C2-Simulation Interoperability in NATO

Similar documents
C2-Simulation Interoperability in NATO

Service Level Agreements: An Approach to Software Lifecycle Management. CDR Leonard Gaines Naval Supply Systems Command 29 January 2003

Multi-Modal Communication

Architecting for Resiliency Army s Common Operating Environment (COE) SERC

Kathleen Fisher Program Manager, Information Innovation Office

A Review of the 2007 Air Force Inaugural Sustainability Report

Information, Decision, & Complex Networks AFOSR/RTC Overview

Space and Missile Systems Center

4. Lessons Learned in Introducing MBSE: 2009 to 2012

Concept of Operations Discussion Summary

Using Model-Theoretic Invariants for Semantic Integration. Michael Gruninger NIST / Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland

US Army Industry Day Conference Boeing SBIR/STTR Program Overview

FUDSChem. Brian Jordan With the assistance of Deb Walker. Formerly Used Defense Site Chemistry Database. USACE-Albuquerque District.

2013 US State of Cybercrime Survey

Coalition Interoperability Ontology:

Space and Missile Systems Center

ATCCIS Replication Mechanism (ARM)

Technological Advances In Emergency Management

Vision Protection Army Technology Objective (ATO) Overview for GVSET VIP Day. Sensors from Laser Weapons Date: 17 Jul 09 UNCLASSIFIED

ARINC653 AADL Annex Update

Headquarters U.S. Air Force. EMS Play-by-Play: Using Air Force Playbooks to Standardize EMS

Col Jaap de Die Chairman Steering Committee CEPA-11. NMSG, October

The C2 Workstation and Data Replication over Disadvantaged Tactical Communication Links

Secure FAST: Security Enhancement in the NATO Time Sensitive Targeting Tool

75th Air Base Wing. Effective Data Stewarding Measures in Support of EESOH-MIS

U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (IDAS) Briefer: Jason Morse ARMED Team Leader Ground System Survivability, TARDEC

Running CyberCIEGE on Linux without Windows

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WEB SITE (EMSWeb)

High-Assurance Security/Safety on HPEC Systems: an Oxymoron?

Towards a Formal Pedigree Ontology for Level-One Sensor Fusion

Dr. Stuart Dickinson Dr. Donald H. Steinbrecher Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport, RI May 10, 2011

DoD Common Access Card Information Brief. Smart Card Project Managers Group

2011 NNI Environment, Health, and Safety Research Strategy

MATREX Run Time Interface (RTI) DoD M&S Conference 10 March 2008

Dana Sinno MIT Lincoln Laboratory 244 Wood Street Lexington, MA phone:

Empirically Based Analysis: The DDoS Case

Using Templates to Support Crisis Action Mission Planning

COUNTERING IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES

A Distributed Parallel Processing System for Command and Control Imagery

CENTER FOR ADVANCED ENERGY SYSTEM Rutgers University. Field Management for Industrial Assessment Centers Appointed By USDOE

ASSESSMENT OF A BAYESIAN MODEL AND TEST VALIDATION METHOD

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Corrosion Prevention and Control Database. Bob Barbin 07 February 2011 ASETSDefense 2011

Setting the Standard for Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Pentek Seminar Series. Digital IF Standardization

QuanTM Architecture for Web Services

MODELING AND SIMULATION OF LIQUID MOLDING PROCESSES. Pavel Simacek Center for Composite Materials University of Delaware

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF HALON- REPLACEMENT FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS (PHASE II)

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

SURVIVABILITY ENHANCED RUN-FLAT

Components and Considerations in Building an Insider Threat Program

Use of the Polarized Radiance Distribution Camera System in the RADYO Program

Chemical, Biological, Radiological & Nuclear Defense Information Analysis Center CBRNIAC

SINOVIA An open approach for heterogeneous ISR systems inter-operability

Distributed Real-Time Embedded Video Processing

Office of Global Maritime Situational Awareness

ASPECTS OF USE OF CFD FOR UAV CONFIGURATION DESIGN

Current Threat Environment

PEO C4I Remarks for NPS Acquisition Research Symposium

Cyber Threat Prioritization

Topology Control from Bottom to Top

An Update on CORBA Performance for HPEC Algorithms. Bill Beckwith Objective Interface Systems, Inc.

Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Power in Aircraft T&E Tests. Todd Remund Dr. William Kitto EDWARDS AFB, CA. July 2011

Web Site update. 21st HCAT Program Review Toronto, September 26, Keith Legg

M&S Strategic Initiatives to Support Test & Evaluation

Energy Security: A Global Challenge

Washington University

Defense Hotline Allegations Concerning Contractor-Invoiced Travel for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Contracts W912DY-10-D-0014 and W912DY-10-D-0024

DoD M&S Project: Standardized Documentation for Verification, Validation, and Accreditation

BUPT at TREC 2009: Entity Track

Super Energy Efficient Containerized Living Unit (SuperCLU) Technology Design and Development

Wireless Connectivity of Swarms in Presence of Obstacles

Directed Energy Using High-Power Microwave Technology

VICTORY VALIDATION AN INTRODUCTION AND TECHNICAL OVERVIEW

LARGE AREA, REAL TIME INSPECTION OF ROCKET MOTORS USING A NOVEL HANDHELD ULTRASOUND CAMERA

Nationwide Automatic Identification System (NAIS) Overview. CG 939 Mr. E. G. Lockhart TEXAS II Conference 3 Sep 2008

Introducing I 3 CON. The Information Interpretation and Integration Conference

Data Reorganization Interface

David W. Hyde US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg, Mississippi ABSTRACT

Requirements for Scalable Application Specific Processing in Commercial HPEC

Edwards Air Force Base Accelerates Flight Test Data Analysis Using MATLAB and Math Works. John Bourgeois EDWARDS AFB, CA. PRESENTED ON: 10 June 2010

Balancing Transport and Physical Layers in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks: Jointly Optimal Congestion Control and Power Control

Computer Aided Munitions Storage Planning

Accuracy of Computed Water Surface Profiles

75 TH MORSS CD Cover Page. If you would like your presentation included in the 75 th MORSS Final Report CD it must :

Data Warehousing. HCAT Program Review Park City, UT July Keith Legg,

Air Virtual At Sea (VAST) Platform Stimulation Analysis

Folded Shell Projectors and Virtual Optimization

Preventing Insider Sabotage: Lessons Learned From Actual Attacks

Shallow Ocean Bottom BRDF Prediction, Modeling, and Inversion via Simulation with Surface/Volume Data Derived from X-Ray Tomography

Agile Modeling of Component Connections for Simulation and Design of Complex Vehicle Structures

DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL MICROWAVE RADAR SYSTEM USING ANGULAR CORRELATION FOR THE DETECTION OF BURIED OBJECTS IN SANDY SOILS

Advanced Numerical Methods for Numerical Weather Prediction

Dynamic Information Management and Exchange for Command and Control Applications

By Derrick H. Karimi Member of the Technical Staff Emerging Technology Center. Open Architectures in the Defense Intelligence Community

Advanced Numerical Methods for Numerical Weather Prediction

Rockwell Science Center (RSC) Technologies for WDM Components

A Multilevel Secure MapReduce Framework for Cross-Domain Information Sharing in the Cloud

Approaches to Improving Transmon Qubits

NEW FINITE ELEMENT / MULTIBODY SYSTEM ALGORITHM FOR MODELING FLEXIBLE TRACKED VEHICLES

THE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM

Transcription:

C2-Simulation Interoperability in NATO Dr Hans Jense Chief, Capability Planning, Exercises and Training NATO UNCLASSIFIED 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE JUN 2013 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2013 to 00-00-2013 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE C2-Simulation Interoperability in NATO 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) NATO Communications and Information Agency (NCI),Batiment Z,Avenue du Bourget 140,1110 Brussels Belgium, 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Presented at the 18th International Command & Control Research & Technology Symposium (ICCRTS) held 19-21 June, 2013 in Alexandria, VA. U.S. Government or Federal Rights License 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 13 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

