Interactive Fluid Simulation Using Augmented Reality Interface

Similar documents
Interactive Fluid Simulation using Augmented Reality Interface

Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics on GPUs

CGT 581 G Fluids. Overview. Some terms. Some terms

IMPROVED WALL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS WITH IMPLICITLY DEFINED WALLS FOR PARTICLE BASED FLUID SIMULATION

Overview of Traditional Surface Tracking Methods

Navier-Stokes & Flow Simulation

Realtime Water Simulation on GPU. Nuttapong Chentanez NVIDIA Research

Navier-Stokes & Flow Simulation

Navier-Stokes & Flow Simulation

2.7 Cloth Animation. Jacobs University Visualization and Computer Graphics Lab : Advanced Graphics - Chapter 2 123

Interaction of Fluid Simulation Based on PhysX Physics Engine. Huibai Wang, Jianfei Wan, Fengquan Zhang

Smoke Simulation using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Shruti Jain MSc Computer Animation and Visual Eects Bournemouth University

CS-184: Computer Graphics Lecture #21: Fluid Simulation II

Computer animation for fluid simulation of a high viscous fluid melting

Adaptive Particles for Incompressible Fluid Simulation (Technical Report tamu-cs-tr )

Simulation of Swirling Bubbly Water using Bubble Particles

Robust Simulation of Sparsely Sampled Thin Features in SPH-Based Free Surface Flows

Fluid Simulation. Dhruv Kore, Giancarlo Gonzalez, and Jenny Sum CS 488: Introduction to Computer Graphics Professor Angus Forbes

Animation of Fluids. Animating Fluid is Hard

Shape of Things to Come: Next-Gen Physics Deep Dive

FLUID SIMULATION BY PARTICLE LEVEL SET METHOD WITH AN EFFICIENT DYNAMIC ARRAY IMPLEMENTATION ON GPU

NVIDIA. Interacting with Particle Simulation in Maya using CUDA & Maximus. Wil Braithwaite NVIDIA Applied Engineering Digital Film

Comparison between incompressible SPH solvers

Adarsh Krishnamurthy (cs184-bb) Bela Stepanova (cs184-bs)

GPU-based rendering of point-sampled water surfaces

Acknowledgements. Prof. Dan Negrut Prof. Darryl Thelen Prof. Michael Zinn. SBEL Colleagues: Hammad Mazar, Toby Heyn, Manoj Kumar

Example 13 - Shock Tube

Topics in Computer Animation

Simulation in Computer Graphics. Deformable Objects. Matthias Teschner. Computer Science Department University of Freiburg

Support for Multi physics in Chrono

An Adaptive Sampling Approach to Incompressible Particle-Based Fluid

A Geometric Approach to Animating Thin Surface Features in SPH Water

More Animation Techniques

Modelling of Impact on a Fuel Tank Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Characteristic Aspects of SPH Solutions

Cloth Simulation. Tanja Munz. Master of Science Computer Animation and Visual Effects. CGI Techniques Report

Fluid Simulation. [Thürey 10] [Pfaff 10] [Chentanez 11]

Simultaneous Coupling of Fluids and Deformable Bodies

Fluids in Games. Jim Van Verth Insomniac Games

Divergence-Free Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Particle-based Fluid Simulation

Water. Notes. Free surface. Boundary conditions. This week: extend our 3D flow solver to full 3D water We need to add two things:

PHYSICALLY BASED ANIMATION

Thermal Coupling Method Between SPH Particles and Solid Elements in LS-DYNA

Transfer and pouring processes of casting by smoothed particle. hydrodynamic method

Thermal Coupling Method Between SPH Particles and Solid Elements in LS-DYNA

Surface Tension Approximation in Semi-Lagrangian Level Set Based Fluid Simulations for Computer Graphics

SPH: Why and what for?

Abstract. Introduction. Kevin Todisco

Cloth Simulation. COMP 768 Presentation Zhen Wei

Fluid-Structure-Interaction Using SPH and GPGPU Technology

Lagrangian methods and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Computation in Astrophysics Seminar (Spring 2006) L. J. Dursi

Chapter 3: Computer Animation Reminder: Descriptive animation. Procedural animation : Examples. Towards methods that generate motion?

