Notes. Notes. Introduction. Notes. Propositional Functions. Slides by Christopher M. Bourke Instructor: Berthe Y. Choueiry.

Similar documents
Predicate Logic and Quan0fies

Introduction II. Sets. Terminology III. Definition. Definition. Definition. Example

Section 2.2: Introduction to the Logic of Quantified Statements

Chapter 1.3 Quantifiers, Predicates, and Validity. Reading: 1.3 Next Class: 1.4. Motivation

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Fall

COMP232 - Mathematics for Computer Science

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter

CSC Discrete Math I, Spring Sets

CPSC 121: Models of Computation. Module 5: Predicate Logic

Overview. CS389L: Automated Logical Reasoning. Lecture 6: First Order Logic Syntax and Semantics. Constants in First-Order Logic.

CMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computation. Lecture #7: Quantifiers and Languages 6 February 2012

Homework 1. Due Date: Wednesday 11/26/07 - at the beginning of the lecture

CPSC 121: Models of Computation. Module 6: Rewriting predicate logic statements

Propositional Calculus. Math Foundations of Computer Science

To prove something about all Boolean expressions, we will need the following induction principle: Axiom 7.1 (Induction over Boolean expressions):

CSE Discrete Structures

9/19/12. Why Study Discrete Math? What is discrete? Sets (Rosen, Chapter 2) can be described by discrete math TOPICS

To prove something about all Boolean expressions, we will need the following induction principle: Axiom 7.1 (Induction over Boolean expressions):

Discrete Mathematics Lecture 4. Harper Langston New York University

Quantification. Using the suggested notation, symbolize the statements expressed by the following sentences.

Propositional Logic. Application of Propositional logic

(a) (4 pts) Prove that if a and b are rational, then ab is rational. Since a and b are rational they can be written as the ratio of integers a 1

Foundations of AI. 9. Predicate Logic. Syntax and Semantics, Normal Forms, Herbrand Expansion, Resolution

(l) Represent each of the sets A, B and C using bit strings. Then, use bit string representation and bitwise logical operations to find

Introductory logic and sets for Computer scientists

Lecture 5: Predicate Calculus. ffl Predicate Logic ffl The Language ffl Semantics: Structures

Summary of Course Coverage

Going beyond propositional logic

Lecture 1: Conjunctive Queries

Operations of Relational Algebra

1 Elementary number theory

Predicate Logic CHAPTER What This Chapter Is About

A set with only one member is called a SINGLETON. A set with no members is called the EMPTY SET or 2 N

2.2 Set Operations. Introduction DEFINITION 1. EXAMPLE 1 The union of the sets {1, 3, 5} and {1, 2, 3} is the set {1, 2, 3, 5}; that is, EXAMPLE 2

LECTURE 2 An Introduction to Boolean Algebra

Propositional Calculus. CS 270: Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science Jeremy Johnson

CS Bootcamp Boolean Logic Autumn 2015 A B A B T T T T F F F T F F F F T T T T F T F T T F F F

Mixed Integer Linear Programming

CSL105: Discrete Mathematical Structures. Ragesh Jaiswal, CSE, IIT Delhi

Logic and its Applications

Propositional Calculus. Math Foundations of Computer Science

Solutions to Selected Exercises

logic with quantifiers (informally)

CS 3512, Spring Instructor: Doug Dunham. Textbook: James L. Hein, Discrete Structures, Logic, and Computability, 3rd Ed. Jones and Barlett, 2010

Propositional Calculus: Boolean Algebra and Simplification. CS 270: Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science Jeremy Johnson

7. Relational Calculus (Part I) 7.1 Introduction

Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Chapter 6 Outline. Unary Relational Operations: SELECT and

Program Verification & Testing; Review of Propositional Logic

Introduction to dependent types in Coq

Introduction to Logic Programming

2. Sets. 2.1&2.2: Sets and Subsets. Combining Sets. c Dr Oksana Shatalov, Fall

What is a Logic Program. Introduction to Logic Programming. Introductory Examples. Introductory Examples. Foundations, First-Order Language

Lecture Notes 15 Number systems and logic CSS Data Structures and Object-Oriented Programming Professor Clark F. Olson

Sets. Mukulika Ghosh. Fall Based on slides by Dr. Hyunyoung Lee

The Inverse of a Schema Mapping

Practice Problems: All Computer Science majors are people. Some computer science majors are logical thinkers. Some people are logical thinkers.

