COMP9332 Network Routing & Switching

Similar documents
Multi Protocol Label Switching (an introduction) Karst Koymans. Thursday, March 12, 2015

MPLS MULTI PROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING OVERVIEW OF MPLS, A TECHNOLOGY THAT COMBINES LAYER 3 ROUTING WITH LAYER 2 SWITCHING FOR OPTIMIZED NETWORK USAGE

Migration Strategies for IP Service Growth: Cell-switched MPLS or IP-routed MPLS

MPLS опорни мрежи MPLS core networks

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) on Cisco Routers

Telematics Chapter 7: MPLS

LARGE SCALE IP ROUTING LECTURE BY SEBASTIAN GRAF

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) on Cisco Routers

Multiprotocol Label Switching Overview

Securizarea Calculatoarelor și a Rețelelor 32. Tehnologia MPLS VPN

MPLS Multi-Protocol Label Switching

MPLS Intro. Cosmin Dumitru March 14, University of Amsterdam System and Network Engineering Research Group ...

Table of Contents. Cisco MPLS FAQ For Beginners

Multi Protocol Label Switching

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)

MPLS, THE BASICS CSE 6067, UIU. Multiprotocol Label Switching

Internet Routing - MPLS. By Richard Harris

2D1490 p MPLS, RSVP, etc. Olof Hagsand KTHNOC/NADA

MPLS VPN. 5 ian 2010

MPLS/Tag Switching. Background. Chapter Goals CHAPTER

Computer Network Architectures and Multimedia. Guy Leduc. Chapter 2 MPLS networks. Chapter 2: MPLS

MPLS Multi-protocol label switching Mario Baldi Politecnico di Torino (Technical University of Torino)

MultiProtocol Label Switching - MPLS ( RFC 3031 )

Tag Switching. Background. Tag-Switching Architecture. Forwarding Component CHAPTER

Ahmed Benallegue RMDCN workshop on the migration to IP/VPN 1/54

سوي يچينگ و مسيريابي در شبكه

MPLS. Multi-Protocol Label Switching

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) on Cisco Routers

MPLS etc.. MPLS is not alone TEST. 26 April 2016 AN. Multi-Protocol Label Switching MPLS-TP FEC PBB-TE VPLS ISIS-TE MPƛS GMPLS SR RSVP-TE OSPF-TE PCEP

Advanced Telecommunications

Label Switching. The idea. Add a small label (sometimes called a tag ) on the front of a packet and route the packet based on the label. cs670.

Outline. Circuit Switching. Circuit Switching : Introduction to Telecommunication Networks Lectures 13: Virtual Things

Router Construction. Workstation-Based. Switching Hardware Design Goals throughput (depends on traffic model) scalability (a function of n) Outline

MULTIPROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING: REIVEW KAISER ALI BHAT

MPLS Introduction. (C) Herbert Haas 2005/03/11

MPLS AToM Overview. Documentation Specifics. Feature Overview

Institute of Computer Technology - Vienna University of Technology. L85 - Multiprotocol Label Switching

MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching)

Implementing MPLS Forwarding

Introduction to MPLS APNIC

Connection Oriented Networking MPLS and ATM

Syed Mehar Ali Shah 1 and Bhaskar Reddy Muvva Vijay 2* 1-

Configuring MPLS and EoMPLS

MPLS VPN--Inter-AS Option AB

AToM (Any Transport over MPLS)

Table of Contents Chapter 1 MPLS Basics Configuration

CS High Speed Networks. Dr.G.A.Sathish Kumar Professor EC

MPLS Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)

Virtual Link Layer : Fundamentals of Computer Networks Bill Nace

Virtual Link Layer : Fundamentals of Computer Networks Bill Nace

Concepts and Operation of MPLS VPNs. Francisco Bolanos

ENTERPRISE MPLS. Kireeti Kompella

Introduction to MPLS. What is MPLS? 1/23/17. APNIC Technical Workshop January 23 to 25, NZNOG2017, Tauranga, New Zealand. [201609] Revision:

MPLS Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)

