APC APPLICATION NOTE #146

Similar documents
APC APPLICATION NOTE #114

How to Sell APC s Cisco Approved Solution for Nexus 7018

Cooling. Highly efficient cooling products for any IT application. For More Information: (866) DATA CENTER SOLUTIONS

APC by Schneider Electric Solutions for Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Blade Applications

Current Data Center Design. James Monahan Sept 19 th 2006 IEEE San Francisco ComSoc

APC APPLICATION NOTE #74

Power and Cooling for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Close-coupled cooling

Close Coupled Cooling for Datacentres

Improving Rack Cooling Performance Using Blanking Panels

ENCLOSURE HEAT DISSIPATION

Thermal management. Thermal management

APC InfraStruXure Solution Overview

Passive RDHx as a Cost Effective Alternative to CRAH Air Cooling. Jeremiah Stikeleather Applications Engineer

Reducing Data Center Cooling Costs through Airflow Containment

APC by Schneider Electric Elite Data Centre Partner

A Green Approach. Thermal

Moving Containment Inside the Enclosure. Jeff Markle Great Lakes Case & Cabinet

Data Center Airflow Management Basics: Comparing Containment Systems

RE Series Rack from Eaton Product Presentation

InRow Chilled Water. Up to 70kW. Close-coupled, chilled water cooling for medium to large data centers. Row-Based Cooling.

Rittal Cooling Solutions A. Tropp

MECHANICAL AND THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR RACK DEPLOYMENT OF THE DELL POWEREDGE M-SERIES. One Dell Way Round Rock, Texas

SECTION 5 -- EQUIPMENT LAYOUT & EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTS

Virtualization and consolidation

Data Center Enclosures Best Practices. Maximize the Efficiency of the Enclosure within a Data Center

Design and Installation Challenges: Aisle Containment Systems

A) Differences between Precision and Comfort Cooling Here are the major differences exist between precision air conditioning and comfort systems.

Recapture Capacity for Existing. and Airflow Optimization

Impact of Air Containment Systems

High Tech Getting Too Hot? High Density Environments Require A Different Cooling Approach

Where s the Heat Coming From. Leland Sparks Global Account Technical Consultant Belden

Ten Cooling Solutions to Support High-density Server Deployment. Schneider Electric Data Center Science Center White Paper #42

Cooling on Demand - scalable and smart cooling solutions. Marcus Edwards B.Sc.

Heat Containment System (HCS)

A LAYMAN S EXPLANATION OF THE ROLE OF IT RACKS IN COOLING YOUR DATA CENTER

Reducing Energy Consumption with

Air Containment Design Choices and Considerations

One Stop Cooling Solution. Ben Tam Business Development Manager

Evaporative free air cooling technology Providing evaporative free air cooling solutions.

Ten Cooling Solutions to Support High- Density Server Deployment

Implementing Hot and Cold Air Containment in Existing Data Centers

Rethinking Datacenter Cooling

Eaton Heat Containment System (HCS) Installation Guide

Liquid Cooling Package LCP Cooling Systems

APC APPLICATION NOTE #126

INNOVATE DESIGN APPLY.

INNOVATE DESIGN APPLY.

AisleLok Modular Containment vs. Legacy Containment: A Comparative CFD Study of IT Inlet Temperatures and Fan Energy Savings

Deploying High-Density Zones in a Low-Density Data Center

Total Modular Data Centre Solutions

PI Server - 19 enclosures

Effectiveness and Implementation of Modular Containment in Existing Data Centers

Cabinet Level Containment. IsoFlo Cabinet. Isolated Airfl ow Cabinet for Raised Floor Data Centers

Introducing the Heat Wheel to the Data Center

A Data Center Heat Removal System That Saves... 80% Discover Inertech s Award-winning Data Center Heat Removal System

Product Brochure DENCO Close Control Units Row-DENCO. High Density Cooling for Data Centres

Combining Cold Aisle Containment with Intelligent Control to Optimize Data Center Cooling Efficiency

