Gaussian Beam Calculator for Creating Coherent Sources

Similar documents
FRED Slit Diffraction Application Note

Rectangular Lenslet Array

Ray Optics I. Last time, finished EM theory Looked at complex boundary problems TIR: Snell s law complex Metal mirrors: index complex

Efficient wave-optical calculation of 'bad systems'

Fundamental Optics for DVD Pickups. The theory of the geometrical aberration and diffraction limits are introduced for

Innovations in beam shaping & illumination applications

Chapter 8: Physical Optics

The liquid s index of refraction is. v liquid = nm = = 460 nm 1.38

Lasers PH 645/ OSE 645/ EE 613 Summer 2010 Section 1: T/Th 2:45-4:45 PM Engineering Building 240

Chapter 37. Wave Optics

Chapter 24. Wave Optics

Chapter 24. Wave Optics

EE119 Homework 3. Due Monday, February 16, 2009

Diffraction from small and large circular apertures

Chapter 37. Interference of Light Waves

Interference and Diffraction of Light

Single slit diffraction

TEAMS National Competition Middle School Version Photometry Solution Manual 25 Questions

TEAMS National Competition High School Version Photometry Solution Manual 25 Questions

Diffraction Diffraction occurs when light waves pass through an aperture Huygen's Principal: each point on wavefront acts as source of another wave

Ray Optics. Lecture 23. Chapter 23. Physics II. Course website:

Experiment 8 Wave Optics

E x Direction of Propagation. y B y

Chapter 36. Diffraction. Copyright 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.

MEASUREMENT OF THE WAVELENGTH WITH APPLICATION OF A DIFFRACTION GRATING AND A SPECTROMETER

Diffraction. Light bends! Diffraction assumptions. Solution to Maxwell's Equations. The far-field. Fraunhofer Diffraction Some examples

FLAP P6.2 Rays and geometrical optics COPYRIGHT 1998 THE OPEN UNIVERSITY S570 V1.1

Image Formation by Refraction

Historical Perspective of Laser Beam Shaping

Chapter 24. Wave Optics

Chapter 25. Wave Optics

Section 10. Stops and Pupils

INTERFERENCE. where, m = 0, 1, 2,... (1.2) otherwise, if it is half integral multiple of wavelength, the interference would be destructive.

Diffraction at a single slit and double slit Measurement of the diameter of a hair

PHYSICS. Chapter 34 Lecture FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS A STRATEGIC APPROACH 4/E RANDALL D. KNIGHT

Figure 1 - Refraction

CHAPTER 26 INTERFERENCE AND DIFFRACTION

Chapter 38. Diffraction Patterns and Polarization

College Physics 150. Chapter 25 Interference and Diffraction

Light and refractive index

Supplementary Figure 1 Optimum transmissive mask design for shaping an incident light to a desired

f. (5.3.1) So, the higher frequency means the lower wavelength. Visible part of light spectrum covers the range of wavelengths from

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS

Physics 1CL WAVE OPTICS: INTERFERENCE AND DIFFRACTION Fall 2009

Models of Light The wave model: The ray model: The photon model:

MEFT / Quantum Optics and Lasers. Suggested problems from Fundamentals of Photonics Set 1 Gonçalo Figueira

Physics 4C Chapter 33: Electromagnetic Waves

Stable Laser Resonator Modeling: Mesh Parameter Determination and Empty Cavity Modeling

Chapter 35 &36 Physical Optics

PHYSICS. Chapter 33 Lecture FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS A STRATEGIC APPROACH 4/E RANDALL D. KNIGHT

Fresnel's biprism and mirrors

x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 1 = ˆr ŷ = ±y cosθ z (a) The half angle of the cones (inside the material) is just given by the critical angle sinθ c n = 3.

PY212 Lecture 25. Prof. Tulika Bose 12/3/09. Interference and Diffraction. Fun Link: Diffraction with Ace Ventura

Chapter 3 Geometric Optics

Physics Midterm I

Diffraction and Interference of Plane Light Waves

Figure 1: Derivation of Bragg s Law

POLARIZATION 3.5 RETARDATION PLATES

Interference. Electric fields from two different sources at a single location add together. The same is true for magnetic fields at a single location.

AP Physics Problems -- Waves and Light

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS

Basic optics. Geometrical optics and images Interference Diffraction Diffraction integral. we use simple models that say a lot! more rigorous approach

UNIT VI OPTICS ALL THE POSSIBLE FORMULAE

dq dt I = Irradiance or Light Intensity is Flux Φ per area A (W/m 2 ) Φ =

Configuration of Light Sources

2.710 Optics Spring 09 Solutions to Problem Set #1 Posted Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009

IMGS Solution Set #9

The location of the bright fringes can be found using the following equation.

