NORTH SIDE IMPACT ANALYSIS

Similar documents
Bellevue s Traffic Adaptive Signals

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3

5,952 SF - 172,012 SF

SECTION 2 NAVIGATION SYSTEM: DESTINATION SEARCH

Cornerstone of downtown; Gateway to the state

APPENDIX E TRANSPORTATION

THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9

Construction Phase Public Outreach Plan

THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9

Northwest Needs Improvements Survey

Metrolinx / Toronto Transit Plan April 28, Jack Collins Vice President, Rapid Transit Implementation

Looking Ahead. A Context for the Next Twenty Year Needs Assessment. July 2013

1.1. Driving Around Euclid. Goals. Launch 1.1

ESTIMATING PARAMETERS FOR MODIFIED GREENSHIELD S MODEL AT FREEWAY SECTIONS FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS

Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO

RESOLVED this 22 nd day of May, ATTEST: By: Mark Dunnagan, Chairman

Creating Dallas-Fort Worth s Transportation System: Celebrating Partnerships and Milestones

Chapter 5: Euler Paths and Circuits The Mathematics of Getting Around

Transit Development Plan/Transportation Demand. Chuck Steigerwald Director of Strategic Planning. Management Plan

INTERNET BASICS 1. Introduction to the Internet

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 3 REFINED MLT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS

Metrobus 30s Line Enhancements

2015 Major Projects Work Program

November 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING

OR 217,I-5 Experience Portland, OR

Chapter 5: Euler Paths and Circuits The Mathematics of Getting Around

Downtown Boise Multimodal Center

Math 5593 Linear Programming Final Exam

CODE RED Name: Date: Period: Ms. Mora

Network Redundancy Concepts and Configuration

Building Success through Partnerships

Feasibility Study Downtown Moorhead Railroad Grade Separation Moorhead, Minnesota July 2008

Muni Service Equity Strategy. Presentation to SFCTA Plans and Programs Committee April 19, 2016

C Line Rapid Bus 90% Design

Lane Closure System. User Manual

ROCKFORD CONSTRUCTION 601 First Street

Corridor Management Committee. December 17, 2014

Final Major New Program List

AQR UNIT 7. Circuits, Paths, and Graph Structures. Packet #

FORM-BASED CODES IN THE WEST. Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute March 2007

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

Municipal Service Park 3 December Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex

What is Network Analyst?

UTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO

Travel Demand Modeling and Project Coding Procedures

ARTS DISTRICT 2018 E. 8 TH STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA

Why is Indiana using P3s?

The Number Plane THE NUMBER PLANE PASSPORT.

Record of Public Comment on Central Corridor SDEIS

SYSTEM CONFIGURATION AND FUNCTIONAL OUTLINE OF MPD ROAD TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER

I-20 EAST TEXAS CORRIDOR STUDY. TxDOT Planning Conference, Corpus Christi June 4 th, 2014

West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions. Downtown Open House and Neighborhood Forum September 11, 2018

3D Visualization of the 14.4 Mile Multi-lane, Multi-level DFW Connector Corridor in North Texas

Dakota County Transportation CIP Process Requests from cities/townships

The Residence Hall Security System That So You Don't Have To.

1150 N 44 th St - PHOENIX, AZ

Appendix-A: Usage of EventFilter Utility Program

of Nebraska - Lincoln

Performance Measurement, Data and Decision Making: A Matter of Alignment. Mark F. Muriello Assistant Director Tunnels, Bridges & Terminals

KANSAS MAP CHANGES KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROUTE COUNTY PROJECT WORK TYPE I 635 WYANDOTTE K GR&SU

Kansas Division. January 31, 2018

National Roundabout Conference 2005 DRAFT High-Capacity Roundabout Intersection Analysis: Going Around in Circles David Stanek, PE & Ronald T. Milam,

Owner s manual NX405. English. Clarion NX405 English 1

Using GPS Based Origin-Destination Data to Improve Traffic Studies. Michael R. Wahlstedt, PE, PTOE OTEC October 11, 2017

Transportation Improvement Program. Project Lookup Lists

User Manual Alpine Navigation

An Assessment of Congestion in the Kansas City Region using the MARC Travel Demand Model

Graph Theory. 26 March Graph Theory 26 March /29

PRIME/ESSENTIAL NAVIGATION USER MANUAL

CHANGE-ONLY MODELING IN NAVIGATION GEO-DATABASES

GORE BUILDING. 238 N. Massachusetts Avenue, Lakeland, FL 33801

DOWNTOWN TUNNEL / MIDTOWN TUNNEL / MLK EXTENSION PROJECT PROCUREMENT PROCESS

Transportation Improvement Program. Project Lookup Lists

Connected Corridors: I-210 Pilot Integrated Corridor Management System

Cedar Rapids ITS Deployment Project

Writing Functions in C

Council of State Governments. Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing. October 28, 2013

Traffic Impact Analysis Shotwell Road Residential Clayton, NC

STUDY REPORT #1 ADDENDUM

City of Manteca. Community Directional (Wayfinding) Sign Program. May 17, 2011

M50 Demand Management Study

Bremner Transformer Station and Cable Tunnel PROGRESS OF THE CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2017 TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM

User Manual JRV9000. Navigation software for the JRV9000. English April 2016, ver. 1.0

City of Ames Street Banner Policy

Gaston County GIS. Interactive Mapping Website

Riverside Public Utilities Long Range Space Plan. Board of Public Utilities 12/07/12

OPTIMAL MERGE LAYOUT ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE M50: A MICROSIMULATION MODELLING APPROACH

MANAGED TALENT SOLUTIONS

Ioannis Psarros Department of Civil Engineering and Intermodal Freight Transportation Institute, Memphis, TN

Provo-Orem Bus Rapid Transit


PROJECT TIMELINE. Next steps. Plan. Start of Service

UF-IFAS Jackson County Extension Office Marianna, FL 32448

L-1. Free Metro Ride. Free Metro Ride. Light Rail. Light Rail. 16th Street Mall / Free Mall Ride. Skyline Park. Site.