Particle-Based Fluid Simulation. CSE169: Computer Animation Steve Rotenberg UCSD, Spring 2016

Fast Particle Neighbor Searching for Unlimited Scene with Fluid Refraction Improvement

Experimental Validation of the Computation Method for Strongly Nonlinear Wave-Body Interactions

Simulation of Fuel Sloshing Comparative Study

Technical Report TR

CUDA. Fluid simulation Lattice Boltzmann Models Cellular Automata

CS 231. Fluid simulation

Simulation of Automotive Fuel Tank Sloshing using Radioss

LS-DYNA 980 : Recent Developments, Application Areas and Validation Process of the Incompressible fluid solver (ICFD) in LS-DYNA.

Using the Eulerian Multiphase Model for Granular Flow

PARALLEL SIMULATION OF A FLUID FLOW BY MEANS OF THE SPH METHOD: OPENMP VS. MPI COMPARISON. Pawe l Wróblewski, Krzysztof Boryczko

AN ADAPTIVE SAMPLING APPROACH TO INCOMPRESSIBLE PARTICLE-BASED FLUID. A Dissertation WOO-SUCK HONG

Physically Based Simulation

Particle-based Viscoelastic Fluid Simulation

3D Simulation of Dam-break effect on a Solid Wall using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic

Announcements. Ray tracer is due in five days you should have started by now or you re going to have a bad week. Missing file posted on the web page

Mass-Spring Systems. Last Time?

Two-Phase flows on massively parallel multi-gpu clusters

A stable moving-particle semi-implicit method for free surface flows

Physically Based Simulation

T6: Position-Based Simulation Methods in Computer Graphics. Jan Bender Miles Macklin Matthias Müller

A Framework for Real-Time Animation of Liquid-Rigid Body Interaction

A Hybrid Technique Using Particle and Boundary-Element Methods for Wave-Body Interaction Problems

Real-time haptic display of fluids

Level set methods Formulation of Interface Propagation Boundary Value PDE Initial Value PDE Motion in an externally generated velocity field

Gradient Free Design of Microfluidic Structures on a GPU Cluster

Realistic Animation of Fluids

Dynamical Simulation 1: Particle Systems and ODEs

Applications of ICFD /SPH Solvers by LS-DYNA to Solve Water Splashing Impact to Automobile Body. Abstract

Isogeometric Analysis of Fluid-Structure Interaction

Occlusion Detection of Real Objects using Contour Based Stereo Matching

Parallel GPU-Based Fluid Animation. Master s thesis in Interaction Design and Technologies JAKOB SVENSSON

Numerical study of composite structures subjected to slamming loads using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH)

Chapter 2 Water and Bubbles

Use 6DOF solver to calculate motion of the moving body. Create TIFF files for graphic visualization of the solution.

CNM 190, pt 2 Advanced Digital Animation Lec 03 : Art Direction on Madagascar / Effects 1

ALE Seamless Immersed Boundary Method with Overset Grid System for Multiple Moving Objects

Divergence-Free Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Discrete representations of geometric objects: Features, data structures and adequacy for dynamic simulation. Part I : Solid geometry

Index FEATURES LIST 2

Constraint fluids in Sprinkle. Dennis Gustafsson Mediocre

SPH: Towards the simulation of wave-body interactions in extreme seas

Possibility of Implicit LES for Two-Dimensional Incompressible Lid-Driven Cavity Flow Based on COMSOL Multiphysics

2D numerical simulation of ocean waves

The Simulation of Liquids

Ship in a Bottle. 1 Modeling and Rendering the Water. Saket Patkar and Bo Zhu

Simulation of liquid cube fracture with SPH

Transcription:

Interactive Fluid Simulation Using Augmented Reality Interface Makoto Fuisawa and Hirokazu Kato Graduate School of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, Japan {fuis,kato}@is.naist.p Abstract. This paper presents an interactive fluid simulation system using augmented reality interface. The presented system uses Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics to simulate the behavior of liquid and adopts a particle-particle interaction approach to calculate the surface tension that becomes important in a small-scale liquid. Fluid-solid interaction can be calculated effectively by representing a solid as a distance function. Therefore, the shape of the solid can be represented precisely without increasing the number of the particles. Moreover, The system can directly operate the solid by augmented reality interface. Keywords: real-time fluid simulation, surface tension, augmented reality interface. 1 Introduction Fluid simulation has been mainly used in an industrial field to design products. In these fields, the accuracy is very important and then the computational time tends to be quite long. On the other hand, in computer graphics field, several methods for real-time fluid simulation had been developed in recent years. Especially, particle method, which is a technique of representing liquid by many particles, is used mainly for real-time application, game, and interactive system. There are many researches to generate fluid animations such as ocean wave, explosion, and dam breaking. However, the many of fluid phenomena familiar to us are small-scale, for example, pouring water to the cup, flowing droplets. In such smallscale fluid phenomena, surface tension becomes a dominant factor. To realize the interaction with small-scale liquid such as water droplets, the fluid simulation must be stable and fast even though the surface tension is very large. We adopt Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method with a particle-particle interaction approach for the surface tension calculation. In addition, to simulate high-viscosity fluid such as cream and incompressibility fluid, we use a double density relaxation method [3]. Interface is important part of the interactive fluid simulation system. Generally, movements of mouse in 2D are converted into limited movements in 3D space. However, this technique is not intuitive operation, and it is difficult to deal for inexperienced users. It is also possible to use 3D user interface such as PHANToM. But the cost is high. On the other hand, augmented reality (AR) interface is used as three dimensional interface that contains virtual and real obects simultaneously. AR R. Shumaker (Ed.): Virtual and Mixed Reality, LNCS 5622, pp. 431 438, 2009. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

