Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational. May IEEE Information Element for the IETF

Similar documents
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7973 Category: Informational ISSN: November 2016

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 5451 March 2012 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 2474 August 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7319 BCP: 191 July 2014 Category: Best Current Practice ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8186 Category: Standards Track. June 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 4326 June 2014 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: January 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational March 2016 ISSN:

Updates: 6126 May 2015 Category: Experimental ISSN: Extension Mechanism for the Babel Routing Protocol

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6028 Category: Experimental ISSN: October 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8516 Category: Standards Track January 2019 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6379 Obsoletes: 4869 Category: Informational October 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: March 2016

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8142 Category: Standards Track April 2017 ISSN:

Clarifications for When to Use the name-addr Production in SIP Messages

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: March 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7537 Updates: 4379, L. Andersson S. Aldrin Huawei Technologies May 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track. Cisco May 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8035 Updates: 5761 November 2016 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. Enterprise Architects February 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 6376 January 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: January 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7189 Category: Standards Track March 2014 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) October This document establishes an IETF URN Sub-namespace for use with OAuth-related specifications.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track ISSN: February 2016

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Cisco Systems, Inc. April 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track May 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. S. Aldrin Google, Inc. L. Ginsberg Cisco Systems November 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8441 Updates: 6455 September 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track March 2015 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: S. Previdi. Cisco Systems

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8440 Category: Standards Track ISSN: August 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. March 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track January 2019 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 6811 September 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7725 Category: Standards Track February 2016 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8297 Category: Experimental December 2017 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6309

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7193 Category: Informational. J. Schaad Soaring Hawk Consulting April 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) January 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: November 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track October 2018 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 5736 Category: Informational. ICANN January 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7660 Category: Standards Track. October 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: May 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational. August IANA Registration for the Cryptographic Algorithm Object Identifier Range

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6441 BCP: 171 November 2011 Category: Best Current Practice ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: August 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track April 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track ISSN: September 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7504 June 2015 Updates: 1846, 5321 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: July 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: Y. Umaoka IBM December 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7125 Category: Informational. February 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational October 2013 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8069 Category: Informational February 2017 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8336 Category: Standards Track. March 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8464 September 2018 Category: Informational ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7213 Category: Standards Track. M. Bocci Alcatel-Lucent June 2014

Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: December 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) ISSN: April 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6034 Category: Standards Track October 2010 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational. Juniper Networks May 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7881 Category: Standards Track. Big Switch Networks July 2016

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Nokia P. Pillay-Esnault Huawei USA January 2019

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. S. Aldrin Google Inc. March 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: March 2012

DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6522 STD: 73 January 2012 Obsoletes: 3462 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track. Juniper July 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7791 Category: Standards Track. March 2016

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8191 Category: Standards Track. X. Lee CNNIC. August 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8055 Category: Standards Track. January 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: March 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: April 2011

February Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track. Cisco B. Wen Comcast J. Rabadan Nokia June 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6440 Category: Standards Track. Huawei December 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Best Current Practice ISSN: March 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 5904 Category: Informational June 2010 ISSN:

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems D. Tappan Consultant October 2009

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8465 September 2018 Category: Informational ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7043 Category: Informational October 2013 ISSN:

Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) Request for Comments: 6255 Category: Informational May 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: J. Haas Juniper Networks March 2019

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: November 2013

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6032 Category: Standards Track. December 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6694 August 2012 Category: Informational ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Best Current Practice. Cisco Systems July IPv6 Prefix Length Recommendation for Forwarding

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 5885 Category: Standards Track July 2016 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8050 Category: Standards Track ISSN: May 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7330 Category: Standards Track. Cisco Systems August 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Google Inc. October 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational March 2017 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 5280 May 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6994 Category: Standards Track August 2013 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. S. Krishnan Ericsson October 2015

Request for Comments: 7314 Category: Experimental July 2014 ISSN: Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS) EXPIRE Option.

Transcription:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8137 Category: Informational ISSN: 2070-1721 T. Kivinen INSIDE Secure P. Kinney Kinney Consulting LLC May 2017 IEEE 802.15.4 Information Element for the IETF Abstract IEEE Std 802.15.4 defines Information Elements (IEs) that can be used to extend 802.15.4 in an interoperable manner. The IEEE 802.15 Assigned Numbers Authority (ANA) manages the registry of the Information Elements. This document formulates a request for ANA to allocate a number from that registry for the IETF and describes how the IE is formatted to provide subtypes. Status of This Memo This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8137. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust s Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Kivinen & Kinney Informational [Page 1]

Table of Contents 1. Introduction........................ 2 2. Terminology......................... 3 3. Working Groups Benefiting from the IETF 802.15.4 IE..... 3 4. IETF IE Subtype Format................... 3 5. Request to Allocate an IETF IE............... 4 6. Security Considerations................... 4 7. IANA Considerations..................... 5 8. References......................... 6 8.1. Normative References.................. 6 8.2. Informative References................. 6 Appendix A. Vendor Specific IE in IEEE 802.15.4........ 7 Authors Addresses....................... 7 1. Introduction IEEE Std 802.15.4 [IEEE802.15.4] is a standard, referred to by RFC 4944 [RFC4944] and other documents, that enables very low-cost and low-power communications. The standard defines numerous optional Physical Layers (PHYs) operating in many different frequency bands with a simple and effective Medium Access Control (MAC). IEEE Std 802.15.4 defines Information Elements (IEs) that can be used to extend 802.15.4 in an interoperable manner. An IE provides a flexible, extensible, and easily implementable method of encapsulating information. The general format of an IE as defined in Section 7.4 of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015 [IEEE802.15.4] consists of an identification (ID) field, a length field, and a content field. Multiple IEs may be concatenated, and elements with unknown ID values in a list of IEs can be skipped since their length is known. IEs provide a flexible container for information that allows the addition of new IE definitions in future versions of the standard in a backwards-compatible manner. There are two different IE types, Header IE and Payload IE. A Header IE is part of the MAC header; it is never encrypted, but it may be authenticated. Most of the Header IE processing is done by the MAC, and IETF protocols should not have any direct effect on that processing. A Payload IE is part of the MAC payload and may be encrypted and authenticated. IETF protocols will need to insert information in the 802.15.4 frames; the 802.15.4 standard enables that by including one or more payload IEs in the frame that will contain the information. For this purpose, the IETF requests a dedicated Payload IE from the IEEE 802.15 Assigned Numbers Authority (ANA) [IEEE802.15-ANA]. The current 802.15 ANA database can be found at [IEEE802.15-ANA-DB]. Kivinen & Kinney Informational [Page 2]

