An Oracle White Paper September Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management Demonstrates Extreme Performance on Oracle Exadata/Exalogic

Similar documents
An Oracle White Paper June Exadata Hybrid Columnar Compression (EHCC)

An Oracle White Paper June Enterprise Database Cloud Deployment with Oracle SuperCluster T5-8

SUN ORACLE DATABASE MACHINE

Oracle Database 12c: JMS Sharded Queues

Sun Fire X4170 M2 Server Frequently Asked Questions

ORACLE S PEOPLESOFT GENERAL LEDGER 9.2 (WITH COMBO EDITING) USING ORACLE DATABASE 11g FOR ORACLE SOLARIS (UNICODE) ON AN ORACLE S SPARC T7-2 Server

An Oracle White Paper. Released April 2013

An Oracle White Paper October The New Oracle Enterprise Manager Database Control 11g Release 2 Now Managing Oracle Clusterware

An Oracle White Paper November Primavera Unifier Integration Overview: A Web Services Integration Approach

Oracle Event Processing Extreme Performance on Sparc T5

Oracle DIVArchive Storage Plan Manager

Oracle Spatial and Graph: Benchmarking a Trillion Edges RDF Graph ORACLE WHITE PAPER NOVEMBER 2016

Oracle Business Activity Monitoring 12c Best Practices ORACLE WHITE PAPER DECEMBER 2015

Oracle Database Exadata Cloud Service Exadata Performance, Cloud Simplicity DATABASE CLOUD SERVICE

An Oracle Technical White Paper October Sizing Guide for Single Click Configurations of Oracle s MySQL on Sun Fire x86 Servers

Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Object Usage Tracking Performance Characterization Using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Object Usage Tracking

Oracle Database Appliance characterization with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Performance and Scalability Benchmark: Siebel CRM Release 7 on HP-UX Servers and Oracle9i Database. An Oracle White Paper Released October 2003

ORACLE SNAP MANAGEMENT UTILITY FOR ORACLE DATABASE

Automatic Data Optimization with Oracle Database 12c O R A C L E W H I T E P A P E R S E P T E M B E R

Oracle Exadata Statement of Direction NOVEMBER 2017

Veritas NetBackup and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage ORACLE HOW TO GUIDE FEBRUARY 2018

Extreme Performance Platform for Real-Time Streaming Analytics

ORACLE EXADATA DATABASE MACHINE X2-8

Oracle Database 10g Resource Manager. An Oracle White Paper October 2005

Oracle Hyperion Planning on the Oracle Database Appliance using Oracle Transparent Data Encryption

An Oracle White Paper Released April 2008

An Oracle White Paper September, Oracle Real User Experience Insight Server Requirements

An Oracle White Paper December Oracle Exadata Database Machine Warehouse Architectural Comparisons

E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (R12.2.5) ORDER MANAGEMENT (OLTP) BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE11g

Handling Memory Ordering in Multithreaded Applications with Oracle Solaris Studio 12 Update 2: Part 2, Memory Barriers and Memory Fences

Configuring a Single Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance into an InfiniBand Fabric with Multiple Oracle Exadata Machines

Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Object Usage Tracking Performance Characterization Using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Object Usage Tracking

Improve Data Integration with Changed Data Capture. An Oracle Data Integrator Technical Brief Updated December 2006

Oracle Flash Storage System QoS Plus Operation and Best Practices ORACLE WHITE PAPER OCTOBER 2016

Hybrid Columnar Compression (HCC) on Oracle Database 18c O R A C L E W H IT E P A P E R FE B R U A R Y

Automatic Receipts Reversal Processing

Using Oracle In-Memory Advisor with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

New Oracle NoSQL Database APIs that Speed Insertion and Retrieval

Rapid Bottleneck Identification A Better Way to do Load Testing. An Oracle White Paper June 2008

Installation Instructions: Oracle XML DB XFILES Demonstration. An Oracle White Paper: November 2011

Technical White Paper August Recovering from Catastrophic Failures Using Data Replicator Software for Data Replication

Creating Custom Project Administrator Role to Review Project Performance and Analyze KPI Categories

Oracle NoSQL Database For Time Series Data O R A C L E W H I T E P A P E R D E C E M B E R