432 M. Fuisawa and H. Kato interface only requires to a cheap camera and marker patterns which is printed on a paper, and provide more intuitive operations. The AR interface is used to operate a solid in our fluid simulator. The liquid represented by particles can control freely by using the solid. As a result, it is possible to use it as assistance for making CG animations. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes previous work and Section 3 details our fluid simulation techniques. Section 4 and 5 address our rendering method of liquid surface and AR interface used in the simulation. Section 6 shows the result of our method. Finally, we conclude the paper in section 7 with a discussion of future work. 2 Related Work As a physical-based simulation, fluid dynamics have been used to animate complicated behaviors of water [4], gas [15], flames [14] etc. To capture a smooth interface of liquid, structured or unstructured grid has been used in computer graphics. The grid-based method, which known as a type of Eulerian approach, discretize the computational space by finite cells. Each cell contains a discriminant function (e.g. Level set function) to identify liquid region or not. This function represents the smooth surface of liquid. However, it is difficult to represent exact boundary of solid because of axis aligned grid. Losasso et al. [12] used an unstructured grid. The size of which is finer around free fluid and solid surfaces. However, a boundary region between the obects and fluid is represented by hexahedrons and good results are not always obtained. Klingner et al. [7] proposed a method in which tetrahedral grids are generated according to a boundary shape at each time step for interactions with moving solid obects. However, the generation of adaptive grids requires additional processing time. The particle-based Lagrangian method abandons the grid completely. In this method, fluid is represented by a finite number of moving particles. Movement of the particle is equivalent to the movement of the fluid. The particle method can compute effectively as compared to the grid-based Eulerian approach that discretizes the whole space with the grids, because it only has to arrange the particles in the liquid domain where we want to calculate the movement. Therefore, the particle method frequently used for real-time applications. The most common of which include Moving Particle Semi-implicit(MPS) [8] and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics(SPH) [13]. MPS employed a semi-implicit algorithm to treat incompressible flows. The semi-implicit algorithm increases the computational cost. On the other hand, SPH that computes compressible flows, is often used in computer graphics because the computation cost of SPH is typically lower than that of MPS. Tartakovsky et al. [16] introduced a particle-particle interaction model in the calculation of SPH to represent the surface tension of liquid drop. The particle-particle interaction model was also applied to MPS by Liu et al. [10]. Harada et al. [5] proposed an improved calculation model of wall boundary computation. They used an implicit representation for solid surface. Clavet et al. [3] proposed a robust and stable method for viscoelastic fluid simulation. They adopted a prediction-relaxation scheme in SPH for numerical stability. The