Power & Cooling Considerations for Virtualized Environments

COOLING SOLUTIONS. SmartRack Close-Coupled Cooling for IT Environments

Critical Facilities Round Table SUN Microsystems Friday, March 25, Thursday, March 24, 2005 Wright Line LLC,

Reclaim Wasted Cooling Capacity Now Updated with CFD Models to Support ASHRAE Case Study Data

Using CFD Analysis to Predict Cooling System Performance in Data Centers Ben Steinberg, P.E. Staff Applications Engineer

Variable Density, Closed-Loop, Water-Cooled Data Center Solution

Running Your Data Center Under Ideal Temperature Conditions

NetShelter CX Performance Guide

Mission Critical Facilities & Technology Conference November 3, 2011 Cooling 101. Nick Gangemi Regional Sales Manager Data Aire

Certified 1. AMCO Enclosures Containment Brochure. Hot/Cold Aisle Containment Solutions ACB3.0. Designed and Manufactured in the USA

1.866.TRY.GLCC WeRackYourWorld.com

Server Rack Cabinet Compatibility Guide

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

How Liquid Cooling Helped Two University Data Centers Achieve Cooling Efficiency Goals. Michael Gagnon Coolcentric October

Switch to Perfection

The Energy. David L. Moss Dell Data Center Infrastructure

HPE Performance Optimized Datacenter (POD) Networking Guide

84 kw, Tier 3, Direct Expansion, 937 ft 2

Rittal White Paper 506: Cold Aisle Containment for Improved Data Center Cooling Efficiency By: Daniel Kennedy

How to Increase Data Center Efficiency

NetShelter SX Cable Management. Organize large volumes of cables from networking switches and patch panels

Schneider Electric Cooling Portfolio. Jim Tubbesing Heath Wilson APC/Schneider North Texas Rep Tubbesing Solutions

MEMO. Manager7~ RICHARDSON TEXAS. June 5, 2018 DATE : Keith Dagen- Director of Finance TO: FROM : Todd Gastorf- Purchasing

DATA CENTER EFFICIENCY: Data Center Temperature Set-point Impact on Cooling Efficiency

To Fill, or not to Fill Get the Most out of Data Center Cooling with Thermal Blanking Panels

NetShelter CX Technical Guide

HP Modular Cooling System: water cooling technology for high-density server installations

Solutions Guide for Cisco UCS B and C Series Servers

Fundamentals of CFD and Data Center Cooling Amir Radmehr, Ph.D. Innovative Research, Inc.

Green IT and Green DC

VAPOR CHAMBER TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Liebert XDA Air Flow Enhancer. User Manual

Future of Cooling High Density Equipment. Steve Madara Vice President and General Manager Liebert Precision Cooling Business Emerson Network Power

The Efficient Enterprise. All content in this presentation is protected 2008 American Power Conversion Corporation

Google s Green Data Centers: Network POP Case Study

APC APPLICATION NOTE #133

How to Design Custom Enclosures for Motherboard-Based Systems

Overcoming the Challenges of Server Virtualisation

Efficiency of Data Center cooling

Avoidable Mistakes that Compromise Cooling Performance in Data Centers and Network Rooms

Datacenter Efficiency Trends. Cary Roberts Tellme, a Microsoft Subsidiary

APC InRow Cooler Prototype Initial Report - Test Setup Verification. H. Coles, S. Greenberg Contributing: J. Bean (APC) November 18, 2011

Transcription:

