Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-00.

Similar documents
Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-03.

Network Working Group Internet-Draft January 25, 2006 Expires: July 29, Feed Rank draft-snell-atompub-feed-index-05.txt. Status of this Memo

Network Working Group Internet-Draft October 27, 2007 Intended status: Experimental Expires: April 29, 2008

Expires: October 9, 2005 April 7, 2005

Network Working Group. Intended status: Standards Track Columbia U. Expires: March 5, 2009 September 1, 2008

Jabber, Inc. August 20, 2004

Intended status: Standards Track August 15, 2008 Expires: February 16, 2009

Expires in six months 24 October 2004 Obsoletes: RFC , , 3377, 3771

Intended status: Informational. B. Wyman October 2, 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4913 Category: Experimental July 2007

Internet-Draft September 1, 2005 Expires: March 5, Feed History: Enabling Incremental Syndication draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-04

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track August Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Request for Comments: 4633 Category: Experimental August 2006

Request for Comments: 3934 Updates: 2418 October 2004 BCP: 94 Category: Best Current Practice

Intended status: Standards Track Expires: August 28, 2008 Hitachi A. Kobayashi NEC Corp. M. Stiemerling (Ed.) NEC Europe Ltd.

Network Working Group. Category: Informational January 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4424 February 2006 Updates: 4348 Category: Standards Track

Category: Standards Track June Requesting Attributes by Object Class in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Status of This Memo

Category: Standards Track September MIB Textual Conventions for Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)

Request for Comments: 5179 Category: Standards Track May 2008

Request for Comments: May 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3937 Category: Informational October 2004

Network Working Group Request for Comments: August Address-Prefix-Based Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option

TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (tcpm) Intended status: Standards Track Expires: May 1, 2009 October 28, 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Informational April A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)

Category: Standards Track June 2006

Request for Comments: 3861 Category: Standards Track August 2004

Request for Comments: 3932 October 2004 BCP: 92 Updates: 3710, 2026 Category: Best Current Practice

Intended Category: Standards Track Expires March 2006 September 2005

IETF TRUST. Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents. February 12, Effective Date: February 15, 2009

Network Working Group. Category: Informational October 2005

IETF TRUST. Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents. Approved November 6, Effective Date: November 10, 2008

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc January The Secure Shell (SSH) Session Channel Break Extension

Category: Standards Track December 2007

Request for Comments: 5010 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. September 2007

Network Working Group. Cisco Systems June 2007

Category: Standards Track Cisco H. Tschofenig Nokia Siemens Networks August 2008

Network Working Group. February 2005

Network Working Group. Category: Informational May OSPF Database Exchange Summary List Optimization

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4143 Category: Standards Track Brandenburg November 2005

Internet-Draft September 5, 2004 Expires: March 6, The Atom Syndication Format draft-ietf-atompub-format-02. Status of this Memo

Request for Comments: 4393 Category: Standards Track March MIME Type Registrations for 3GPP2 Multimedia Files

C. Martin ipath Services February A Policy Control Mechanism in IS-IS Using Administrative Tags

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track July 2007

Category: Standards Track October Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4)

Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track January 2008

Request for Comments: 4680 Updates: 4346 September 2006 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group. February Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Redirect and Reset Package

Network Working Group Request for Comments: December 2004

Updates: 2409 May 2005 Category: Standards Track. Algorithms for Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1)

Isode Limited March 2008

Request for Comments: 3905 Category: Informational September A Template for IETF Patent Disclosures and Licensing Declarations

Expires: February 25, 2004 August 27, Using the NETCONF Configuration Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH) draft-wasserman-netconf-over-ssh-00.

Request for Comments: 4315 December 2005 Obsoletes: 2359 Category: Standards Track. Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - UIDPLUS extension

Category: Standards Track March Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport Over TCP

Request for Comments: 4509 Category: Standards Track May Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs)

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4242 Category: Standards Track University of Southampton B. Volz Cisco Systems, Inc.