Interactive Fluid Simulation Using Augmented Reality Interface 433 incompressibility was accomplished by a technique called double density relaxation. For liquid simulation, we use the method of [3]. There are some researches which uses physic simulation in augmented reality environment. Allard and Raffin [1] developed a virtual reality system for augmenting real worlds with physical simulation and Chae and Ko [2] introduced rigid collisions by using Open Dynamics Engine. Kwatra et al. [9] used a fluid simulation and a complete 3D geometry reconstructed from binocular video sequences to enable one-way coupling from the video to the fluid. Imura et al. [6] integrated the particle-based fluid simulation method into augmented reality environment. We use SPH and the interaction between fluid and solids for operating the fluid as well as [6]. Our method also can treat highly viscous fluid and small-scale liquid phenomena such as water drops. 3 Fluid Simulation 3.1 Physical Quantity In SPH, a physical property ( x) neighbor particles. φ is approximated by summing weighted properties of φ ( x) = m N W x, ρ ( x h) φ. where N is the set of neighboring particles that are closer than the effective radius h. m and ρ are the mass and density of particle respectively. W is the kernel function. The gradient of this property is approximated by using the derivative of the kernel function. The density ρ can be found from equation (1). ( x ) ρ ( x) = W x,. (2) N h We assume all the particles have the unit mass (i.e. m = 1) for simplification. For 2 density calculation, we employ W = ( 1 x x / h) as a kernel function. Given the density ρ, the pressure p is obtained from the equation of state. (1) p = k( ρ ρ ) 0. (3) where k is the stiffness parameter and ρ is the rest density. 0 3.2 Incompressibility SPH was developed for compressible flow in astrophysics, In order to simulate incompressibility and compute surface tension, we use a double density relaxation, and adopt a prediction relaxation approach for numerical stability [3].

434 M. Fuisawa and H. Kato The double density relaxation has two different particle densities: density and neardensity. The near-density prevents particle clustering and provides surface tension effect without curvature evaluation. A typical SPH computation updates the position and velocity of each particle by accumulating various forces. This explicit force integration tends to be unstable, particularly, when large time step is used and/or when large force is acted on particles (e.g. small water drop). The prediction relaxation avoids explicit force integration by using a technique more similar to an implicit scheme. At the start of the time step, predicted position of particle is computed from previous position and velocity. The predicted position is relaxed by relaxation displacements due to pressure, collision with solid, etc during the time step. The velocities are recomputed by subtracting previous positions from relaxed position at the end of the time step. The density displacement between two particles is ( x x h) 2 Di Δt pi Wp i, where ( ) ( ) 2 =. (4) Wp x xi, h = 1 x xi / h is the kernel function of the density relaxation. As described above, we use the near-density ρ in order to incompressibility near and anti-clustering. The density displacement with the near-density is near ( p W ( x x, h) + p W ( x x h ) 2 Di Δt i p i i n i, =. (5) where ( ) ( ) 3 Wn x xi, h = 1 x xi / h is the near-density kernel and the neardensity is calculated by using this kernel as well as equation (2). p = k ρ is near near near the near-pressure. The near-density kernel acts as a repulsion force because its value becomes sharper near the center. The surface tension force can be calculated by equation (5) as inter-particle force. There is another method for calculating surface tension that defines a color function to distinguish between liquid and non-liquid. The curvature of the liquid surface can be computed from the color function. Although the method using the color function works well with large-scale simulation, it is difficult to apply it to small-scale liquid phenomena such as small drop of water, because the method adds the force explicitly. Surface tension is physically caused by the forces acting on molecules at the surface. The forces can be modeled by the particle-particle interactions. We can include the surface tension in our simulation without using the color function which may cause numerical instability. 3.3 Interaction with Solid Generally, a solid boundary in particle methods is represented as static particles. These particles are treated ust like the fluid particles during the density and pressure calculations but the relative positions doesn't change. If we use this method, several layers of particles along the boundary is required. Furthermore, the particles can not accurately represent the boundary.

Interactive Fluid Simulation Using Augmented Reality Interface 435 In order to improve these issues, Harada et al. [5] had introduced a precomputed wall weight function to compute the contribution of a boundary. The computation of fluid density with the wall weight function is where ( ) wall r iw ( x x, h) + W ( ) wall x ρ ( x) = x W N, h fluid N wall =, ( x h) + Z ( ) W N wall riw fluid x. (6) Z is the wall weight function, r iw is the distance between a particle i and wall. The wall weight function can be computed before the simulation step starts and simply referred in the step. 4 Rendering The positions of particles have been computed, and then we have to visualize the free surface of liquid. One way to visualize the free surface of liquid is to render an iso surface of particles by using an additional field quantity called color field which is 1 at particle locations and 0 otherwise. The color field c s can identify the free surface of liquid. ( x h) c ( ) = W x, s x. (7) N cs We use Marching Cubes [11] to triangulate the iso-surface c s ( x ) T = 0 where T is user defined threshold. We implemented Marching Cubes on GPU using CUDA to accomplish the real-time computation. 5 Augmented Reality Interface AR interface is 3D input device that can be constructed at a low price, and we use this for the interaction with 3D flow simulation. The solid obects is moved by the AR interface, the user can operate the fluid through the solid. The solid obects can take any shape as described in section 0 because it is represented by a distance function. 6 Results This section describes the results of our method. The results are performed on a PC with Core 2 Duo 3.16GHz CPU and 3.0GB RAM. The AR interface is implemented by AR Toolkit, and we make the two markers to indicate the environment and the user operation. Fig. 1 shows the result of liquid in a tank and a solid ball augmented onto markers. The ball moves according to the movement of the marker and interacts with the liquid. The number of particles was about 800. Surface polygons were extracted from the particles using equation (7) and Marching Cubes and the process was accelerated