#146 Hot Aisle Containment Application Guidelines and Approved Configurations By Kevin Lemke Abstract The Hot Aisle Containment System (HACS) is a modular ceiling panel and door system for use in isolating the supply and return air between an APC NetShelter rack and an APC InRow cooling solution. The containment system is designed to create a separate environment for air distribution in order to prevent mixing of hot and cold air streams, resulting in a more predictable cooling pattern. The modular design and ability to retrofit to an existing Netshelter rack enables medium to high density racks to be cooled in an autonomous environment without overcooling the room. How It Works The most common configuration for rows of racks in the data center is hot / cold aisle design for separating the supply and return air paths. HACS takes this one step further by containing the return path of the hot air exhausted from the IT equipment. Figures 1 and 2 show a containment configuration. Figure 1 HACS (airflow) Figure 2 HACS (assembled) In Row RC In Row RC In Row RC In Row RC HACS configurations capture the hot exhaust air in a plenum that is also connected to one or more InRow cooling unit(s). InRow cooling units are designed to draw air in a back to front pattern. The warm air in the HACS plenum is drawn to the 1 _

InRow cooling unit(s) where it is cooled and then discharged from the front, into the room, at a room neutral temperature. The discharge temperature is at or slightly below room temperature. Benefits of Hot Aisle Containment Eliminating mixing of hot / cold air streams in the data center has several benefits over a flooded and mixed environment. The main benefits from this design are listed in Table 1. Table 1 Hot Aisle Containment benefits Benefit Warmer intake temperatures increase unit capacity Predictable cooling Isolate high density racks Reduction or elimination of moisture removal Improved redundancy Shared capacity Description / Details Higher temperature differentials, between the entering air and the cooling coil, increase the amount of heat transfer and therefore capacity of the cooling unit. Removal of heat ensures that the supply temperature has little to no mixing and can be relatively constant and within the ASHRAE recommended guidelines for air delivery. Allows for mixed density racks to exist in the same environment without overcapacity or overcooling by the perimeter cooling system. Elevated entering and discharge temperatures almost guarantees that the leaving air temperature from the cooling coil will be above dew point. This saves energy on make-up humidification. Hot aisle containment improves the capture index of InRow cooling units, enabling redundancy to be achieved more easily and with less equipment. All of the InRow cooling units that share a common hot aisle have the ability to share their cooling capacity with heat load in the system. This improves overall cooling capacity utilization of the equipment in the Hot Aisle Containment System eliminating stranded cooling capacity that can happen with rack-based containment solutions. 2

Applications and product usage The use of HACS is not limited to one situation or application in the data center. In fact, it may be used as a general purpose cooling solution or as a targeted deployment for a group of racks. The following are some common applications for the product. Isolating high density zones There are large numbers of existing data centers, which were designed for densities below 3 kw per rack, in operation today. Newer IT equipment has pushed well beyond the design density of 3 kw per rack. This stressing of the perimeter or central air handling cooling system is sometimes compensated for by adding additional capacity (which doesn t solve the air distribution problem) or by overcooling the room by running the set point at a lower temperature. Overcooling is a hope strategy the does not address the hot spot directly but may temper the hot air by mixing in some portion of the overcooled surrounding air. In this application, in conjunction with InRow cooling, HACS provides a targeted cooling solution to higher density racks without changes to the existing system that was cooling lower density racks sufficiently. Figure 3 shows how a single highdensity zone could be isolated using HACS. Figure 3 Isolated high density zone with HACS High density zone InRow Cooling Unit CDU Perimeter Cooling Unit IT Rack 3

Virtualization / consolidation of servers In today s data centers there is a push toward virtualization and consolidation of servers to reduce white space occupied by the IT equipment. The virtualization and consolidation of servers packs the racks with higher densities than their existing infrastructure was designed for. In the traditional perimeter approach, the datacenters are designed with a typical load of 3 kw per rack. Figure 4a shows a traditional design with a total IT load of 96 kw. Figure 4b shows the same data center with the same 96 kw total IT load, yet the number of IT racks is reduced from 32 to 8, pushing the load per rack from 3 to 12 kw. Utilizing InRow with HACS would allow the same datacenter the ability to more than double in capacity without expanding into other building spaces. Figure 4a 96 kw deployment (3 kw per rack perimeter design) Figure 4b 96 kw deployment (12 kw per rack InRow design with HACS) IT Rack Perimeter Cooling Unit InRow Cooling Unit 4