4400 WEST 78TH STREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MN

MARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018

SECURITY AND CAMPUS SAFETY

NEW TxDOT CONGESTION RELIEF PROGRAM

EXTENDING RED/PURPLE LINE REVENUE SERVICE TO EAST SIDE OF DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES/ARTS DISTRICT

Transcription:

NORTH SIDE IMPACT ANALYSIS

INDOT INTERSTATE PROJECTSS Heavy investment in a fifty-year-old central Indiana interstate system is in process, and unless redirected, will incrementally embed the system s inefficiencies and inequities for another half century. The INDOT overall project is separated into three sections as shown in the location maps*: I-65/70 North Junction bounded by Vermont Street, Central Avenue and Commerce Avenue (Des #1600808) I-65 from Central Avenue to Fall Creek (Des #1600713) I-70 from Commerce Avenue to I-465 East Leg (Des #1600712) *From Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016, INDOT

INDOT CURRENT PROJECT 50 -year impact neighborhoods just beginning to recover from original interstate construction 65 70 I-65/I-70 North Split Interchange Reconstruction Project Incremental - part of a larger project area let s take the time to study alternatives and look at the big picture for all the projects Added travel lanes don t solve future congestion - we need a more forward-thinking solution that considers autonomous vehicles, transit and logistics traffic Reconstruct North Split Interchange Replace bridges/replace pavement/add travel lane Replace bridges/replace pavement/add travel lane/ Reconfigure ramps along 11th and 12th Streets

INDOT ATTACHMENT A LANE MARKING RETAINING WALL/BARRIER BRIDGE 20-30 HIGH BRIDGE 40-50 HIGH BRIDGE 60-70 HIGH 245 370 180 180 110 110 *Drawing from Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

INDOT ATTACHMENT A LANE MARKING RETAINING WALL/BARRIER BRIDGE 20-30 HIGH BRIDGE 40-50 HIGH BRIDGE 60-70 HIGH 260 245 150 134 *Drawing from Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

INDOT ATTACHMENT A LANE MARKING RETAINING WALL/BARRIER BRIDGE 20-30 HIGH BRIDGE 40-50 HIGH BRIDGE 60-70 HIGH *Drawing from Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

INDOT ATTACHMENT D LANE MARKING RETAINING WALL/BARRIER BRIDGE 20-30 HIGH BRIDGE 40-50 HIGH BRIDGE 60-70 HIGH NOTES: EASTERN EXIT/ENTRANCE RAMPS AT GRADE 180 180 110 110 *Drawing from Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

INDOT ATTACHMENT D LANE MARKING RETAINING WALL/BARRIER BRIDGE 20-30 HIGH BRIDGE 40-50 HIGH BRIDGE 60-70 HIGH NOTES: EXIT/ENTRANCE RAMPS AT GRADE 260 240 150 134 *Drawing from Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

INDOT ATTACHMENT D LANE MARKING RETAINING WALL/BARRIER BRIDGE 20-30 HIGH BRIDGE 40-50 HIGH BRIDGE 60-70 HIGH NOTES: WESTERN EXIT RAMP AT GRADE *Drawing from Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

EXISTING BETWEEN PENN & COLLEGE 12TH ST. 50 134 50 PARKING +/- 250 INDOT R.O.W.

INDOT PROPOSAL A BETWEEN PENN & COLLEGE 12TH ST. 245 PARKING +/- 250 INDOT R.O.W. *This illustration is an interpretation of INDOT s plan. Source: Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

INDOT PROPOSAL D BETWEEN PENN & COLLEGE 12TH ST. 240 PARKING +/- 250 INDOT R.O.W. *This illustration is an interpretation of INDOT s plan. Source: Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

EXISTING INDIANA LANDMARKS BUTLER HOUSE 12TH ST. CENTRAL DOWNTOWN ALABAMA

INDOT PROPOSAL INDIANA LANDMARKS BUTLER HOUSE 12TH ST. CENTRAL DOWNTOWN ALABAMA *This illustration is an interpretation of INDOT s plan. Source: Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

COMPARISON INDIANA LANDMARKS BUTLER HOUSE 12TH ST. 134 245 CENTRAL DOWNTOWN ALABAMA *This illustration is an interpretation of INDOT s plan. Source: Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

ALABAMA EXISTING DOWNTOWN CENTRAL 12TH ST. INDIANA LANDMARKS

ALABAMA INDOT PROPOSAL DOWNTOWN CENTRAL 12TH ST. INDIANA LANDMARKS *This illustration is an interpretation of INDOT s plan. Source: Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

ALABAMA COMPARISON DOWNTOWN CENTRAL 245 134 12TH ST. INDIANA LANDMARKS *This illustration is an interpretation of INDOT s plan. Source: Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

BEFORE - 12TH & ALABAMA

AFTER - 12TH & ALABAMA *This illustration is an interpretation of INDOT s plan. Source: Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

BEFORE - 12TH & CENTRAL

AFTER - 12TH & CENTRAL *This illustration is an interpretation of INDOT s plan. Source: Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

BEFORE - 11TH & PECK

AFTER - 11TH & PECK *This illustration is an interpretation of INDOT s plan. Source: Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT

BEFORE - 11TH & PARK

AFTER - 11TH & PARK *This illustration is an interpretation of INDOT s plan. Source: Project Intent Report, Revision July 18, 2016 INDOT