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS

Sets 1. The things in a set are called the elements of it. If x is an element of the set S, we say

Module 6. Knowledge Representation and Logic (First Order Logic) Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

Range Restriction for General Formulas

A Survey of Mathematics with Applications 8 th Edition, 2009

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING DESIGN I

HOL DEFINING HIGHER ORDER LOGIC LAST TIME ON HOL CONTENT. Slide 3. Slide 1. Slide 4. Slide 2 WHAT IS HIGHER ORDER LOGIC? 2 LAST TIME ON HOL 1

CS40-S13: Functional Completeness

MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURES FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE

CITS2211 Discrete Structures Logic

Taibah University College of Computer Science & Engineering Course Title: Discrete Mathematics Code: CS 103. Chapter 2. Sets

CSE20: Discrete Mathematics

CSC 501 Semantics of Programming Languages

LOGIC AND DISCRETE MATHEMATICS

Part I Logic programming paradigm

Chapter 3. Set Theory. 3.1 What is a Set?

[Ch 6] Set Theory. 1. Basic Concepts and Definitions. 400 lecture note #4. 1) Basics

CSCI.6962/4962 Software Verification Fundamental Proof Methods in Computer Science (Arkoudas and Musser) Chapter p. 1/27

Z Notation. June 21, 2018

BOOLEAN ALGEBRA AND CIRCUITS

ITCS 6150 Intelligent Systems. Lecture 13 First-Order Logic Chapter 8

Notes on Predicate Calculus

4&5 Binary Operations and Relations. The Integers. (part I)

Mathematical Logic Prof. Arindama Singh Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 9 Normal Forms

For next Tuesday. Read chapter 8 No written homework Initial posts due Thursday 1pm and responses due by class time Tuesday

CSE 215: Foundations of Computer Science Recitation Exercises Set #4 Stony Brook University. Name: ID#: Section #: Score: / 4

Introduction to Sets and Logic (MATH 1190)

CS221 / Autumn 2017 / Liang & Ermon. Lecture 17: Logic II

COMP Intro to Logic for Computer Scientists. Lecture 2

CS 512, Spring 2017: Take-Home End-of-Term Examination

The set consisting of all natural numbers that are in A and are in B is the set f1; 3; 5g;

AXIOMS FOR THE INTEGERS

Back to the knights and knaves island

Automated Reasoning PROLOG and Automated Reasoning 13.4 Further Issues in Automated Reasoning 13.5 Epilogue and References 13.

correlated to the Michigan High School Mathematics Content Expectations

Solutions to In-Class Problems Week 1, Fri

CSE 311: Foundations of Computing. Lecture 8: Predicate Logic Proofs

Lecture 4: January 12, 2015

Bootcamp. Christoph Thiele. Summer An example of a primitive universe

Lecture 6: Arithmetic and Threshold Circuits

An Introduction to Programming and Proving in Agda (incomplete draft)

Logic (or Declarative) Programming Foundations: Prolog. Overview [1]

Set 7: Predicate logic Chapter 8 R&N. ICS 271 Fall 2015

Number System. Introduction. Natural Numbers (N) Whole Numbers (W) Integers (Z) Prime Numbers (P) Face Value. Place Value

Transcription:

Slides by Christopher M. Bourke Instructor: Berthe Y. Choueiry Spring 2006 1 / 1 Computer Science & Engineering 235 Introduction to Discrete Mathematics Sections 1.3 1.4 of Rosen cse235@cse.unl.edu Introduction Consider the following statements: x > 3, x = y + 3, x + y = z The truth value of these statements has no meaning without specifying the values of x, y, z. However, we can make propositions out of such statements. A predicate is a property that is affirmed or denied about the subject (in logic, we say variable or argument ) of a statement. x }{{} subject is greater than 3 }{{} predicate 2 / 1 Terminology: affirmed = holds = is true; denied = does not hold = is not true. Propositional Functions To write in predicate logic: x }{{} subject is greater than 3 }{{} predicate We introduce a (functional) symbol for the predicate, and put the subject as an argument (to the functional symbol): P (x) Examples: Father(x): unary predicate Brother(x,y): binary predicate Sum(x,y,z): ternary predicate P(x,y,z,t): n-ary predicate 3 / 1

