The OTT Co-Viewing Experience: 2017 November 2017

Similar documents
Direct Brands and the Ad-Supported OTT Video Viewer

2017 REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

Left To Your Own Devices

IAB Ireland Video On Demand 2016

Time-Shifting: More Choices For Watching More Content

State of OTT An in-depth look at today s over-the-top content consumption and device usage

IAB Ireland Video On Demand 2017

THE STATE OF ONLINE VIDEO 2017

INTRODUCTION. In this summary version, we present some of the key figures and charts.

CE Adoption and Trends

Measuring the impact of IoT. Alison Robart Director, Client Services

DISCOVERABILITY. How Canadians Find TV Content

State of OTT. An in-depth look at today s over-the-top content consumption and device usage. Susan Engleson SENIOR DIRECTOR, EMERGENT PRODUCTS

A Portrait of Today s Smartphone User

Consumer Insights. YouGov Omnibus, 5 th -6 th April

State of OTT An in-depth look at over-the-top consumption

A Portrait of Today s Tablet User

ONLINE TV VIEWING BY AGE

THE POWER OF OTT. CTV Media, Inc 2018

V I D E O A D V E R T I S I N G B U R E A U - R E P O R T Linear TV and OTT: Living Together in Harmony

Entertainment Services: The future is mobile White Paper December 2016

Home Sweet Digital Home Mike Rich, Susan Engleson & Angela Bryant June 7, 2016

T he Inbox Report REVEAL MORE CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS OF . Fluent LLC Inbox. Sent. Drafts. Spam. Trash. Click here to Reply

The Future of TV and Video, Clarified

T he Inbox Report 2017

LONGITUDINAL ETHNOGRAPHY & ACCELERATION EXTENSION STUDY. April 28, 2015

The Mobile Consumer Lifestyle. Implications for Marketers

THE POWER OF BROADCAST MEDIA IN NEBRASKA

emarketer US Social Network Usage StatPack

Online Consumers Views and Usage of Ad Blocking Technologies. IAB Ad Blocking Study

The Mobile Movement Understanding Smartphone Users. Google/IPSOS OTX MediaCT U.S., April 2011

The Smartphone Consumer June 2012

The Demographics of Mobile News Habits

Deloitte TMT Predictions 2018

Quality of. The importance of TV-like quality on every device. experience. Quality matters.

Contents. 1. Survey Background and Methodology. 2. Summary of Key Findings. 3. Survey Results. 4. Appendix

Simmons OneView SM. How to Interpret Quick Reports Simmons OneView: How to Interpret Quick Reports Page 1

Q THE RISE OF MOBILE AND TABLET VIDEO GLOBAL VIDEO INDEX LONG-FORM VIDEO CONTINUES TO ENGAGE LIVE VIDEO DOMINATES ON-DEMAND MEDIA

Mobile Messaging Apps Study : India. August 2014

COMPARABLE METRICS Q4 2015

You Down With OTT? An Overview Of The Competitive Video Ecosystem

BEYOND THE LIVING ROOM

NinthDecimal Mobile Audience Insights Report. Q Spotlight on Quick Service (QSR) & Casual Dining Restaurants

Norton s My First Device Report. October 2018

T H E S H I F T T O SMARTPHONE DOMINANCE

U.S. Digital Video Benchmark Adobe Digital Index Q2 2014

Local Search Insights

Connected Devices and The Internet of Things

IPSOS / REUTERS POLL DATA Prepared by Ipsos Public Affairs

The Multi-Screen Landscape

THE NIELSEN TOTAL AUDIENCE REPORT Q Copyright 2018 The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. All Rights Reserved.

The Rise of the Connected Viewer

I Travel on mobile / FR

GLOBAL VIDEO INDEX REPORT Q1 2012

Focus on potential and usage of platforms Thomas Fuchs, Conference of Directors of the Media Authorities (DLM)

2010 American Mobile Consumer Report

MCA Market Research Consumer Perceptions Survey fixed broadband. April 2018

THE ONLINER A VIP FOR MARKETERS. Slovenia

Connected Consumer Survey

COMPARABLE METRICS Q1 2016

CONNECTED TV GUIDE: WHERE CAN I SERVE MY VIDEO ASSET?

THE NIELSEN TOTAL AUDIENCE REPORT Q Copyright 2018 The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. All Rights Reserved.