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4869 Category: Informational May Suite B Cryptographic Suites for IPsec. Status of This Memo

Request for Comments: 5079 Category: Standards Track December Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4603 Category: Informational Cisco Systems July Additional Values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute

Network Working Group Request for Comments: A. Zinin Alcatel-Lucent March 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. December 2005

Request for Comments: K. Norrman Ericsson June 2006

Request for Comments: 5208 Category: Informational May 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track <draft-aboba-radius-iana-03.txt> 30 March 2003 Updates: RFC IANA Considerations for RADIUS

Request for Comments: 4255 Category: Standards Track SPARTA January Using DNS to Securely Publish Secure Shell (SSH) Key Fingerprints

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. March 2005

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. June 2006

Opaque Information Distribution

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks August 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems May 2007

RFC 4871 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures -- Update draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03-01dc

Category: Informational September 2004

Category: Best Current Practice February Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points

Category: Standards Track May Transport Layer Security Protocol Compression Methods

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4792 Updates: 3641 January 2007 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5235 January 2008 Obsoletes: 3685 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group. N. Williams Sun Microsystems June 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5138 Category: Informational February 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4147 Category: Informational August Proposed Changes to the Format of the IANA IPv6 Registry

Network Working Group. Updates: 3463, 4468, 4954 June 2008 Category: Best Current Practice. A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes

Network Working Group. BCP: 131 July 2007 Category: Best Current Practice

Request for Comments: 4759 Category: Standards Track Neustar Inc. L. Conroy Roke Manor Research November 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: February 2006

INTERNET-DRAFT DTLS over DCCP February 6, DTLS over DCCP

Request for Comments: 3968 Updates: 3427 December 2004 BCP: 98 Category: Best Current Practice

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Samsung S. Kumar Tech Mahindra Ltd S. Madanapalli Samsung May 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4573 Category: Standard Track July MIME Type Registration for RTP Payload Format for H.

September The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) tel Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry. Status of This Memo

Request for Comments: 4142 Category: Standards Track Nine by Nine November 2005

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Request for Comments: 4481 Columbia U. Category: Standards Track July 2006

Request for Comments: 4715 Category: Informational NTT November 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. April 2004

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June 2005

February T11 Network Address Authority (NAA) Naming Format for iscsi Node Names

Request for Comments: 4755 Category: Standards Track December 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4432 March 2006 Category: Standards Track

Transcription:

Network Working Group J. Snell Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, 2006 Status of this Memo Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-00.txt By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on February 2, 2006. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). Abstract This memo presents a mechanism that allows feed publishers to express preferences over how a consumer processes Atom links and Content-By- Reference. Snell Expires February 2, 2006 [Page 1]

Table of Contents 1. Introduction......................... 3 2. Notational Conventions.................... 3 3. The x:follow extension attribute.............. 4 4. The x:index extension attribute.............. 4 5. The x:archive extension attribute............. 5 6. Security Considerations................... 6 7. IANA Considerations..................... 6 8. References.......................... 6 Author s Address....................... 6 A. Acknowledgements....................... 6 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements........ 7 Snell Expires February 2, 2006 [Page 2]

1. Introduction This docoument specifies a mechanism by which feed publishers MAY express how applications consuming Atom documents should handle links and referenced content contained within the feed. For example, a publisher may include an enclosure link within a feed but may not wish for applications to automatically download the enclosed file when it processes the feed; or, the publisher may not wish to allow applications to archive or index the enclosure in any way. The follow, index and archive attributes introduced herein provide the means for publishers to express these preferences. nofollowattributes = { attribute follow { "yes" "no" }?, attribute index { "yes" "no" }?, attribute archive { "yes" "no" }? } 2. Notational Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, [RFC2119], as scoped to those conformance targets. In this specification, "entry" refers to an atom:entry element. In this specification, "feed" refers to an Atom Feed Document. In this specification, "head section" refers to the children of a feed s document-wide metadata container; e.g., the child elements of the atom:feed element in an Atom Feed Document. In this specification, the term "extension attribute" refers to a namespace qualified element attribute. In this specification, the term "link" refers to an atom:link element. In this specificaiton, the term "referenced content" refers to an atom:content element that contains a @src attribute. This specification uses XML Namespaces [W3C.REC-xml-names-19990114] to uniquely identify XML element and attribute names. It uses the following namespace prefix for the indicated namespace URI; "x": "http://purl.org/atompub/nofollow/1.0" This specification uses terms from the XML Infoset [W3C.REC-xmlinfoset-20040204]. However, this specification uses a shorthand; the Snell Expires February 2, 2006 [Page 3]