Propositional Functions Definition A statement of the form P (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) is the value of the propositional function P. Here, (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) is an n-tuple and P is a predicate. You can think of a propositional function as a function that Evaluates to true or false. Takes one or more arguments. Expresses a predicate involving the argument(s). Becomes a proposition when values are assigned to the arguments. 4 / 1 Propositional Functions Example Example Let Q(x, y, z) denote the statement x 2 + y 2 = z 2. What is the truth value of Q(3, 4, 5)? What is the truth value of Q(2, 2, 3)? How many values of (x, y, z) make the predicate true? 5 / 1 Propositional Functions Example Example Let Q(x, y, z) denote the statement x 2 + y 2 = z 2. What is the truth value of Q(3, 4, 5)? What is the truth value of Q(2, 2, 3)? How many values of (x, y, z) make the predicate true? Since 3 2 + 4 2 = 25 = 5 2, Q(3, 4, 5) is true. Since 2 2 + 2 2 = 8 3 2 = 9, Q(2, 2, 3) is false. There are infinitely many values for (x, y, z) that make this propositional function true how many right triangles are there? 6 / 1

Universe of Discourse Consider the previous example. Does it make sense to assign to x the value blue? Intuitively, the universe of discourse is the set of all things we wish to talk about; that is, the set of all objects that we can sensibly assign to a variable in a propositional function. What would be the universe of discourse for the propositional function P (x) = The test will be on x the 23rd be? 7 / 1 Universe of Discourse Multivariate Functions Moreover, each variable in an n-tuple may have a different universe of discourse. Let P (r, g, b, c) = The rgb-value of the color c is (r, g, b). For example, P (255, 0, 0, red) is true, while P (0, 0, 255, green) is false. What are the universes of discourse for (r, g, b, c)? 8 / 1 Introduction A predicate becomes a proposition when we assign it fixed values. However, another way to make a predicate into a proposition is to quantify it. That is, the predicate is true (or false) for all possible values in the universe of discourse or for some value(s) in the universe of discourse. Such quantification can be done with two quantifiers: the universal quantifier and the existential quantifier. 9 / 1

Universal Quantifier Definition Definition The universal quantification of a predicate P (x) is the proposition P (x) is true for all values of x in the universe of discourse We use the notation which can be read for all x xp (x) If the universe of discourse is finite, say {n 1, n 2,..., n k }, then the universal quantifier is simply the conjunction of all elements: xp (x) P (n 1 ) P (n 2 ) P (n k ) 10 / 1 Universal Quantifier Example I Let P (x) be the predicate x must take a discrete mathematics course and let Q(x) be the predicate x is a computer science student. The universe of discourse for both P (x) and Q(x) is all UNL students. Express the statement Every computer science student must take a discrete mathematics course. Express the statement Everybody must take a discrete mathematics course or be a computer science student. 11 / 1 Universal Quantifier Example I Let P (x) be the predicate x must take a discrete mathematics course and let Q(x) be the predicate x is a computer science student. The universe of discourse for both P (x) and Q(x) is all UNL students. Express the statement Every computer science student must take a discrete mathematics course. x(q(x) P (x)) Express the statement Everybody must take a discrete mathematics course or be a computer science student. 12 / 1

Universal Quantifier Example I Let P (x) be the predicate x must take a discrete mathematics course and let Q(x) be the predicate x is a computer science student. The universe of discourse for both P (x) and Q(x) is all UNL students. Express the statement Every computer science student must take a discrete mathematics course. x(q(x) P (x)) Express the statement Everybody must take a discrete mathematics course or be a computer science student. x(q(x) P (x)) 13 / 1 Universal Quantifier Example I Let P (x) be the predicate x must take a discrete mathematics course and let Q(x) be the predicate x is a computer science student. The universe of discourse for both P (x) and Q(x) is all UNL students. Express the statement Every computer science student must take a discrete mathematics course. x(q(x) P (x)) Express the statement Everybody must take a discrete mathematics course or be a computer science student. x(q(x) P (x)) 14 / 1 Are these statements true or false? Universal Quantifier Example II Express the statement for every x and for every y, x + y > 10 15 / 1