OTT Churn and Retention: Increasing Lifetime Subscriber Value

Days of channel hopping are over as the average TV viewer only watches 12 of the 215 channels they sign up to

Introduction CJ s Cross-Device Tracking Solution Key Strategies Shopping & Device Paths Average Order Value...

Turner Insights: Summer 2015

Wave 9 Summary. Sept

Sneak Peek StreamOn Report Preview

The Nielsen Comparable Q2 2016

How Young Children Are Watching TV and DVDs: From the June 2013 Rating Survey on Young Children s TV Viewing

OTT Video Opportunity, threat or something else?

Insights JiWire Mobile Audience Insights Report Q4 2012

Click to edit Master title style

MOBILE CONNECTIONS AND EVOLUTION IDIL CAKIM NOVEMBER 2013

App-nesia in the UK The need for app re-engagement marketing

Tech Tracker + Social Networking module Quarterly Release: Q1 2012

Profiles of Subscribers in Multifamily Residences

I Shopping on mobile / RU

How Many, How Often & How Long:

The Future of Digital Platforms Smartphones, Streaming Video & Smart Speakers

TIME TO GET MOBILE 70%IN % 76% 84%

SUPER PANEL: A MULTI-SCREEN AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT

Holiday Shopping With Mobile Phones October 2010

REPORT Kids and Apps

TOP 5 SNEAK PEEK. A Brief Review of MTM s Latest Findings

VAB REPORT: MVPD S VOD DRIVING ENGAGEMENT & AD LIFT

Deliver your message to an audience of passionate Anime and Gaming fans.

65% say that they wouldn t want to go back to life without their Smart Speaker

November 2016 G. Oscar Anderson, Senior Research Advisor AARP Research

Navigating Content Chaos

Live Video Streaming A Global Perspective June Kristina Sruoginis, IAB Research Director,

Constantly connected:

Adobe Security Survey

THE NIELSEN TOTAL AUDIENCE REPORT Q Copyright 2019 The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Digital Day 2016 Overview of findings. Fieldwork: Feb-April Date

YuMe & ZenithOptimedia: Mobile & Multi-Screen Planning. Matt Taylor (YuMe) Simon Taylor (ZenithOptimedia)

2015 Local Business Search Webinar comscore & Neustar December comscore.com

DIGITAL MEDIA CONSUMPTION IS GROWING, EVERYTHING ELSE IS SHRINKING

I Travel on mobile / UK

Contending with Another Challenger

Transcription:

The OTT Co-Viewing Experience: 2017 November 2017 Sponsored by

Objectives IAB Digital Video Center of Excellence has identified OTT/Connected TV as one of its research priorities in 2017. During the first half of 2017, IAB Digital Video Center released the Video Content Discovery Study and the Changing TV Experience Study to understand the awareness and discovery patterns of video content across platforms, including OTT/Connected TV, and specifically the adoption, usage and attitudes towards OTT/Connected TV. To continue building this OTT/Connected TV research program, IAB Digital Video Center, in collaboration with Freewheel, Hulu, and Roku, conducted this primary research study to focus on understanding the co-viewing behavior on OTT and its benefits to brands, such as incremental reach and advertising effectiveness. In addition, the research aims to compare co-viewing behaviors between OTT and linear live TV programming to understand similarities and differences. 2

Methodology An online survey was fielded among MARU/Matchbox s Springboard America online panel (~250,000 U.S. members). The total sample included 1,223 video viewers ages 13-64 in the U.S., representative by Census. The survey was fielded 10/2/2017 10/9/2017 All statistical significance is noted with (*) and tested at 95% confidence level. Key definitions: Co-viewing Watching video content with others OTT Video programming (on demand or live) streamed to a TV via the internet, using a streaming device, Blu-ray player, gaming console, or smart TV. Linear TV Live video programming received through a cable/satellite/telco TV service or an antenna. VOD On demand video programming received through a cable/satellite/telco TV service. 3

Key Findings: Co-Viewing Landscape TV viewing is social, with 93% of people engaging in some co-viewing activity on the big screen. The TV screen is the most co-viewed screen, with 93% of TV viewers engaging in some co-viewing activity. Co-viewing behavior on TV is highly prevalent across all platforms including linear, OTT, VOD and DVR. OTT takes #2 position in overall reach behind linear TV and ahead of VOD and DVR. Viewers co-view more on OTT than on VOD or DVR. 4

