Agenda. 1. The LoU between EC-CEF and OpenPEPPOL about transition and migration to AS4 - Niels

Similar documents
Letter of Understanding (LoU) edelivery alignment between the European Commission and OpenPEPPOL

Transport Infrastructure Agreement Change management

PEPPOL Transport Infrastructure Agreements Annex 3 Services and service levels

CEF edelivery Connectivity Testing Service

SAT for eid [EIRA extension]

Insight Session: T2S User Testing and Migration

e-sens Electronic Simple European Networked Services Klaus Vilstrup Pedersen WP6 Manager DIFI, Norway

European Transport Policy: ITS in action ITS Action Plan Directive 2010/40/EU

Third public workshop of the Amsterdam Group and CODECS European Framework for C-ITS Deployment

GOV Framework. Transport Infrastructure Transport Infrastructure Agreement (TIA) Framework. Version: 1.10 Status: In use

SLHC-PP DELIVERABLE REPORT EU DELIVERABLE: Document identifier: SLHC-PP-D v1.1. End of Month 03 (June 2008) 30/06/2008

Status of activities Joint Working Group on standards for Smart Grids in Europe

Electronic registered delivery services (ERDS) in light of the eidas regulation. Warsaw Common Sign Conference 2015

edelivery SMP Profile Test Assertions Description

Working Group Charter: Web Services Basic Profile

INSPIRE status report

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

Prior Authorization and Clinician Burden: Updates from ONC

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERPRETATION

Report from UN-GGIM: Europe A year in review

Request for Proposal for Technical Consulting Services

ETSI ESI and Signature Validation Services

eidas & e-delivery CE Midsummer Conference "The role of policy decisions in the postal & delivery industry", Copenhagen (DK), 12 June 2017

Final Project Report. Abstract. Document information

IT Governance ISO/IEC 27001:2013 ISMS Implementation. Service description. Protect Comply Thrive

Sector Vision for the Future of Reference Standards

TOOP Introducing The Once-Only Principle project

Draft ETSI EN V1.0.0 ( )

ETSI TC ESI WORK ON ELECTRONIC REGISTERED DELIVERY SERVICES AND REGISTERED ELECTRONIC MAIL

ENISA s Position on the NIS Directive

Memorandum of Understanding between the Central LHIN and the Toronto Central LHIN to establish a Joint ehealth Program

ETSI TCR-TR 006 TECHNICAL COMMITTEE October 1992 REFERENCE TECHNICAL REPORT

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. DIGIT DG CNECT Connecting Europe Facility. SML and SMP. Component Offering Description. CEF edelivery Building Block

ehealth Network ehealth Network Governance model for the ehealth Digital Service Infrastructure during the CEF funding

Third public workshop of the Amsterdam Group and CODECS C-ITS Deployment in Europe: Common Security and Certificate Policy

Smart Metering industry approach for aligning standardization requirements and national security demands

ESS Shared SERVices project Background, Status, Roadmap. Modernisation Workshop 16/17 March Bucharest

An Introduction to Network Codes & The Links Between Codes

Memorandum of Understanding

ISO/IEC/ IEEE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Systems and software engineering Requirements for acquirers and suppliers of user documentation

Stakeholder consultation process and online consultation platform

INTERMEDIATE EVALUATION

Report of the Working Group on mhealth Assessment Guidelines February 2016 March 2017

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Enterprise Directorate-General

Working Group Charter: Basic Profile 1.2 and 2.0

Cybersecurity Policy in the EU: Security Directive - Security for the data in the cloud

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Special Committee (SC) 223

European Standards & Community Specifications

EU Code of Conduct on Data Centre Energy Efficiency

Request for Quotation (RfQ)

Figure 1: Summary Status of Actions Recommended in June 2016 Committee Report. Status of Actions Recommended # of Actions Recommended

Certification Standing Committee (CSC) Charter. Appendix A Certification Standing Committee (CSC) Charter

Audit Report. Chartered Management Institute (CMI)

e-sens Electronic Simple European Networked Services

The 5G Infrastructure Association

2017 ICANN-IETF MoU Supplemental Agreement Introduction

Change Control Process for European ectd Standards Version 1.1. December 2006

Grant for research infrastructure of national interest

Guidelines for Interface Publication Issue 3

Promoting accountability and transparency of multistakeholder partnerships for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda

T2S PROGRAMME STATUS AS OF MID-SEPTEMBER

esignature Infrastructure Marketing Model

EuroHPC: the European HPC Strategy

5.10 CUSTOMER SPECIFIC DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES (L )

European Interoperability Reference Architecture (EIRA) overview

Common Criteria Certification (ISO15408) Update

13174/15 AT/tl 1 DGE 2B

HEALTH INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT: PROGRESS REPORT

CONCLUSIONS OF THE WESTERN BALKANS DIGITAL SUMMIT APRIL, SKOPJE

History of NERC December 2012

Dated 3 rd of November 2017 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SIERRA LEONE NATIONAL ehealth COORDINATION HUB

Digital Advisory Services Professional Service Description SIP IP Trunk with Field Trial for Legacy PBX Model

Security Training Seminars An integral part of The Open Group Security Programme

SUBJECT: PRESTO operating agreement renewal update. Committee of the Whole. Transit Department. Recommendation: Purpose: Page 1 of Report TR-01-17

ICB Industry Consultation Body

Superannuation Transaction Network

Update on EFSA s activities on the molecular typing data collection from isolates in animals and food

Consolidation Team INSPIRE Annex I data specifications testing Call for Participation

Electricity Sub-Sector Coordinating Council Charter FINAL DISCUSSION DRAFT 7/9/2013

2008 E-customs progress report

ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level. Release Plan CTAL Version 1.1

European Diplomatic Programme. The EU Global Strategy: from Vision to Action

ISO/ IEC (ITSM) Certification Roadmap

Digital Advisory Services Professional Service Description SIP SBC with Field Trial Endpoint Deployment Model

IEEE 802 EC ITU standing committee

Mandate to CEN, CENELEC and ETSI for Standardisation in the field of electric motors

OUR MISSION PERFORMANCE

EuroHPC and the European HPC Strategy HPC User Forum September 4-6, 2018 Dearborn, Michigan, USA

Technical Advisory Board (TAB) Terms of Reference

Grid Security Policy

New cybersecurity landscape in the EU Sławek Górniak 9. CA-Day, Berlin, 28th November 2017

Authorized Training Provider Application Process

NIS Standardisation ENISA view

On the EGI Operational Level Agreement Framework

Insight Session on T2S User Testing

MNsure Privacy Program Strategic Plan FY

Dr. Eng. Antonio Mauro, PhD October 20th 2011

Chapter 1. Purpose, definitions and application

OASIS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE FORMAT OF AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR INFORMATION

P344 IWG 2 & 4 MSID Pairs

Transcription:

www.peppol.eu OpenPEPPOL CC F2F meetings Vienna May 9 th and 10 th, 2017. AS4 Transition. Joint TICC/PoCC session Niels Pagh-Rasmussen, Executive architect IBM and member of OpenPEPPOL MC. Sander Fieten, CEO Chasquis Consulting and technical consultant OpenPEPPOL.

Agenda 1. The LoU between EC-CEF and OpenPEPPOL about transition and migration to AS4 - Niels 2. OpenPEPPOL AS4 workgroup - mandate and background. - Niels 3. The esens AS4 Taskforce and the take over from CEF with an edelivery AS4 taskforce testing activity. - Niels 4. Status on the agreed migration from the LoU - The dashboard and summary from Steering group meeting Wednesday 3th May - Sander 5. Status and more details on the OpenPEPPOL AS4 group, including details about the coming AS4 profile etc. - Sander.

New Agreement between the European Commission and OpenPEPPOL, 19 September 2016, I In a Letter of Understanding (LoU) signed between the Commission and OpenPEPPOL, the parties agree a plan for the transition from AS2 to AS4 in the PEPPOL profile of CEF edelivery. The adoption of AS4 is part of a well-defined, step-by-step transition process. This approach has been adopted to minimise the risks associated with the adoption of a new technology. Page 3

AS4 Transition Agreement between the European Commission and OpenPEPPOL, II As a first step, AS4 will be introduced as an optional protocol (Phase In). Based on this LoU, OpenPEPPOL has initiated the start of the Phase In step. If and when the following conditions stated by OpenPEPPOL are met, then AS4 will be made mandatory and AS2 be made optional (Transition), these conditions are listed below: OpenPEPPOL has opened, in cooperation with e-sens, AS4-testing in the PEPPOL edelivery network. This includes issuing of test certificates, integration with SML/SMP and PKI, use of pilot document identifiers and support for these processes. In addition, a number of OpenPEPPOL members have contributed to the testing of AS4 within the e-sens consortium. Phase Step CEF Timeline Protocol LCM Step Associated Criteria Start of Phase In T1 Work Programme 2016 Q4 2016 AS4 adopted as optional protocol 3 a Phase in T2 Q4 2017 Announcement of T3 1 a-c, 2 a-b, 3 b-c, 5 a-d Transition T3 Work Programm e 2017 Work Programm e 2018 T2 + 18 (*) months if conditions are met AS4 Mandatory in the PEPPOL edelivery network Transition Target Date 2 c, 4 a-d Phase Out T4 TBD AS2 Phase-out 4e Page 4