Hot Aisle Containment Components There are a number of components with the HACS system (Table 2) that allow it to be both retrofitted in the field and modular in nature. First, since every datacenter does not have the exact same equipment or layout each component of the HACS must be chosen separately. There are specific rules that must be followed to ensure that the HACS can be deployed on a project. These rules are discussed later in this application note. Table 2 SKUs and descriptions SKU Description SKU Description ACDC1005 Baying Kit 900mm to 900mm (PDU/UPS to PDU/UPS) ACDC1016 Door and Frame Assembly SX to SX ACDC1006 Baying Kit 1070mm to 900mm (Rack to PDU/UPS) ACDC1017 Door and Frame Assembly SX to VX (VX Right Side) ACDC1007 Baying Kit 1070mm to 1070mm (Rack to Rack) ACDC1018 Ceiling Assembly 300mm (InRow RC and InRow RD) ACDC1008 Privacy Panel for Symmetra PX and RX Frame ACDC1019 Retrofittable Ceiling Assembly 600mm (SX, InRow RP, InRow RC, InRow RD) ACDC1009 Door Lock Assembly ACDC1020 Door and Frame Assembly VX to SX (VX Left Side) ACDC1015 Retrofittable Ceiling Assembly 750mm ACDC1021 Door and Frame Assembly VX to VX Each SKU is designed to either be installed at the same time as the rack and cooling units, or retrofitted to an existing InRow cooling environment. Figure 5 illustrates the different components and how they are assembled to make the final solution. 5

Figure 5 HACS exploded view with InRow RCs and NetShelter SX racks Door and Frame Assembly Ceiling Assembly Door Lock Assembly InRow RC NetShelter SX Rack Product and Component Configuration Options The ability of the HACS to work with multiple InRow cooling products and the modularity of the parts enables many different configuration possibilities which are shown in Tables 3-5. However, since all of the racks and cooling units are not the same physical size there are rules that must be followed to ensure a successful deployment of the HACS. 6

APC products supported and guidelines Table 3 HACS door kits HACS Door Kits Right side of hot aisle SX VX RC / RD / RP 600mm* PX40 / PX80 / XR PD40 / PD60 / PD80 Door Handle Left side of hot aisle SX ACDC1016 ACDC1017 ACDC1016 ACDC1017 ACDC1017 ACDC1009 VX ACDC1020 ACDC1021 ACDC1020 ACDC1021 ACDC1021 ACDC1009 RC / RD / RP 600mm* ACDC1016 ACDC1017 ACDC1016 ACDC1017 ACDC1017 ACDC1009 PX40 / PX80 / XR ACDC1020 ACDC1021 ACDC1020 ACDC1021 ACDC1021 ACDC1009 PD40 / PD60 / PD80 ACDC1020 ACDC1021 ACDC1020 ACDC1021 ACDC1021 ACDC1009 Door Handle ACDC1009 ACDC1009 ACDC1009 ACDC1009 ACDC1009 *InRow cooling units placed at the end of the row is not recommended Table 4 HACS ceiling assemblies HACS Ceiling Assemblies SX / VX 600mm SX / VX 750mm RC / RD 300mm (2) RC / RD 300mm* RC / RD / RP 600mm PX40 / PX80 / XR PD40 / PD60 PD80 SX / VX 600mm ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 SX / VX 750 mm ACDC1015 ACDC1015 RC / RD 300mm ACDC1018 (2) RC / RD 300mm* ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 RC / RD / RP 600mm ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 PX40 / PX80 / XR ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 PD40 / PD60 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 ACDC1019 PD80 ACDC1015 ACDC1015 *Two 300mm InRow cooling units placed side by side 7