Key Findings: OTT Co-Viewing Experience Co-viewing on OTT tends to occur among younger viewers, in larger households, and with strong brand-engagement. Co-viewers on OTT skew younger (18-34), Hispanic and cordless/no pay TV; they are likely to have a larger household with kids. The majority of OTT co-viewers say they pay most attention to video content and report a high level of enjoyment and interaction during co-viewing. When co-viewing, OTT viewers are likely to engage in brand/product-related multitasking activities such as online searches, social discussions and online purchases. Group interaction is dynamic during OTT co-viewing, which involves brand/productrelated discussions in-person or on social media and influencing one another s perceptions. 5

Key Findings: OTT Co-Viewing Deep Dive The study further looks into co-viewing behaviors and attitudes on OTT to uncover opportunities for brands to engage with OTT audiences. OTT accounts for 29% of the 29.5 hours of weekly co-viewing time among those who watch OTT video content with others. OTT co-viewers spend more than double the amount of time on a weekly basis watching ad-supported content than on subscription services with no ads. Movies are the most co-viewed genre; co-viewing with children and co-viewing of animated/children s programming on OTT are also common. Households usually choose co-viewed content on OTT collaboratively. Co-viewing is generally motivated by a desire to share time together and to relax/unwind. Longer videos (>30 minutes) are more popular than short-form videos for coviewing on OTT. And 36% of OTT videos co-viewed are live programming. 6

Co-Viewing Landscape

Video viewing is highly social; TV is the dominant screen for co-viewing Most co-viewing takes place on a TV screen, with 93% of viewers having watched video content with others on TV. About half of viewers also watch video content with others on computer and smartphone screens. Co-Viewing Incidence by Screen (Ever Co-View with Others) Among Total U.S. Viewers TV 93% Computer Smartphone 49% 55% 94% do some co-viewing on any screen Tablet 39% 8 TimeCoViewing. How is your time split between watching alone and watching with others on each of the following devices in a typical week? Base size: Total U.S. viewers.

Co-viewing behavior is prevalent on the TV screen, no matter the viewing platform Linear TV has the highest co-viewing incidence among its viewers. Co-viewing contributes to incremental audience reach across viewing platforms. Co-viewing Incidence on Platform Among Viewers on the Platform Co-viewing No co-viewing 4% 96% 7% 93% 10% 90% 6% 94% Linear TV OTT VOD DVR 9 CoviewingDev. When you watch video content on a TV at home in a typical week, how is your time split between watching alone and watching with others in the following ways? Base size: Viewers on this platform.

After linear TV, more Americans watch video content on OTT than on VOD or DVR OTT takes #2 position on overall reach, ahead of VOD and DVR. Overall Viewership by Platform Among Total U.S. Viewers 86% 84% Monthly viewership Weekly viewership 61% 54% 44% 40% 36% 36% Linear TV OTT VOD DVR 10 FreqVideoWatch_Way. How often do you watch TV shows, movies or videos on a TV in the following ways? Base size: Total U.S. viewers.

As a result, co-viewing reach is highest among linear TV and OTT Co-Viewing Viewership by Platform Among Total U.S. Viewers Monthly co-viewing Weekly co-viewing 76% 72% 56% 47% 43% 34% 35% 31% Linear TV OTT VOD DVR 11 CoviewingDev. When you watch video content on a TV at home, how often do you watch with others in each of the following ways? Base size: Total U.S. viewers.

12 OTT Co-Viewing Experience

Co-viewers on OTT skew more Millennial, Hispanic, and cordless; they are likely to have a bigger household with kids OTT co-viewers over-index on millennials, Hispanics, cord cutters/nevers, and large families with children. Co-Viewer Profile Among Co-viewers on the Platform Total U.S. Viewers OTT Linear TV 61% 49% 53% 53% 50% 38% 37% 46% 51% 40% 51% 44% 18% 23% 19% 22% 25% 12% Male 18-34 years* Hispanics* Cord cutters/nevers* Kids in HH* 4+ people in HH* 13 Base size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+. * Statistically significant difference. Cordless includes cord cutters and cord nevers.

Co-viewing activity on OTT centers around family, where top co-viewing companions are spouses/partners and children OTT can be an effective platform to reach children through family co-viewing on the platform. Person Co-Viewing With.. Among Co-viewers on the Platform OTT Linear TV 59% 58% 41% 34% 26% 25% 22% 19% 14% 10% 4% 4% 9% 8% Spouse/Partner Any children* Parent Sibling Roommate/Friend* Tenant Other people 14 CoviewingCompanionByDev. In a typical week, with whom do you usually watch TV shows, movies or videos in each of the following ways? Base size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+. * Statistically significant difference.