Configuring Basic MPLS Using OSPF

Internet Multicast Routing

Implementing MPLS Layer 3 VPNs

Routing Concepts. IPv4 Routing Forwarding Some definitions Policy options Routing Protocols

N:1 PVC Mapping to PWE with Nonunique VPIs

MPLS VPN Inter-AS Option AB

Chapter 4. Advanced Internetworking. 4.3 MPLS 4.4 Mobile IP

Exam : Title : Implementing Cisco MPLS Exam (MPLS) Ver :

Introduction to Segment Routing

Configuring MPLS, MPLS VPN, MPLS OAM, and EoMPLS

MPLS Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)

IP Datagram Service MPLS. Virtual Call Call Request (CR) Agenda

Multi-Protocol Label Switching

MPLS VPN Carrier Supporting Carrier Using LDP and an IGP

Multiprotocol Label Switching Virtual Private Network

BROADBAND AND HIGH SPEED NETWORKS

Trafffic Engineering 2015/16 1

MPLS Multi-protocol label switching Mario Baldi Politecnico di Torino (Technical University of Torino)

MPLS. 9 March 2018 AN

WORKSHOP MPLS.

Configuring MPLS L2VPN

IPv6 Switching: Provider Edge Router over MPLS

MPLS Multi-protocol label switching Mario Baldi Politecnico di Torino (Technical University of Torino)

HP Routing Switch Series

CCIE R&S Techtorial MPLS

MPLS Core Networks Николай Милованов/Nikolay Milovanov

MPLS etc.. 9 May 2017 AN

N:1 PVC Mapping to PWE with Nonunique VPIs

Configuring Static MPLS

IPv6 Switching: Provider Edge Router over MPLS

Service Providers Networks & Switching (MPLS) 20/11/2009. Local Team

Routing Basics. ISP Workshops. Last updated 10 th December 2015

MPLS VPN Carrier Supporting Carrier Using LDP and an IGP

PASS4TEST. IT Certification Guaranteed, The Easy Way! We offer free update service for one year

Routing Basics ISP/IXP Workshops

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3035

Configuring Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)

Multiprotocol Label Switching

What You Will Learn By the end of this appendix, you should know and be able to explain the following:

Supporting Differentiated Services in MPLS Networks

This chapter covers the following topics: Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) AToM operations

MIT International Journal of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan. 2013, pp

LARGE SCALE IP ROUTING LECTURE BY SEBASTIAN GRAF

MPLS MPLS. Basically: 9 March 2018 AN. Multi-Protocol Label Switching. A bit of history. Multi-Protocol Label Switching.

Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) ATM concepts

Transcription:

COMP9332 Network Routing & Switching Switching in IP Networks with MPLS http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~cs9332 1

Lecture Overview This lecture introduces the concept of switching, which allows faster processing of packets in routers. 2

Topics to be Covered Concept of switching (with ATM switches) Concept of label switching - MPLS Implementing MPLS on ATM switches 3

Forwarding vs Switching 4

Problems with forwarding Routing table lookup is slow Routing tables are exploding Table lookup limits future growth of Internet Cannot scale to ultra high-speed backbone 5

Benefits of switching No longest prefix match Lookup is indexed and very fast 6

Switching (with ATM Networks) 7

Characteristics of ATM Packet-based technology like IP, but Unlike IP, it is connection oriented IP is datagram based (connectionless) ATM packets (called cells) are switched inside ATM switches 8

ATM Protocol model ATM is a 3-layer model ATM terminal" ATM terminal" ATM switch" 9

ATM layers in routers and switches 10

ATM Cells 53-byte long 5-byte header 48-byte payload 11

Advantages of Short, Fixed Size Cells Minimise delay and jitter for voice/video traffic Easier to process (fast switching) 12

Without Short Cells A voice packet waits behind a large data packet 13

With Short Cells Voice packet can go immediately after data packet #1 Waiting for voice is reduced significantly 14

ATM Interfaces User-Network Interface (UNI) public and private Network-Network Interface (NNI) 15

Cell Formats 16

Virtual Channels ATM is connection oriented An ATM connection is called virtual channel/ connection/circuit (VC) A VC must be established between two end points before data can be transmitted Tens of thousands of VCs per fiber Different VC, different bandwidth, QoS User data and signaling on different VCs 17