NATO CIS Services Agency NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency NATO Air Command and Control System Management Agency Active Layered Theatre Ballistic Missile Defence Programme Office HQ Information, Communication, Technology Management Agency Reform VISION To strengthen the Alliance through connecting forces, by the end of 2014, the NCI Agency Team: Optimises NATO mission success and be recognised as the trusted enabler of information superiority and enterprise excellence; Uses best practice to develop, deliver, connect and protect capabilities in partnership with other NATO entities, nations and industry; Earns customers confidence through agility, innovation and by delivering coherent and cost-effective solutions. Connecting Forces NATO UNCLASSIFIED 2

6le. NATO UNCLASSIFIED 3

The Journey to a Services-Based Organisation We are here We want to be here 16/04/2013 NATO UNCLASSIFIED 4

Internal External Hybrid Service Design Service Lines Service Transition C3 and Enterprise Services Service Operation Operational and Planning Support Services CIS Services Missile Defence Air C2 Joint/Land/Maritime/Logistics C2 JISR Enterprise Business Applications (incl. SMC) CIS Planning Operations CIS Support Exercise CIS Support Future Operations Operations Research Desktop Collaboration Mobility C4ISR Enabling Services Support Services Education and training Validation and testing Subject Matter Expertise P3M Acquisition General Services HR Finance Legal 02/08/2013 NATO UNCLASSIFIED 5

Future vision? NATO cloud Federated Networks Member Nation networks/systems Member Nation network/ systems Member Nation networks/ systems Partner Nation networks/ systems NATO UNCLASSIFIED 6

C2-Simulation Interoperability Why? Integrate simulations as new C2 capabilities for Planning Training Mission Rehearsal Exploit simulations for C2 Concept Development and Experimentation C2 Testing NATO UNCLASSIFIED 7

C2-Simulation Interoperability How? Leverage/merge existing standards (e.g., JC3IEDM, MIP-DEM, HLA) Harmonise/merge standards: (MSDL, C-BML) Develop additional standards (SINEX, DSEEP Overlay) Engage C2 and Simulation standards development organisations (MIP, SISO, NMSG) Engage operational user community NATO UNCLASSIFIED

C2-Simulation Interoperability Who? NATO Modelling & Simulation Group 2006-09 MSG-048 Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) 2010 MSG-079 C-BML Workshop 2010-14 MSG-085 Standardisation for C2-Simulation Interopererability 2013 MSG-119 C2-Simulation Interoperability Workshop Simulation Interoperability Standards Organisation C-BML Product Development Group MSDL Product Development Group and many national R&D groups/activities NATO UNCLASSIFIED 9

Current State and Way Ahead C-BML has been assessed as useful and applicable for the exchange of orders and reports between C2 and simulation systems Expected benefits include increased effectiveness and efficiency of exercises, planning, and operational decision support A draft C-BML standard exists, as do prototype implementations of C-BML capabilities in operational C2 systems, simulations, and exchange mechanisms Development and implementations of additional C2- Sim interoperability related standards are underway NATO UNCLASSIFIED 10

C2-Simulation Interoperability in NATO General NCI Agency Areas Of Interest Testing C2 Decision Support Training and Exercise Support Specific Use Cases Coalition Interoperability Assurance and Validation (Joint) Operational Planning Exercise Control Services NATO UNCLASSIFIED 11

C-BML Opportunities in NATO NATO is all about interoperability, based on common vocabulary and common language JC3IEDM vocabulary, C-BML language Each enables interoperability, but at different levels C-BML Is one of the enablers of information sharing, not the only one! Enables leveraging of NATO s investments in MIP for enhanced interoperability Fits within the SOA based NATO C3 Classification Taxonomy NATO UNCLASSIFIED 12

State Of The Art: Some Improvement M&S C4I convergence Search 2010: Adopting joint : interoperability through convergence. Free C4ISR Command Control Communications Computers Intelligence Surveillance and... and user interface software released in 1985 to run on top of MS-DOS.... 2013: [PPT] C4I M&S Convergence Opportunities and Challenges for C-BML... ftp.rta.nato.int/public/pubfulltext/rto/.../mp-msg-079-15.ppsx C4I M&S Convergence Opportunities and Challenges for C-BML in NATO. Dr. Hans Jense. Chief, Exercises and Training (CAT-3). Contents. Background... NATO UNCLASSIFIED 13