Average number of weekly co-viewing companions is about two people on OTT and linear TV # of People Co-View with Weekly (not including the respondents) Among Co-viewers on the Platform Estimated Average # of co-viewing companions (excluding It varies ) 1.94 1.86 1 person 37% 41% 2 people 30% 28% 3+ people 24% 22% It varies 9% 9% OTT Linear TV 15 CoviewingCountByDev. In a typical week, when you watch video content on TV with others, how many people do you watch with in each of the following ways? Base size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+.

The majority of co-viewers on OTT indicate a high level of interaction and enjoyment Co-Viewing Attitudes (Top 2 Box agreement %) Among Co-viewers on the Platform OTT Linear TV When I watch video content with others we talk about what we're watching * 63% 69% Watching video on TV with others is more fun than watching alone * 57% 64% 16 CoviewingCompanionByDev2. Think of your experience watching video content on a TV with others versus when watching alone. To what extent do you agree with the following statements? Base size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+. * Statistically significant difference.

Brand-related interaction is dynamic during OTT co-viewing, including in-person or social discussions Viewer interaction triggered by co-viewing further enhances brand engagement and decision-making dynamics. Likelihood to Interact During Co-Viewing (Top 2 Box agreement %) Among Co-viewers on the Platform OTT Linear TV Talk about the products/brands I see* 50% 56% Change someone else's mind about a product/brand I see* 36% 45% Discuss the products/brands I see on social networks* Change my mind about a product/brand I see* 26% 33% 36% 41% Teens, millennials, men, and people with kids are more likely to interact and influence one another s perceptions about the products/brands they see during co-viewing on both OTT and linear TV. 17 CoviewingAttitudinal. Thinking about watching video content on a TV alone vs. watching with others, how likely would you be to do each of the following? Base Size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+. * Statistically significant difference.

Co-viewers are likely to take an action in response to the product/brand they see, especially on OTT Likelihood to Take Actions During Co-Viewing (Top 2 Box agreement %) Among Co-viewers on the Platform OTT Linear TV Make a note to purchase a product/brand I see later* 24% 33% Search for products/brands I see online for more information* 24% 32% Purchase a product/brand I see online* 23% 32% Teens, millennials, men, and people with kids are more likely to take an action related to the products/brands they see during co-viewing on both OTT and linear TV. 18 CoviewingAttitudinal. Thinking about watching video content on a TV alone vs. watching with others, how likely would you be to do each of the following? Base Size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+. * Statistically significant difference.

Most multitask on another device during co-viewing; likely activities include online searches, discussions on social media and online purchases Frequency of Using Another Device during Co-viewing Among Co-viewers on the Platform Likelihood to Take Actions During Co-Viewing (Top 2 Box agreement %) Among Co-viewers on the Platform OTT Linear TV OTT Linear TV Everytime / Frequently 57% 52% 41% Occasionally 33% 32% 32% 24% 23% Never / Rarely 25% 19% 22% 26% Discuss the products/brands I see on social networks* Search for the products/brands I see online* Purchase a product/brand I see online* 19 FreqCoviewingMultiTask. How often do you also use another device (such as a smartphone, tablet or laptop), while watching TV with others in the following ways? CoviewingAttitudinal. Thinking about watching video content on a TV alone vs. watching with others, how likely would you be to do each of the following? Base Size Co-viewers of the platform weekly+. * Statistically significant difference.

The majority of co-viewers say they pay full/most attention to video content, especially on OTT Given the tendency of multi-tasking, co-viewers are likely to conduct brand-related activities on another device triggered by seeing an ad. Attention Paid to Video Content and Ads During Co-Viewing Among Co-viewers on the Platform Video Content Advertisement OTT Linear TV OTT Linear TV Full / most attention* 43% 34% 70% 62% Moderate attention 26% 30% 22% 28% 8% 10% Little / No attention 31% 36% 20 CoViewAttentionToVideo/Ads. How much attention do you pay to the video content / advertisements, while watching TV with others in the following ways? Base size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+. * Statistically significant difference.