436 M. Fuisawa and H. Kato Fig. 1. Liquid in a tank interacting with a ball by using GPU. The wall weight functions were used for the wall of the tank and the ball. Fig. 2 shows water drop simulation with a solid box rendered by wireframe. The shape of water drop is mainly governed by surface tension. Appropriate shape is reproduced by our stable surface tension calculation. The users can move the drop of water by using the solid. The drop of water spattered when the recognition of the marker becomes unstable depending on the environment and the marker moves too rapidly. It is necessary to improve it to become smooth movement by using Kalman filtering etc. 7 Conclusion and Future Work We presented an interactive fluid simulation system using augmented reality interface. Our system adopted SPH to simulate the behavior of liquid and used the particle-particle interaction approach for the surface tension calculation. In addition, we used the double density relaxation method to simulate high-viscosity fluid and incompressibility fluid. In order to achieve intuitive operation, the augmented reality interface was used and fluid-solid interaction could be calculated effectively by representing the solid as a signed distance function.

Interactive Fluid Simulation Using Augmented Reality Interface 437 Fig. 2. Water drop interacting with a solid box For future work, as mentioned in section 0, we may be able to estimate the solid motion using Kalman filtering. Other future research topics include a combination of another simulation and AR Interface, for example, elastic body deformation, air flow over the whole space etc. References 1. Allard, J., Raffin, B.: Distributed Physical Based Simulations for Large VR Applications. In: VR 2006: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Virtual Reality, pp. 89 96 (2006) 2. Chae, C., Ko, K.: Introduction of Physics Simulation in Augmented Reality. In: International Symposium on Ubiquitous Virtual Reality, pp. 37 40 (2008) 3. Clavet, S., Beaudoin, P., Poulin, P.: Particle-based Viscoelastic Fluid Simulation. In: ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, pp. 219 228 (2005) 4. Enright, D., Marschner, S., Fedkiw, R.: Animation and rendering of complex water surfaces. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2002, pp. 736 744 (2002) 5. Harada, T., Koshizuka, S., Kawaguchi, Y.: Improvement of the Boundary Conditions in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Computer Graphics & Geometry 9(3), 2 15 (2007)

438 M. Fuisawa and H. Kato 6. Imura, M., Amada, T., Yasumuro, Y., Manabe, Y., Chihara, K.: Synthetic Representation of Virtual Fluid for Mixed Reality. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Virtual Reality, pp. 135 142 (2006) 7. Klingner, B.M., Feldman, B.E., Chentanez, N., O Brien, J.F.: Fluid animation with dynamic meshes. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2006, pp. 820 825 (2006) 8. Koshizuka, S., Tamako, H., Oka, Y.: A particle method for incompressible viscous flow with fluid fragmentation. Computational Fluid Dynamics Journal 4(4), 29 46 (1995) 9. Liu, J., Koshizuka, S., Oka, Y.: A hybrid particle-mesh method for viscous, incompressible, multiphase flows. Journal of Computational Physics 202, 65 93 (2005) 10. Kwatra, V., Mordohai, P., Narain, R., Penta, S.K., Carlson, M., Pollefeys, M., Lin, M.: Fluid in Video: Augmenting Real Video with Simulated Fluids. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. Eurographics) 27(2), 487 496 (2008) 11. Lorensen, W.E., Cline, H.E.: Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 1987 Proceedings) 21(4), 163 169 (1987) 12. Losasso, F., Gibou, F., Fedkiw, R.: Simulating water and smoke with an octree data structure. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004, pp. 457 462 (2004) 13. Monaghan, J.J.: An Introduction to SPH. Computer physics communications 48, 89 96 (1988) 14. Nguyen, D., Fedkiw, R., Jensen, H.: Physically based modeling and animation of fire. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002, pp. 721 728 (2002) 15. Stam, J.: Stable fluids. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1999, pp. 121 128 (1999) 16. Tartakovsky, A., Meakin, P.: Modeling of surface tension and contact angles with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Physical Review E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics) 72(2), 026301 (2005)