StorageTek ACSLS Manager Software Overview and Frequently Asked Questions

Generate Invoice and Revenue for Labor Transactions Based on Rates Defined for Project and Task

An Oracle Technical White Paper September Detecting and Resolving Oracle Solaris LUN Alignment Problems

Configuring Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition to Support Teradata Database Query Banding

Data Capture Recommended Operating Environments

ORACLE EXADATA DATABASE MACHINE X2-2

E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (R12.2.5) HR (OLTP) BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE11g ON ORACLE S CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE

Partitioning in Oracle Database 10g Release 2. An Oracle White Paper May 2005

An Oracle White Paper September Methods for Upgrading to Oracle Database 11g Release 2

Achieving High Availability with Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Ravello Service O R A C L E W H I T E P A P E R J U N E

Correction Documents for Poland

E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (R12.1.3) iprocurement (OLTP) BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE DATABASE 11g ON FUJITSU S M10-4S SERVER RUNNING SOLARIS 11

Oracle Data Provider for.net Microsoft.NET Core and Entity Framework Core O R A C L E S T A T E M E N T O F D I R E C T I O N F E B R U A R Y

Data Capture Recommended Operating Environments

Oracle Fusion General Ledger Hierarchies: Recommendations and Best Practices. An Oracle White Paper April, 2012

Bulk Processing with Oracle Application Integration Architecture. An Oracle White Paper January 2009

Using the Oracle Business Intelligence Publisher Memory Guard Features. August 2013

Capacity planning for Oracle NoSQL Database cloud service

An Oracle White Paper Released October 2008

An Oracle White Paper October Minimizing Planned Downtime of SAP Systems with the Virtualization Technologies in Oracle Solaris 10

An Oracle White Paper September Upgrade Methods for Upgrading to Oracle Database 11g Release 2

Open storage architecture for private Oracle database clouds

Oracle CIoud Infrastructure Load Balancing Connectivity with Ravello O R A C L E W H I T E P A P E R M A R C H

RAC Database on Oracle Ravello Cloud Service O R A C L E W H I T E P A P E R A U G U S T 2017

Superior Product Variants Software for Multi-Attribute Product Companies. An Oracle White Paper April 2004

Integrating Oracle SuperCluster Engineered Systems with a Data Center s 1 GbE and 10 GbE Networks Using Oracle Switch ES1-24

Overview. Implementing Fibre Channel SAN Boot with the Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance. January 2014 By Tom Hanvey; update by Peter Brouwer Version: 2.

An Oracle White Paper August Building Highly Scalable Web Applications with XStream

An Oracle White Paper September Oracle Integrated Stack Complete, Trusted Enterprise Solutions

Oracle Utilities Smart Grid Gateway MV-90 Adapter for Itron

E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (R12.1.3) HR (OLTP) BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE DATABASE 11g ON FUJITSU S M10-4S SERVER RUNNING SOLARIS 11

Frequently Asked Questions Oracle Content Management Integration. An Oracle White Paper June 2007

Oracle Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Performance and Sizing Guide. An Oracle White Paper April 2011

Oracle TimesTen Scaleout: Revolutionizing In-Memory Transaction Processing

Subledger Accounting Reporting Journals Reports

Benefits of an Exclusive Multimaster Deployment of Oracle Directory Server Enterprise Edition

Was ist dran an einer spezialisierten Data Warehousing platform?

An Oracle White Paper February Optimizing Storage for Oracle PeopleSoft Applications

Cloud Operations for Oracle Cloud Machine ORACLE WHITE PAPER MARCH 2017

An Oracle White Paper June StorageTek In-Drive Reclaim Accelerator for the StorageTek T10000B Tape Drive and StorageTek Virtual Storage Manager

Highly Available Forms and Reports Applications with Oracle Fail Safe 3.0

Oracle Fusion Middleware 11g Oracle Access Manager Frequently Asked Questions June 2009

Oracle Enterprise Performance Reporting Cloud. What s New in September 2016 Release (16.09)

Technical Upgrade Guidance SEA->SIA migration

Storage Optimization with Oracle Database 11g

An Oracle White Paper October Oracle Social Cloud Platform Text Analytics

An Oracle White Paper September Security and the Oracle Database Cloud Service

Advanced Global Intercompany Systems : Transaction Account Definition (TAD) In Release 12