The 802.15.4 operations manual [IEEE802.15-OPS] describes how a Standards Development Organization (SDO) may request an allocation of one IE. To make this request the SDO has to provide (i) the reason for the request, (ii) a description of the protocol format that shows an appropriate subtype capability, and (iii) an agreement that only one IE number will be allocated for use by the SDO. This document provides the information needed for the request. 2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 3. Working Groups Benefiting from the IETF 802.15.4 IE There are several IETF working groups such as 6TiSCH, 6lo, and CoRE that could benefit from the IETF IE. The 6TiSCH Working Group has already expressed the need for the IE; this allocation is expected to satisfy that need. 4. IETF IE Subtype Format The maximum length of the Payload IE content is 2047 octets, and the 802.15.4 frame contains a list of payload IEs. A single frame can have multiple payload IEs, terminated with the payload IE terminator, which may then be followed by the payload. Since the 802.15.4 standard defines a list of payload IEs along with their structures, there is no need for this document to specify the internal nesting structure of the IETF IE. The Payload IE format of 802.15.4 standard contains the Length field. The length of the subtype content can be calculated from the 802.15.4 Payload IE Length field of the IETF IE. Kivinen & Kinney Informational [Page 3]

The format of the IETF IE is as follows: 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Subtype ID +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ subtype content +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: IETF IE Subtype Format o Subtype ID is the IANA-allocated number specifying the subtype of the IETF IE. Value 0 is reserved for future extensibility, i.e., in case a longer subtype ID field is needed. o Subtype content is the actual content of the Information Element, and its length can be calculated from the Length field of the IETF IE. One IEEE 802.15.4 frame MAY contain multiple IETF IEs with the same or different subtypes. 5. Request to Allocate an IETF IE Per the IETF s request, the IEEE 802.15 Working Group has allocated an ID (5) for a Payload IE for IETF use. The IETF understands that this is the only ID it will be issued. 6. Security Considerations This document creates an IANA registry for IETF IE subtype IDs (see Section 7). The security of the protocols using the IEs MUST be described in the documents requesting allocations from this registry. The IEEE Std 802.15.4 [IEEE802.15.4] contains methods in which security of the IE can be enforced when a frame is received, but this is only per IE type. Therefore, all IETF IEs will have the same security-level requirements regardless of the subtype ID used. This can cause issues if different security processing would be needed and any of those IEs would need to be processed in the MAC level. Since all IETF protocols should operate at a higher level than the MAC level, the higher-layer processing for these IEs SHOULD perform separate security policy checking based on the IETF IE subtype ID in addition to the checks done by the MAC. Kivinen & Kinney Informational [Page 4]

7. IANA Considerations The "IEEE Std 802.15.4 IETF IE Subtype IDs" registry has been created as follows: Value Subtype ID 0 Reserved 1-200 Unassigned 201-255 Experimental Use Any change or addition to this registry requires Expert Review [RFC5226]. Note that there are vendor-specific IEs already defined in IEEE 802.15.4 (see Appendix A); because of this, there is no need to reserve any subtype IDs for the vendor-specific uses. Kivinen & Kinney Informational [Page 5]

8. References 8.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. 8.2. Informative References [IEEE802.15.4] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks", IEEE Standard 802.15.4, <https://standards.ieee.org/about/get/802/802.15.html>. [IEEE802.15-ANA] IEEE 802.15, "IEEE 802.15 Assigned Numbers Authority", <http://www.ieee802.org/15/ana.html>. [IEEE802.15-ANA-DB] IEEE, "IEEE 802.15 ANA database", <https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/ documents?is_dcn=257&is_group=0000>. [IEEE802.15-OPS] IEEE, "IEEE 802.15 Operations Manual", <https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/ documents?is_dcn=235&is_group=0000>. [RFC4944] Montenegro, G., Kushalnagar, N., Hui, J., and D. Culler, "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks", RFC 4944, DOI 10.17487/RFC4944, September 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4944>. [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, DOI 10.17487/RFC5226, May 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>. Kivinen & Kinney Informational [Page 6]

Appendix A. Vendor Specific IE in IEEE 802.15.4 IEEE 802.15.4 already has several numbers for different Vendor Specific IE types. There is one for the Vendor Specific Header IE for Header IEs. There is one incorrectly named Vendor Specific Nested IE for Payload IEs, and there is another one with exactly the same name, but under the MLME Nested IE long format. All of the Vendor Specific IEs start with a 3-octet vendor OUI to identify the organization. Authors Addresses Tero Kivinen INSIDE Secure Lonnrotinkatu 11 Helsinki FI-00120 Finland Email: kivinen@iki.fi Pat Kinney Kinney Consulting LLC Email: pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com Kivinen & Kinney Informational [Page 7]