Waves & Oscillations

Interference of Light

Determining Wave-Optics Mesh Parameters for Complex Optical Systems

Past Paper Questions Waves

Unit-22 Interference and Diffraction

Diffraction and Interference

Diffraction and Interference of Plane Light Waves

Chapter 26 Geometrical Optics

Michelson Interferometer

Single Slit Diffraction

Where n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4

PHY 222 Lab 11 Interference and Diffraction Patterns Investigating interference and diffraction of light waves

Chapter 24. Wave Optics. Wave Optics. The wave nature of light is needed to explain various phenomena

Optics Vac Work MT 2008

Electricity & Optics

3B SCIENTIFIC PHYSICS

Optics: Laser Light Show Student Advanced Version

Lens Design I. Lecture 4: Properties of optical systems III Herbert Gross. Summer term

FRESNEL DIFFRACTION AND PARAXIAL WAVE EQUATION. A. Fresnel diffraction

Interference & Diffraction

AP* Optics Free Response Questions

Diffraction: Propagation of wave based on Huygens s principle.

Physics 1C, Summer 2011 (Session 1) Practice Midterm 2 (50+4 points) Solutions

Ray Optics Demonstration Set (RODS) and Ray Optics Demonstration Set Plus (RODS+) USER S GUIDE

Module 18: Diffraction-I Lecture 18: Diffraction-I

New Features in CODE V Version 10

Chapter 36 Diffraction

Exercise 12 Geometrical and Technical Optics WS 2013/2014

Chapter 24. Wave Optics. Wave Optics. The wave nature of light is needed to explain various phenomena

Geometrical Optics INTRODUCTION. Wave Fronts and Rays

PHY132 Introduction to Physics II Class 5 Outline:

Physics 214 Midterm Fall 2003 Form A

Transcription:

Gaussian Beam Calculator for Creating Coherent Sources INTRODUCTION Coherent sources are represented in FRED using a superposition of Gaussian beamlets. The ray grid spacing of the source is used to determine the waist and divergence of the beamlets. To properly model coherent propagation properties, the beamlets must remain Gaussian and perform best when they obey the paraxial approximation. As a result, some Gaussian beam calculations should be performed to determine the appropriate grid size and number of rays for a coherent source. The attached script uses desired source parameters to calculate and display the proper inputs for a new coherent source. This calculator is valid for the following source types: Simplified Source o Collimated Source (plane wave) o Laser Beam (Gaussian 00 mode) Detailed Source o Grid Plane (rectangular array of points arranged on a plane) o Hexagonal Plane (hexagonal array of points arranged on a plane) Figure 1. Gaussian beam calculator dialog

COHERENT SOURCES AND BEAMLETS A note on terminology: the terms beam waist radius and beam far-field divergence refer to the overall Gaussian beam that is being modeled. Beamlet waist radius and beamlet far-field divergence refer to the individual Gaussian beamlets that FRED creates to represent the overall beam. There is a beamlet for every base ray. The beamlets are described and propagated using rays. A central base ray represents the trajectory of the beamlet (its position and direction is analogous to the corresponding ray of a non-coherent source) and additional secondary waist and divergence rays track the evolution of the beamlet parameters. The relationship between a beamlet and its corresponding rays is shown in the figure below. The rays fully describe the beamlet characteristics as they undergo refraction, reflection, and diffraction. This process is referred to as complex raytracing. At any plane in the system, the coherent field can be calculated by determining the contribution of each beamlet at each position on the analysis surface and accounting for the phases. Figure 2. Gaussian beamlet with corresponding rays When a coherent source grid is defined, the beamlet waist radius becomes,,,, 4 π (1) where, is the semi-aperture, is the overlap factor, and, is the number of rays across the full aperture. These parameters may differ in the x and y directions for rectangular and elliptical ray grids. The overlap factor is the fractional overlap between adjacent beamlets on the grid, and has a default value of 1.5 (which should rarely be

changed). The 4 factor arises from the fact that FRED actually uses the / point for creating secondary rays along the beamlet waist, while the more common waist radius definition is used here. The divergence,, of the beamlet follows the relation for Gaussian beams, tan where is the index of refraction, and is the wavelength. (2) In order for the model to be accurate, the beamlets must remain Gaussian and perform best when they obey the paraxial approximation. This is perhaps the most important consideration in properly implementing coherent raytracing. Attempting to operate outside this paraxial limit negates the ability of Gaussian beamlets to accurately sample optical components as they propagate. Failure of secondary rays to remain wellcorrelated with their base ray may lead to coherent ray errors and erroneous irradiance calculations. While not precisely defined, the paraxial approximation can be expressed in many forms, including tanθ θ and θ << π. In both cases, a reasonable choice for θ is 0.1 radians, or about 6 degrees. Plugging this into Equation 2 and assuming propagation in air ( 1) yields the result that the beamlet waist radius ω o must be greater than or equal to about 3λ. In practice, the user should consider operating with some amount of margin, maybe 5-10λ. If the desired number of rays is known, this beam waist radius restriction can be plugged into Equation 1 and solved for the appropriate grid semiaperture,,. This is precisely what the Gaussian Beam Calculator script does. USING THE CALCULATOR Figure 3 shows the calculator dialog with parameter dependencies. Each input parameter was assigned a differently colored circle. Colored squares have been placed next to each calculated value that is dependent on the input parameter of the corresponding color. For example, the number of rays across the full x/y aperture depends on the total number of rays and the grid shape. Note that if the beamlet waist restriction is defined in terms of waves, changing the wavelength affects the beamlet waist and thus also all the calculated values that are dependent on the beamlet waist restriction.