Table 5 HACS roof height adapters to VX 42U racks HACS Roof Height Adapters Roof adapter SX to VX 42U SX 600mm SX 750 mm RC / RD 300mm RC / RD / RP 600mm AR7203 AR7202 ACAC10003 ACAC10004 1. The standard HACS is compatible with either 600 mm or 750 mm wide NetShelter racks. 2. HACS may only be deployed on equal length rows. 3. PDU/UPS in VS racks in a layout, the fronts of the racks are required to be aligned. The difference in the depth between the VS (35.4 inch (900 mm)) and the SX racks are accommodated by the door (ACDC1017, ACDC1020 or ACDC1021) and ceiling assembly panels (ACDC1019). See Figure 6 4. The hot aisle width between rows (frame to frame) of NetShelter SX racks must be 39 inches (990 mm). The ceiling panels and door assemblies are designed to work with the 39 inch (990mm) aisle width. See Figure 6 Figure 6 Required row spacing for HACS deployment NetShelter NetShelter InRow UPS PDU PDU Measure distance at enclosure frames. 39.00 (990.60) 39.00 (990.60) 45.50 (1155.70) 52.20 (1325.88) 34.43 (874.52) 70.81 (1798.58) 119.60 (3037.80) 52.43 (1331.72) NetShelter NetShelter InRow NetShelter NetShelter PDU 23.62 (600) 23.62 (600) 23.62 (600) 23.62 (600) 23.62 (600) 23.62 (600) 8

5. The HACS was designed to incorporate racks without rear doors. The doors on the end of the hot aisle were designed to secure the hot aisle and the racks. The clearance required to lift rear doors up and off of their hinges does not exist in a HACS configuration with the NetShelter SX rack. Additionally, NetShelter SX racks with rear doors installed in the HACS may result in the doors contacting the ceiling panels. If door removal or contact with the ceiling panels is an issue, roof height adapters may be installed on top of every rack and cooling unit to create clearance for the door swing. 6. InRow cooling units placed at the end of a row is not recommended in an open row configuration. a. Cooling is not optimized when the units are placed at the end of a row. The Capture Index is limited when there is not a rack on either side of the cooling unit. If the cooling unit is placed in between racks the cooling equipment will be able to capture the heat from adjacent racks on both sides of the cooling unit. If the unit is placed at the end of the row, then the heat is only being captured from the racks on one side of the unit, and will pull more air from the room as illustrated in Figure 7. Figure 7 Capture Index of InRow cooling units R R R R R R R R R R R R C C C 100% 100% 64% 46% 100% 100% 100% 78% 100% 100% 100% 100% While one of the big advantages of the HACS is to improve the capture index of the cooling units in the row, general best practice is to configure the design to optimize the capture index of the cooling units in an open aisle configuration, and then add containment to the solution. As a result you end up not placing units at the end of the row. b. The InRow RP, RD 600mm and RC 600mm are built in NetShelter SX frames, so physically they can be placed at the end of a row. c. The InRow RC 300mm and RD 300mm are not built in a NetShelter SX frame therefore they do not have the mounting holes required to mount the door assembly. A custom engineered solution must be implemented to accommodate this preference. APC products not supported 1. The only InRow cooling unit that cannot be installed in a HACS is the InRow SC. All of the other InRow units can be installed in a HACS configuration. The InRow SC is not supported because there is interference between the ceiling panels of the HACS and the supply and return air ducts for the condensers on the top of the unit. 9

2. The standard HACS is not compatible with the AR7709 NetShelter SX channel mounting bracket. This bracket requires the removal of the casters from the racks resulting in the misalignment of the mounting flange / holes of the door assembly and the rack mounting position. Custom installations of HACS While the standard HACS will support a wide variety of applications the system is limited in what it supports as a standard offering. However, with some assistance from the APC Custom Engineering Group (CEG), and appropriate on site services, the HACS can be installed to support a wider range of installations. 1. 48 inch (1200 mm) deep SX racks (AR3300 and AR3350) may be installed in a HACS with the following clarifications. This is also illustrated in Figure 8. a. The InRow cooling units are not the same depth as these racks. The backs of the racks are required to be aligned with the backs of the cooling units. Custom engineered components have been developed to compensate for the difference in depth of the components. b. The ceiling panel mounting holes do not line up with the mounting holes on the deep racks. A drill or a self tapping screw must be used to secure the ceiling panels to the racks. Care must be taken to avoid getting metal shavings into the IT equipment. c. All of the racks in the HACS solution must be SX racks. VX racks cannot be installed in a HACS zone with 48 inch (1200 mm) deep racks. Figure 8 HACS with 1200mm deep racks 1200 mm deep SX Rack Hot Aisle Containment CEG depth adapter InRow cooling unit 10