OTT Co-Viewing Deep Dive

OTT accounts for nearly one-third (29%) of weekly co-viewing time on TV, among those who watch OTT content with others Share of Total Weekly Co-Viewing Time Among Co-viewers on OTT Among Co-viewers on Linear TV 29.5 hours of co-viewing in a week 28.5 hours of co-viewing in a week 14% Linear TV 12% Linear TV 12% 36% OTT 9% OTT 9% DVR VOD 12% 52% DVR VOD 29% Other video content (e.g., DVD) 15% Other video content (e.g., DVD) 22 TimeSpentCoviewingDev. Think of all your video content viewing on a TV with others at home. In a typical week, how many hours do you spend? Base size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+.

OTT co-viewers spend more than double the amount of time watching ad-supported content than subscription services Average Hours Spent Co-Viewing with Streaming Services in A Week Among OTT Co-viewers 16.8 7.9 Ad-supported streaming services (e.g., digital TV service/vmvpd, digital video with ads, TV network app with ads, etc.) Non ad-supported streaming service (e.g., Netflix, Amazon Prime, etc.) 23 TimeSpentCoviewingPlatform. In a typical week, how many hours do you spend using the following types of video streaming services to watch TV with others? Base Size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+.

Movies are by far the most co-viewed genre; other top genres vary by platform Animation/children s programming and music are more co-viewed on OTT, whereas news and sitcoms are more co-viewed on linear TV. Top Co-Viewed Genres Among Co-viewers on the Platform OTT Linear TV 79% 73% 52% 52% 51% 39% 47% 49% 48% 41% 39% 40% 41% 31% 23% 25% 26% 18% 15% 12% 10% 8% 7% 5% Movies* Drama/ Adventure News* Sports Sitcoms* Reality TV Animation/ Children* Game Shows Music* Late-Night Talk Daytime Serials Foreign Language* 24 CoviewingContentByDev. When you watch video content on a TV with others at home, what are the top 5 types of programming you watch? Base size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+. * Statistically significant difference.

While movies are most co-viewed by all groups, other top genre choices vary by co-viewing companion Top Co-Viewed Genres by Companion Among Co-viewers Spouse/Partner Child/children Parents Sibling All other people Movies 74% Movies 77% Movies 77% Movies 74% Movies 73% Drama/Adventure 54% Animation/Children 54% Sitcoms 57% Sports 50% Sports 50% News 50% Drama/Adventure 49% Reality TV 49% Drama/Adventure 44% Drama/Adventure 46% Sitcoms 49% Sports 46% Sports 48% Reality TV 42% News 45% Sports 48% News 43% Drama/Adventure 47% News 39% Sitcoms 40% Reality TV 37% Sitcoms 40% Animation/Children 42% Sitcoms 39% Reality TV 36% Animation/Children 35% Reality TV 39% Music 33% Animation/Children 34% Animation/Children 30% Game Shows 23% Game Shows 23% News 25% Music 31% Game Shows 26% 25 CoviewingContentByDev. When you watch video content on a TV with others at home, what are the top 5 types of programming you watch? Base size: Those who co-view weekly+.

The selection of co-viewed content on OTT is usually collaborative Collaborative content choices potentially expose broader audiences to both content and the products/brands advertised. Selection of Streaming Video Content Among OTT Co-viewers We watch shows we both/all like/are interested in 64% We browse until something catches our eye 52% We watch shows I like/am interested in 50% We watch shows that we've heard buzz about 39% We watch shows others recommend 37% We watch shows someone else likes/is interested in We rely on streaming service recommendations 26% 34% Women are more collaborative than men when it comes to co-viewing content selection; millennials are more likely to select content based on recommendations and buzz. 26 CoviewingDecision. Typically how do you decide what to watch when you stream video content on TV with others? Base size: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+.

The popularity of longer (>30 minutes) videos reflects the interest in movies and TV shows for OTT co-viewing Share of OTT Co-Viewing By Video Length Among OTT Co-viewers Average % of co-viewing time is spent watching > 30 Minutes 43% < 8 Minutes 29% 8-30 Minutes 29% Live Programming in OTT Co-Viewing Among OTT Co-Viewers An average of 36% of all OTT content that is co-viewed in a typical week is live Live programming in OTT co-viewing is more likely to be sports, music and game shows; drama/adventure, sitcoms and animation/children s programming are less likely to be co-viewed live. 27 Q_TimeSpentCoviewingLength. When you stream the following lengths of video content on TV and watch with others in a typical week, what % of your time is spent watching Q_TimeSpentCoviewingLive. Keep thinking only about your experience watching video content with others by streaming digital video on TV. In a typical week, what percentage of the content you watch is live - meaning you watch it as it airs? Base size: Co-viewers on OTT weekly+.