Figure 3. Calculator dialog with parameter dependencies shown. When an input parameter represented by a colored circle is changed, it affects all the calculated values that include the same colored square. The calculator includes a default value for each input parameter. These provide a convenient starting point in case of uncertainty. Pressing the Calculate button updates the derived values in the Calculated values box. Pressing Print Results displays a report containing the input parameters and calculated values in the Command Window. When either Calculate or Print Results is pressed, the input values are retained and the dialog remains open. Pressing the Close button closes the dialog and terminates the script. All of the four supported source types listed in the Introduction use a combination of the first three parameters in the Calculated values box as inputs. The beamlet and beam far field-divergences are calculated for reference. The following example demonstrates the use of this calculator. Let s say we want to model a 1 mm-diameter TEM00 laser beam at 0.5 um in air, defined at its waist. We determine that we d like to trace at least 50,000 rays to accurately sample the system, but less than 250,000 to keep the raytrace fast. We decide to use the simplified source type Laser Beam (Gaussian 00 mode), which requires three input parameters: the beam waist semi-aperture, the semi-aperture of the sample plane at the waist, and the number of sample points across the sample plane. How do we determine what these

last two values should be to accurately model the laser and ensure that the beamlets FRED generates are paraxial? This is where the calculator comes in. Going down the lefthand side of the calculator inputs, we put in 0.5 for the waist radius, 0.5 for the wavelength, 250000 for the number of rays, and leave the defaults of n=1, a circular grid, 1.5 overlap factor, and 10 waves for the beamlet waist restriction. Pressing Calculate displays the parameters. The grid semi-aperture is 1.67 mm, which is a bit large for a 0.5 mm beam radius. To reduce the grid semi-aperture to around 1 mm, we can either decrease the beamlet waist restriction to 7 waves (which increases the beamlet divergence to 2.6 degrees), or reduce the number of total rays to 100,000 (which keeps the beamlet divergence at 1.82 degrees). Both of these are valid options. The decision as to which to use depends on whether a larger number of rays or a smaller beamlet divergence is more important. For example, a small beamlet divergence is desirable if the beam travels over a long distance. Such trade-offs are common when defining coherent sources and the GB calculator provides a convenient way to quickly determine the effect various parameters have on the source definition. If an elliptical or rectangular beam with unequal parameters in the x and y directions is being defined, the two sets of parameters may be determined separately by using the calculator twice. If a source type other than Laser Beam (Gaussian 00 mode) is used, the intensity profile (e.g. Gaussian) should be specified under the Position Apodization in the Power tab of the Detailed Source edit/create dialog. If no apodization is defined, the beam width will be equal to the source grid aperture. Although the beam waist of the source is one of the inputs, the calculator can be used for non-gaussian coherent beams. As shown in Figure 3, the beam waist is only used to calculate the beam divergence angle and does not affect any of the source input parameters.

EQUATIONS USED IN CALCULATOR Table 1. Input parameter variables Input parameter label Waist radius at e^-2 (mm) Wavelength (um) Total number of rays Index of refraction Grid shape Overlap factor Beamlet waist restriction (um) Variable used in equations, Circ or Rect, or, Number of rays across the full aperture ( ) If grid shape = Rect: N (3) If grid shape = Circ: X/Y Semi-aperture of grid in mm (): 2 N π (4), 1000 π 4 (5) Semi-aperture of 1 hexagonal cell in mm ( ): Beamlet far-field divergence ( ): 2 (6) tan, (7) Beam far-field divergence ( ): tan, (8)

THE SCRIPT The script is structured as follows: 1. Define variables for calculated parameters and set them as blank strings. 2. Start while loop that runs as long as the user presses Calculate or Print Results in the Dialog. 3. Define dialog, using variables for the string parameters displayed in the Calculated values box. 4. Put in default values if the dialog is being displayed for the first time. 5. Display the dialog and assign all input values to variables. 6. Check if any of the input variables equal 0. a. Yes: assign NA to all calculated parameters. b. No: calculate all dependent parameters in turn and convert them to strings to be displayed in the Dialog. 7. Print report in the Output Window if the Print Results button was pressed. 8. Go to while loop beginning and repeat Steps 2-8 if Calculate or Print Results was pressed. Exit loop and script otherwise (i.e. Close button was pressed).