Universal Quantifier Example II Express the statement for every x and for every y, x + y > 10 Let P (x, y) be the statement x + y > 10 where the universe of discourse for x, y is the set of integers. 16 / 1 Universal Quantifier Example II Express the statement for every x and for every y, x + y > 10 Let P (x, y) be the statement x + y > 10 where the universe of discourse for x, y is the set of integers. Answer: x yp (x, y) 17 / 1 Universal Quantifier Example II Express the statement for every x and for every y, x + y > 10 Let P (x, y) be the statement x + y > 10 where the universe of discourse for x, y is the set of integers. Answer: x yp (x, y) Note that we can also use the shorthand x, yp (x, y) 18 / 1

Existential Quantifier Definition Definition The existential quantification of a predicate P (x) is the proposition There exists an x in the universe of discourse such that P (x) is true. We use the notation xp (x) which can be read there exists an x Again, if the universe of discourse is finite, {n 1, n 2,..., n k }, then the existential quantifier is simply the disjunction of all elements: xp (x) P (n 1 ) P (n 2 ) P (n k ) 19 / 1 Existential Quantifier Example I Let P (x, y) denote the statement, x + y = 5. What does the expression, x yp (x) mean? What universe(s) of discourse make it true? 20 / 1 Existential Quantifier Example II Express the statement there exists a real solution to ax 2 + bx c = 0 21 / 1

Existential Quantifier Example II Express the statement there exists a real solution to ax 2 + bx c = 0 Let P (x) be the statement x = b± b 2 4ac 2a where the universe of discourse for x is the set of reals. Note here that a, b, c are all fixed constants. 22 / 1 Existential Quantifier Example II Express the statement there exists a real solution to ax 2 + bx c = 0 Let P (x) be the statement x = b± b 2 4ac 2a where the universe of discourse for x is the set of reals. Note here that a, b, c are all fixed constants. The statement can thus be expressed as xp (x) 23 / 1 Existential Quantifier Example II Continued Question: what is the truth value of xp (x)? 24 / 1

Existential Quantifier Example II Continued Question: what is the truth value of xp (x)? Answer: it is false. For any real numbers such that b 2 < 4ac, there will only be complex solutions, for these cases no such real number x can satisfy the predicate. How can we make it so that it is true? 25 / 1 Existential Quantifier Example II Continued Question: what is the truth value of xp (x)? Answer: it is false. For any real numbers such that b 2 < 4ac, there will only be complex solutions, for these cases no such real number x can satisfy the predicate. How can we make it so that it is true? Answer: change the universe of discourse to the complex numbers, C. 26 / 1 Truth Values In general, when are quantified statements true/false? Statement True When False When xp (x) P (x) is true for every There is an x for x. which P (x) is false. xp (x) There is an x for P (x) is false for every which P (x) is true. x. Table: Truth Values of 27 / 1

Mixing I Existential and universal quantifiers can be used together to quantify a predicate statement; for example, x yp (x, y) is perfectly valid. However, you must be careful it must be read left to right. For example, x yp (x, y) is not equivalent to y xp (x, y). Thus, ordering is important. 28 / 1 Mixing II For example: x yloves(x, y): everybody loves somebody y xloves(x, y): There is someone loved by everyone Those expressions do not mean the same thing! Note that y xp (x, y) x yp (x, y), but the converse does not hold However, you can commute similar quantifiers; x yp (x, y) is equivalent to y xp (x, y) (which is why our shorthand was valid). 29 / 1 Mixing Truth Values Statement True When False When x yp (x, y) P (x, y) is true for every There is at least one pair x, y. pair, x, y for which P (x, y) is false. x yp (x, y) For every x, there is a There is an x for y for which P (x, y) is true. which P (x, y) is false for every y. x yp (x, y) There is an x for which P (x, y) is true for every y. x yp (x, y) There is at least one pair x, y for which P (x, y) is true. For every x, there is a y for which P (x, y) is false. P (x, y) is false for every pair x, y. Table: Truth Values of 2-variate 30 / 1