Leverage the Oracle Data Integration Platform Inside Azure and Amazon Cloud

An Oracle White Paper November Oracle RAC One Node 11g Release 2 User Guide

Oracle FLEXCUBE Direct Banking Release Corporate Cash Management User Manual. Part No. E

Oracle FLEXCUBE Direct Banking Release Dashboard Widgets Transfer Payments User Manual. Part No. E

Oracle Enterprise Data Quality New Features Overview

Oracle Database Lite. Automatic Synchronization White Paper. An Oracle White Paper August 2008

Selecting Server Hardware for FlashGrid Deployment

Migrating VMs from VMware vsphere to Oracle Private Cloud Appliance O R A C L E W H I T E P A P E R O C T O B E R

Transcription:

An Oracle White Paper September 2011 Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management 2.0.1 Demonstrates Extreme Performance on Oracle Exadata/Exalogic

Introduction New utilities technologies are bringing with them huge increases in data volumes. Residential smart meters alone will increase the consumption data processed for billing purposes from 12 meter reads per year to 35,000 or more. As a consequence, utility business managers and executives are asking: Does hardware and software technology currently exist that is capable of handling the large quantity of data from smart meters? Can today s technology process the data and produce the results needed to drive the meterto-cash process in a timely manner? The tests described in this white paper answer these two questions affirmatively. They demonstrate that Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management (MDM) 2.0.1, running on a full rack Oracle Exadata Database Machine X2-2 and Exalogic X2-2, can easily handle smart metering data for any size of utility. In just one hour, for instance, this hardware/software combination can: Process more than one billion meter reads. 1,2 This approximates the volume of data produced in an hour by 250 million meters recording four interval consumption measurements per hour. 3 1 A meter read may be thought of as an interval or scalar data point that is, a number reported by a meter representing consumption at the end of a given period of time. 2 For this and all results reported throughout this paper, please note that actual results may vary, based on a broad range of implementation-specific factors, such as transaction mix, hardware platform, network parameters, and database size. Oracle does not warrant or guarantee that customers will obtain the same or similar results, even if they use the same or similar equipment and/or software applications. Oracle does not warrant, endorse, or guarantee any performance of any products, any results desired or achieved, or any statements made within this document. 1

Calculate four bill determinants for each of 19.3 million bills a total of more than 77 million bill determinants. A bill determinant is defined as being the results of a calculation that produces a customer s consumption for a defined period of time. These numbers far exceed today s typical utility requirements. 3 It is unlikely that utilities would establish an AMI system that relied on interval data recorded on only one channel. Far more common is a scenario in which each meter reports intervals on multiple channels while also providing a check on consumption using a third channel. The scenario tested in this paper is, in fact, one of these more realistic ones; it uses three channels, two reporting 15-minute interval data and one providing a consumption check, for a total of 193 meter reads per day. 2

Methodology For this demonstration, MDM 2.0.1, running on a full rack Exadata and a full rack Exalogic, performed two separate tests: It processed meter data and subjected it to validation and correction via configurable validation, editing, and estimation (VEE) rules, storing both the raw and validated/corrected data in the database, where it is available for use and review by business users. It used the validated and corrected meter read data to calculate the bill determinants that a billing / CIS system would use to create a customer bill among many other possible uses. The tests covered two batch use cases, both based on meter reads from 5.5 million interval meters. Each meter had reads on three channels: one interval kwh channel, one interval kvarh channel, and one scalar kwh check channel. Both interval channels measured consumption every 15 minutes. The scalar check channel measured consumption once a day. Thus the total number of reads per meter was 193 per day or 5,790 per 30-day billing period. The purpose of these tests is to validate and document the performance of the MDM VEE and bill determinant processes. The creation of smart meter payloads and insertion into corresponding MDM staging table is not included in these test results. Subsequent tests (including tests of Oracle Utilities Smart Grid Gateway) will include conversion of the head-end-specific raw smart meter payload into the standard MDM format and the loading of data into MDM. The historic data as well as the meter readings were randomly generated using an internal data generation tool to closely emulate production scenarios and realistic distribution of the data. This was necessary to ensure that the database cache hit rate stayed in a realistic range during the benchmark. Test 1: Meter Read Processing. The raw meter data are read, edited, estimated, and stored as final measurements for the subsequent process. This process invokes the relevant set of VEE rules included in MDM, as detailed in Appendix 1. Test 2: Bill Determinant Processing. Validated and corrected meter read data for the 30-day billing period are summarized as billable usage. Measurements from the interval kwh channel (2,880 reads per meter) are mapped to time of use (TOU) quantities based on the TOU map defined in the usage rule in this case, three buckets representing consumption during on-peak, shoulder, and off-peak periods. A fourth bill determinant, obtained by summing the previous three bill determinants, represents total consumption. For more details on the methodology, see Appendix 1. 3