Virtual Paths Virtual Private Network over public ATM many individual VCs between two sites switches need to switch VCs individually even if they start and end at the same points VCs starting and ending at the same points can be bundled in virtual paths or VPs Switches may switch only VPs, not aware of individual VCs inside the VP 18

Virtual Paths & Virtual Channels VP VC VC VC VC Physical Channel VP VP VC VC VC VC VC VC VC VC VP VC VC VC VC 19

Virtual Path Connection (VPC) 20

Virtual Channel Connection (VCC) 21

VP and VC Labels concept of hop-by-hop labeling VPs and VCs are labeled with integer identifiers Virtual Path Identifier (VPI) Virtual Channel Identifier (VCI) VPI/VCIs are assigned hop by hop Same end-to-end ATM connection may have different VPI/VCI in different hop Hop-by-hop label assignment allows reuse of the same number at different hops The network maps VPI/VCIs at adjacent hops to create an end-to-end virtual circuit 22

Virtual Channel Identifier (VCI) Each VC is identified by a unique VCI on a given link VCIs therefore have only local significance An end-to-end ATM connection traversing several links will be identified by different VCIs at different links VCI translation occurs at the link boundary VCIs are assigned to a connection during call set-up 23

Reserved Channels VCI 0-31 are reserved Some of them have been pre-allocated to specific functions Type VPI VCI Idle/unassigned cell 0 0 F4 segment OAM x 3 F4 end-to-end OAM x 4 Signaling 0 5 RM for VPs 0 6 ILMI 0 16 LANE configuration direct0 17 PNNI routing 0 or x 18 24

VP and VC Switch Two types of ATM switch VP switch does not look at VCIs, switching is based on VPIs only VCI does not change when passing through a VP switch; VPI may change VC switch looks at both VPI and VCI VCI (as well as VPI) may change when passing through a VC switch 25

VP Switch VP VP VP VPI=5 VCI=15 Switch VPI=7 VCI=15 Switch VPI=9 VCI=15 Switch VPI=6 VCI=15 26

VC Switch VPI=5 VCI=15 VP Switch VPI=7 VCI=15 VC Switch VPI=9 VCI=24 VP Switch VPI=6 VCI=24 27

Permanent Virtual Circuit VPI=0 VCI=51 VPI=0 VCI=39 No signalling required to setup a VC; the VC is pre-setup. 28

Permanent Virtual Circuit VPIs and VCIs for the end-to-end connection are preconfigured in hardware Semi-PVC : VPIs and VCIs are preconfigured, but can be erased and reconfigured later PVC is good for Virtual Leased Line for VPN PVC does not scale well for an ATM LAN/WAN with many stations : too many PVCs required 29

Switched Virtual Circuit Signaling messages Signaling messages VPI=0 VCI=5 VPI=0 VCI=5 Signalling required to setup a VC 30

Switched Virtual Circuit User messages User messages VPI=x 1 VCI=x 2 VPI=Y 1 VCI=Y 2 X 1,X 2,Y 1,Y 2 may take different values at successive call setups. 31

Switched Virtual Circuit Circuit on demand Scalable solution to ATM connectivity Different VPIs and VCIs at successive call setups for the same source-destination. 32

Label Switching with MPLS 33

Introduction to Label Switching Router has two main elements Forwarding and routing Label switching is an alternative to IP forwarding MPLS (multiprotocol label switching) combines benefits of virtual circuit with flexibility and robustness of datagram forwarding An MPLS-capable router uses traditional IP routing, but replaces IP forwarding with label switching 34

Why label switching Improves IP forwarding speed Seamless integration of IP and ATM 35

Terminologies flow : a single instance of an application to application flow of data forwarding equivalence class: a group of IP packets which are forwarded along same path (or same treatment) label: a short fixed length physically contiguous identifier which is used to identify a FEC (local significance) label Switched Router: an MPLS node which is capable of forwarding L3 packets 36

How Does MPLS Work 37

MPLS Devices MPLS edge node MPLS domain LSR MPLS egress node MPLS ingress node LSR LSR LSR: label switching router 38