Spending time together and relaxing are the most common motivations for co-viewing on OTT Co-viewers on OTT are more likely to cite to discover/learn something together and to give us something to talk about with each other than co-viewers on linear TV. Motivations for Co-Viewing Among Co-viewers on the Platform OTT Linear TV To spend time together To relax and unwind 65% 65% 61% 63% To share a favorite show It's part of our routine 46% 46% 39% 41% To make the other person(s) happy by watching her/his favorite show together To discover or learn something together * To give us something to talk about with each other * 23% 21% 20% 18% 19% 16% 28 Q_CoviewingDriverByDev. What are the top 3 reasons you watch video content on a TV with others at home? Please select up to three. Base: Co-viewers of the platform weekly+. * Statistically significant difference.

Early evening & prime time are the leading co-viewing windows; more daytime co-viewing activity occurs on weekends 18-34 years are more likely to co-view during morning and late night. Day of OTT Co-Viewing Among OTT Co-viewers OTT Co-Viewing Weekday 67% 77% 18-34: 52% Male: 47% 19% 30% 36% It varies 41% Weekend 47% Weekday 42% Morning Day Time Early Evening Prime Time Late Night 18-34: 22% 18-34: 41% OTT Co-Viewing Weekend 74% 63% 46% 41% 20% 18-34: 52% Male: 52% Morning Day Time Early Evening Prime Time Late Night 18-34: 23% 18-34: 50% 29 TimeSpentCoviewingWeek. What days of the week do you usually stream video content on TV and watch with others? Base size: Those who co-view on OTT. TimeSpentCoviewWeekdayDaypart. On a typical weekday, what time do you typically stream video content on TV and watch with others? TimeSpentCoviewWeekendLength. On a typical weekend, Saturday or Sunday, what time do you typically stream video content on TV and watch with others? Base size: Co-view streaming content weekly - weekdays/weekends.

On Roku, most people co-view regularly and Millennials are more likely than Boomers to watch OTT with others Co-Viewing Frequency Among Roku Viewers Who Co-view Incidence of Daily Co-Viewing by Demo Among Roku Viewers Who Co-view Once a week or less 20% A few times a week 31% Daily 50% 50% 56% 58% 42% 43% Roku co-viewers overindex on daily co-viewing compared to overall OTT co-viewers (32% daily)* All Adults A18-34 A35-44 A45-54 A55-64 30 Q_CoviewingRokuFreq. When you watch video content on your Roku device, how often do you watch with other people? Base: Those who co-view on Roku, n=543 Q_FreqCoviewingDev. ["Daily" Summary] When you watch video content on a TV at home, how often do you watch with other people in each of the following ways? Base: Those who watch OTT content with others, SBA 18-64*, n=650. IAB Research Using Random Probability Sample of Average Roku Users and Roku Internal Viewership Data, October 2017

On Roku, co-viewers overindex on ad-supported viewership and content searches Ad-Supported Viewership Among Roku Viewers Who Co-view Free Content Viewership Among Roku Viewers Who Co-view Number of Content Searches Among Roku Viewers Who Co-view 113 Index to Roku U.S. Population 160 Index to Roku U.S. Population 145 Index to Roku U.S. Population 31 Among those who co-view on Roku. n=543 IAB Research Using Random Probability Sample of Average Roku Users, October 2017

OTT Co-Viewing: Implications for Brands TV viewing is a pervasively social activity which naturally extends audience reach for brands and marketers across platforms. The co-viewing effect on incremental audience reach should be accounted for when planning and buying video advertising on all video platforms. Given the prevalence of co-viewing, OTT is a powerful platform for advertisers to reach and engage millennials, Hispanics, and cord cutters/nevers. In addition, OTT can be an effective platform to connect with families and children as OTT co-viewing is more likely to include children. Co-viewers on OTT are highly interactive either in person or on social media. This can lead to high brand engagement including discussions, online searches, and online purchases. The interaction also creates a two-way dynamic to influence decision-making and brand perceptions. Brands can leverage the opportunity to plan a cross-device campaign optimizing social and search activities. To fully leverage the OTT co-viewing benefits of incremental reach and highly engaged audience, brands can target long-form videos, such as movies, dramas and day parts including early evening and prime time to ensure the highest level of co-viewing activity. 32

Thank You IAB Maggie Zhang, Ph. D. Sr. Director of Video Research Maggie.Zhang@iab.com 33