SiD Tracking using VXD. Nick Sinev, University of Oregon

Study of the Higgs boson coupling to the top quark and of the b jet identification with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider.

TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction

Inside-out tracking at CDF

CMS FPGA Based Tracklet Approach for L1 Track Finding

TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction

ALICE tracking system

TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction

Update on Energy Resolution of

Boosted ZHLL analysis. Wataru OKAMURA 27/12/2011

Performance of the ATLAS Inner Detector at the LHC

ATLAS PILE-UP AND OVERLAY SIMULATION

b-jet identification at High Level Trigger in CMS

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Fast pattern recognition with the ATLAS L1Track trigger for the HL-LHC

V. Karimäki, T. Lampén, F.-P. Schilling, The HIP algorithm for Track Based Alignment and its Application to the CMS Pixel Detector, CMS Note

3D-Triplet Tracking for LHC and Future High Rate Experiments

Direct photon measurements in ALICE. Alexis Mas for the ALICE collaboration

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)492. Performance and recent developments of the real-time track reconstruction and alignment of the LHCb detector.

Analysis preservation and recasting with Rivet & Contur. Andy Buckley, University of Glasgow FNAL Reinterpretation Workshop, 16 Oct 2017

Collider analysis recasting with Rivet & Contur. Andy Buckley, University of Glasgow Jon Butterworth, University College London MC4BSM, 20 April 2018

Primary Vertex Reconstruction at LHCb

GLAST tracking reconstruction Status Report

Muon Reconstruction and Identification in CMS

for the DESY/ ECFA study detector

PoS(ACAT08)101. An Overview of the b-tagging Algorithms in the CMS Offline Software. Christophe Saout

The GLAST Event Reconstruction: What s in it for DC-1?

Track reconstruction for the Mu3e experiment based on a novel Multiple Scattering fit Alexandr Kozlinskiy (Mainz, KPH) for the Mu3e collaboration

MIP Reconstruction Techniques and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering

Track pattern-recognition on GPGPUs in the LHCb experiment

TPC digitization and track reconstruction: efficiency dependence on noise

ATLAS Simulation Computing Performance and Pile-Up Simulation in ATLAS

Tracking and flavour tagging selection in the ATLAS High Level Trigger

8.882 LHC Physics. Analysis Tips. [Lecture 9, March 4, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

PoS(IHEP-LHC-2011)002

Monte Carlo programs

Performance of the GlueX Detector Systems

Optimisation Studies for the CLIC Vertex-Detector Geometry

LArTPC Reconstruction Challenges

Lecture 1.1. What is PAT and How to use it?

Modelling of non-gaussian tails of multiple Coulomb scattering in track fitting with a Gaussian-sum filter

Precision Timing in High Pile-Up and Time-Based Vertex Reconstruction

Event Displays and LArg

A new inclusive secondary vertex algorithm for b- jet tagging in ATLAS

8.882 LHC Physics. Track Reconstruction and Fitting. [Lecture 8, March 2, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

Meeting. Wataru OKAMURA 26/12/2011 Osaka ATLAS meeting

Johns Hopkins University and CMS

Alignment of the CMS silicon tracker using Millepede II

The performance of the ATLAS Inner Detector Trigger Algorithms in pp collisions at the LHC

LHC Detector Upgrades

Alignment of the CMS Silicon Tracker

Jet algoritms Pavel Weber , KIP Jet Algorithms 1/23

A flexible approach to clusterfinding in generic calorimeters of the FLC detector

Charged Particle Reconstruction in HIC Detectors

L2 Global Status and Opportunities

Dijet A LL Dijet cross section 2006 Dijet A LL Preparation for Tai Sakuma MIT

Tracking and compression techniques

A Topologic Approach to Particle Flow PandoraPFA

Locating the neutrino interaction vertex with the help of electronic detectors in the OPERA experiment