Conventional IP Routing Packet travels from one router to the next an independent forwarding decision made at each hop At each hop packets assigned to a Forwarding Equivalence Class (FEC) packets considered to be in same FEC if the routing table contains some prefix X such that X is the longest match for each packet s destination address 39

MPLS Approach Assignments of packets to FEC done once as the packet enters the network FEC to which packet is assigned is encoded with a label Packet is forwarded to next hop with label no further analysis of packet header at next hop 40

Label encoding MPLS uses 32 bits for label encoding 20 bits for actual label 2 power 20 (2^20) labels possible label exp s TTL Label: Label Value, 20 bits (0-16 reserved) Exp.: Experimental, 3 bits (earlier Class of Service) S: Bottom of Stack, 1 bit (1 = last entry in label stack) TTL: 8 bit Time to Live 41

Reserved Labels Some labels are reserved, for example 1 = Router Alert Label Looked by the router software. Packet forwarded based on the next label in stack Similar to Router Alert Option in IP Packets 3 = Implicit Null Label Used only for label distribution Should not appear in any label in data packets 42

TTL Handling At the beginning TTL = TTL from IP header At every hop: TTL = TTL -1 TTL in MPLS header is decremented (TTL in IP header not touched) Drop the packet if TTL=0 At the exit: TTL in IP Header = TTL from label TTL decrements within MPLS domain now reflected in the IP header In some cases, entire MPLS domain may be considered one hop, e.g., ATM 43

MPLS Encapsulation For ATM, VPI/VCI fields in the ATM cell header carries MPLS labels No separate encapsulation is necessary For non-atm (PPP or Ethernet), MPLS uses a shim layer between link layer and network layer headers shim layer may consist of sequence of labels (concept of label stack) MPLS is layer 2.5! 44

Label Processing Label used as index into a table which specifies next hop and a new label longest match calculation eliminated at subsequent hops Old label replaced with new label and packet forwarded to next hop label may also contain class of service (COS) for scheduling/ discarding packets etc again saves header processing 45

Label Distribution Who assigns labels for communication between A and B? A, B, or someone else? Downstream, upstream,... Where is the control for the entire path? A, B, ingress or egress LSR? Separate protocol or existing route distribution mechanisms? IETF s Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)» based on Cisco s TDP and IBM s ARIS protocol 46

Example Network Table at R2 7 162.25.8 1 162.25.8 R1 Index of table 8 9 192.35.10 0 if1 R2 if0 Table at R4 192.35.10 R3 if1 R4 162.25.8 1 192.35.10 1 47

Label Binding 162.25.8 LDP Binding <162.25.8, 9> downstream R1 upstream if1 R2 if0 LDP Binding <162.25.8, 7> <192.35.10, 8> 192.35.10 R3 if1 R4 LDP Binding <192.35.10, 6> Example shows control packets only (data traffic will flow from R4 to R1) 48

Label allocation Table at R4 In label out label Addr prefix Interface? 7 162.25.8 1? 8 192.35.10 1 Table at R2 In label out label Addr prefix Interface 7 9 162.25.8 1 8 6 192.35.10 0 49

Label Switching 162.25.8 R1 can do a direct delivery R1 9 162.25.8.4 if1 R2 if0 label swapping only (7 is swapped with 9) 7 162.25.8.4 192.35.10 R3 if1 R4 Ingress node longest match + label adding (7 is added) 162.25.8.4 Example shows data packets 50

Domain B BGP Hierarchical Routing (1) IGP BGP BGP: Border Gateway Protocol (inter-domain) IGP: Interior Gateway Protocol (intra-domain) Domain A IGP IGP IGP BGP R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 Domain C BGP In existing non-mpls systems, IGP Routers (R3, R4) in transit domain A maintain all the routes provided by Interdomain routing (necessary to forward transit traffic to/from domains B & C). MPLS can reduce volume of information needed by interior routers. 51

