SH 288 Express Lanes Stated Preference Survey Report. Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire

Similar documents
Des Moines Area Regional Transit Non Rider Survey

2014 REPORT. Distracted Driving. on I-95 in Northern Virginia

GfK Omnibus and Legal Research: Representative surveys in Germany, Europe and worldwide. GfK SE 2015 Consumer Experiences Omnibus & Legal Research 1

Respondents Viewpoint on MRT Project in Jakarta

Florida Rural Household Travel Survey Mobile App

Public Outreach Overview Tuesday, September 27. COTA William J. Lhota Building 33 N. High St. Columbus, OH 43215

Transportation Planning Research Lessons Learned from Passive Mobile Data Collection

Behavioral Adjustments & Equity Effects of Congestion Pricing: Analysis of Morning Commutes During the Stockholm Trial

Local Search Insights

Distracted Driving Public Opinion Poll

U.S. TV and Internet Providers: Competing services for mobile consumers TV time. Market Study Second Quarter 2017

Agenda Overview. Process Update Overview of Revised Goals Transportation Trends Small Group Breakout Questions and Comments Next Steps Meeting Close

SIMPLE IFTA USER MANUAL

"In the Moment" Travel Study A GPS Smartphone Application Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, New Jersey

Acyclica Congestion Management. By Sarah King Regional Sales Manager Control Technologies

Child Abuse Clearance On-line Application instructions: Follow instructions per screenshots.

Leap Credit LLC Privacy Policy

Tolling 101: What You Need to Know. Warren Cooksey October 16, 2018

Contents. 1. Survey Background and Methodology. 2. Summary of Key Findings. 3. Survey Results. 4. Appendix

VShare: A Wireless Social Network Aided Vehicle Sharing System Using Hierarchical Cloud Architecture

HOW THE SMART SPEAKER IS REVOLUTIONIZING THE HOME

CENTRAL INTAKE. AES Central Intake User Guide. AES University Manual. Adaptive Enterprise Solutions

CREATING YOUR EXPENSE REPORT (REIMBURSEMENTS AND DIRECT PAYMENTS TO VENDORS)

Consumers Database Instructions: 1. Under 250 Million Consumer Sales Leads, click the orange START button.

An Analysis of TDM Impacts on a Corridor Segment

A Comparative Usability Test. Orbitz.com vs. Hipmunk.com

USER GUIDE. Homelessness Data Exchange (HDX), Version 2.0 BETA TEST VERSION. June, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

PeMS, Berkeley Highway Lab System, Data Fusion and Future Data Needs

An Assessment of Congestion in the Kansas City Region using the MARC Travel Demand Model

Appendix-A: Usage of EventFilter Utility Program

Managed Lane owner decision needed San Mateo County s options Understanding revenues & costs Pros & cons of County s options Proposed next steps

SHRP2 C10: Jacksonville

XXE Version 2.0. Users Guide 11/23/2009. by Fred L. Mannering (Purdue University) Scott S. Washburn (University of Florida) and

Bus Circulator Feasibility Study Scope of Work March 12, 2018

The Freeway Performance Measurement System (PeMS) (PeMS Version 3)

TomTom Navigation app for iphone/ipad Reference Guide

U.S. Mobile Consumers and OTT Services: Who uses which apps to watch video and connect? Market Study 2Q 2017

511 DFW TRAVELER INFORMATION LESSONS LEARNED

First-Class Versus Pre-Canceled Postage: A Cost/ Benefit Analysis

DriveTAB is a hardware based, tamper resistant solution to Distracted

APPENDIX E TRANSPORTATION

ABSTRACT. Keywords: User Satisfaction, User Participation, User Understanding

Mobile Messaging Apps Study : India. August 2014

Usability Testing Methodology for the 2017 Economic Census Web Instrument

Travel Demand Modeling and Project Coding Procedures

User Manual JRV9000. Navigation software for the JRV9000. English April 2016, ver. 1.0

Usability Test Report of ClinNext 10 EHR version 1.0

Looking Ahead. A Context for the Next Twenty Year Needs Assessment. July 2013

Trip Assignment models in TransCAD. Murtaza Haider Tel: , ext. 2480

AMERICANS USE OF THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE: AN AARP BULLETIN SURVEY

Frequently Asked Questions

Better connections: Australian attitudes to mail and . November 2013

EVALUATION ASSIGNMENT 6. Usability Test Report. ABHISHEK SHRIRAM UMACHIGI Consultant: Team ipatts +1(906)

STEP Household Questionnaire. Guidelines for Data Processing

Residential Femtocells: Impact on Carrier Grades. Market Brief Second Quarter, 2012

Survey Solutions: Advanced Designer

Kyeil Kim, Guy Rousseau, Kyung-Hwa Kim & David D Onofrio

Mobile Internet & Smartphone Adoption

Did the availability of refactoring functionality of IDEs result in refactorings being performed more frequently?

Irish Na5onal Teachers Organisa5on Online Expense Claims System User Guide

QUICK GUIDE HOW TO REQUEST A RIDE ON LYFT

DATA MEMO. The volume of spam is growing in Americans personal and workplace accounts, but users are less bothered by it.