Mixing Example I Express, in predicate logic, the statement that there are an infinite number of integers. 31 / 1 Mixing Example I Express, in predicate logic, the statement that there are an infinite number of integers. Let P (x, y) be the statement that x < y. Let the universe of discourse be the integers, Z. 32 / 1 Mixing Example I Express, in predicate logic, the statement that there are an infinite number of integers. Let P (x, y) be the statement that x < y. Let the universe of discourse be the integers, Z. Then the statement can be expressed by the following. x yp (x, y) 33 / 1

Mixing Example II: More Mathematical Statements Express the commutative law of addition for R. 34 / 1 Mixing Example II: More Mathematical Statements Express the commutative law of addition for R. We want to express that for every pair of reals, x, y the following identity holds: x + y = y + x 35 / 1 Mixing Example II: More Mathematical Statements Express the commutative law of addition for R. We want to express that for every pair of reals, x, y the following identity holds: Then we have the following: x + y = y + x x y(x + y = y + x) 36 / 1

Mixing Example II: More Mathematical Statements Continued Express the multiplicative inverse law for (nonzero) rationals Q \ {0}. 37 / 1 Mixing Example II: More Mathematical Statements Continued Express the multiplicative inverse law for (nonzero) rationals Q \ {0}. We want to express that for every real number x, there exists a real number y such that xy = 1. 38 / 1 Mixing Example II: More Mathematical Statements Continued Express the multiplicative inverse law for (nonzero) rationals Q \ {0}. We want to express that for every real number x, there exists a real number y such that xy = 1. Then we have the following: x y(xy = 1) 39 / 1

Mixing Example II: False Mathematical Statements Is commutativity for subtraction valid over the reals? 40 / 1 Mixing Example II: False Mathematical Statements Is commutativity for subtraction valid over the reals? That is, for all pairs of real numbers x, y does the identity x y = y x hold? Express this using quantifiers. 41 / 1 Mixing Example II: False Mathematical Statements Is commutativity for subtraction valid over the reals? That is, for all pairs of real numbers x, y does the identity x y = y x hold? Express this using quantifiers. The expression is x y(x y = y x) 42 / 1

Mixing Example II: False Mathematical Statements Continued Is there a multiplicative inverse law over the nonzero integers? 43 / 1 Mixing Example II: False Mathematical Statements Continued Is there a multiplicative inverse law over the nonzero integers? That is, for every integer x does there exists a y such that xy = 1? 44 / 1 Mixing Example II: False Mathematical Statements Continued Is there a multiplicative inverse law over the nonzero integers? That is, for every integer x does there exists a y such that xy = 1? This is false, since we can find a counter example. Take any integer, say 5 and multiply it with another integer, y. If the statement held, then 5 = 1/y, but for any (nonzero) integer y, 1/y 1. 45 / 1

Mixing Exercise Express the statement there is a number x such that when it is added to any number, the result is that number, and if it is multiplied by any number, the result is x as a logical expression. Solution: 46 / 1 Mixing Exercise Express the statement there is a number x such that when it is added to any number, the result is that number, and if it is multiplied by any number, the result is x as a logical expression. Solution: Let P (x, y) be the expression x + y = y. 47 / 1 Mixing Exercise Express the statement there is a number x such that when it is added to any number, the result is that number, and if it is multiplied by any number, the result is x as a logical expression. Solution: Let P (x, y) be the expression x + y = y. Let Q(x, y) be the expression xy = x. 48 / 1

Mixing Exercise Express the statement there is a number x such that when it is added to any number, the result is that number, and if it is multiplied by any number, the result is x as a logical expression. Solution: Let P (x, y) be the expression x + y = y. Let Q(x, y) be the expression xy = x. Then the expression is x y (P (x, y) Q(x, y)) 49 / 1 Mixing Exercise Express the statement there is a number x such that when it is added to any number, the result is that number, and if it is multiplied by any number, the result is x as a logical expression. Solution: Let P (x, y) be the expression x + y = y. Let Q(x, y) be the expression xy = x. Then the expression is x y (P (x, y) Q(x, y)) Over what universe(s) of discourse does this statement hold? 50 / 1 Mixing Exercise Express the statement there is a number x such that when it is added to any number, the result is that number, and if it is multiplied by any number, the result is x as a logical expression. Solution: Let P (x, y) be the expression x + y = y. Let Q(x, y) be the expression xy = x. Then the expression is x y (P (x, y) Q(x, y)) 51 / 1 Over what universe(s) of discourse does this statement hold? This is the additive identity law and holds for N, Z, R, Q but does not hold for Z +.