Technical Environment The tests were executed on an Oracle Exadata Database Machine X2-2 and Oracle Exalogic X2-2. This constitutes a full rack Exalogic server (30 application server nodes) in the application tier and a full rack Exadata server (8 database server nodes) in the database tier. Exalogic machines consist of Sun Fire X4170 M2 Servers as compute nodes, Sun ZFS Storage 7320 appliances, as well as required InfiniBand and Ethernet networking components. Each of the application servers in the application tier is connected to one of the database servers in the database tier using a round-robin algorithm. For more details on the technical environment, see Appendix 2. Technical Findings MDM running on Exadata and Exalogic exhibits strong horizontal scaling. Both meter read processing and bill determinant processing showed near linear horizontal scalability. In other words, throughput goes up proportionately as nodes (i.e. new servers on an application tier) are added to a system. (For details on horizontal scaling, see Appendix 3.). A compression ratio 4 of 1.8x was achieved for the database structures that store meter read data using hybrid columnar compression (HCC/Query High). The database partitioning strategy used demonstrates that rapid accumulation of large amounts of historical data does not have to affect Oracle application scalability. This is a key benefit of Exadata, which features highly tuned and balanced elements of computing, storage and networking that adapts and scale predictably. Business Findings These tests demonstrate that Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management 2.0.1, running on a full rack Exadata X2-2 and a full rack Exalogic X2-2 server: Validated, edited, estimated, and stored initial measurement data for smart meters at a rate of 1 billion meter reads per hour. Responded to 19.3 million requests for bill determinants with a total of 77.2 million bill determinants calculated in an hour. 4 Subsequent to these tests, in a separate study, compression ratio as high as 10x been achieved for the table structure that stores meter read data. 4

Furthermore, as Appendix 3 illustrates in detail, the measured throughput of 1 billion meter reads per hour was achieved using 24 compute nodes on Exalogic. Had all 30 compute nodes been used, MDM and the full rack Exalogic would have achieved much higher throughput, conservatively estimated at 1.4 billion per hour. Furthermore, as Appendix 3 illustrates in detail, the maximum measured bill determinant processing throughput of 19.3 million usage transactions per hour was limited by CPU resources on the Exadata hardware. Had there been more Exadata racks available, the full rack Exalogic could have conservatively achieved a throughput of 40 million usage transactions per hour. 5

Appendix 1: Additional Details on Methodology Historic Data The tests were conducted using 3 months of historical measurements for the 5.5 million meters. The historic data was randomly generated using a data generation tool to closely emulate production scenarios and realistic distributions of the data. This ensured that the database cache hit rate stayed in a realistic range during the tests. Testing For the measurement data processing test (i.e. applying the VEE rules), each test load consisted of slightly more than one billion meter reads. 5 For the bill determinant calculation test, the billing period was set at one month (30 days). Each request for bill determinants resulted in the aggregation of consumption measured in the kwh interval channels. The resulting 2,880 meter reads for each meter s kwh interval channel were processed into four bill determinants: the first three representing total consumption during the month for each of three time-of-use billing periods and a fourth a sum of the first three represented total. Note that for processing purposes, the tests grouped raw data into units of Initial Measurement Data (IMD). Each IMD consists of all the meter reads in a single channel for a single day. Each meter in these tests produced three IMDs per day. Note that IMDs are not identical in terms of the number of meter reads contained in each. For the tests described in this paper, the IMDs for each of the two interval channels contain 96 meter reads each, while the IMDs for the kwh scalar check channel contain only one meter read each. There are a total of 193 (96 kwh interval + 96 kvarh interval + 1 kwh scalar) reads per smart device (meter). 5 5.5 million meters x 193 daily meter reads per meter = 1.0165 billion meter reads. 6