2. 48U NetShelter SX (AR3107 and AR3157) racks. Custom engineered components have been developed to support the 48U rack installation, however special considerations need to be made when using 48U racks as shown in Figure 9. a. 48U height adapters need to be used on the InRow cooling units as shown in Table 6. Table 6 HACS roof height adapters to 48U racks HACS Roof Height Adapters Roof adapter 42U to 48U RC / RD 300mm RC / RD / RP 600mm ACAC10007 ACAC10009 Figure 9 HACS with 48U high racks Height adapter CEG door assembly 48U high rack InRow Cooler b. Please keep in mind this is a custom engineered solution and appropriate services and engineering support should be allowed for APC to support this type of installation. 3. Ceiling suspended and non-apc rack installations a. The standard HACS is not compatible with other manufacturer s racks. A custom engineered solution would have to be implemented. b. The standard HACS is not able to be suspended from a ceiling. A custom engineered solution would have to be implemented. 11

System Controls InRow cooling products have multiple modes of operation for system control. When placed in a hot aisle containment system, the InRow cooling unit must be set to RACS / HACS to ensure that the system is operating properly. In addition, the HACS mode has two set points that must be configured. These set points are supply air temperature and fan speed preference. In this mode, the cooling set point will have no effect on the operation of the unit. This is because the cooling set point looks at a remote temperature probe in an open-row configuration in order to maintain the inlet temperature to the adjacent racks. In a HACS configuration, the temperature of the supply air (discharge from the unit) will be the same as the inlet to the IT equipment because it will not have a chance to mix with the surrounding environment. In addition, the InRow cooling unit must respond much quicker in HACS mode to ensure that spikes in rack exhaust temperature that occur over a time scale of a few seconds are properly neutralized. While most IT equipment is designed for approximately a 20 F (11.1 C) temperature rise from the inlet to the exhaust (deltat), some equipment will require more or less airflow. In cases where the deltat is known, the fan speed preference setting can be configured for the desired cfm / kw (l / s per kw). Selection of the fan speed preference should be done by the user using the chart in Table 7 if the deltat or CFM / kw (l / s per kw) is known. If neither of these two values is known, then a setting of medium is recommended. If it is later determined that the fan speed is to low or high, it can be easily adjusted. Fan Speed Preference Table 7 Fan speed preference selection DeltaT F CFM per kw DeltaT C L / s per kw High 10 325 5.5 2.56 Medium-High 15 215 8.3 1.69 Medium 20 160 11.1 1.26 Medium-Low 25 130 13.9 1.02 Low 30 105 16.6.83 Choosing a fan speed preference that is too low (higher delta T and lower CFM / kw) could result in the airflow from the servers to be greater than that of the RC. In this case hot air would be exhausted out the top and bottom of the racks resulting in an increase in heat load to the rest of the room. Operating with the fan speed preference set higher than necessary does not have a negative effect on cooling capability, but in general the fans will run faster and the unit will use more energy. For 12

more information on the controls of the InRow RP refer to APC application note #119. For more information on the controls of the InRow RC refer to APC application note #142. Conclusions The hot aisle containment system is a modular plenum system for improving the predictable architecture of InRow cooling. Following the guidelines for mating the containment system, system control settings, rack placement, and cooling units will ensure proper air distribution throughout the system. About the Author: Kevin Lemke is the Product Manager for InRow Cooling Solutions for APC-MGE. Kevin is responsible for managing the products focused on applications greater than 16 kw for in-row cooling architecture. He has 8 years experience in design, sales, and support of complex cooling solutions. Kevin received a Bachelors degree in Mechanical Engineering from Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL in 2000. 13