Binding Variables I When a quantifier is used on a variable x, we say that x is bound. If no quantifier is used on a variable in a predicate statement, it is called free. Example In the expression x yp (x, y) both x and y are bound. In the expression xp (x, y), x is bound, but y is free. A statement is called a well-formed formula, when all variables are properly quantified. 52 / 1 Binding Variables II The set of all variables bound by a common quantifier is the scope of that quantifier. Example In the expression x, y zp (x, y, z, c) the scope of the existential quantifier is {x, y}, the scope of the universal quantifier is just z and c has no scope since it is free. 53 / 1 Negation Just as we can use negation with propositions, we can use them with quantified expressions. Lemma Let P (x) be a predicate. Then the following hold. xp (x) x P (x) xp (x) x P (x) This is essentially a quantified version of De Morgan s Law (in fact if the universe of discourse is finite, it is exactly De Morgan s law). 54 / 1

Negation Truth Values Statement True When False When xp (x) For every x, P (x) is There is an x for x P (x) false. which P (x) is true. xp (x) There is an x for P (x) is true for every x P (x) which P (x) is false. x. Table: Truth Values of Negated 55 / 1 Prolog 56 / 1 Prolog (Programming in Logic) is a programming language based on (a restricted form of) Calculus. It was developped by the logicians of the artificial intelligence community for symbolic reasoning. Prolog allows the user to express facts and rules Facts are proposational functions: student(juana), enrolled(juana,cse235), instructor(patel,cse235), etc. Rules are implications with conjunctions: teaches(x,y) :- instructor(x,z), enrolled(y,z) Prolog answers queries such as:?enrolled(juana,cse478)?enrolled(x,cse478)?teaches(x,juana) by binding variables and doing theorem proving (i.e., applying inference rules) as we will see in Section 1.5. English into Logic 57 / 1 Logic is more precise than English. Transcribing English to vice versa can be tricky. When writing statements with quantifiers, usually the correct meaning is conveyed with the following combinations: Use with Example: xlion(x) F ierce(x) xlion(x) F ierce(x) means everyone is a lion and everyone is fierce Use with Example: xlion(x) Drinks(x, coffee): holds when you have at least one lion that drinks coffee xlion(x) Drinks(x, coffee) holds when you have people even though no lion drinks coffee.

Conclusion Examples? Exercises? Rewrite the expression, x ( y zp (x, y, z) z yp (x, y, z) ) Let P (x, y) denote x is a factor of y where x {1, 2, 3,...} and y {2, 3, 4,...}. Let Q(y) denote x [ P (x, y) ((x = y) (x = 1)) ]. When is Q(y) true? 58 / 1 Conclusion Examples? Exercises? Rewrite the expression, x ( y zp (x, y, z) z yp (x, y, z) ) Answer: Use the negated quantifiers and De Morgan s law. x ( y z P (x, y, z) z y P (x, y, z) ) Let P (x, y) denote x is a factor of y where x {1, 2, 3,...} and y {2, 3, 4,...}. Let Q(y) denote x [ P (x, y) ((x = y) (x = 1)) ]. When is Q(y) true? 59 / 1 Conclusion Examples? Exercises? Rewrite the expression, x ( y zp (x, y, z) z yp (x, y, z) ) Answer: Use the negated quantifiers and De Morgan s law. x ( y z P (x, y, z) z y P (x, y, z) ) Let P (x, y) denote x is a factor of y where x {1, 2, 3,...} and y {2, 3, 4,...}. Let Q(y) denote x [ P (x, y) ((x = y) (x = 1)) ]. When is Q(y) true? Answer: Only when y is a prime number. 60 / 1

Extra Question Some students wondered if x, yp (x, y) xp (x, y) yp (x, y) This is certainly not true. In the left-hand side, both x and y are bound. In the right-hand side, x is bound in the first predicate, but y is free. In the second predicate, y is bound but x is free. All variables that occur in a propositional function must be bound to turn it into a proposition. Thus, the left-hand side is a proposition, but the right-hand side is not. How can they be equivalent? 61 / 1