Deep Learning Photon Identification in a SuperGranular Calorimeter

A Topologic Approach to Particle Flow PandoraPFA

The CBM sensor digitizer

ATLAS, CMS and LHCb Trigger systems for flavour physics

H γγ. Sean Simon UC San Diego (on behalf of the H γγ WG) Photon Workshop July 23 rd 2008

CMS Simulation Software

π ± Charge Exchange Cross Section on Liquid Argon

Physics and Detector Simulations. Norman Graf (SLAC) 2nd ECFA/DESY Workshop September 24, 2000

Description and performance of track and primaryvertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

Stefania Beolè (Università di Torino e INFN) for the ALICE Collaboration. TIPP Chicago, June 9-14

Tracker algorithm based on Hough transformation

Performance of FPCCD vertex detector. T. Nagamine Tohoku University Feb 6, 2007 ACFA 9, IHEP,Beijin

A 10-minute introduction to. SynRad+ A test-particle Monte Carlo simulator for synchrotron radiation

Data Reconstruction in Modern Particle Physics

Calorimeter Object Status. A&S week, Feb M. Chefdeville, LAPP, Annecy

THE ATLAS INNER DETECTOR OPERATION, DATA QUALITY AND TRACKING PERFORMANCE.

LHC-B. 60 silicon vertex detector elements. (strips not to scale) [cm] [cm] = 1265 strips

A new inclusive secondary vertex algorithm for b-jet tagging in ATLAS

Upgraded Swimmer for Computationally Efficient Particle Tracking for Jefferson Lab s CLAS12 Spectrometer

Modules and Front-End Electronics Developments for the ATLAS ITk Strips Upgrade

Transcription:

Recent developments in tracking and impact on B-tagging Boris Mangano for Tracking POG group page 1

Outline B-tagging Enemies Recent developments in iterative tracking and impact on V0 reconstruction efficiency. Impact on Btagging performance? Open issues page 2

The enemies Why should a light jet be identified as a b (showing a sizeable IP)? Fake tracks Badly reconstructed tracks (mostly in the vicinity of the IP, in the Pixels) Ks, lambda etc (particles with lifetime) From Tommaso s talk at Tracking meeting: http://indico.cern.ch/conferencedisplay.py?confid=36392 page 3

So, twofold track selection strategy Minimize as mush as possible fakes/badly reco tracks Remember, we seek a mistag ~ 10^-4 so even a few bad tracks are a problem Discard decays of longer lifetime particles Ks.) Moreover From Tommaso s talk at Tracking meeting: http://indico.cern.ch/conferencedisplay.py?confid=36392 page 4

From Victor Bazterra Currently the track selection used by b-tagging group discards tracks with distance from jet > 0.07 cm. Similar plots and selections for signed decay length and transverse impact parameter : http://indico.cern.ch/getfile.py/access?contribid=7&resid=0&materialid=slides&confid=38461 page 5

How track reconstruction can help b-tagging 1. Maximize the reconstruction efficiency for both tracks coming from K s, Lambda, Conversions (+ tracks coming from nuclear interactions). 2. Identify the V0s vertices (+ nuclear interaction vertices). 3. Provide to b-tagging a list of tracks which is equal to: tracks for b-tagging = all tracks - tracks from V0s Benefits for b-tagging performance: - lower mis-tagging due to V0s, if the current impact parameter selection is used. - higher b-tagging efficiency, if the impact parameter selection can be loosened. In the next slides, recent developments in tracking that help (mostly, but not only) in the context of V0 reconstruction page 6

Red = single sided strips Blue = double sided strips Green = pixels CMS Tracker R-Z view Measurements used for trajectory seeding Measurements used for trajectory building Due to the geometrical acceptance of the pixel detector, some particles don t produce enough pixel measurements to get a trajectory seed. These particles were lost using the original trajectory seeder based only on pixels. The seeding based on both pixel and strips is able to reconstruct them page 7

effic ciency [% %] Tracking based on Pixel-less seeder CMSSW_2_1_X Tracking for CMSSW_3_0_0_pre2 η η Starting from CMSSW_3_0_0_pre2, track reconstruction sequence will contain a pure pixel-less seeded tracking step (the 4th) Efficiency drop at eta ~0 finally recovered! page 8