AS4 Transition Agreement between the European Commission and OpenPEPPOL, III A common steering group between EC and OpenPEPPOL are following the transition. Recent meeting 3th May 2017. Following the OpenPEPPOL Management Committee meeting on 8 February 2017, the European Commission and OpenPEPPOL are happy to announce that AS4 is now an optional protocol for message exchange in the PEPPOL edelivery Network. The decision is made in principle, but we don t have the PEPPOL profile of AS4 ready yet. AS4 is a mandatory protocol in Pre-award. CEF : https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/wiki/display/edelcommunity/edelivery+user+community Page 5

OpenPEPPOL AS4 workgroup - mandate and background, I Mandate approval is on the agenda for next MC meeting. The subject of the WG is the transition to the AS4 messaging protocol in the PEPPOL edelivery Network. The scope of the WG is defined by the criteria defined in the LoU with EC. The WG will perform the activities needed to evaluate the criteria which includes providing advice to the MC, further detailing of the criteria and performing activities required to be able to evaluate the criteria. Page 6

OpenPEPPOL AS4 workgroup - mandate and background, II Deliverables: The WG will create, at least, the following deliverables, but may decide others are needed as well: Monthly updates to the MC on the status of the AS4 transition. Detailed description of the criteria given in the LoU including measurable objectives and a list of activities that need to be executed to fulfil the criteria. This includes an analysis of the current and expected requirements on the message exchanged executed in the PeDN. Reports on the performed activities to fulfil the criteria. A Request for Change (RFC) to include AS4 as an optional messaging protocol in the PEPPOL edelivery Network. The work must include a PEPPOL AS4 profile describing how to use AS4 in the PEPPOL edelivery Network (PeDN). The profile should include specifications of how to bind SMP and AS4 together and the correct identifiers. Also the RFC must describe how the agreements/policies must be changes to ensure that an AP offering AS4 also offers AS2 (=> multiple SMP registrations). Page 7

OpenPEPPOL AS4 workgroup - mandate and background, III Status of the AS4 workgroup is as follows: 12 people have shown interest in the workgroup and receive all emails; There have been six workgroup meetings. Participation varies, there are 3 regular participants; Currently the workgroup is analyzing which features of the AS4 protocol are needed in the PEPPOL edelivery Network. The e-sens AS4 profile still has some options where choices must be made when implementing it in a domain. For example how to use it in a 4-corner model with dynamic configuration of Access Points based on SMP registrations. The target of the PEPPOL AS4 profile is to clearly define all parameters. The workgroup has also started documents to describe how to execute the comparable testing as described in the LoU. This testing consists of a technical and more organisational part. The first is comparing performance of the AS2 versus the AS4 protocol. The second is comparing the difference in implementing an Access Point based on either protocol. Page 8

The esens AS4 Taskforce and the take over from CEF with an edelivery AS4 taskforce testing activity after esens close down. Mandate & Mission Statement for the AS4 Taskforce, based on mutual agreement between esens and EC- CEF. The mission of the e-sens Y4 e-delivery Task Force will be to review and continue the work done in 2015 and 2016 within the e-delivery AS4 interoperability Workgroup, working towards the vision of robust, production-ready e- Delivery infrastructure in as many domains as possible and with as many solutions as possible. The e-delivery Task Force shall complement the activities in the e- Delivery group chaired by the EC. A close collaboration between the Task Force and the EC is foreseen. Page 9

The esens AS4 Taskforce and the take over from CEF with an edelivery AS4 taskforce testing activity after esens close down. The main objectives and activities will be to: Work together on specific technical issues that ensure the suitability and maturity of AS4-based edelivery solutions, integrated with other ABBs required for operations in particular domains. Continue the testing already done in e-sens on aspects like large files, multiple files, interoperability of different implementations on Java and.net, etc. A testing plan will be produced at the beginning outlining the activities of the period February 2017 April 2017. Document test, setup and outline outstanding issues. Page 10

The esens AS4 Taskforce and the take over from CEF with an edelivery AS4 taskforce testing activity after esens close down. Status: The esens AS4 taskforce is now closed as part of the esens close down. The work has been reported and documented as part of the esens reporting. From 1th April CEF has initiated a continued work with the same group and a work plan that take over where the esens AS4 taskforce ended. Page 11