phrase "Information Item" is omitted when naming Element Information Items. Therefore, when this specification uses the term "element," it is referring to an Element Information Item in Infoset terms. 3. The x:follow extension attribute The x:follow" attribute indicates whether applications should automatically attempt to follow links and referenced content (e.g., whether or not enclosure links should be automatically downloaded, etc). The value of the attribute is either "yes" or "no". If missing, the value is considered to be "yes". A value of "no" indicates that applications SHOULD NOT attempt to automatically resolve the referenced resource -- rather, the application should wait until a user explicitly requests the resource to be resolved. For example, xmlns:x="http://purl.org/atompub/nofollow/1.0"> <link rel="enclosure" href="http://example.com/mediafiles/mysong.mp3" x:follow="no" /> The x:follow attribute MAY be contained by atom:link elements and atom:content elements that contain a src attribute. 4. The x:index extension attribute The x:index attribute indicates whether applications should index links and referenced content. The value of the attribute is either "yes" or "no". If missing, the value is considered to be "yes". A value of "no" indicates that applications SHOULD NOT index the referenced resource. xmlns:x="http://purl.org/atompub/nofollow/1.0"> <link rel="enclosure" href="http://example.com/mediafiles/mysong.mp3" x:index="no" /> The x:index attribute MAY also be included as a child of atom:feed and atom:entry elements -- in which case it is used to indicate Snell Expires February 2, 2006 [Page 4]

whether or not applications should index the information content of the containing atom:feed or atom:entry. xmlns:x="http://purl.org/atompub/nofollow/1.0" x:index="no"> The x:index attribute MAY be contained by atom:entry, atom:feed, atom:link elements and atom:content elements that contain a src attribute. 5. The x:archive extension attribute The x:archive attribute indicates whether applications should archive the targets of links and content references. The value of the attribute is either "yes" or "no". If missing, the value is considered to be "yes". A value of "no" indicate that applications SHOULD NOT archive the referenced resource. xmlns:x="http://purl.org/atompub/nofollow/1.0"> <link rel="enclosure" href="http://example.com/mediafiles/mysong.mp3" x:archive="no" /> The x:archive attribute MAY also be included as a child of atom: feed and atom:entry elements -- in which case it is used to indicate whether or not applications should archive the information content of the containing atom:feed or atom:entry. xmlns:x="http://purl.org/atompub/nofollow/1.0" x:archive="no"> The x:archive attribute MAY be contained by atom:entry, atom:feed, atom:link elements and atom:content elements that contain a src attribute. Snell Expires February 2, 2006 [Page 5]

6. Security Considerations There are no security considerations introduced by this specification. 7. IANA Considerations There are no IANA considerations introduced by this specification. 8. References [I-D.ietf-atompub-format] Sayre, R. and M. Nottingham, "The Atom Syndication Format", draft-ietf-atompub-format-11 (work in progress), August 2005. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [W3C.REC-xml-infoset-20040204] Tobin, R. and J. Cowan, "XML Information Set (Second Edition)", W3C REC REC-xml-infoset-20040204, February 2004. [W3C.REC-xml-names-19990114] Hollander, D., Bray, T., and A. Layman, "Namespaces in XML", W3C REC REC-xml-names-19990114, January 1999. [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028] Malhotra, A. and P. Biron, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition", W3C REC REC-xmlschema-2-20041028, October 2004. Author s Address James M Snell Phone: Email: jasnell@gmail.com URI: http://snellspace.com Appendix A. Acknowledgements The author gratefully acknowledges the feedback from the members of the Atom Publishing Format and Protocol working group during the development of this specification. Snell Expires February 2, 2006 [Page 6]

Intellectual Property Statement The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Disclaimer of Validity This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. Acknowledgment Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. Snell Expires February 2, 2006 [Page 7]