Final Report. Interstate-680 Bus-on-Shoulder Feasibility Assessment. prepared for

AudienceView How To Guides How to Run a Crosstab Report

2012 Cell Phone Consumer Attitudes Study

ITS Canada Annual Conference and General Meeting. May 2013

Mobile data usage & habits of MENA Internet users. Research conducted by Effective Measure in conjunction with Spot On PR January 2011

Dulles Area Transportation Association

A User s Introduction to. Global Rescue s GRID SM Mobile Application. trust

ServicePoint HMIS Entry/Exit Quick Reference Card (non HPRP)

Solving the Problems Cell Phones Create for Survey Research

Economic Crash Analysis Tool. Release Notes

Using GPS-enabled Cell Phones to Improve Multimodal Planning and Facilitate Travel Behavior Change

NANOS SURVEY NANOS SURVEY

ONLINE CONSUMER CHARACTERISTICS AND BEHAVIOR: INDONESIA TOURIST IN USING INTERNET FOR SEARCHING ONLINE ROOM RESERVATIONS

Chrome River Guide for OTE Supervisors

MULTI-CLIENT 2017 US INTERCHANGEABLE LENS CAMERA MARKET STUDY. Consumer Imaging Behaviors and Industry Trends SERVICE AREAS:

PROTRAV TRIP CREATION DOCUMENT

EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE DATE DISPLAYS FOR ADVANCE NOTIFICATION MESSAGES ON PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS IN WORK ZONES

QUESTIONNAIRE. 1. Gender : Male [ ] Female [ ] 2. Age (in years) : [ ] [ ] 60 and above [ ]

Chapter 10: Offering Guaranteed/Emergency Ride Home

2009 ATP Solutions Newsletter Questionnaire

DATE: September 2014 Project Sponsors Rachel Schuett and Transportation Team Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Data Collection

Usability Report for Online Writing Portfolio

Cambridge South East Transport Study: Summary Report of Consultation Findings

Mobile telephones and mobile positioning data as source for statistics: Estonian experiences

Direct Brands and the Ad-Supported OTT Video Viewer

Creating transportation system intelligence using PeMS. Pravin Varaiya PeMS Development Group

Smartphone Ownership 2013 Update

Market Advisor TOOLS GUIDE

Almost half of all internet users now use search engines on a typical day

Blanket Travel Expense Report

ITU s work on ICT measurement

Crystal Springs Upland School Transportation Demand Management Plan. March 2016

Northern Virginia Transportation Authority

Personal and business current account prompt pilot findings

CIE4801 Transportation and spatial modelling Beyond the 4-step model

The Promise and Challenges of Creating Intelligent Travelers. Presented by Melanie Crotty, Director Traveler Information &Coordination MTC

U.S. Home Broadband & Wi-Fi Usage Forecast, : More homes, Wi-Fi and data

The Household Diary Study

Transcription:

SH 288 Express Lanes Stated Preference Survey Report Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire DATA ANALYSIS SOLUTIONS

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INSTRUCTIONS... 1 2.0 SCREENER AND TRIP CHARACTERISTIC QUESTIONS... 2 3.0 STATED PREFERENCE QUESTIONS... 30 4.0 DEBRIEF QUESTIONS... 34 5.0 DEMOGRAPHIC QUESTIONS... 40 Page Ai

1.0 INSTRUCTIONS Questionnaire Review Instructions Page A1

2.0 SCREENER AND TRIP CHARACTERISTIC QUESTIONS Survey Introduction and Instructions Page A2

Survey Recruitment Method Screening Criteria Terminate if respondent does not meet all conditions Page A3

Page A4

Termination Screen If respondent has not made a trip that meets all conditions Page A5

One Way Trip Description Page A6

Travel Locations Page A7

Vehicle Type Terminate if respondent traveled in a bus or taxi. If respondent travelled in a commercial vehicle with 2+ axles, skip to beginning and end location questions, then to survey comments Page A8

Day of the Week Page A9

Trip Purpose Page A10

Trip Beginning and Ending Locations Page A11

Location Confirmation If trip began and ended in the same location. If No, send back to trip beginning and ending location question Page A12

Trip Origin Location Page A13

Trip Origin Location with Google Maps Interface If I would rather use a map is selected Page A14

Trip Destination Location Page A15

Trip Destination Location with Google Maps Interface If I would rather use a map is selected Page A16

Invalid Trip Warning If highway distance is less than three miles, or origin and destination pair suggests that respondent did not use one of the study corridors, or origin and destination locations are the same. If Yes, send back to the trip origin and destination location questions. Page A17

Screener If previous locations entered are correct. If yes, send back to day of week question and if No, terminate. Page A18

SH 288 Entrance Ramp SH 288 Exit Ramp Page A19

Departure Time Page A20

Page A21

Total Travel Time Page A22

Travel Time Warning if travel times are significantly different from a Google Maps calculated driving time. If Yes, send back to trip travel time question Page A23

Travel Delay Due to Congestion Page A24

.Travel Time Without Delay if experienced delay Page A25

Trip Frequency Page A26

Vehicle Occupancy Page A27

ETC Ownership Page A28

Reason for Not Owning an ETC Device If respondent does not own an ETC device Page A29

3.0 STATED PREFERENCE QUESTIONS Introduction to Express Lanes Project Page A30

Payment Information Stated Preference Instructions Page A31

Page A32

Example Stated Preference Scenario (1 of 10 from survey) Page A33

4.0 DEBRIEF QUESTIONS Reason for Never Selecting the Express Lanes Alternative if never selected express lanes option in stated preference scenarios Page A34

Opinion of Proposed Express Lanes Reason for Being in Favor of the Proposed Express Lanes if strongly or somewhat favors express lanes project Page A35

Page A36

Reason for Being Opposed to the Proposed Express Lanes if strongly or somewhat opposed to express lanes project Page A37

Attitude Statements Related to Congestion Page A38

Attitude Statements Related to Tolling Page A39

5.0 DEMOGRAPHIC QUESTIONS Home ZIP code Page A40

Gender Page A41

Age Page A42

Employment Status Page A43

Household Size Page A44

Number of Vehicles in Household Page A45

Annual Household Income Page A46

Survey/Project Comments Page A47

Survey End Page A48