Tracking based on Pixel-less seeder TTbar sample No PU Pt > 0.9 GeV CMSSW_ 2_ 1_ X + tags for 4th step by Kevin Stenson Pt [GeV] η Efficiency recovered mostly (but not only) around eta=0 N.B.: Efficiency denominator is # charged particles produced at r <3.5, z<30 page 9

Tracking based on Pixel-less seeder TTbar sample No PU Pt > 0.9 GeV CMSSW_ 2_ 1_ X + tags for 4th step by Kevin Stenson Pt [GeV] η Considering a different denominator for the efficiency definition (# charged particles produced at r <20, z<60), the improvement in reconstruction performance is even more striking page 10

Tracking based on Pixel-less seeder TTbar sample No PU CMSSW_2_1_X 2 1 X + tags for 4th step by Kevin Stenson Pt [GeV] η The improvement in efficiency is NOT jeopardized by an increase of the fake rate. NB: Selection of tracks from 2nd and 3rd step has been re-tuned as wellby Kevin Stenson. NB 2: Bug in cleaning of pixel-less seeds collection found by I.Tomalin page 11

TOB-TEC seeded tracking (5th step) Reconstruction of particles produced at r > 30 cm Measurements used for trajectory seeding Measurements used for trajectory building by K.Stenson, I.Tomalin and B.Drell page 12

TOB-TEC seeded tracking (5th step) tags t for 4 steps by Kevin tracking Stenson + tagsfor5steps steps tracking Pt [GeV] η N.B.: Efficiency denominator is # charged particles produced at r <60, z<120 page 13

TOB-TEC seeded tracking (5th step) CMSSW_2_1_X Kshort reconstruction efficiency in B 0 -> K s mu mu events + tags for 4 steps tracking + tags for 5 steps tracking Almost a factor 8 improvement in K s reconstruction ti efficiency. i V0 finder has been also retuned to improve timing i performance: factor 5-10X speedup by K.Stenson, B.Drell, K.Ulmer page 14

Improvement to seed reconstruction from triplets by C.Saout, F.Sikler, MK M.Konecki Expected improvement of reconstruction efficiency for: - very low pt particles - tracks detached from primary vertex A speed up in general seed reconstruction has already been measured page 15

The enemies Why should a light jet be identified as a b (showing a sizeable IP)? Fake tracks Badly reconstructed tracks (mostly in the vicinity of the IP, in the Pixels) Ks, lambda etc (particles with lifetime) From Tommaso s talk at Tracking meeting: http://indico.cern.ch/conferencedisplay.py?confid=36392 page 16

Open issue: pixel-less seeding and splitting of merged pixel clusters Code used for splitting merged pixel clusters implemented by Johns Hopkins Univ. group Pixel-less seeding allows to recover particles that actually have pixel hits, but were not reconstructed because of clusters merging. Improvement in efficiency has still to be quantified page 17

Conclusion In addition to fake tracks, also particles with a genuine large impact parameter are responsible for (mis)tagging light jets as b-jest These particles are the product of V0s decays, nuclear interactions, conversions. Recent developments in tracking have dramatically increased the efficiency for identifying these particles. TO BE TESTED: try to explicitly remove these particles from the pool of tracks used to tag jets. Tracking performance is improved in general. B-tagging performance should be re-measured starting from CMSSW_ 3_ 0_ 0_pre2. On-going g activities to understand how the splitting of merged pixel clusters can impact on b-tagging of very high pt jets. page 18

B-tagging users are welcome to directly contribute to improving track reconstruction. Please contact me and Kevin page 19