The following table represents the data volumes used to determine the workload profile for the tests. ENTITY TYPE NUMBER COMMENTS Meters 5,500,000 Service Point 5,500,000 Channels 16,500,000 Three channels per meter 1 kwh interval channel (15 minute), 1 kvarh interval channel (15 minute) and 1 kwh scalar check channel. Initial Measurement Data 1,485,000,000 Total number of channels x 30 days in the month x 3 months Final Measurements 95,535,000,000 Row counts in the database at the end of the tests. Repeated test runs may add data. VEE Rules VEE RULES FOR INTERVAL INITIAL MEASUREMENT DATA PROCESSING RULE UOM Check Interval Size Validation Spike Check Interval Interpolation 1 Interval Interpolation 2 Interval Interpolation 3 Interval Averaging Replacement Rule Sum Check Negative Consumption Check Hi Low Check DESCRIPTION This VEE rule checks the unit of measure (UOM) passed in with the Initial Measurement against the primary unit of measure configured on the measuring component's type This VEE rule algorithm validates that the seconds per interval (SPI) supplied with the Initial Measurement is equal to the interval size defined on measuring component's type. This VEE rule algorithm looks for spikes by taking the highest interval and the third-highest interval, and determining the percent difference between the two. This VEE rule attempts to interpolate gaps in Initial Measurement Data sets using prior and subsequent intervals as starting points for linear interpolation. This VEE rule attempts to interpolate gaps in Initial Measurement Data sets using prior and subsequent intervals as starting points for linear interpolation. This VEE rule attempts to interpolate gaps in Initial Measurement Data sets using prior and subsequent intervals as starting points for linear interpolation. This VEE rule performs estimation of missing consumption by aggregating MC's consumption history - the average consumption of which becomes the estimated amount. This VEE rule algorithm checks if the intervals in an Interval Initial Measurement will replace existing final measurements. This rule evaluates whether consumption for the current Initial Measurement Data is within a tolerance of the sum of the consumption during the same period for any measuring components related to the current one. A VEE rule using this algorithm logs a VEE exception using the exception type and severity configured on the rule if the total consumption (as calculated by summing all measurements from Initial Measurement Data) is less than zero. This VEE rule performs validation of measurements using the historical measurement data 7

VEE RULES FOR SCALAR INITIAL MEASUREMENT DATA (CONSUMPTION CHECK) PROCESSING RULE UOM Check Multiplier Check Replacement Rule Negative Consumption Hi Low Check DESCRIPTION This VEE rule checks the unit of measure (UOM) passed in with the Initial Measurement against the primary unit of measure configured on the measuring component's type This VEE rule validates that the register multiplier supplied with the Initial Measurement is equal to the multiplier stored on the measuring component. This VEE rule checks if there exists a final measurement with a date/time equal to the date/time in the current initial measurement being validated. A VEE rule using this algorithm logs a VEE exception using the exception type and severity configured on the rule if the total consumption (as calculated by summing all measurements from Initial Measurement Data) is less than zero. This VEE rule performs validation of measurements using the historical measurement data USAGE RULES FOR BILL DETERMINANT CALCULATION RULE Get TOU Mapped Usage Service Quantity Math DESCRIPTION This usage rule is used to get time of use quantities from interval measuring components installed in the service points linked to the usage subscription for the specified 'Interval' usage period. Only measuring components that match the UOM/SQI defined in the usage rule instance are processed. Measurements within the period are mapped to time of use quantities based on the TOU map defined in the usage rule. This rule is for deriving the total consumption by summing each TOU period. Validate Against Tolerance This will validate the total consumption during ON Peak to be less than 500,000 8

Appendix 2: Technical Environment Below is a high-level architecture topology diagram. Exadata For the Exadata configuration, the main database table for storing meter readings and usage was partitioned, and the data for that table was stored using Oracle Secure Files (an Oracle Database Enterprise Edition Advanced Compression feature) with the compression level set to medium. The following table further defines the specifications of the database and the host servers. DATABASE SERVERS/STORAGE SYSTEM Platform Exadata X2-2 Full Rack, Sunfire X4170M2 Operating System Oracle Enterprise Linux 5 64 bit O/S Version and Release 2.6.18-164.el5 9