Hierarchical Routing (2) Domain B BGP R1 IGP BGP R2 Domain A IGP IGP IGP BGP R3 R4 R5 Domain C BGP R6 BGP entries IGP entries R1 R2 R5 R6 in label. out label 4. next hop R2 4 3 R5 3 7 7 R6. R2 R3 R4 R5 in label? out label 9 9 11 11 14 14? next hop R3 R4 R5 R5 52

Stack of labels Packets carry several labels organised as a label stack packet forwarded from one domain to other contains one label packet forwarded through a transit domain contains two labels LSRs use label from top of stack labels pushed (ingress) and poped (egress) at domain boundaries 53

push/pop on stack swap label 4 to 3 R5 not directly connected Find direct conn. and label push label 9 and send to R3 next hop R5 (self) pop off the top label of the stack swap this label 3 to 7 (BGP) 4 3 9 3 11 3 14 7 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 BGP entries IGP entries R1 R2 R5 in label. out label 4 next hop R2 4 3 R5 3 7 R6 push R2 R3 R4 in label? out label 9 9 11 11 14 next hop R3 R4 R5 pop R6 7.. R5 14? R5 54

Commentary for the previous slide Lets assume that a packet comes from Domain B/router R1 with label 4. The BGP table at LSR R2 indicates that label to be used in 3 and next hop is R5 which is not directly connected to R2. LSR R2 performs a push operation on label (:3 0 and put new label 9 after consulting the IGP table. IGP table also gives the next hop as R3 (directly connected to R2). At router R3 and R4 simple label swapping takes place (on top label). R3 replaces label 9 with 11 and forwards it to R4. R4 replaces label 11 with 14 and forwards it to R5. At the egress router R5, again the IGP entry indicates next hop as R5 (itself). R5 pops off the top label off the stack (which is value 3). BGP table indicates that the outgoing label should be 7. Now the packet is forwarded to Domain C LSR R6 with this new label 7. 55

IP-ATM Integration using MPLS 56

MPLS over ATM ATM switches performing label switching are called ATM-LSRs Labels need to be encoded in VCI/VPI fields ATM forwarding hardware remains unchanged Only software upgrade is needed to convert an ATM switch to ATM-LSR 57

MPLS over ATM Actual label is encoded in VPI/VCI. No TTL decrement VCI = 0 through 32 should not be used in labels 58

Cell Interleave Problem 7 7 7 R1 7 162.25 5 5 5 ATM R3 7 R2 7 7 7 in label 7.. out label 5.. addr prefix 162.25. interface 1.. R3 needs to reassemble cells into packets, but can t distinguish which cell belongs to which Packet (last cell of an IP packet is marked as EoF for reassembly) 59

Solution 1 Request Separate labels get a label for 162.25 R1 if0 request separate labels for R1 and R2 from R3 162.25 if2 ATM R3 get a label for 162.25 R2 in in interface label out label addr prefix interface 0 7 5 162.25 1 2 7 4 162.25 1 Predefined VPI/VCI used for Label binding 60

Solution 2 VC - Merge 7 7 7 R1 7 162.25 7 ATM 5 5 5 5 5 5 R3 R2 7 7 7 Delay cells from one packet (AAL5 EOF marker used in this router for reassembly (strictly speaking, reassembly should only be done in end nodes)) 61

MPLS on ATM: Issues VCI field is sufficient for one level tagging VPI may be used for the 2nd level LSR switches need to participate in network layer routing protocols (OSPF, BGP) Multiple labels per destination may be used to avoid cell interleave problem VPI/VCI space may be segmented for label switching and normal ATM switching 62

What Do ATM LSRs Bring to Us Now we know how to convert an ATM switch to an ATM LSR What do we gain by converting existing ATM switches to ATM LSRs? Two main benefits (see picture next slide) Reduced number of neighbours Full view of the network topology 63

Existing Systems [Overlay Approach] R1 R1 has 5 neighbours S1 S3 R6 R2 S2 R5 R3 R4 ATM switches are NOT converted to LSR 64

ATM-LSR Approach [Direct Peering] R1 R2 R1 has only 1 neighbour! S3 S1 S2 R6 R5 R3 R4 ATM switches are converted to LSRs 65

References IBM Redbook: Chapter 18 66