Database Software / Version Oracle Database Server 11gR2 with Automatic Storage Management (ASM) Number of CPUs 8 RAC nodes, each with 2 Sockets (12 Cores) Processor /CPU Speed Intel Xeon X5670 / 2.93GHz Memory 96 GB Storage System 14 Exadata Storage Servers, each with 12 High Performance SAS disks and 384 GB Smart Flash Cache Raid Level ASM 2-way normal mirror. Note that Exadata Storage Servers provide a high-bandwidth, massively parallel solution delivering up to 75 gigabytes per second of raw I/O bandwidth and up to 1,500,000 I/O operations per second (IOPS). These significant performance increases derive from the use of Exadata Smart Flash Cache in each Exadata Storage Server and hierarchical optimization of the Oracle Database. Exalogic For the Exalogic configuration, each Exalogic machine was connected to the database server via a tengigabit Ethernet interface. The following table outlines the application operating system and hardware specifications. One application server was used for the vertical scalability testing; two application servers were used for the horizontal scalability testing. (See Appendix for results of these tests.) APPLICATION/BATCH MIDDLE TIER Platform Exalogic X2-2 full Rack, Sunfire X4170 M2 Operating System Oracle Enterprise Linux 5 64 bit O/S Version and Release 2.6.18-164.el5 Software / Version Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management version 2.0.1 Weblogic 10.0 MP2 64 bit # CPU 30 compute nodes, each node has 2 Sockets and 12 Cores (Total 360 cores). Processor / CPU / Speed 2.93GHz Memory 96 GB on each compute node Partitioning Strategy The database storage data structures that keep high volume raw and finalized meter data reads were partitioned by the date-time of the readings. Furthermore, these structures were sub-partitioned by their primary access key. All associated index structures were created as local indexes to the partitions 10

and sub-partitions while making sure that the critical use cases contained the partitioning key during query and DML operations against these structures. This partitioning strategy not only helps by making query and DML operational performance on these data structures independent of the duration of the historical transactions to be kept for online access, it also helps by enabling archiving of this large volume of data in timely and efficient manner. 11

Appendix 3: Tests of Horizontal Scalability Horizontal scalability (i.e. scale out) is defined as the ability of an application to demonstrate higher throughput when more nodes are added to a system, such as adding a new server on the database tier. For these tests, horizontal scalability was measured by starting with 8 compute nodes and increasing the number (in increments of 8) up to a total of 24 compute nodes, while capturing a performance benchmark data point on each increment. Horizontal scalability was tested until the point at which the CPU on the application server or database tier was saturated. In the case of the usage transaction / bill determinant calculations, the scalability was limited by database CPU. The charts below depict the scalability characteristics of Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management v2.0.1, as measured during the tests. For the horizontal scalability evaluation tests, the execution threads were uniformly distributed across all the application servers. Horizontal scalability chart for interval read validate & load for Exalogic X2-2 compute node Throughput shown above is "Interval Read Validate & Load" per hour. CPU utilization shown here is the average CPU utilization per node. 12

Horizontal scalability chart for billing for Exalogic X2-2 compute notes Throughput shown above is expressed as "UTs/Hour (i.e. Usage Transaction requests per hour), where each usage transaction requested results in the production of four bill determinants. The extrapolated throughput for full rack Exalogic X2-2 with sufficient Exadata is estimated to be approximately 40 million usage transactions per hour. Both data processing and bill determinant processing, showed near linear scalability (horizontal scalability). Note: Horizontal scalability on the database tiers was not measured for the following reasons: Exadata is a database machine made of multiple RAC nodes that communicate with storage servers. Each RAC node communicates with all of the storage servers. Thus, even when only one of the RAC nodes is used, it still uses all the available storage servers. 13

Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management 2.0.1 Demonstrates Extreme Performance on Oracle Exadata/Exalogic September 2011 Oracle Corporation World Headquarters 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 U.S.A. Worldwide Inquiries: Phone: +1.650.506.7000 Fax: +1.650.506.7200 Copyright 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is provided for information purposes only and the contents hereof are subject to change without notice. This document is not warranted to be error-free, nor subject to any other warranties or conditions, whether expressed orally or implied in law, including implied warranties and conditions of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. We specifically disclaim any liability with respect to this document and no contractual obligations are formed either directly or indirectly by this document. This document may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose, without our prior written permission. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. OUMDM_bmExs_0911 oracle.com